Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1997 Apr;6(4):808–815. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060407

Architecture of helix bundle membrane proteins: an analysis of cytochrome c oxidase from bovine mitochondria.

E Wallin 1, T Tsukihara 1, S Yoshikawa 1, G von Heijne 1, A Elofsson 1
PMCID: PMC2144765  PMID: 9098890

Abstract

We have analyzed the structure of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase in terms of general characteristics thought to be important for describing the architecture of helix bundle membrane proteins. Many aspects of the structure are similar to what has previously been found for the photosynthetic reaction center and bacteriorhodopsin. Our results lead to a considerably more precise general picture of membrane protein architecture than has hitherto been possible to obtain.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (5.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen J. P., Feher G., Yeates T. O., Komiya H., Rees D. C. Structure of the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26: the protein subunits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Sep;84(17):6162–6166. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.17.6162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bairoch A., Boeckmann B. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Apr 25;19 (Suppl):2247–2249. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.suppl.2247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowie J. U., Lüthy R., Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science. 1991 Jul 12;253(5016):164–170. doi: 10.1126/science.1853201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Claverie J. M., Daulmerie C. Smoothing profiles with sliding windows: better to wear a hat! Comput Appl Biosci. 1991 Jan;7(1):113–115. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/7.1.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cowan S. W., Rosenbusch J. P. Folding pattern diversity of integral membrane proteins. Science. 1994 May 13;264(5161):914–916. doi: 10.1126/science.8178151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Doig A. J., Baldwin R. L. N- and C-capping preferences for all 20 amino acids in alpha-helical peptides. Protein Sci. 1995 Jul;4(7):1325–1336. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560040708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eisenberg D., McLachlan A. D. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature. 1986 Jan 16;319(6050):199–203. doi: 10.1038/319199a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Engelman D. M., Steitz T. A., Goldman A. Identifying nonpolar transbilayer helices in amino acid sequences of membrane proteins. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1986;15:321–353. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.15.060186.001541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gavel Y., von Heijne G. The distribution of charged amino acids in mitochondrial inner-membrane proteins suggests different modes of membrane integration for nuclearly and mitochondrially encoded proteins. Eur J Biochem. 1992 May 1;205(3):1207–1215. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb16892.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grigorieff N., Ceska T. A., Downing K. H., Baldwin J. M., Henderson R. Electron-crystallographic refinement of the structure of bacteriorhodopsin. J Mol Biol. 1996 Jun 14;259(3):393–421. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heijne G. The distribution of positively charged residues in bacterial inner membrane proteins correlates with the trans-membrane topology. EMBO J. 1986 Nov;5(11):3021–3027. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04601.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Iwata S., Ostermeier C., Ludwig B., Michel H. Structure at 2.8 A resolution of cytochrome c oxidase from Paracoccus denitrificans. Nature. 1995 Aug 24;376(6542):660–669. doi: 10.1038/376660a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kabsch W., Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 1983 Dec;22(12):2577–2637. doi: 10.1002/bip.360221211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kyte J., Doolittle R. F. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol. 1982 May 5;157(1):105–132. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kühlbrandt W., Wang D. N., Fujiyoshi Y. Atomic model of plant light-harvesting complex by electron crystallography. Nature. 1994 Feb 17;367(6464):614–621. doi: 10.1038/367614a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MacArthur M. W., Thornton J. M. Influence of proline residues on protein conformation. J Mol Biol. 1991 Mar 20;218(2):397–412. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90721-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mohana Rao J. K., Argos P. A conformational preference parameter to predict helices in integral membrane proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1986 Jan 30;869(2):197–214. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(86)90295-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pawagi A. B., Wang J., Silverman M., Reithmeier R. A., Deber C. M. Transmembrane aromatic amino acid distribution in P-glycoprotein. A functional role in broad substrate specificity. J Mol Biol. 1994 Jan 14;235(2):554–564. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pearson W. R., Lipman D. J. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Apr;85(8):2444–2448. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.8.2444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Persson B., Argos P. Prediction of transmembrane segments in proteins utilising multiple sequence alignments. J Mol Biol. 1994 Mar 25;237(2):182–192. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rees D. C., Komiya H., Yeates T. O., Allen J. P., Feher G. The bacterial photosynthetic reaction center as a model for membrane proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 1989;58:607–633. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.58.070189.003135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Richardson J. S., Richardson D. C. Amino acid preferences for specific locations at the ends of alpha helices. Science. 1988 Jun 17;240(4859):1648–1652. doi: 10.1126/science.3381086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Samatey F. A., Xu C., Popot J. L. On the distribution of amino acid residues in transmembrane alpha-helix bundles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 May 9;92(10):4577–4581. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.10.4577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schneider T. D., Stormo G. D., Gold L., Ehrenfeucht A. Information content of binding sites on nucleotide sequences. J Mol Biol. 1986 Apr 5;188(3):415–431. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90165-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Taylor W. R., Jones D. T., Green N. M. A method for alpha-helical integral membrane protein fold prediction. Proteins. 1994 Mar;18(3):281–294. doi: 10.1002/prot.340180309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Thompson J. D., Higgins D. G., Gibson T. J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Nov 11;22(22):4673–4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tsukihara T., Aoyama H., Yamashita E., Tomizaki T., Yamaguchi H., Shinzawa-Itoh K., Nakashima R., Yaono R., Yoshikawa S. The whole structure of the 13-subunit oxidized cytochrome c oxidase at 2.8 A. Science. 1996 May 24;272(5265):1136–1144. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5265.1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Weiss M. S., Abele U., Weckesser J., Welte W., Schiltz E., Schulz G. E. Molecular architecture and electrostatic properties of a bacterial porin. Science. 1991 Dec 13;254(5038):1627–1630. doi: 10.1126/science.1721242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Woolfson D. N., Williams D. H. The influence of proline residues on alpha-helical structure. FEBS Lett. 1990 Dec 17;277(1-2):185–188. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(90)80839-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yeates T. O., Komiya H., Rees D. C., Allen J. P., Feher G. Structure of the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26: membrane-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Sep;84(18):6438–6442. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.18.6438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. von Heijne G. Membrane protein structure prediction. Hydrophobicity analysis and the positive-inside rule. J Mol Biol. 1992 May 20;225(2):487–494. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90934-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. von Heijne G. Proline kinks in transmembrane alpha-helices. J Mol Biol. 1991 Apr 5;218(3):499–503. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90695-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES