Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2007 Aug 13;51(11):3895–3901. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00458-07

Adenosine Kinase of Trypanosoma brucei and Its Role in Susceptibility to Adenosine Antimetabolites

Alexandra Lüscher 1, Pinar Önal 1,, Anne-Marie Schweingruber 1, Pascal Mäser 1,*
PMCID: PMC2151413  PMID: 17698621

Abstract

Trypanosoma brucei cannot synthesize purines de novo and relies on purine salvage from its hosts to build nucleic acids. With adenosine being a preferred purine source of bloodstream-form trypanosomes, adenosine kinase (AK; EC 2.7.1.20) is likely to be a key player in purine salvage. Adenosine kinase is also of high pharmacological interest, since for many adenosine antimetabolites, phosphorylation is a prerequisite for activity. Here, we cloned and functionally characterized adenosine kinase from T. brucei (TbAK). TbAK is a tandem gene, expressed in both procyclic- and bloodstream-form trypanosomes, whose product localized to the cytosol of the parasites. The RNA interference-mediated silencing of TbAK suggested that the gene is nonessential under standard growth conditions. Inhibition or downregulation of TbAK rendered the trypanosomes resistant to cordycepin (3′-deoxyadenosine), demonstrating a role for TbAK in the activation of adenosine antimetabolites. The expression of TbAK in Saccharomyces cerevisiae complemented a null mutation in the adenosine kinase gene ado1. The concomitant expression of TbAK with the T. brucei adenosine transporter gene TbAT1 allowed S. cerevisiae ado1 ade2 double mutants to grow on adenosine as the sole purine source and, at the same time, sensitized them to adenosine antimetabolites. The coexpression of TbAK and TbAT1 in S. cerevisiae ado1 ade2 double mutants proved to be a convenient tool for testing nucleoside analogues for uptake and activation by T. brucei adenosine salvage enzymes.


Trypanosoma brucei species comprise the etiological agents of human sleeping sickness and livestock trypanosomes. The WHO estimates that over 23 countries are affected in sub-Saharan Africa, with a total burden of 1,598,000 disability-adjusted life years (http://www.who.int/tdr/diseases/tryp). Vaccination is hampered by the antigenic variation of the trypanosomes. Current chemotherapy relies on drugs that are either too expensive (e.g., eflornithine) or too toxic (e.g., melarsoprol) for mass use. The situation is somewhat mitigated by the donation of eflornithine from Sanofi-Aventis to the WHO and by the newly developed drug pafuramidine (50), which is active only against first-stage sleeping sickness but orally applicable and presently under a phase III clinical trial. Still, there is a need for new drugs to treat sleeping sickness. Purine salvage offers attractive opportunities for chemotherapeutic intervention. Like all obligate parasitic protozoa, African trypanosomes cannot synthesize purines de novo and rely completely on salvage from their hosts to build nucleic acids (26). Their purine salvage machinery is remarkably versatile, as T. brucei incorporates any of the physiological purine bases or nucleosides and interconverts the corresponding nucleotides (19). This means that no single salvage enzyme is essential and that trypanosomal purine salvage, although vital to the parasite, may not hold suitable drug targets. However, the salvage pathways may be exploited for drug targeting, i.e., the specific delivery or activation of subversive substrates via enzymes that are absent or different in the mammalian host.

The concept was illustrated for adenosine kinase of Toxoplasma gondii (TgAK), which, in contrast to its mammalian counterparts, phosphorylates nitrobenzylmercaptopurine riboside (NBMPR) (6-nitrobenzylthioinosine), rendering it and related compounds specifically toxic to the parasite (10, 17, 29, 56). Tgak null mutants were resistant to NBMPR (10, 52). The loss of adenosine kinase also caused drug resistance in Leishmania donovani, to formycin A and cordycepin (24). Cordycepin (3′-deoxyadenosine) from Cordyceps militaris is nature's forestalling of the Sanger sequencing method (47). It is a prodrug, with the presumed mechanism of action—chain termination upon incorporation into RNA—demanding prior phosphorylation. Since this is the case for most nucleoside antimetabolites, particular pharmacological importance is allocated to nucleoside kinases from parasites. Adenosine kinase has been dissected to the molecular level in T. gondii and Leishmania donovani (9, 10, 12, 13, 22, 23, 48), cloned from Babesia canis (5) and Cryptosporidium parvum (20), and characterized in cell extracts of Trypanosoma cruzi (28) and Eimeria spp. (36) but has not yet been described for African trypanosomes.

T. brucei bloodstream forms incorporate radiolabeled adenosine into the nucleotide pool faster than any other nucleoside (19). Trypanosomal adenosine uptake consists of two components: P1 transports adenosine, inosine, and guanosine, and P2 transports adenosine, adenine, melarsoprol, and diamidines (6, 7, 14). While the P1 transporters are redundant (30, 46), P2 is encoded by a single gene, T. brucei AT1 (TbAT1) (33, 35). Homozygous disruption of TbAT1 in T. brucei bloodstream forms caused resistance to melarsoprol, diamidines, cordycepin, and tubercidin (21, 35). Cordycepin was found to be a potent and selective trypanocide in vitro (34, 53) but not in vivo (40). However, when cordycepin was coadministered with an adenosine deaminase inhibitor to prevent it from being converted to 3′-deoxyinosine in plasma (44), it cured T. brucei-infected mice even from (supposedly) late-stage trypanosomiasis (45). Tubercidin (7-deazaadenosine) is another natural adenosine analogue of potent antitrypanosomal activity. In vivo, its therapeutic window may be widened by the coadministration of NBMPR to block uptake by host cells (16, 39). Here we clone and characterize TbAK and investigate by functional expression in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae its potential for the activation (i.e., phosphorylation) of cordycepin, tubercidin, and other adenosine analogues.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Trypanosome stocks, in vitro culture, and drug sensitivity tests.

Bloodstream-form T. brucei brucei BS221 (s427) and its Tbat1−/− derivative (35) were cultivated at 37°C and in 5% CO2 in HMI-9 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS; Amimed) and 1 mM hypoxanthine. “Purine-free” FCS was obtained after passage through a Sephadex G25 column with an exclusion limit of 5 kDa (PD-10; Amersham Biosciences) and elution with Hanks balanced salt solution buffer (GIBCO). Procyclic forms were grown at 27°C in SDM-79 medium supplemented with 5% FCS (4). Alamar Blue drug sensitivity tests were performed as described previously (43). In brief, 104 cells were incubated at serial drug dilutions for 70 h, followed by a 2-h incubation with the redox-sensitive dye Alamar Blue as an indicator of cell viability. The assays were performed at least four times, each in duplicate. Fifty percent inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were calculated by nonlinear fitting to a sigmoidal dose-response curve with Prism4 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Cordycepin, tubercidin, and ABT-702 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

Southern and Northern blots.

For Southern blots, genomic DNA was isolated from procyclic trypanosomes (PC427). Total RNA for Northern blots was isolated from cultured trypanosomes with the hot phenol method. A TbAK probe of 315 bp, amplified by PCR from cloned TbAK with the primers TbAK-i-s (GCAAGCTTGGATCCGGTTTCACGTTGACAGTTGACGTTAA) and TbAK-i-as (GCTCTAGACTCGAGTGAACACAACAACACGACCTTTTGT), was labeled with digoxigenin (PCR DIG probe synthesis kit; Roche) for Southern blots and [α-32P]dCTP (Megaprime DNA labeling system; Amersham) for Northern blots. An actin probe was made in the same manner with primers act-s (CCGAGTCACACAACGT) and act-as (CCACCTGCATAACATTG).

RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated gene silencing.

A TbAK stem-loop construct was obtained by cloning the PCR product of primers TbAK-i-s and TbAK-i-as (see above) twice, in opposite directions, into the plasmid pALC14 (1). NY-single-marker (T7RNAP/TetR) bloodstream-form trypanosomes (55) were transfected with 10 μg of NotI-linearized plasmid by electroporation. Transfectants were selected for by cultivation in 0.5 μg/ml puromycin and 1 μg/ml neomycin and cloned by limited dilution. Expression of the stem-loop construct was induced by the addition of 1 μg/ml tetracycline (Tet).

In situ tagging of TbAK.

C-terminal fusion of the TbAK gene product with a hemagglutinin (HA) tag was carried out in situ using the system developed by Oberholzer et al. (38). A linear tagging construct containing the hygromycin resistance gene was created by PCR with the plasmid pMOTag4HA and the primers RevUTR (AAAAAAAATCATCAACCACACCATCGAAATCATATCAACCACCGTATTTGGCATTAACAACCGACAACGAAAACAAAAAAACTGGCG GCCGCTCTAGAACTAGTGGAT) and FwORF (GCGAAA CTGGCCACTACACAGCACAAGAGGTTATCCAGCGTGACGGTTGCTCGTTCCCCGA GAAGCCCAGTTTCTCTCCTGGTACCGGGCCCCCCCTCGA) and transformed into bloodstream-form T. brucei. Transformants were selected in 1.5 μg/ml hygromycin, cloned by limited dilution, and verified by PCR for an in-frame insertion of the HA tag.

Digitonin extraction and Western blotting.

Cells (2.5 × 107) were washed twice in SBG buffer (22 mM glucose, 0.6 M NaCl, 80 mM NaHPO4; pH 7.9) and resuspended in SoTE buffer (1.2 M sorbitol, 4 mM EDTA, 40 mM Tris-HCl; pH 8.0) containing digitonin (Sigma-Aldrich) at the concentrations indicated in Fig. 3B. After incubation on ice for 5 min, the lysate was centrifuged twice at 6,000 × g to pellet all insoluble proteins from the supernatant. The soluble and the insoluble fractions were then dissolved in protein sample buffer containing β-mercaptoethanol, subjected to 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and blotted onto an Immobilon-P membrane (Millipore). For immunodetection, mouse anti-HA 12CA5 (at 1/1,000; Roche) was used. The secondary antibody was rabbit anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase (at 1/3,500; Dako), which was followed by exposure to a chemiluminescent substrate detection system (Pierce). To detect glycosomal proteins, antialdolase from rabbit (at 1/100,000; a gift from Paul Michels, Université Catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium) was used, and as a secondary antibody, swine anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase (at 1/3,300) was used.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Subcellular localization of TbAK in bloodstream-form T. brucei. (A) HA-tagged TbAK localized to the cytosol as determined by immunofluorescence microscopy. Bar, 10 μm. (B) Differential lysis with digitonin. P, pellet; S, supernatant; α, anti. Aldolase served as a marker for the glycosome.

Immunofluorescence.

For immunofluorescence, 105 cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and fixed onto cover slides with 4% formaldehyde. The cells were permeabilized with 2% Triton X-100. After the cells were blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin, the primary antibody, anti-HA rabbit immunoglobulin G polyclonal antibody sc-805 (Santa Cruz; at 1/100), was added and the slides were incubated for 45 min at room temperature, washed with phosphate-buffered saline, and incubated with the secondary antibody, Alexa Fluor goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (Molecular Probes; at 1/1,000), for 45 min at room temperature. Vectashield containing DAPI (4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole) (Vector Laboratories, Inc.) was used for mounting.

Expression of TbAK in yeast and drug tests.

TbAK was amplified from genomic DNA of T. brucei with the primers Fw-Xba/Bam (GGTCTAGAGGATCCACTTTCAGTCATCTAAAGGTTTGC) and Rev-Xho/Hind (GGCTCGAGAAGCTTTTTGGCATTAACAACCGACA), cloned into pGEMT-Easy (Promega), sequenced, and subcloned into the yeast expression vector pRS413. TbAT1 had been cloned into p416-MET25 (33). The constructs were transformed into the yeast strain Y759 (MATα ura3-52 leu2-3,112 lys2Δ201 his3Δ200 ade2 ado1::LEU2) (31). SD medium consisted of 2% glucose and 0.67% yeast nitrogen base (Difco), complemented with lysine (30 μg/ml), leucine (30 μg/ml), histidine (20 μg/ml), uracil (20 μg/ml), and, depending on the experiment, adenine (20 μg/ml), hypoxanthine (20 μg/ml), adenosine (30 μg/ml), or S- adenosylmethionine (SAM) (30 μg/ml). For halo assays, cells (106 per ml) were mixed with SD medium containing 150 μM hypoxanthine plus 0.8% agar and poured into plates. Test compounds were spotted (spots were 5 μl at different concentrations), and the plates were incubated for 24 h at 30°C. 8-Aza-7-deaza-2′deoxyadenosine, 8-azaadenosine, formycin A, and 7-deazaadenine were purchased from Berry & Associates Inc. (Dexter, MI); iodotubercidin and A134974 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

RESULTS

Adenosine kinase from Trypanosoma brucei.

In order to identify adenosine kinase genes from T. brucei, we used the program HMMER (15) to build a hidden Markov model-based profile from 18 known adenosine kinases (EC 2.7.1.20) of all eukaryotic kingdoms and bacteria. The profile (adok.hmm) is available in the supplemental material. Searching the deduced T. brucei proteome (version 4 containing 9,152 proteins) with that profile yielded two hits with very trustworthy expectancy values of 10−150. The two proteins, Tb927.6.2300 and Tb927.6.2360, had already been annotated as putative adenosine kinases based on BLAST searches (3). The next-best hit of the hidden Markov model search, Tb11.03.0090, still had an expectancy value of 10−6 but appeared to be a ribokinase (EC 2.7.1.15) when a BLAST search of Swiss-Prot was conducted, indicating that the T. brucei genome contains just the two adenosine kinase genes. The two open reading frames (ORFs) are of equal lengths (1,038 bp) and differ only in seven positions, of which three are synonymous. For the sake of simplicity, we use here the name TbAK for either gene. The two TbAK genes lie on chromosome VI in close proximity. A self-alignment matrix revealed a tandem duplication of 7.8 kb containing TbAK plus four additional ORFs without similarity to known genes (Fig. 1A). Unrelated to adenosine kinase but noteworthy nevertheless was the presence at the TbAK locus of a triplicate sequence of 396 bases (Fig. 1A), within which a 20-mer element (ATGAGTTTTGGAGGGAACAA) turned out to occur also in 15 of the human chromosomes and on several chromosomes of chimpanzee and mouse. Randomized versions of the element did not perfectly match any of the GenBank nonredundant DNA sequences. We do not know whether the 20-mer is transcribed, but its repeated occurrence is certainly exceptional. The duplication of the TbAK locus was confirmed by Southern blotting with a TbAK-specific probe (Fig. 1B). Northern blotting results revealed that TbAK is expressed at high levels in both tsetse midgut procyclic- and mammalian bloodstream-form trypanosomes but somewhat higher in the latter (Fig. 1C). This contrasts to what occurs with Leishmania, where adenosine kinase is 50 times more active in the macrophage-dwelling amastigote forms than in promastigotes (32). Direct sequencing of reverse transcriptase PCR products indicated that both TbAK genes are transcribed (data not shown).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

TbAK locus in T. brucei. (A) Self-alignment matrix of 18 kb from chromosome VI (Chrs VI) and predicted genes therein. Gray, uncharacterized ORFs; black, TbAK. About 8 kb are almost perfectly duplicated, and a sequence of 396 bases even occurs three times (asterisks). (B) A Southern blot with a TbAK probe of genomic DNA digested with the enzymes indicated in panel A confirmed the duplication of the locus. (C) A Northern blot of total RNA showed the expression of TbAK in the bloodstream (BS) and procyclic (PC) stages of T. brucei.

As shown in Fig. 2, TbAK groups together with known adenosine kinases and is clearly separated from inosine kinases (EC 2.7.1.73) or deoxynucleoside kinases (EC 2.7.1.145). Within the adenosine kinases, the T. brucei enzyme forms a significantly distinct branch together with the AK homologues from Trypanosoma cruzi and Leishmania donovani (LdAK), with which TbAK shares 77% and 74% similarity, respectively. All the charged residues that are indispensable for catalysis in LdAK (Asp16, Arg69, Arg131, and Asp299) (12, 13) are conserved in TbAK (Asp17, Arg70, Arg132, and Asp299, respectively). However, with a predicted pI of 5.5, TbAK does not share with LdAK its unusually high pI of 8.8 (11). TbAK also carries the diglycyl motif (Gly62 and Gly63) involved in the domain rotation upon adenosine binding, which allows subsequent binding of ATP (48), and shares with TgAK the kinase anion hole motif: DTNGAGD in TgAK (48) and DMNGAGD in TbAK (amino acids 293 to 299). Kinetoplastid parasites possess membrane-bound organelles, namely, glycosomes (41), which are specialized for glycolysis but also contain purine salvage enzymes (42). To test whether T. brucei adenosine kinase localizes to the glycosome or to the cytosol, an HA tag was added in situ by homologous recombination (38) to the C terminus of TbAK (TbAK does not possess a targeting C-terminal tripeptide (49) that would be masked by the tag). Western blot analysis of HA-tagged TbAK indicated a molecular mass of about 40 kDa, in agreement with the predicted mass of 38 kDa for TbAK. Immunofluorescence microscopy with an Alexa Fluor-coupled secondary antibody gave a granular signal dispersed throughout the cytosol of bloodstream-form trypanosomes (Fig. 3A). The saponin digitonin, a mild detergent that dissolves the plasma membrane at much lower concentrations than are required for internal membranes (51), was used for differential lysis of trypanosomes. Digitonin lysates were centrifuged, and both the pellet (insoluble material) and the supernatant (solubilized) were analyzed on Western blots (Fig. 3B). While TbAK entered the soluble fraction with the use of 0.1 mg digitonin per mg protein, the glycosomal marker aldolase remained with the insoluble material until 0.5 mg digitonin per mg protein was used, demonstrating that TbAK does not reside in the glycosome but in the cytosol. This is in agreement with a recent proteome-wide survey for glycosomal proteins of T. brucei (8).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Phylogenetic tree of purine nucleoside kinase amino acid sequences. TbAK clearly groups with the adenosine kinases, and within those kinases, it groups with a subbranch formed by the enzymes from kinetoplastid parasites. Bootstrapping values (in percentages of positive samples per 1,000 rounds) are shown for the major branches.

Functional characterization of TbAK in trypanosomes.

As an initial test for a possible involvement of TbAK in the trypanocidal action of adenosine analogues, we assessed the effects of the pharmacological inhibition of TbAK on the susceptibility of trypanosomes to adenosine antimetabolites. Drug sensitivity was measured in vitro over an exposure time of 72 h, using the redox-sensitive dye Alamar Blue as an indicator of cell viability (43). ABT-702 {4-amino-5-(3-bromophenyl)-7-(6-morpholinopyridin-3-yl)pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine}, a specific inhibitor of adenosine kinase (27), had an IC50 against T. brucei bloodstream forms of 3.4 ± 1.1 μM. When applied at the nontoxic concentration of 320 nM, ABT-702 significantly reduced the sensitivity of trypanosomes to cordycepin (3′-deoxyadenosine), raising the IC50 from 52 nM to 308 nM (P < 0.001, analysis of variance and Tukey's post hoc test) (Fig. 4A). This supports the notion that TbAK activates cordycepin, albeit formal proof that ABT-702 inhibits TbAK is lacking. Homozygous disruption of the adenosine transporter gene TbAT1 has been shown to cause cordycepin resistance in T. brucei bloodstream forms (21). The subtherapeutic application of ABT-702 further reduced the cordycepin sensitivity of Tbat1 null trypanosomes, raising the IC50 from 189 nM to 497 nM (P < 0.001) (Fig. 4A). Regarding the antitrypanosomal activity of tubercidin (7-deazaadenosine), however, ABT-702 had no significant alleviating effects. The IC50 values of both tubercidin-susceptible BS221 trypanosomes (104 nM) and tubercidin-resistant Tbat1 null trypanosomes (1.95 μM) were only slightly raised by the addition of the adenosine kinase inhibitor (to 152 nM and 2.07 μM, respectively) (Fig. 4B).

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Sensitivity of bloodstream-form T. brucei 221 (TbAT1+/+) and its Tbat1/ derivative to cordycepin (Cor) (A) and tubercidin (Tub) (B), in the absence (white) or presence (black) of the adenosine kinase inhibitor ABT702 at 320 nM. ABT702 exacerbated the resistance phenotype of Tbat1 null trypanosomes to cordycepin but not to tubercidin. Error bars indicate standard deviations, and a, b, c, and d indicate significance groups according to the results of analysis of variance and Tukey's post hoc test.

The second approach to functionally characterize TbAK in trypanosomes was to knock down its expression by RNAi. A stem-loop construct targeting TbAK was made under the control of a Tet-inducible promoter and transformed into bloodstream-form T. brucei that expressed the Tet repressor and T7 RNA polymerase (54, 55). Upon addition of 1 μg/ml of Tet to TbAK RNAi transformant clones, the expression levels of TbAK were strongly reduced but not depleted completely (Fig. 5A). Nevertheless, the addition of Tet reduced the cordycepin sensitivity of TbAK RNAi cells (Fig. 5B). No effect on tubercidin sensitivity was observed (not shown). As usual with these kinds of constructs, there was a certain degree of leakiness, indicated by the slightly reduced expression of TbAK in TbAK RNAi cells (Fig. 5A) and elevated IC50s to cordycepin (Fig. 4A and 5B) in the absence of Tet. Coadministration of Tet and the adenosine kinase inhibitor ABT-702 (at 320 nM) caused a substantial loss of cordycepin susceptibility in TbAK RNAi cells (Fig. 5B). RNAi against TbAK did not affect the growth of trypanosomes in standard cultivation medium containing 1 mM hypoxanthine and 10% FCS. The critical test for TbAK function, the growth of TbAK RNAi cells on adenosine as the sole purine source, was experimentally challenging since the FCS appeared to contain enough purines for the trypanosomes to grow even without a purine supplement. A high background of purines in the medium might also account for the lower toxicity of cordycepin on wild-type trypanosomes, compared to that observed in previous studies (21). In order to obtain a “purine-free” serum, the FCS was passed through a desalting column with a 5-kDa exclusion limit. Using that serum, the parasites proliferated only in the presence of extra purines. However, the loss of all the low-molecular-weight compounds from the serum severely slowed down the growth rate of the trypanosomes, shifting the population doubling times to around 60 h, compared to 9 h with normal serum. When adenosine (1 mM) was offered as the sole purine source, the addition of Tet initially abolished the growth of TbAK RNAi cells but not of the control cells. After 4 days of adaptation to adenosine though, downregulation of TbAK no longer affected the growth rate of TbAK RNAi cells (data not shown).

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

RNAi-mediated silencing of TbAK in T. brucei bloodstream forms. (A) Northern blot analysis on total RNA of control wild-type cells (ctr) and TbAK RNAi cells in the presence (+) or absence (−) of 1 μg/ml Tet. (B) Cordycepin (Cor) sensitivity of TbAK RNAi trypanosomes with or without Tet (1 μg/ml) and/or ABT702 (320 nM).

Functional characterization of TbAK in yeast.

In contrast to trypanosomes, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae synthesizes purines de novo but does not take up exogenous adenosine (2). Purine-auxotrophic S. cerevisiae strains with null mutations in phosphoribosylaminoimidazole-carboxylase (Ade2p) grow in the presence of adenine or hypoxanthine, which they salvage via phosphoribosyltransferases, but cannot use adenosine as a purine source. They can, however, take up SAM and convert it via SAM-methyltransferase and S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase to adenosine, which then is incorporated into the nucleotide pool by means of adenosine kinase (Ado1p) (31). Null mutation in Ado1 disrupts this bypass (31). We expressed either TbAK or the adenosine transporter TbAT1, or both genes, in the ade2 ado1 double mutant yeast strain Y759 (31). Expression of TbAK restored growth on SAM (Fig. 6), proving that TbAK is adenosine kinase. Only simultaneous expression of TbAK and TbAT1 allowed Y759 cells to grow on adenosine (Fig. 6), demonstrating the successful reconstitution of two consecutive steps of trypanosomal adenosine salvage in yeast.

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6.

Functional expression of TbAK in S. cerevisiae. Yeast ado1 ade2 double mutants transformed with TbAK and/or TbAT1, or the respective empty vectors (−), were grown on minimal medium containing as the purine source adenine, SAM, or adenosine. Only concomitant expression of TbAK and TbAT1 allowed growth on adenosine. OD, optical density.

The TbAK TbAT1 double transformants provided a convenient means to test nucleoside prodrugs for import and activation by the trypanosomal enzymes. Qualitative halo assays revealed that a number of adenosine analogues depend on TbAK and TbAT1 for activity; cordycepin, tubercidin, 8-azaadenosine, formycin A, and iodotubercidin were toxic only to TbAK TbAT1 double transformant Y759 cells and not to TbAK or TbAT1 single transformants (data not shown). NBMPR, 8-aza-7-deaza-2′-deoxyadenosine, 2′,3′-dideoxyadenosine, and A134974 (5′-amino-iodotubercidin) were inactive against all of the yeast transformants up to spotting concentrations of 10 mM and so were the purine nucleobase analogues 7-deazaadenine, aminopurinol, allopurinol, and caffeine. Surprisingly, also melarsen oxide was toxic only to cells expressing TbAK and TbAT1, indicating a role for TbAK in the action of melarsoprol. However, the IC50 of melarsen oxide to bloodstream-form T. brucei increased only marginally in the presence of 320 nM ABT-702, from 11 to 13 nM (P = 0.009, two-tailed paired t test), and no significant effect on melarsen sensitivity was observed in TbAK RNAi cells upon the addition of Tet (data not shown), indicating that the observed requirement of adenosine kinase for melarsen activity in yeast does not apply to trypanosomes.

DISCUSSION

Adenosine kinase has been identified and found to be of pharmacological importance in a number of protozoan parasites except, somewhat surprisingly, African trypanosomes. Based on AMP production assays with cell extracts, bloodstream-form T. brucei was even suggested to lack adenosine kinase (40). On the other hand, adenosine was reported to be the preferred purine nucleoside for salvage by trypanosomes (26). Our findings (Fig. 4, 5, and 6) strongly suggest that TbAK is indeed adenosine kinase and a prerequisite for cordycepin susceptibility in T. brucei. With trypanosomes lacking means of transcriptional regulation such as polymerase II promoters, the duplication of the TbAK locus (Fig. 1) may well reflect the importance of adenosine kinase for trypanosomal purine salvage. Nevertheless, TbAK is unlikely to be essential since adenosine can also be converted to AMP by the sequential actions of adenosine nucleosidase (EC 3.2.2.7) and adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (EC 2.4.2.7). This may explain why subtoxic application of the adenosine kinase inhibitor ABT-702 caused resistance to cordycepin but not to tubercidin (Fig. 4). Tubercidin's toxophore resides in the purine ring (lacking N7) and is maintained after incorporation into the nucleotide pool via adenosine nucleosidase and adenine phosphoribosyltransferase, while cordycepin following the same path simply gets converted to adenosine. In yeast, which in contrast to T. brucei does not possess adenosine nucleosidase (25, 31), tubercidin activity was TbAK dependent.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae lacks adenosine transporters (2). In order to facilitate the pharmacological characterization of TbAK in the ade2 ado1 yeast strain Y759 (31), it was coexpressed with TbAT1, enabling the transformants to take up adenosine and analogues thereof. This allowed a simple, qualitative test of potential subversive substrates for import and activation by the two trypanosomal enzymes. Cordycepin, tubercidin, 8-azadeadenosine, formycin A, and iodotubercidin exhibited activity only against TbAK- and TbAT1-expressing cells, demonstrating the pharmacological significance of the two genes. Surprisingly, also melarsen oxide was active only against TbAK and TbAT1 expressors. An involvement of TbAK must be indirect, since melarsen lacks hydroxyl groups that could be phosphorylated. Possibly, adenosine competes with melarsen at the intracellular target site and the overexpression of TbAK increases melarsen sensitivity by reducing the cytosolic adenosine levels (37). However, the phenomenon was not directly translatable to T. brucei, where inhibition of TbAK hardly reduced melarsen sensitivity. In trypanosomes, melarsen is complexed by trypanothione to form MelT, which in turn inhibits trypanothione reductase (18). The case of melarsen oxide shows that the yeast system is useful only when the mode of action is conserved between S. cerevisiae and T. brucei.

In summary, the reconstitution of the first two steps of trypanosomal adenosine salvage in yeast provides a convenient means of testing adenosine antimetabolites for import and activation by T. brucei. Parallel inclusion of human adenosine kinase and/or nucleoside transporters will allow screening for selective antitrypanosomal nucleoside prodrugs in yeast. With nucleoside analogues being widely used in antiviral and antitumor therapy, a large number of promising compounds are available for screening, some of which are already registered for use in humans. The specific targeting of subversive substrates toward parasites via their purine salvage pathways is an excellent strategy against T. brucei due to its elaborate purine uptake and interconversion machinery.

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental material]

Acknowledgments

We thank Bertrand Daignan-Fornier for the yeast strain Y759, George Cross for the NY-single-marker T. brucei, Paul Michels for the aldolase antibody, Howard Riezman for plasmid pRS413, André Schneider for plasmid pALC14, Tom Seebeck for plasmid pMOTag4HA, and Xuan Lan Vu and Erwin Studer for technical assistance with trypanosome cultures.

We thank the Swiss National Science Foundation for financial support.

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aac.asm.org/.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Allemann, N., and A. Schneider. 2000. ATP production in isolated mitochondria of procyclic Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 111:87-94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Anderson, J. M., and R. Roth. 1976. Adenosine utilization in cordycepin-sensitive mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 128:689-691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Berriman, M., E. Ghedin, C. Hertz-Fowler, G. Blandin, H. Renauld, D. C. Bartholomeu, N. J. Lennard, E. Caler, N. E. Hamlin, B. Haas, U. Bohme, L. Hannick, M. A. Aslett, J. Shallom, L. Marcello, L. Hou, B. Wickstead, U. C. Alsmark, C. Arrowsmith, R. J. Atkin, A. J. Barron, F. Bringaud, K. Brooks, M. Carrington, I. Cherevach, T. J. Chillingworth, C. Churcher, L. N. Clark, C. H. Corton, A. Cronin, R. M. Davies, J. Doggett, A. Djikeng, T. Feldblyum, M. C. Field, A. Fraser, I. Goodhead, Z. Hance, D. Harper, B. R. Harris, H. Hauser, J. Hostetler, A. Ivens, K. Jagels, D. Johnson, J. Johnson, K. Jones, A. X. Kerhornou, H. Koo, N. Larke, S. Landfear, C. Larkin, V. Leech, A. Line, A. Lord, A. Macleod, P. J. Mooney, S. Moule, D. M. Martin, G. W. Morgan, K. Mungall, H. Norbertczak, D. Ormond, G. Pai, C. S. Peacock, J. Peterson, M. A. Quail, E. Rabbinowitsch, M. A. Rajandream, C. Reitter, S. L. Salzberg, M. Sanders, S. Schobel, S. Sharp, M. Simmonds, A. J. Simpson, L. Tallon, C. M. Turner, A. Tait, A. R. Tivey, S. Van Aken, D. Walker, D. Wanless, S. Wang, B. White, O. White, S. Whitehead, J. Woodward, J. Wortman, M. D. Adams, T. M. Embley, K. Gull, E. Ullu, J. D. Barry, A. H. Fairlamb, F. Opperdoes, B. G. Barrell, J. E. Donelson, N. Hall, C. M. Fraser, et al. 2005. The genome of the African trypanosome Trypanosoma brucei. Science 309:416-422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brun, R., and M. Schönenberger. 1979. Cultivation and in vivo cloning of procyclic culture forms of Trypanosoma brucei in a semi-defined medium. Acta Trop. 36:289-292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Carret, C., S. Delbecq, G. Labesse, B. Carcy, E. Precigout, K. Moubri, T. P. Schetters, and A. Gorenflot. 1999. Characterization and molecular cloning of an adenosine kinase from Babesia canis rossi. Eur. J. Biochem. 265:1015-1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Carter, N. S., B. J. Berger, and A. H. Fairlamb. 1995. Uptake of diamidine drugs by the P2 nucleoside transporter in melarsen-sensitive and -resistant Trypanosoma brucei brucei. J. Biol. Chem. 270:28153-28157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Carter, N. S., and A. H. Fairlamb. 1993. Arsenical-resistant trypanosomes lack an unusual adenosine transporter. Nature 361:173-175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Colasante, C., M. Ellis, T. Ruppert, and F. Voncken. 2006. Comparative proteomics of glycosomes from bloodstream form and procyclic culture form Trypanosoma brucei brucei. Proteomics 6:3275-3293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cook, W. J., L. J. DeLucas, and D. Chattopadhyay. 2000. Crystal structure of adenosine kinase from Toxoplasma gondii at 1.8 Å resolution. Protein Sci. 9:704-712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Darling, J. A., W. J. Sullivan, Jr., D. Carter, B. Ullman, and D. S. Roos. 1999. Recombinant expression, purification, and characterization of Toxoplasma gondii adenosine kinase. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 103:15-23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Datta, A. K., D. Bhaumik, and R. Chatterjee. 1987. Isolation and characterization of adenosine kinase from Leishmania donovani. J. Biol. Chem. 262:5515-5521. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Datta, R., I. Das, B. Sen, A. Chakraborty, S. Adak, C. Mandal, and A. K. Datta. 2006. Homology-model-guided site-specific mutagenesis reveals the mechanisms of substrate binding and product-regulation of adenosine kinase from Leishmania donovani. Biochem. J. 394:35-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Datta, R., I. Das, B. Sen, A. Chakraborty, S. Adak, C. Mandal, and A. K. Datta. 2005. Mutational analysis of the active-site residues crucial for catalytic activity of adenosine kinase from Leishmania donovani. Biochem. J. 387:591-600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.de Koning, H. P., and S. M. Jarvis. 1999. Adenosine transporters in bloodstream forms of Trypanosoma brucei brucei: substrate recognition motifs and affinity for trypanocidal drugs. Mol. Pharmacol. 56:1162-1170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Eddy, S. R. 1995. Multiple alignment using hidden Markov models. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 3:114-120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.el Kouni, M. H., D. Diop, and S. Cha. 1983. Combination therapy of schistosomiasis by tubercidin and nitrobenzylthioinosine 5′-monophosphate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:6667-6670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.el Kouni, M. H., V. Guarcello, O. N. Al Safarjalani, and F. N. M. Naguib. 1999. Metabolism and selective toxicity of 6-nitrobenzylthioinosine in Toxoplasma gondii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:2437-2443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fairlamb, A. H., G. B. Henderson, and A. Cerami. 1989. Trypanothione is the primary target for arsenical drugs against African trypanosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:2607-2611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fish, W. R., D. L. Looker, J. J. Marr, and R. L. Berens. 1982. Purine metabolism in the bloodstream forms of Trypanosoma gambiense and Trypanosoma rhodesiense. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 719:223-231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Galazka, J., B. Striepen, and B. Ullman. 2006. Adenosine kinase from Cryptosporidium parvum. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 149:223-230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Geiser, F., A. Luscher, H. P. de Koning, T. Seebeck, and P. Maser. 2005. Molecular pharmacology of adenosine transport in Trypanosoma brucei: P1/P2 revisited. Mol. Pharmacol. 68:589-595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ghosh, M., and A. K. Datta. 1994. Probing the function(s) of active-site arginine residue in Leishmania donovani adenosine kinase. Biochem. J. 298:295-301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Iltzsch, M. H., S. S. Uber, K. O. Tankersley, and M. H. el Kouni. 1995. Structure-activity relationship for the binding of nucleoside ligands to adenosine kinase from Toxoplasma gondii. Biochem. Pharmacol. 49:1501-1512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Iovannisci, D. M., and B. Ullman. 1984. Characterization of a mutant Leishmania donovani deficient in adenosine kinase activity. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 12:139-151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Iwashima, A., M. Ogata, K. Nosaka, H. Nishimura, and T. Hasegawa. 1995. Adenosine kinase-deficient mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 127:23-28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.James, D. M., and G. V. R. Born. 1980. Uptake of purine bases and nucleosides in African trypanosomes. Parasitology 81:383-393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jarvis, M. F., H. Yu, K. Kohlhaas, K. Alexander, C. H. Lee, M. Jiang, S. S. Bhagwat, M. Williams, and E. A. Kowaluk. 2000. ABT-702 (4-amino-5-(3-bromophenyl)-7-(6-morpholinopyridin-3-yl)pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine), a novel orally effective adenosine kinase inhibitor with analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties: I. In vitro characterization and acute antinociceptive effects in the mouse. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 295:1156-1164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kidder, G. W. 1982. Adenosine kinase from Trypanosoma cruzi. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 107:381-388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kim, Y. A., A. Sharon, C. K. Chu, R. H. Rais, O. N. Al Safarjalani, F. N. Naguib, and M. H. el Kouni. 2007. Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular modeling studies of N6-benzyladenosine analogues as potential anti-toxoplasma agents. Biochem. Pharmacol. 73:1558-1572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Landfear, S. M., B. Ullman, N. S. Carter, and M. A. Sanchez. 2004. Nucleoside and nucleobase transporters in parasitic protozoa. Eukaryot. Cell 3:245-254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lecoq, K., I. Belloc, C. Desgranges, and B. Daignan-Fornier. 2001. Role of adenosine kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: identification of the ADO1 gene and study of the mutant phenotypes. Yeast 18:335-342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Looker, D. L., R. L. Berens, and J. J. Marr. 1983. Purine metabolism in Leishmania donovani amastigotes and promastigotes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 9:15-28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mäser, P., C. Sütterlin, A. Kralli, and R. Kaminsky. 1999. A nucleoside transporter from Trypanosoma brucei involved in drug resistance. Science 285:242-244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mäser, P., D. Vogel, C. Schmid, B. Räz, and R. Kaminsky. 2001. Identification and characterization of trypanocides by functional expression of an adenosine transporter from Trypanosoma brucei in yeast. J. Mol. Med. 97:121-127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Matovu, E., M. L. Stewart, F. Geiser, R. Brun, P. Mäser, L. J. M. Wallace, R. J. Burchmore, J. C. K. Enyaru, M. P. Barrett, R. Kaminsky, T. Seebeck, and H. P. de Koning. 2003. Mechanisms of arsenical and diamidine uptake and resistance in Trypanosoma brucei. Eukaryot. Cell 2:1003-1008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Miller, R. L., D. L. Adamczyk, J. L. Rideout, and T. A. Krenitsky. 1982. Purification, characterization, substrate and inhibitor specificity of adenosine kinase from several Eimeria species. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 6:209-223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Naula, N., N. Hilti, A. M. Schweingruber, and M. E. Schweingruber. 2003. Cordycepin in Schizosaccharomyces pombe: effects on the wild type and phenotypes of mutants resistant to the drug. Curr. Genet. 43:400-406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Oberholzer, M., S. Morand, S. Kunz, and T. Seebeck. 2006. A vector series for rapid PCR-mediated C-terminal in situ tagging of Trypanosoma brucei genes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 145:117-120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ogbunude, P. O., and C. O. Ikediobi. 1982. Effect of nitrobenzylthioinosinate on the toxicity of tubercidin and ethidium against Trypanosoma gambiense. Acta Trop. 39:219-224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ogbunude, P. O., C. O. Ikediobi, and A. I. Ukoha. 1985. Adenosine cycle in African trypanosomes. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 79:7-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Opperdoes, F. R., and P. Borst. 1977. Localization of nine glycolytic enzymes in a microbody-like organelle in Trypanosoma brucei: the glycosome. FEBS Lett. 80:360-364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Parsons, M., T. Furuya, S. Pal, and P. Kessler. 2001. Biogenesis and function of peroxisomes and glycosomes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 115:19-28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Räz, B., M. Iten, Y. Grether-Bühler, R. Kaminsky, and R. Brun. 1997. The Alamar Blue assay to determine drug sensitivity of African trypanosomes in vitro. Acta Trop. 68:139-147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rodman, L. E., D. R. Farnell, J. M. Coyne, P. W. Allan, D. L. Hill, K. L. Duncan, J. E. Tomaszewski, A. C. Smith, and J. G. Page. 1997. Toxicity of cordycepin in combination with the adenosine deaminase inhibitor 2′-deoxycoformycin in beagle dogs. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 147:39-45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rottenberg, M. E., W. Masocha, M. Ferella, F. Petitto-Assis, H. Goto, K. Kristensson, R. McCaffrey, and H. Wigzell. 2005. Treatment of African trypanosomiasis with cordycepin and adenosine deaminase inhibitors in a mouse model. J. Infect. Dis. 192:1658-1665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sanchez, M., R. Tryon, J. Green, I. Boor, and S. Landfear. 2002. Six related nucleoside/nucleobase transporters from Trypanosoma brucei exhibit distinct biochemical functions. J. Biol. Chem. 277:21499-21504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sanger, F., S. Nicklen, and A. R. Coulson. 1977. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74:5463-5467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Schumacher, M. A., D. M. Scott, I. I. Mathews, S. E. Ealick, D. S. Roos, B. Ullman, and R. G. Brennan. 2000. Crystal structures of Toxoplasma gondii adenosine kinase reveal a novel catalytic mechanism and prodrug binding. J. Mol. Biol. 298:875-893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sommer, J. M., and C. C. Wang. 1994. Targeting proteins to the glycosomes of African trypanosomes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 48:105-138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sturk, L. M., J. L. Brock, C. R. Bagnell, J. E. Hall, and R. R. Tidwell. 2004. Distribution and quantitation of the anti-trypanosomal diamidine 2,5-bis(4-amidinophenyl)furan (DB75) and its N-methoxy prodrug DB289 in murine brain tissue. Acta Trop. 91:131-143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Styrt, B., P. C. Johnson, and M. S. Klempner. 1985. Differential lysis of plasma membranes and granules of human neutrophils by digitonin. Tissue Cell 17:793-800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sullivan, W. J., Jr., C. W. Chiang, C. M. Wilson, F. N. Naguib, M. H. el Kouni, R. G. Donald, and D. S. Roos. 1999. Insertional tagging of at least two loci associated with resistance to adenine arabinoside in Toxoplasma gondii, and cloning of the adenosine kinase locus. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 103:1-14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Williamson, J. 1972. Further experiments with the nucleoside trypanocide, cordycepin. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 66:354-355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wirtz, E., and C. Clayton. 1995. Inducible gene expression in trypanosomes mediated by a prokaryotic repressor. Science 268:1179-1183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wirtz, E., S. Leal, C. Ochatt, and G. A. Cross. 1999. A tightly regulated inducible expression system for conditional gene knock-outs and dominant-negative genetics in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 99:89-101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yadav, V., C. K. Chu, R. H. Rais, O. N. Al Safarjalani, V. Guarcello, F. N. Naguib, and M. H. el Kouni. 2004. Synthesis, biological activity and molecular modeling of 6-benzylthioinosine analogues as subversive substrates of Toxoplasma gondii adenosine kinase. J. Med. Chem. 47:1987-1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Supplemental material]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES