Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1970 Oct 31;132(5):926–940. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.5.926

IN VITRO-INITIATED SECONDARY ANTI-HAPTEN RESPONSE

II. INCREASING CELL AVIDITY FOR ANTIGEN

Wesley W Bullock 1, Marvin B Rittenberg 1
PMCID: PMC2138869  PMID: 5528414

Abstract

Decreasing antigen in vivo may preferentially stimulate cells with the potential for synthesis of high-affinity antibody through activation of surface receptors with similarly high affinity. This selection should result in cells with increased sensitivity to lower antigen concentrations, cells with greater avidity for antigen. We have followed the in vivo changes in anti-TNP memory-cell sensitivity by initiating the secondary anti-hapten response in vitro. This response was determined by anti-TNP plaque assay. The results indicate that cell populations with increased sensitivity for antigen continue to emerge with time after priming and that this sensitivity may increase 1000-fold in a 4 month period. Increased sensitivity to stimulation by antigen is concomitant with suppression by higher, previously stimulatory doses as in high zone immune tolerance. The data support the hypothesis that memory cells of high avidity result from the selective pressure of diminishing in vivo antigen concentration.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (808.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BOREL Y., FAUCONNET M., MIESCHER P. A. 7S VERSUS 19S ANAMNESTIC RESPONSE IN RABBITS. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1964 Nov;117:603–607. doi: 10.3181/00379727-117-29649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Britton S. Regulation of antibody synthesis against Escherichia coli endotoxin. IV. Induction of paralysis in vitro by treating normal lymphoid cells with antigen. J Exp Med. 1969 Mar 1;129(3):469–482. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.3.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bullock W. W., Rittenberg M. B. Kinetics of in vitro initiated secondary anti-hapten response: induction of plaque-forming cells by soluble and particulate antigen. Immunochemistry. 1970 Mar;7(3):310–314. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(70)90169-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Byers V. S., Sercarz E. E. The X-Y-Z scheme of immunocyte maturation. IV. The exhaustion of memory cells. J Exp Med. 1968 Feb 1;127(2):307–325. doi: 10.1084/jem.127.2.307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cerottini J. C., Trnka Z. The role of persisting antigen in the development of immunological memory. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1970;38(1):37–41. doi: 10.1159/000230257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DUTTON R. W., EADY J. D. AN IN VITRO SYSTEM FOR THE STUDY OF THE MECHANISM OF ANTIGENIC STIMULATION IN THE SECONDARY RESPONSE. Immunology. 1964 Jan;7:40–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Daniels J. C., Weigle W. O. Antibody-producing cells in rabbits injected with soluble BSA. II. Kinetica and dose response. J Immunol. 1968 Dec;101(6):1230–1235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Diener E., Armstrong W. D. Immunological tolerance in vitro: kinetic studies at the cellular level. J Exp Med. 1969 Mar 1;129(3):591–603. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.3.591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dresser D. W., Mitchison N. A. The mechanism of immunological paralysis. Adv Immunol. 1968;8:129–181. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60466-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. EISEN H. N., SISKIND G. W. VARIATIONS IN AFFINITIES OF ANTIBODIES DURING THE IMMUNE RESPONSE. Biochemistry. 1964 Jul;3:996–1008. doi: 10.1021/bi00895a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eisen H. N. Learning and memory in the immune response. Cancer Res. 1966 Sep;26(9):2005–2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. FECSIK A. I., BUTLER W. T., COONS A. H. STUDIES ON ANTIBODY PRODUCTION. XI. VARIATION IN THE SECONDARY RESPONSE AS A FUNCTION OF THE LENGTH OF THE INTERVAL BETWEEN TWO ANTIGENIC STIMULI. J Exp Med. 1964 Dec 1;120:1041–1049. doi: 10.1084/jem.120.6.1041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hartman B. K., Pettengill O. S., Sorenson G. D. Chloramphenicol: effects on mouse myeloma cells in tissue culture. Science. 1969 Jul 18;165(3890):297–298. doi: 10.1126/science.165.3890.297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hübner K. F., Gengozian N. Critical variables of the Jerne plaque technique as applied to rodent antibody-forming systems responding to heterologous red cell antigens. J Immunol. 1969 Jan;102(1):155–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Klinman N. R. Antibody with homogeneous antigen binding produced by splenic foci in organ culture. Immunochemistry. 1969 Sep;6(5):757–759. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(67)90140-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mishell R. I., Dutton R. W. Immunization of dissociated spleen cell cultures from normal mice. J Exp Med. 1967 Sep 1;126(3):423–442. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.3.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mitchell G. F., Miller J. F. Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. II. The source of hemolysin-forming cells in irradiated mice given bone marrow and thymus or thoracic duct lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):821–837. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mosier D. E., Coppleson L. W. A THREE-CELL INTERACTION REQUIRED FOR THE INDUCTION OF THE PRIMARY IMMUNE RESPONSE in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Oct;61(2):542–547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.61.2.542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mäkelä O., Mitchison N. A. The effect of antigen dosage on the response of adoptively transferred cells. Immunology. 1965 Jun;8(6):549–556. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nossal G. J., Austin C. M., Ada G. L. Antigens in immunity. VII. Analysis of immunological memory. Immunology. 1965 Oct;9(4):333–348. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Paul W. E., Siskind G. W., Benacerraf B., Ovary Z. Secondary antibody responses in haptenic systems: cell population selection by antigen. J Immunol. 1967 Oct;99(4):760–770. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Paul W. E., Siskind G. W., Benacerraf B. Specificity of cellular immune responses. Antigen concentration dependence of stimulation of DNA synthesis in vitro by specifically sensitized cells, as an expression of the binding characteristics of cellular antibody. J Exp Med. 1968 Jan 1;127(1):25–42. doi: 10.1084/jem.127.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pearlman D. S. The influence of antibodies on immunologic responses. I. The effect on the response to particulate antigen in the rabbit. J Exp Med. 1967 Jul 1;126(1):127–148. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.1.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pierce C. W. Immune responses in vitro. I. Cellular requirements for the immune response by nonprimed and primed spleen cells in vitro. J Exp Med. 1969 Aug 1;130(2):345–364. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.2.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. RUECKERT R. R., MUELLER G. C. Studies on unbalanced growth in tissue culture. I. Induction and consequences of thymidine deficiency. Cancer Res. 1960 Dec;20:1584–1591. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Radovich J., Hemingsen H., Talmage D. W. The enhancing effect of bone marrow cells on the immune response of irradiated mice reconstituted with spleen cells from normal and immunized donors. J Immunol. 1968 Apr;100(4):756–759. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Richardson M., Moorhead J. W., Reedy D. L. The secondary anti-erythrocyte response of rabbit spleen cells stimulated in vitro. Immunology. 1969 Oct;17(4):603–615. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Richter M., Abdou N. I. Cells involved in the immune response. VII. The demonstration, using allotypic markers, of antibody formation by irradiation-resistant cells of irradiated rabbits injected with normal allogeneic bone marrow cells and sheep erythrocytes. J Exp Med. 1969 Jun 1;129(6):1261–1273. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.6.1261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rittenberg M. B., Amkraut A. A. Immunogenicity of trinitrophenyl-hemocyanin: production of primary and secondary anti-hapten precipitins. J Immunol. 1966 Sep;97(3):421–430. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rittenberg M. B., Campbell D. H. Heterologous carriers in the anamnestic antihapten response. J Exp Med. 1968 Apr 1;127(4):717–730. doi: 10.1084/jem.127.4.717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rittenberg M. B., Pratt K. L. Antitrinitrophenyl (TNP) plaque assay. Primary response of Balb/c mice to soluble and particulate immunogen. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1969 Nov;132(2):575–581. doi: 10.3181/00379727-132-34264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Romeyn J. A., Ross S. Anti-immunoglobulin control of immune hemolysis. J Immunol. 1969 May;102(5):1242–1249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Roseman J. M., Leserman L. D., Fitch F. W., Rowley D. A. Do antibody-forming cells circulate in the blood? J Immunol. 1969 Apr;102(4):1002–1007. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. SVEHAG S. E., MANDEL B. THE FORMATION AND PROPERTIES OF POLIOVIRUS-NEUTRALIZING ANTIBODY. II. 19S AND 7S ANTIBODY FORMATION: DIFFERENCES IN ANTIGEN DOSE REQUIREMENT FOR SUSTAINED SYNTHESIS, ANAMNESIS, AND SENSITIVITY TO X-IRRADIATION. J Exp Med. 1964 Jan 1;119:21–39. doi: 10.1084/jem.119.1.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schrek R. Sensitivity of normal and leukemic lymphocytes and leukemic myeloblasts to heat. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1966 Nov;37(5):649–654. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Siskind G. W., Benacerraf B. Cell selection by antigen in the immune response. Adv Immunol. 1969;10:1–50. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60414-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Steiner L. A., Eisen H. N. Sequential changes in the relative affinity of antibodies synthesized during the immune response. J Exp Med. 1967 Dec 1;126(6):1161–1183. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.6.1161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Steiner L. A., Eisen H. N. The relative affinity of antibodies synthesized in the secondary response. J Exp Med. 1967 Dec 1;126(6):1185–1205. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.6.1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. TALMAGE D. W. The primary equilibrium between antigen and antibody. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1957 Aug 30;70(1):82–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1957.tb35380.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tao T. W. Initiation of primary-type and secondary-type antibody responses to bacteriophage phiX 174 in vitro. J Immunol. 1968 Dec;101(6):1253–1263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. UHR J. W., FINKELSTEIN M. S. Antibody formation. IV. Formation of rapidly and slowly sedimenting antibodies and immunological memory to bacteriophage phi-X 174. J Exp Med. 1963 Mar 1;117:457–477. doi: 10.1084/jem.117.3.457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES