Skip to main content
Anesthesia Progress logoLink to Anesthesia Progress
. 2000 Winter;47(4):125–129.

Clinical evaluation of inferior alveolar nerve block by injection into the pterygomandibular space anterior to the mandibular foramen.

Y Takasugi 1, H Furuya 1, K Moriya 1, Y Okamoto 1
PMCID: PMC2149033  PMID: 11432177

Abstract

The conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (conventional technique) has potential risks of neural and vascular injuries. We studied a method of inferior alveolar nerve block by injecting a local anesthetic solution into the pterygomandibular space anterior to the mandibular foramen (anterior technique) with the purpose of avoiding such complications. The insertion angle of the anterior technique and the estimation of anesthesia in the anterior technique were examined. The predicted insertion angle measured on computed tomographic images was 60.1 +/- 7.1 degrees from the median, with the syringe end lying on the contralateral mandibular first molar, and the insertion depth was approximately 10 mm. We applied the anterior technique to 100 patients for mandibular molar extraction and assessed the anesthetic effects. A success rate of 74% was obtained. This is similar to that reported for the conventional technique but without the accompanying risks for inferior alveolar neural and vascular complications.

Full text

PDF
126

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BERNS J. M., SADOVE M. S. Mandibular block injection: a method of study using an injected radiopaque material. J Am Dent Assoc. 1962 Dec;65:735–745. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1962.0337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berezowski B. M., Lownie J. F., Cleaton-Jones P. E. A comparison of two methods of inferior alveolar nerve block. J Dent. 1988 Apr;16(2):96–98. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(88)90060-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Budenz A. W., Osterman S. R. A review of mandibular anesthesia nerve block techniques. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1995 Sep;23(9):27–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Delgado-Molina E., Bueno-Lafuente S., Berini-Aytés L., Gay-Escoda C. Comparative study of different syringes in positive aspiration during inferior alveolar nerve block. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999 Nov;88(5):557–560. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70085-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Donkor P., Wong J., Punnia-Moorthy A. An evaluation of the closed mouth mandibular block technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990 Aug;19(4):216–219. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80395-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Galbreath J. C. Tracing the course of the mandibular block injection. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1970 Oct;30(4):571–582. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(70)90176-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Haas D. A., Lennon D. A 21 year retrospective study of reports of paresthesia following local anesthetic administration. J Can Dent Assoc. 1995 Apr;61(4):319-20, 323-6, 329-30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harn S. D., Durham T. M. Incidence of lingual nerve trauma and postinjection complications in conventional mandibular block anesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990 Oct;121(4):519–523. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1990.0198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Krafft T. C., Hickel R. Clinical investigation into the incidence of direct damage to the lingual nerve caused by local anaesthesia. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1994 Oct;22(5):294–296. doi: 10.1016/s1010-5182(05)80079-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lustig J. P., Zusman S. P. Immediate complications of local anesthetic administered to 1,007 consecutive patients. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999 Apr;130(4):496–499. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Petersen J. K. The mandibular foramen block. A radiographic study of the spread of the local analgesic solution. Br J Oral Surg. 1971 Nov;9(21):126–138. doi: 10.1016/s0007-117x(71)80060-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pogrel M. A., Bryan J., Regezi J. Nerve damage associated with inferior alveolar nerve blocks. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995 Aug;126(8):1150–1155. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pogrel M. A., Thamby S. Permanent nerve involvement resulting from inferior alveolar nerve blocks. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000 Jul;131(7):901–907. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rood J. P. Inferior alveolar nerve blocks. The use of 5 per cent lignocaine. Br Dent J. 1976 Jun 15;140(12):413–414. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4803774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sisk A. L. Evaluation of the Akinosi mandibular block technique in oral surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986 Feb;44(2):113–115. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(86)90192-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vreeland D. L., Reader A., Beck M., Meyers W., Weaver J. An evaluation of volumes and concentrations of lidocaine in human inferior alveolar nerve block. J Endod. 1989 Jan;15(1):6–12. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(89)80091-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Waikakul A., Punwutikorn J. A comparative study of the extra-intraoral landmark technique and the direct technique for inferior alveolar nerve block. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991 Aug;49(8):804–809. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(91)90006-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Watson J. E., Gow-Gates G. A. Incidence of positive aspiration in the Gow-Gates mandibular block. Anesth Pain Control Dent. 1992 Spring;1(2):73–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yared G. M., Dagher F. B. Evaluation of lidocaine in human inferior alveolar nerve block. J Endod. 1997 Sep;23(9):575–578. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81125-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Anesthesia Progress are provided here courtesy of American Dental Society of Anesthesiology

RESOURCES