Skip to main content
The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners logoLink to The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
. 1978 Nov;28(196):692–695.

Why standards? *

H W K Acheson
PMCID: PMC2158947  PMID: 739471

Abstract

My experiences of growing up in a general practitioner's home and practice led me to want to be a general practitioner myself.

The early 1950s were critical years for general practice. Three developments — the foundation and work of the College, the introduction of vocational training, and the development of postgraduate medical centres — have led to its revival.

The next main change may well be the interest in, and development of, clinical standards. In my opinion this ought to be done by general practitioners themselves rather than by society via the Ombudsman.

Full text

PDF
695

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Acheson H. W. Medical audit and general practice. Lancet. 1975 Mar 1;1(7905):511–513. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92846-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown G. W., Harris T., Copeland J. R. Depression and loss. Br J Psychiatry. 1977 Jan;130:1–18. doi: 10.1192/bjp.130.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966 Jul;44(3 Suppl):166–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES