Skip to main content
Anesthesia Progress logoLink to Anesthesia Progress
. 1992;39(3):79–82.

Anesthetic effect of EMLA occluded with Orahesive oral bandages on oral mucosa. A placebo-controlled study.

P Svensson 1, J K Petersen 1
PMCID: PMC2148753  PMID: 1308377

Abstract

The efficiency of a topical anesthetic occluded with Orahesive Oral Bandage was investigated. Experimental pain was provoked by needle insertions into two palatal test areas in 20 healthy subjects. Pain, estimated on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS), decreased significantly from 23.5 mm to 10.5 mm at the greater palatine foramen and from 51.5 mm to 35.0 mm at the incisive foramen after application of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA). No significant change in pain perception was obtained after placebo application. The EMLA cream and the Orahesive Oral Bandages were well accepted by the subjects, as only two out of 20 subjects experienced slight gagging reflexes and only three considered the taste unpleasant. No other adverse reactions were observed. Occlusion of topical anesthetics seems to be a useful technique for achieving superficial mucosal anesthesia.

Full text

PDF
79

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Austin D., Attanasio R. The implications and applications of biostatistical analysis in craniomandibular and orofacial pain disorders. Cranio. 1991 Jul;9(3):280–285. doi: 10.1080/08869634.1991.11678374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DIXON A. D. The position, incidence and origin of sensory nerve termination in oral mucous membrane. Arch Oral Biol. 1962 Jan-Feb;7:39–48. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(62)90046-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gill C. J., Orr D. L., 2nd A double-blind crossover comparison of topical anesthetics. J Am Dent Assoc. 1979 Feb;98(2):213–214. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1979.0476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Haasio J., Jokinen T., Numminen M., Rosenberg P. H. Topical anaesthesia of gingival mucosa by 5% eutectic mixture of lignocaine and prilocaine or by 10% lignocaine spray. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990 Apr;28(2):99–101. doi: 10.1016/0266-4356(90)90131-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Holst A., Evers H. Experimental studies of new topical anaesthetics on the oral mucosa. Swed Dent J. 1985;9(5):185–191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Howitt J. W., Lowell C. Topical anesthetic effectiveness. An old and new product evaluated. N Y State Dent J. 1972 Nov;38(9):549–550. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Juhlin L., Evers H. EMLA: a new topical anesthetic. Adv Dermatol. 1990;5:75–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rosivack R. G., Koenigsberg S. R., Maxwell K. C. An analysis of the effectiveness of two topical anesthetics. Anesth Prog. 1990 Nov-Dec;37(6):290–292. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Anesthesia Progress are provided here courtesy of American Dental Society of Anesthesiology

RESOURCES