Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1974 Jul 1;140(1):253–266. doi: 10.1084/jem.140.1.253

SELECTIVE ROLES OF THYMUS-DERIVED LYMPHOCYTES IN THE ANTIBODY RESPONSE

II. PREFERENTIAL SUPPRESSION OF HIGH-AFFINITY ANTIBODY-FORMING CELLS BY CARRIER-PRIMED SUPPRESSOR T CELLS

Toshitada Takemori 1, Tomio Tada 1
PMCID: PMC2139704  PMID: 4599880

Abstract

Passive transfer of thymocytes and spleen cells from donors primed with keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) caused significant decrease in the average avidity of anti-DNP antibodies produced by direct and indirect PFC in the recipients in both primary and adoptive secondary antibody responses against DNP-KLH. The analysis of the avidity distribution of antibodies produced by plaque-forming cells (PFC) indicated that the observed decrease in the average avidity is primarily due to the selective loss of high avidity subpopulation of PFC leaving low avidity subpopulation relatively unaffected. The degree of suppression in antibody avidity did not correlate with the reduction in the number of PFC, and thus causing the "shift" of avidity distribution of PFC to the low avidity end. These results indicate that the "maturation" of antibody in the T-cell-dependent antibody response is influenced by the carrier-specific suppressor T cells with respect to the emergence and selection of B cells having high affinity receptors for hapten. It is suggested that B cells binding antigen with high affinity receptors would be more easily affected than those with low affinity receptors by specific suppressor T cells which are capable of reacting the carrier portion of the same antigen.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (751.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker P. J., Prescott B., Stashak P. W., Amsbaugh D. F. Characterization of the antibody response to type 3 pneumococcal polysaccharide at the cellular level. 3. Studies on the average avidity of the antibody produced by specific plaque-forming cells. J Immunol. 1971 Sep;107(3):719–724. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brody N. I., Walker J. G., Siskind G. W. Studies on the control of antibody synthesis. Interaction of antigenic competition and suppression of antibody formation by passive antibody on the immune response. J Exp Med. 1967 Jul 1;126(1):81–91. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.1.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Claflin L., Merchant B., Inman J. Antibody-binding characteristics at the cellular level. I. Comparative maturation of hapten-specific IgM and IgG plaque-forming cell populations. J Immunol. 1973 Jan;110(1):241–251. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davie J. M., Paul W. E., Katz D. H., Benacerraf B. Hapten-specific tolerance. Preferential depression of the high affinity antibody response. J Exp Med. 1972 Sep 1;136(3):426–438. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.3.426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davie J. M., Paul W. E. Receptors on immunocompetent cells. V. Cellular correlates of the "maturation" of the immune response. J Exp Med. 1972 Mar 1;135(3):660–674. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.3.660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Feldmann M., Nossal G. J. Tolerance, enhancement and the regulation of interactions between T cells, B cells and macrophages. Transplant Rev. 1972;13:3–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1972.tb00058.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Frank M. M., Humphrey J. H. The subunits in rabbit anti-Forssman IgM antibody. J Exp Med. 1968 May 1;127(5):967–982. doi: 10.1084/jem.127.5.967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gershon R. K., Kondo K. Infectious immunological tolerance. Immunology. 1971 Dec;21(6):903–914. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gershon R. K., Paul W. E. Effect of thymus-derived lymphocytes on amount and affinity of anti-hapten antibody. J Immunol. 1971 Mar;106(3):872–874. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Harel S., Ben-Efraim S., Liacopoulos P. The production and affinity of anti-hapten antibody under the influence of various inhibitory conditions. Immunology. 1970 Aug;19(2):319–327. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hornick C. L., Karuch F. Antibody affinity. 3. The role of multivalance. Immunochemistry. 1972 Mar;9(3):325–340. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(72)90096-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Miller G. W., Segre D. Determination of relative affinity and heterogeneity of mouse anti-DNP antibodies by a plaque-inhibition technique. J Immunol. 1972 Jul;109(1):74–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mitchell G. F., Grumet F. C., McDevitt H. O. Genetic control of the immune response. The effect of thymectomy on the primary and secondary antibody response of mice to poly-L(tyr, glu)-poly-D, L-ala--poly-L-lys. J Exp Med. 1972 Jan;135(1):126–135. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.1.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mäkelä O., Ruoslahti E., Seppälä I. J. Affinity of IgM and IgG antibodies. Immunochemistry. 1970 Nov;7(11):917–932. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(70)90053-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Okumura K., Tada T. Regulation of homocytotropic antibody formation in the rat. IX. Further characterization of the antigen-specific inhibitory T cell factor in hapten-specific homocytotropic antibody response. J Immunol. 1974 Feb;112(2):783–791. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Paul W. E., Benacerraf B., Siskind G. W., Goidl D. A., Reisfeld R. A. The anamnestic antibody response to type 3 specific pneumococcal polysaccharide. J Exp Med. 1969 Jul 1;130(1):77–89. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.1.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Paul W. E., Siskind G. W., Benacerraf B. Specificity of cellular immune responses. Antigen concentration dependence of stimulation of DNA synthesis in vitro by specifically sensitized cells, as an expression of the binding characteristics of cellular antibody. J Exp Med. 1968 Jan 1;127(1):25–42. doi: 10.1084/jem.127.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stupp Y., Yoshida T., Paul W. E. Determination of antibody-hapten equilibrium constants by an ammonium sulfate precipitation technique. J Immunol. 1969 Sep;103(3):625–627. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tada T., Okumura K., Taniguchi M. Regulation of homocytotropic antibody formation in the rat. 8. An antigen-specific T cell factor that regulates anti-hapten homocytotropic antibody response. J Immunol. 1973 Sep;111(3):952–961. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tada T., Takemori T. Selective roles of thymus-derived lymphocytes in the antibody response. I. Differential suppressive effect of carrier-primed T cells on hapten-specific IgM and IgG antibody responses. J Exp Med. 1974 Jul 1;140(1):239–252. doi: 10.1084/jem.140.1.239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Taniguchi M., Tada T. Dual regulatory role of the thymus in the maturation of immune response in the rabbit. J Exp Med. 1974 Jan 1;139(1):108–127. doi: 10.1084/jem.139.1.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Taylor R. B., Wortis H. H. Thymus dependence of antibody response: variation with dose of antigen and class of antibody. Nature. 1968 Nov 30;220(5170):927–928. doi: 10.1038/220927a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Torrigiani G. Quantitative estimation of antibody in the immunoglobulin classes of the mouse. II. Thymic dependence of the different classes. J Immunol. 1972 Jan;108(1):161–164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Werblin T. P., Siskind G. W. Effect of tolerance and immunity on antibody affinity. Transplant Rev. 1972;8:104–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1972.tb01566.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES