Abstract
The Rcs phosphorelay is a multicomponent signaling system that positively regulates colanic acid synthesis and negatively regulates motility and virulence. We have exploited a spontaneously isolated mutant, IgaA(T191P), that is nearly maximally activated for the Rcs system to identify a vast set of genes that respond to the stimulation, and we report new regulatory properties of this signaling system in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Microarray data show that the Rcs system normally functions as a positive regulator of SPI-2 and other genes important for the growth of Salmonella in macrophages, although when highly activated the system completely represses the SPI-1/SPI-2 virulence, flagellar, and fimbrial biogenesis pathways. The auxiliary protein RcsA, which works with RcsB to positively regulate colanic acid and other target genes, not only stimulates but also antagonizes the positive regulation of many genes in the igaA mutant. We show that RcsB represses motility through the RcsB box in the promoter region of the master operon flhDC and that RcsA is not required for this regulation. Curiously, RcsB selectively stimulates expression of the flagellar type 3 secretion genes fliPQR; an RcsAB box located downstream of fliR influences this regulation. We show that excess colanic acid impairs swimming and inhibits swarming motility, consistent with the inverse regulation of the two pathways by the Rcs system.
The Rcs phosphorelay signaling system appears to be exclusively present only in the family Enterobacteriaceae (30). This system was first identified by its role in the positive regulation of capsular polysaccharide or colanic acid synthesis in Escherichia coli but is now known to also regulate genes involved in the maintenance of cell wall integrity, cell division, the regulation of stationary-phase sigma factor σS, motility, and virulence (Fig. 1) (39). In response to unknown environmental signals, the hybrid kinase RcsC is activated to autophosphorylate a conserved His residue. From here, the phosphate is transferred first to an Asp residue within RcsC itself, then to a His residue in RcsD, and finally to the response regulator RcsB. RcsB∼P (the phosphorylated or functionally active form of RcsB) associates with an unstable protein, RcsA, to bind to an RcsAB box in the promoter region of several genes (70), although not all genes require RcsA for regulation. Conditions that modestly induce the Rcs regulon include osmotic and other kinds of membrane stress, growth at low temperatures in the presence of glucose and zinc, and possibly growth on a solid surface (27, 39). Capsule synthesis also is reported to be activated by acetyl phosphate via RcsB independently of RcsC (20). Capsular polysaccharide helps cells survive drying (52) and apparently is important for later stages of biofilm formation (10).
FIG. 1.
Rcs signal transduction pathway. Phosphate (∼P) transfer from the RcsC kinase via RcsD to the response regulator RcsB is indicated. H/H2 and D refer to phosphorylated histidine and aspartate residues in the signaling proteins. Dotted lines indicate a reversal of the pathway due to the phosphatase activity of RcsCD. Acetyl∼P or unknown phosphodonors (X∼P) are implicated in phosphorylating RcsB independently of RcsC. Pathways positively (arrowhead) or negatively (bar head) influenced by RcsB∼P alone, or in conjunction with the coregulator RcsA, are indicated. Lon protease degrades RcsA. RcsF and IgaA respond to the indicated known or unknown (?) signals to regulate RcsC. OM and IM, outer and inner membrane, respectively. See the text for details. Adapted from reference 39 with the permission of the publisher.
While the Rcs system positively regulates capsule synthesis, it negatively regulates flagella synthesis (Fig. 1) (39). Swimming and swarming motility are both dependent on flagella (28, 36). In E. coli the Rcs system is thought to repress motility by controlling the master flagellar operon (18). Purified RcsA enhances the affinity of RcsB for the RcsAB box within the promoter region of flhDC (18); however, RcsA does not appear to affect the motility of E. coli in vivo unless expressed at high levels from a plasmid (20). Flagellar biogenesis in both E. coli and S. enterica involves the expression of more than 50 genes that are transcribed in operons of three temporal classes (8). The class 1 genes are included in the master operon flhDC, the proteins of which direct transcription of class 2 promoters, which encode structural and assembly proteins required for the biosynthesis of the base of the flagellar structure. FliA (σ28) is made at this stage and regulates class 3 transcription, which produces the functional flagellar filament. Early in assembly, after the inner membrane/supramembrane (MS) ring and the cytoplasmic C ring are assembled, a flagellum-specific type 3 secretion (TTS) apparatus docks at the base of this structure and directs the export of most extracytoplasmic flagellar subunits comprising the rod, the external hook, and the filament. The flagellar TTS system shares sequence and structural similarities with secretion systems that export virulence proteins into host cells (38).
Mutations that activate the Rcs phosphorelay system are reported to attenuate virulence in S. enterica; the activating mutations were either in RcsC (25, 48) or in IgaA (14). A point mutation in igaA (intracellular growth attenuator) was first identified in a screen for S. enterica mutants able to proliferate in fibroblast cells (5); the mutant was attenuated for growth in macrophages. igaA encodes an inner membrane protein (14) that is homologous to yrfF in E. coli and to umoB in Proteus mirabilis (15). The igaA mutant in Salmonella was mucoid and showed reduced motility, and the locus was shown to be essential (4). Lethality was suppressed by mutations in rcsB, rcsC, or rcsD, suggesting that IgaA represses the Rcs signaling system in both E. coli and S. enterica (Fig. 1) (4, 9, 14). In the absence of IgaA, an overactive Rcs signaling pathway is lethal, likely because of the inappropriate regulation of an Rcs regulon member(s). The role of IgaA in virulence apparently is to prevent the activation of the RcsCDB system during early stages of infection. We show in this study, however, that the Rcs system is required for the activation of some virulence genes required for later stages of infection.
Our study began with the isolation of a spontaneous mutant of S. enterica that was simultaneously mucoid and completely defective in both swimming and swarming motility. We mapped the mutation to igaA. A literature search revealed that the particular missense mutation we had isolated (T191P) had been reported earlier, and it was the strongest of the five mutations assayed for the induction of colanic acid synthesis (14). An initial microarray analysis of the igaA mutant revealed a 20- to 400-fold induction of genes for colanic acid synthesis and a similarly impressive repression of flagellar and SPI-1/SPI-2 (SPI is short for “Salmonella pathogenicity island”) virulence genes. We therefore exploited this mutant, which apparently is nearly maximally activated for the Rcs signaling pathway, to identify a vast set of genes (∼20% of the Salmonella genome) positively and negatively regulated by RcsB in both mid-log and stationary phases of growth. We also have identified RcsA-dependent and -independent targets of RcsB. We provide most of these microarray data as supplementary material, but we present the novel results showing dual regulation of SPI-2 and other virulence genes by the Rcs system. The experimental focus of this paper is on the regulation of flagellar genes and motility.
We report that RcsB regulates flagellar gene expression both negatively and positively. We show that the negative regulation occurs solely at the initiation of transcription of the master operon and operates through an RcsB box within the flhDC promoter; RcsA appears to have no effect on flhDC transcription. Positive regulation involves the three TTS genes fliPQR; RcsA does not promote this regulation but instead antagonizes it. An RcsAB box located downstream of fliR appears to be required for the elevated transcript levels of fliPQR. We also show that excess colanic acid inhibits swarming motility. Thus, while polysaccharides in general favor surface motility (28), the colanic acid polysaccharide does not.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains, growth conditions, and procedures.
Strains are listed in Table 1. Bacteria were grown in L broth (LB) base (20 g/liter). LB swim plates were solidified with 0.3% agar, while LB swarm plates were supplemented with 0.5% glucose and were solidified with 0.6% agar (65). Eiken agar (Eiken Chemical Co., Tokyo, Japan) was used in most experiments. For preparation of RNA samples, cultures were harvested at an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.6 (∼2.5 h) for mid-log phase and at 6 h for stationary phase. The growth curve for wild-type bacteria has been published already (65). Strains with the igaA mutant allele had a slightly slower growth rate than the wild type and reached mid-log phase (OD600 of 0.6) with a delay of ∼0.5 h; they were harvested for stationary phase by an equivalent delay. Procedures for motility assays, viewing bacteria on plates, and photography have been described previously (42). Antibiotics used in this study are ampicillin (100 μg/ml), chloramphenicol (30 μg/ml), tetracycline (12.5 μg/ml), and kanamycin (25 μg/ml). Deletion of genes and regulatory regions was achieved by the one-step mutagenesis procedure (11) as described previously (68). Mutant combinations were constructed by P22 transduction where appropriate.
TABLE 1.
Strains and plasmids used
| Strain or plasmid | Descriptiona | Mutation siteb | Source or reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strains | |||
| 14028 | Wild-type ATCC strain of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium | 42 | |
| QW184 | pwzawza::kan | −478∼1140 (1140) | This study |
| QW119 | igaA* | 571 A'C | This study |
| QW200 | igaA* pwzawza::kan | This study | |
| QW220 | igaA* pflhD(g8t) | −196 G'T | This study |
| QW221 | igaA* pflhD(a9c) | −195 A'C | This study |
| QW222 | igaA* pflhD(g8t, a9c) | −196 G'T, −195 A'C | This study |
| QW226 | igaA* pflhD(g8t, a9c, c15a) | −196 G'T, −195 A'C, −189 C'A | This study |
| QW227 | igaA* pflhD(c15a) | −189 C'A | This study |
| QW228 | igaA* pflhD(g8t) pwzawza::kan | This study | |
| QW229 | igaA* pflhD(a9c) pwzawza::kan | This study | |
| QW230 | igaA* pflhD(g8t, a9c) pwzawza::kan | This study | |
| QW231 | igaA* pflhD(g8t, a9c, c15a) pwzawza::kan | This study | |
| QW233 | igaA* pflhD(c15a) pwzawza::kan | This study | |
| QW327 | ΔrcsA | 99∼539 (624) | This study |
| QW434 | ΔrcsB | 33∼715 (651) | This study |
| QW398 | ΔrcsC | 1∼2847 (2847) | This study |
| QW459 | ΔrcsD | 7∼2322 (2670) | This study |
| QW329 | ΔrcsAB | This study | |
| QW436 | ΔrcsCD | This sutdy | |
| QW441 | igaA* ΔrcsA | This study | |
| QW442 | igaA* ΔrcsB | This study | |
| QW556 | igaA* ΔRA(1-48) | See Fig. 3 | This study |
| TH341 | F::Tn10dCm | K. Hughes | |
| TH338 | F::Tn10dTc | K. Hughes | |
| TH1793 | dam::Tn10dTc | K. Hughes | |
| QW215 | flhDC::tetRA | −243 of flhD(351)∼579 of flhC(579) | This study |
| Phage/plasmids | |||
| P22 | HT12/4int103 | 42 | |
| pKD4 | Source for kanamycin cassette | 11 | |
| pKD46 | Lambda red recombinase | 11 | |
| pCP20 | FLP recombinase | 11 | |
| pNK972 | pBR322 origin, Tn10 transposase | K. Hughes |
Mutations indicated in parenthesis after pflhD refer to base changes within the RcsAB box in the promoter region of flhD. Δ and :: refer to deletion of or insertion/substitution within the indicated gene or F episome.
A minus refers to the nucleotides upstream of ATG, a tilde indicates the nucleotides included in the deletion (when the description indicates a deletion) or deletion/substitution (when the description indicates ::kan or ::tetRA), an apostrophe indicates mutation (i.e., 571 A'C means a mutation from A to C at nucleotide 571), and the number in parentheses is the total length of the gene from ATG to TAA. Positive values indicate residues after the start codon. For single-base-pair changes, the nucleotide at which the indicated change was introduced is shown. Note that deletions created by the Datsenko and Wanner method (11) leave behind a scar sequence of ∼80 bp.
Mapping and identification of the igaA mutation.
P22 was grown on TH341 carrying Tn10dCm (defective Tn10, lacking the transposase, and carrying chloramphenicol resistance [Cmr]) and used to generate a random pool of Tn10dCm hops into the spontaneous mucoid mutant, which was transformed with pNK972, a plasmid expressing the transposase gene of Tn10. Transducing lysates prepared from ∼25,000 Cmr pooled colonies were crossed with the wild-type strain 14028, selecting for mucoid and nonmotile colonies resistant to Cm. One such transductant was named QW119, and it was crossed back with 14028 to determine the distance (∼14 kb) between the Cmr marker and the mutated locus using cotransduction frequencies. The Cmr marker was located at a noncoding region between genes bigA and yhfL by using semirandom-primed PCR from both ends of the Cm coding sequence and subsequent sequencing of the PCR products. TH1793 carrying a tetracycline resistance (Tcr) insertion in dam, 3.6 kb down from bigA, then was crossed with QW119, and the distance between dam::Tcr and the mutated locus was determined to be ∼11 kb by cotransduction frequencies, establishing the order of the markers as Cmr-dam::Tcr-mucoid locus. DNA sequencing around the predicted position of the mutation revealed a point mutation of A to C at nucleotide 571 in igaA (Table 1).
Introducing point mutations on the chromosome.
Point mutations within the chromosomal RcsAB box sequence in flhDC were created as follows. The flhDC coding sequence first was replaced with tetRA (encoding tetracycline resistance genes [7]) by a modification of the one-step mutagenesis procedure (11). The modification involved using genomic DNA from TH338 (carrying tetRA) as the template to amplify the tetRA sequence using hybrid primers that included 40 to 50 nucleotides homologous to sequences flanking either side of the region to be deleted within flhDC, followed by 20 nucleotides homologous to sequences on either side of the tetRA cassette. The amplified PCR product was introduced into the wild-type strain as described previously (11), and the resulting strain, flhDC::tetRA, was named QW215. The region replaced by tetRA in flhDC started at the +1 transcription start site of flhD and extended to the termination codon TAA of flhC. Point mutations in the RcsAB box (Table 1) were introduced into QW215 by designing appropriate PCR primers carrying the mutations. The basic forward primer containing the RcsAB box was 5′CTCCGTTGTATGTCACGAAGCTGACGAGTAGAGTTGCGTCGAATTAGGAAAAATCTTAGGCATTTGTAAAAATTGATGTA (the box is underlined). In mutant primers, the G, A, and C residues shown in boldface in the wild-type sequence were changed to T, C, and A, respectively, either singly or in combinations. Each of the forward primers, together with the reverse primer (5′GACATCATCCTTCCGCTGTT), was used to generate PCR products using wild-type flhDC as the template. The PCR products were electroporated into QW215 with pKD46 (a helper plasmid encoding phage lambda recombinase [11] to replace the tetRA cassette). Tets transformants were selected on media described previously (41) on which Tets colonies appear much bigger than Tetr colonies; these were further verified by replica plating on tetracycline and unmodified LB plates. All point mutations finally were verified by DNA sequencing. The Cmr-linked igaA allele was moved into the RcsAB box mutants by transduction and screening for mucoidy, and the construct was verified by DNA sequencing.
Microarray experiments and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).
RNA preparation and microarray analyses were done as described previously (65). The microarray data in all tables represent two to five independent experimental repeats. A list of differentially expressed (DE) genes for each comparison (e.g., wild type compared to ΔrcsB at one growth phase) was selected by using the significance analysis of microarrays method, which assigns a score to each gene on the basis of the change in gene expression relative to the standard deviation of repeated measurements (63). Briefly, significance analysis of microarrays orders the genes by using a modified statistic t and declares a gene to be up- or down-regulated if the observed modified statistic t is above or below the global cutoff point, which is chosen to control the estimated median false discovery rates. The false discovery rate was set to 5%. Each DE list was further screened stringently according to the behavioral consistency of each DE gene in two genetic backgrounds (RcsB++ [high levels of active RcsB] and ΔrcsB) and in two growth phases (mid-log phase and stationary phase).
RT-PCR was performed essentially as described previously (66), using a one-step RT-PCR kit (Qiagen). Briefly, DNase (Ambion)-treated RNA samples initially were diluted to 20 ng/μl and were further normalized against RT-PCR-amplified 30S rRNA as an internal control. An RT-PCR of 50 μl consisted of 10 μl buffer (5×), 1 μl of deoxynucleoside triphosphates (10 mM), 2 μl each of forward and reverse primers (25 μM), 1 μl of RT-PCR enzyme mix, and ∼40 ng of RNA and RNase-free water supplemented to 50 μl. RT-PCR cycling conditions were as follows: 50°C for 35 min and 95°C for 15 min, followed by 26 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 40 s, and then an extra step of elongation at 72°C for 10 min.
RESULTS
IgaA(T191P) is strongly induced for colanic acid synthesis and simultaneously is repressed for flagellar, fimbriae, and SPI-1/SPI-2 virulence genes.
A spontaneous mucoid mutant of S. enterica (QW119) (Table 1) was found to be completely defective in swimming and swarming motility (Fig. 2A). The mutation was mapped to the igaA locus by three-factor crosses, and sequence analysis identified the mutation as IgaA(T191P) (see Materials and Methods). We will refer to this allele as igaA*. Consistent with the mutant phenotype, microarray analysis of this mutant showed a dramatic induction of colanic acid synthesis genes (20- to 400-fold) that are a major target of the Rcs signaling system (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). These data, along with experiments reported previously (14), suggest that the Rcs system is nearly maximally induced in the igaA* strain QW119 (indicated by RcsB++ in Table S1 in the supplemental material). Comparison of the RcsB++ to ΔrcsB strains therefore should give us the whole range of genes positively and negatively regulated by RcsB. These microarray experiments showed that RcsB regulates nearly one-fifth of the Salmonella genome. Data for genes that are strongly regulated in both mid-exponential and stationary phases of growth are provided in Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material. A list of 445 other genes regulated in either one or the other growth phase (but not in both phases) is available from the authors upon request. We also have examined the contribution of RcsA to this regulation (see Tables S3 and S4 in the supplemental material). We first summarize the overall findings from these studies and then focus on the regulation of flagellar genes and motility.
FIG. 2.
Swimming and swarming motility of the Rcs signaling pathway and regulatory mutants. (A) The motility of the indicated mutant strains on 0.3% swim or 0.6% swarm Eiken agar. Mutations introduced in the promoter region of flhD are indicated in parenthesis after pflhD. (B) The motility of the indicated mutant strains on 0.3% swim (white bars) or 0.6% swarm (gray bars) Eiken agar. Similar results were obtained with Bacto agar. The data are averages from three independent experiments conducted in triplicate. Error bars are standard deviations from the means. Plates in both panels were incubated at 37°C for 6 h.
Positive regulation of colanic acid and a subset of flagellar biosynthesis genes.
Positively regulated genes are those for which the transcription levels are elevated in an RcsB++ background or decreased in a ΔrcsB background. The most strongly positively regulated genes belong to the colanic acid biosynthesis cluster (see Table S1 in the supplemental material), followed by those associated with membrane and periplasmic functions. Among genes with known functions, inclusion of the class 2 flagellar genes fliQ and fliR (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) in the set of strongly induced genes is curious, because the rest of the flagellar genes are repressed by RcsB (see Table S2 in the supplemental material); fliQR are members of an export system specific for extracytoplasmic flagellar proteins (37).
Negative regulation of flagellar and virulence genes.
Negatively regulated genes are those for which the transcription levels are decreased in an RcsB++ background or increased in a ΔrcsB background. Among the most strongly negatively regulated genes are those encoding flagellar motility (up to 117-fold repression) (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). Besides the well-known flagellar biosynthetic pathway, the more recently identified motility genes (mcpC, STM3155, yhjH, etc. [21, 67]) also were repressed by RcsB. Equally striking was the repression of virulence genes encoded on the pathogenicity island SPI-1 (up to 270-fold) (see Table S2 in the supplemental material) as well as virulence genes encoded on the pathogenicity island SPI-2 (up to 150-fold) and genes for fimbriae (up to 37-fold) (Table 2). The latter class of genes (SPI-2 and fim) showed a novel regulation that is discussed separately below.
TABLE 2.
Dual regulation of virulence and other genes by the Rcs systema
| Gene/open reading frame and functional categoryb | WT/ΔrcsBc | WT/RcsB++d | Function/descriptione |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pathogenicity (47) | |||
| mig-14 | 4.0 | 2.4 | Put. transcription activator |
| pagC | 13 | 35 | PhoP regulated; reduced macrophage survival |
| pagD | 13 | 9.5 | PhoP regulated |
| pagK | 3.6 | 5.5 | PhoPQ-activated gene |
| pgtE | 3.4 | 2.9 | Phosphoglycerate transport; outer membrane protein E |
| pipB | 7.5 | 59 | Pathogenicity island-encoded protein; SPI-3 |
| sifA | 16 | 38 | Replication in macrophages |
| sifB | 8.8 | 26 | Translocated effector; translocated by SPI-2 |
| spvA | 2.0 | 4.4 | Salmonella plasmid virulence; outer membrane protein |
| spvC | 1.9 | 12 | Salmonella plasmid virulence; hydrophilic protein |
| spvD | 1.9 | 5.5 | Salmonella plasmid virulence; hydrophilic protein |
| ssaB, ssaC, ssaD, ssaE (ssaB) | 7.3-26 | 8.0-89 | Secretion system apparatus |
| ssaG∼L, STM1410 (ssaG) | 12-30 | 17-150 | Secretion system apparatus |
| ssaM∼Q, ssaV (ssaM) | 4.0-34 | 4.4-33 | Secretion system apparatus |
| sscB, sseF, sseG | 3.4-13 | 4.9-35 | Secretion system chaperone |
| sseA∼E, sscA (sseA) | 13-19 | 42-58 | Secretion system effector |
| sseJ | 42 | 48 | Salmonella translocated effector; regulated by SPI-2 |
| ssrA, ssrB (ssrA) | 3.6-5.4 | 9.7-11 | Secretion system regulator; sensor component |
| STM0972 | 11 | 22 | Homologous to secreted protein SopD |
| ugtL (ugtL) | 13 | 16 | Put. membrane protein; homology with chitinase |
| virK | 7.3 | 6.4 | Virulence gene; homologous to virK in Shigella |
| yscR, ssaS, ssaT, ssaU (yscR) | 2.8-16 | 3.6-56 | Homology with YscR of Yersinia secretion system |
| Fimbriae (8) | |||
| fimA | 74.3 | 37.2 | Major type 1 subunit fimbrin (pilin) |
| fimI, fimC, fimD, fimF (fimI) | 1.8-14 | 2.1-15 | Fimbrial protein internal segment |
| fimW | 9.8 | 8.5 | Put. fimbrial protein |
| fimZ | 15 | 15 | Fimbrial protein Z; Put. transcriptional regulator |
| stdA | 12 | 14 | Put. fimbria-like protein |
| Membrane and periplasm (11) | |||
| cvpA, purF (cvpA) | 2.3-2.4 | 3.4 | Membrane protein required for colicin V production |
| STM1689 (STM1689) | 23 | 78 | Put. inner membrane protein |
| STM2139 | 8.3 | 18 | Put. inner membrane protein |
| STM2245 | 8.0 | 10 | Put. outer membrane protein |
| STM4257∼4262 (STM4257) | 2.6-8.1 | 20-40 | Put. inner membrane or exported |
| Others (14) | |||
| carA, carB (carA) | 3.0-3.4 | 8.2-13 | Carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase |
| ilvB, ilvN (ilvB) | 2.7 | 2.4-3.0 | Acetolactate synthase I; large subunit, valine sensitive |
| STM1055 (STM1055) | 2.4 | 2.3 | Gifsy-2 prophage |
| STM1548 | 2.7 | 4.9 | S-adenosylmethionine/tRNA-ribosyltransferase-isomerase |
| STM2137 | 4.1 | 4.7 | Put. cytoplasmic protein |
| STM2138 | 9.5 | 28 | Put. cytoplasmic protein |
| STM2287 | 17 | 38 | Put. cytoplasmic protein |
| STM2585 | 4.3 | 7.3 | Gifsy-1 prophage; similar to transposase |
| STM2778 | 7.6 | 25 | Pseudogene; frameshift |
| STM2780 | 9.8 | 33 | Homologue of pipB; Put. pentapeptide repeats |
| STM3133, STM3132 (STM3133) | 2.1-3.6 | 3.7 | Put. amidohydrolase |
The microarray data are for RNA prepared from cells harvested at stationary phase. Indicated transcription ratios are averages from two to five independent experiments. These ratios are expressed such that the numbers are >1 for both positively and negatively regulated genes, because it is easier to compare fold regulation using whole numbers rather than fractions. The range indicates low and high values for individual genes within the operon.
Genes and open reading frames from the same operon are listed together; the first gene of the operon is indicated in parentheses. ∼ indicates intervening genes in the operon. Operon prediction was based on data from reference 47 and from http://biocyc.org/STYP99287/NEW-IMAGE?object=Transcription-Units. Only genes significantly differentially expressed in an operon are listed. The genes are grouped under broad functional categories, and the total number in each category is indicated in parentheses.
ΔrcsB refers to strain QW434, which contains a deletion of rcsB. Genes in this column are positively regulated by RcsB.
RcsB++ refers to the igaA mutant strain QW119 with elevated RcsB levels and activity. Genes in this column are negatively regulated by RcsB.
Functions and descriptions are based on data from reference 45; when several genes in an operon are listed, only the first one is described. Put., putative.
Dual regulation of SPI-2 and other virulence genes.
The microarray data revealed a third class of genes that were both positively and negatively regulated depending of the activity level of RcsB (Table 2). The transcription ratios at normal levels of RcsB (wild type compared to ΔrcsB) show that RcsB is required for expression of the indicated genes, i.e., the genes are positively regulated by RcsB. The transcription ratios at elevated levels of RcsB (wild type compared to RcsB++) show that the same genes are repressed when RcsB is highly active, i.e., negatively regulated by RcsB. The largest functionally related group of genes showing dual regulation included genes encoding the TTS system on the pathogenicity island SPI-2 (ssa, ssb, sse, etc.). This system is required for the intracellular survival of Salmonella and the remodeling of the Salmonella-containing vacuole (69). Genes for the SsrAB two-component signaling system encoded within SPI-2 also show dual regulation. This system controls the expression of components of the SPI-2 TTS apparatus as well as its translocated effectors. Other genes grouped under pathogenicity also are required for growth of Salmonella in macrophages. For example, the genes pagC, pagD, ugtL, mig-14, virK, pgtE, pipB, sopD, and pagK have functions associated with the bacterial envelope, and some have been directly implicated in virulence and resistance to antimicrobial peptides (50). Fimbrial genes (fim) belonged to the dual category as well; fimbriae are thought to play a role only during the intestinal phase of infection (32). RcsB recently has been reported to influence the piliation state of E. coli (57).
RcsA both stimulates and antagonizes a subset of RcsB-regulated genes.
Earlier array studies do not distinguish between RcsA-dependent and RcsA-independent targets. In order to study these, we first compared gene expression of the wild type to that of an rcsA mutant but found no genes that were significantly differentially expressed. We therefore performed microarray analysis of the wild-type and RcsB++ strains with or without RcsA. RcsA had either a stimulatory or an antagonistic effect on the positive regulation of several genes by RcsB (some of these are indicated in Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material). The effect of RcsA on the negative regulation of genes by RcsB was less clear in that the effect either was small, not observed in all members of a regulon, or not consistently observed in all experimental repeats. The data showing all the positively regulated genes for which expression either was stimulated or antagonized by RcsA are presented in Tables S3 and S4 in the supplemental material, respectively.
RcsA was not required for the negative or the positive regulation of flagellar genes. However, an antagonistic effect was seen on the positive regulation of fliPQR; i.e., the absence of RcsA increased the positive stimulation by RcsB (see Tables S1 and S4 in the supplemental material). An antagonistic effect also was observed on the positive regulation of rcsA, the gene immediately downstream of fliR (see Tables S1 and S4 in the supplemental material). Note that the ΔrcsA strain QW327 used in these experiments had removed most of the gene, leaving ∼100 bp at the beginning and at the end (Table 1); the rcsA transcript corresponding to residual regions of the gene is being detected in the microarrays. An antagonistic effect may result from competition between the two proteins for binding the RcsAB box and could be interpreted as a moderating influence of RcsA on the positive regulation of genes by RcsB.
Regulation of flagellar genes and motility. (i) Negative regulation of flagellar genes occurs through the RcsB-binding box in the master flagellar operon flhDC: excess colanic acid inhibits swarming motility.
An RcsAB box was identified within a footprint of RcsAB proteins in the promoter region of flhDC in E. coli (18). An identical sequence (TAGGAAA/AATCTTA) is present at a similar location in S. enterica, at +5 to +19 from the +1 transcription start site (71). We shall refer to this sequence as the RcsB box in S. enterica, since RcsA is not required for repression. To test if the inhibition of motility genes was entirely through repression of the flhDC master operon, we created point mutations in the GA (left half site) and C (right half site) residues of the RcsB box (in boldface), alone and in combinations, in the igaA* strain QW119 (see Materials and Methods). These three residues were seen to be conserved between several RcsA-independent targets and an RcsA-dependent target (18). All of these mutant derivatives remained mucoid. While most of the mutant strains had regained swimming motility to various extents when assayed on 0.3% agar plates, none of them showed swarming motility on 0.6% agar plates (Table 3). Motility assays for representative mutants are shown in Fig. 2A. Of the five combinations of point mutants, the single mutants g8t (QW220) and c15a (QW227) showed the lowest recovery of motility, while all mutants that included the a9c mutation (QW221, QW222, and QW226) had recovered half the swimming motility of the wild type (Table 3 and Fig. 2A, compare QW119 to QW226). In order to test if mucoidy was interfering with motility, we introduced a deletion mutation of wza, the first gene in the colanic acid biosynthesis operon, into the igaA* strain (resulting in strain QW200) as well as in all of its RcsB box mutant derivatives (resulting in strains QW228 to QW233). Mutation of wza abolished the mucoid phenotype of the mutants but did not reverse the motility defect in the igaA* parent (Fig. 2A, compare QW200 to QW119). However, both swarming and swimming motility now could be observed in the RcsB box mutants (Table 3). The results confirmed that the a9 residue was critical, the g8 residue less critical, and the c15 residue not critical for RscB-mediated repression of motility (only QW231 is shown in Fig. 2A). A control strain with the wza deletion alone (QW184) swarmed as well as the wild type, showing that colanic acid was not required for swarming (also see reference 62). Gene expression was assayed only in the mutant with all three RcsB box residues altered (QW226); repression of motility operons was completely relieved in this strain, while the expression pattern of all other genes remained unchanged (some of the microarray data for this strain were reported previously [67]; the rest of the data are not shown). The motility defect of QW226, despite the relief of flhDC repression, demonstrates that the excess colanic acid still being produced by this strain impairs swimming and inhibits swarming (Fig. 2A, compare QW226 to QW231).
TABLE 3.
Effect of RcsAB box mutations on recovery of motilitya
| Strain | Genotype | Colony diameter (cm)
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Swarm | Swim | ||
| 14028 | Wild type | 8.3 | 7.8 |
| QW184 | pwzawza::kan | 8.2 | 7.8 |
| QW119 | igaA* | — | — |
| QW200 | igaA* pwzawza::kan | — | — |
| QW220 | igaA* pflhD(g8t) | — | 3.4 |
| QW221 | igaA* pflhD(a9c) | — | 4.7 |
| QW222 | igaA* pflhD(g8t, a9c) | — | 4.8 |
| QW226 | igaA* pflhD(g8t, a9c, c15a) | — | 4.6 |
| QW227 | igaA* pflhD(c15a) | — | 3.7 |
| QW228 | igaA* pflhD(g8t) pwzawza::kan | 4.3 | 5.1 |
| QW229 | igaA* pflhD(a9c) pwzawza::kan | 8.3 | 8.3 |
| QW230 | igaA* pflhD(g8t, a9c) pwzawza::kan | 8.3 | 8.3 |
| QW231 | igaA* pflhD(g8t, a9c, c15a) pwzawza::kan | 8.3 | 8.0 |
| QW233 | igaA* pflhD(c15a) pwzawza::kan | — | 3.0 |
Effect of RcsAB box mutations on the recovery of motility in igaA* strains. Mutations within the RcsAB box TAGGAAAAATCTTA found in the promoter region of flhD are indicated in parenthesis after pflhD. Residue numbering is from the +1 transcription start site. Boldface residues represent conserved residues among four such boxes identified in ftsA, osmC, and two flhD variants in E. coli (18). The numbers in the Swarm and Swim columns refer to the diameter of the colonies, while the dash refers to no migration (swim) or movement (swarm) outwards from the point of inoculation.
In an earlier study, we had reported that a Tn10 insertion in rcsD (formerly yojN) in S. enterica serovar Typhimurium inhibited swarming on medium solidified with one commercial source of agar (Bacto) but not another (Eiken) (62). In light of the reported stimulation of swarming motility by insertion mutations in rcsD in both E. coli (60) and P. mirabilis (2), we decided to reexamine our results by creating specific deletions in each of the rcs genes by the method of Datsenko and Wanner (11) and by assaying the motility phenotypes of the resulting mutants (Fig. 2B). The ΔrcsB mutant (QW434) showed better swimming and swarming motility than the wild type, consistent with the negative effect of RcsB on the expression of flhDC. ΔrcsA (QW327) had no effect on swimming, also as expected; however, swarming motility was inhibited ∼25%. A ΔrscAB double mutant (QW329), however, showed the same phenotype as the rscB mutant. ΔrcsC (QW398) and ΔrcsD (QW459) mutants showed a small inhibition of swimming but ∼40 to 60% inhibition of swarming. A ΔrcsCD double mutant (QW436) was similar to the single mutants for swimming, but it was slightly worse at swarming. We attribute the modest inhibition of swimming motility in the rcsC and rcsD mutants to the loss of phosphatase activity of RcsCD and a consequent accumulation of RcsB∼P due to phosphorylation from other phosphor donors (20, 39) (Fig. 1) (see Discussion). The more pronounced effect of these mutants on swarming motility is due to the development dynamics of the swarmer colony, in which motility initiates only after a substantial lag. Both mutants initiated swarming later than the wild type, the delay being longer for rcsD than for rcsC. A small initial delay was observed in the rcsA mutant as well (see Discussion).
In summary, our mutation data show that only conserved residues in the left half of the RcsB box are important for the repression of flhDC in S. enterica and that RcsB-mediated inhibition of motility occurs entirely through the repression of the flhDC promoter. Colanic acid is not required for swarming, and excess colanic acid inhibits swarming motility completely. Deletion of rcsB has a positive effect on motility, but deletion of rcsC or rcsD had a slightly negative effect on swimming motility and a more pronounced negative effect on swarming motility.
(ii) Positive regulation of flagellar genes fliPQR.
The fliL flagellar operon encodes seven genes, fliL through fliR (Fig. 3A) (36). rcsA is located 281 bp after fliR (45). An RcsAB box, homologous to the one identified in E. coli, occurs 18 bp downstream from the stop codon of fliR. The RcsA and RcsB proteins have been shown to bind to this box and to positively regulate rcsA expression in E. coli (70).
FIG. 3.
Positive regulation of fliPQR by RcsB. (A) Schematic showing the fliL operon and rcsA. The lengths of the region corresponding to the individual genes within the operon are drawn approximately to scale with respect to each other. Arrows indicate the transcription start sites. The square box in the intergenic region between fliR and rcsA is the RcsAB box (not drawn to scale). (B) Microarray data showing positive or negative regulation of the indicated genes during mid-exponential and stationary phases of growth. QW119 is the igaA* (RcsB++) mutant, and QW441 its isogenic ΔrcsA derivative. The data are extracted from Table S4 in the supplemental material. (C) RT-PCR results for RNA isolated from strains indicated on the left. QW556 is deleted for residues 1 to 48 in the intergenic region between fliR and rcsA, starting at the first base pair after the stop codon of fliR. Primers pairs were designed to anneal within the coding region of the genes indicated at the top. RNA for the wild-type (WT) strain was isolated at mid-log phase, at which point flagellar gene expression is maximal, while that for the igaA* strains was isolated at stationary phase, at which point the activity of the Rcs system is maximal.
The maximum induction of fliPQR genes was seen at stationary phase in the RcsB++ igaA* strain QW119 (Fig. 3B) (note that fliP is not included in Table S1 in the supplemental material, because that table lists only genes upregulated in both exponential and stationary phases of growth). The stimulation of fliQ and fliR was strong (14- and 54-fold, respectively), and the stimulation of fliP was moderate in comparison (threefold). This stimulation was increased in the absence of rcsA, an effect also seen on expression of rcsA itself, as noted earlier (Fig. 3B; also see Table S4 in the supplemental material). Curiously, there appeared to be a reverse gradient of expression of these genes, in that the last gene in the operon was expressed at higher levels than the previous gene; thus, the order of expression levels was fliR > fliQ > fliP (Fig. 3B).
RT-PCR was used to confirm all three findings from microarray experiments; i.e., the elevated expression of only fliPQR in the RcsB++ mutant, the RcsB dependence of the response, and the increased stimulation of expression in the absence of RcsA. These results are presented in Fig. 3C, in which fliM is used as a representative early gene in the operon and fliO is used as the nearest neighbor of the positively regulated gene fliP. In the wild-type strain 14028, the gradient of gene expression follows proximal genes ≫ distal genes in the fliL operon; the fliR message is barely detected. In the RcsB++ strain QW119, however, the fliM transcript is barely detected, while expression of fliQR is elevated, along with some elevation of fliP. The increased expression of rcsA in the RcsB++ background (QW119) is consistent with the positive regulation of this gene by RcsB (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). In the absence of RcsB (QW442), transcription of fliM is restored due to the release of flhDC repression, and the positive regulation of both fliR and rcsA is abolished. In the absence of RcsA, however, the expression of fliPQR is enhanced further (Fig. 3B), and the reverse transcription gradient extends into fliO (Fig. 3C). Deletion of 48 bp containing the RcsAB box in the fliR-rcsA intergenic region decreases both the fliPQR and rcsA transcripts. Since RcsB binding to the RcsAB box is required for stimulation of rcsA transcription (70), the positive regulation of fliPQR likely also is promoted by RcsB binding here.
Given that the transcription of the fliL operon is repressed in the igaA* background, it follows that fliPQR must be transcribed from an internal RcsB-dependent cryptic promoter in this operon or that a basal level of the transcript is being stabilized in the igaA* background. The detailed nature of this positive regulation, which apparently does not affect motility as determined by similar levels of swimming and swarming observed for the wild type and igaA* mutant QW231 (wherein flhDC repression is relieved and excess colanic acid synthesis is abrogated [Fig. 2A, compare 14028 to QW231]), will be explored in future studies.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we have exploited a spontaneously arising point mutant, IgaA(T191P) (or igaA*), which is nearly maximally induced for the Rcs signaling system, to glean information about motility, virulence, and other genes regulated by this system in S. enterica. Microarray experiments revealed that the Rcs system regulates nearly one-fifth of the S. enterica genome under these conditions. Flagellar genes were the largest group of functionally related genes that were strongly negatively regulated, the other large group being the SPI-1 and SPI-2 virulence genes. Within the flagellar regulon, three flagellar genes, fliPQR, were selectively upregulated. A large set of SPI-2 and other virulence genes primarily involved in the growth of Salmonella in macrophages were activated or repressed, depending on the level of RcsB. We have followed up further only on the microarray results pertaining to motility.
The Rcs system and regulation of motility. (i) Repression of the flagellar regulon.
A sequence identical to that of the RcsAB-binding box consensus derived from E. coli studies is present in S. enterica at an equivalent position within the flhDC promoter. We have called this the RcsB box in S. enterica, because microarray data did not show a requirement for RcsA in the repression of the flagellar genes by RcsB. These results are consistent with those of earlier studies on S. enterica that showed no effect of an rcsA mutation on the expression of flhDC::lac in an igaA1 mutant background (4). They also are consistent with results of studies on E. coli that showed no effect of rcsA on motility when present as a single copy (20). We note that the RcsB box is part of a large region bound by the osmoregulator OmpR in E. coli; OmpR represses flhDC under conditions of high osmolarity (59). However, deletion of ompR does not affect motility under our experimental conditions (our unpublished data; also see reference 62).
Our mutational analysis showed that the conserved GA residues (+8 and +9) in the left half of the RcsB box were important for repression, while the C residue (+11) was not, as determined by assays for the restoration of motility (Table 3 and Fig. 2A). Microarray analysis of the triple-conserved-residue RcsB box mutant determined that transcription of the flagellar regulon was restored to wild-type levels (data not shown), showing that the repression of motility by RcsB is solely through flhDC.
(ii) Positive regulation of fliPQR.
Microarray experiments showed that three class 2 flagellar genes, fliPQR, were positively regulated by RcsB (Fig. 3). These results were confirmed by RT-PCR experiments. A curious aspect of this regulation is what we have termed a reverse gradient of expression; i.e., expression levels in the order fliR > fliQ > fliP. Whether this regulation involves the initiation of transcription from an internal cryptic promoter and/or stabilization of a basal-level transcript remains to be determined. The fliR-rcsA intergenic region containing an RcsAB box appears to be important for the regulation (Fig. 3).
We had reported earlier that fliQR showed a different expression pattern from that of class 2 flagellar genes, in that unlike class 2 genes they continued to be expressed in stationary phase (65). Their expression during log phase also was not significantly affected in flhDC and fliA mutant backgrounds (our unpublished data). It appears, therefore, that these two genes can be regulated independently of flagellar operon control. The exact role of the fliPQR genes in flagellar export is not known, but along with fliO they are essential for flagellar biogenesis, and their gene products are found in the basal body (37). The existence of a natural FliR/FlhB fusion in Clostridium (51) suggests an association of FliR with the membrane protein FlhB, which plays a role in determining export substrate specificity (37). The positive regulation of these flagellar export-related genes by RcsB, for which other positively regulated functions are involved in responding to membrane stress, including capsule and other polysaccharide synthesis, suggests that perhaps FliPQR have a dual role in the cell. Thus, these proteins may participate in the export of flagellar components when conditions favor motility but export other molecules when conditions call for a sessile existence.
(iii) rcs genes and swarming.
Deletion of rcsB had a positive effect on motility, consistent with a role of the Rcs system in the repression of motility (Fig. 2B). However, deletion of rcsC or rcsD had a slightly negative effect on swimming motility and a more pronounced negative effect on swarming motility. The motility phenotype of the rcsC mutant could be related to the dual function of RcsC as both a phosphatase and a kinase (39). The loss of phosphatase activity could result in the accumulation of RcsB∼P due to cross-talk from other sources. Indeed, acetyl phosphate-mediated activation of RscB has been reported to delay transcription of the flagellar operon in an rcsC mutant in E. coli (20). A similar mechanism may be invoked to explain the phenotype of the rcsD mutant, since RcsD links RcsC and RcsB in the signaling pathway (Fig. 1). The more severe effect on swarming motility of both the rcsC and rcsD mutations is due to a longer lag in the initiation of swarming in these mutants. The rcsA mutation, which does not affect swimming, affects swarming at the initiation stage as well. We speculate that this may be due to an antagonistic effect of RcsA on the repression of flhDC, i.e., more inhibition in the absence of RcsA; we observed such an effect in one of three microarray experimental repeats. Swarming apparently is more sensitive to changes in the transcription profile of flagellar genes, likely because of other factors that influence the initiation of motility on the surface (28).
(iv) Colanic acid and swarming.
Moist surface conditions are of paramount importance during swarming (28). Swarming bacteria often secrete special wetting agents and surfactants that aid in trapping sufficient moisture and decreasing surface tension to facilitate the spreading of the swarming colony. For example, P. mirabilis produces an acidic capsular polysaccharide (19, 54), Serratia marcescens and Serratia liquefaciens produce the surfactant serrawettin (35, 43, 44), Pseudomonas aeruginosa makes rhamnolipids (13), and Bacillus subtilis makes the surfactant surfactin (33, 46), all of which aid the advancement of the surface colony. In E. coli and S. enterica, the lipopolysaccharide is proposed to play this role (62). We therefore were curious to learn whether excess colanic acid would promote swarming. We have found that not only does excess colanic acid not promote swarming, but in fact it inhibits swarming while moderately inhibiting swimming motility. Consistent with our earlier findings that genes for colanic acid synthesis are not induced during swarming or growth on an agar surface (65), deletion of wza does not affect swarming (Fig. 2A). Thus, colanic acid is not required for swarming, is not induced during swarming, and does not promote swarming if overproduced. Inhibition of motility by excess colanic acid is consistent with the transcriptional shutdown of motility functions by the organism in an apparent preparation for a sessile existence. Our results are inconsistent with the finding that cps genes are induced upon growth on an agar surface in E. coli (17). It is possible that E. coli and Salmonella respond differently to the induction of these genes on surfaces.
The Rcs system and regulation of virulence genes.
S. enterica encodes two virulence systems that operate at different steps of the infection cycle (31). The SPI-1 system is involved in the intestinal phase of infection and is essential for the invasion of nonphagocytic cells (22). The SPI-2 system is required for intracellular survival and proliferation and is essential for systemic infection (29, 58, 69). Consequently, the expression of these systems is differentially regulated: the expression of SPI-1 is stimulated by environmental cues (e.g., high osmolarity and low oxygen tension) present in the intestinal tract, while the expression of SPI-2 is stimulated by conditions present within host cells (e.g., low Mg2+ concentrations and acidic pH) (23). The results reported in this study suggest that the Rcs signaling system is an important player in fine-tuning the bacterial response to different environmental challenges. We discuss below only our new results with respect to SPI-2.
Dual regulation of SPI-2 genes.
A majority of the genes showing dual regulation by RcsB in our studies, i.e., genes positively regulated at normal levels and negatively regulated at highly activated levels of RcsB, either belong to the SPI-2 group or are virulence determinants known to be involved in survival in macrophages, which are endowed with robust and varied antimicrobial defenses (55) (Table 2). The SPI-2-encoded TTS system and the two-component PhoPQ system are absolutely required to withstand these defenses (26, 34, 69). The SPI-2 effectors remodel the Salmonella-containing vacuole (SCV) by a variety of functions, which include an inhibition of various aspects of endocytic trafficking, an avoidance of NADPH oxidase-dependent killing, the induction of a delayed apoptosis-like host cell death, the control of SCV membrane dynamics, the assembly of a meshwork of F-actin around the SCV, an accumulation of cholesterol around the SCV, and interference with the localization of inducible nitric oxide synthase to the SCV (69). ugtL, virK, mig-14, and pgtE are PhoPQ-regulated genes that play a role in resistance to polymyxin B and/or cationic antimicrobial peptides (50). pagC, pagD, pipB, sopD, and pagK also are controlled by the PhoPQ signaling system (73). Positive regulation of all of these virulence genes by the Rcs system is consistent with the report that an rcsC mutant of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium was attenuated for systemic infection (12).
PhoPQ controls a large number of genes in Salmonella (47, 72, 73); why only a subset of these is affected by the Rcs system is not clear. We note that a connection between the Rcs and the PhoPQ systems has been seen in several studies (24, 27, 61). Both OmpR/EnvZ and PhoPQ have been implicated in the expression of SPI-2 genes and associated effectors by controlling the SsrAB system, which regulates transcription of the SPI-2 genes (3, 16). It appears from our studies that the Rcs system is the third signaling system that also regulates SsrAB (Table 2). Multiple regulation of the SPI-2 pathway may be designed to respond to different stimuli at different stages of infection (1). The Salmonella ugd gene, for example, which is required for the incorporation of 4-aminoarabinose in the lipopolysaccharide and resistance to the antibiotic polymyxin B, also is controlled by three two-component systems: PhoPQ, PmrAD, and RcsCDB systems (49, 61). The dual regulation of SPI-2 we have observed in an isolated system is only an indicator of the more complex regulation inside the bacterial host, where the Rcs system must activate SPI-2 gene expression in macrophages while repressing motility and SPI-1 virulence. The significance of the degree of RcsB activation for SPI-2 expression may be related to the different host signals encountered by the bacteria en route to their site of proliferation or within their specific niches. The IgaA protein must play an important role during these transitions.
How is the dual regulation of the virulence genes by RcsB achieved? Identification of promoters that are directly regulated by RcsB will allow a dissection of the molecular mechanism of this regulation. The 14-bp RcsAB box consensus (70) generally occurs in the promoter region but can be found as far upstream as 50 to 300 bp from the transcription start site (27). The consensus sequence therefore does not have enough sequence or position specificity to reliably predict which genes may be directly regulated. The identification of genes directly regulated by these regulators must await a more direct analysis, such as chromatin immunoprecipitation-on-chip.
Function of the Rcs regulon.
The specific signals that activate the Rcs system are not known, although the general physiological conditions that trigger the system are accepted to be osmotic or other membrane stresses acting through RcsF and IgaA upstream of RcsC (6, 39, 40) (Fig. 1). rcs genes are not present in endosymbionts, which have only an intracellular existence. Consideration of the pathways that are the most strongly regulated suggests that the Rcs system initially evolved to protect the organism from osmotic changes in the environment as well as to support a sessile existence within biofilms. Colanic acid is reported to be required for maintaining a proper biofilm architecture (10, 53). Motility and pathogenicity (including SPI-1/SPI-2) are not required in such an environment, and the Rcs system is expected to be most activated in such a sessile state. A transition from a sessile to a motile state requires the system to be deactivated. Inside the host, motility and SPI-1 virulence are important for the intestinal phase of infection but then must be selectively turned off in the macrophages while still allowing SPI-2 gene expression. IgaA must be an important player in these transitions, which clearly are influenced by other signaling pathways as well.
S. enterica contains more than 30 two-component systems (64). Of these, the PhoPQ system has been reported to control as much as 2 to 3% of genes in E. coli and S. enterica (47, 72). This system often mediates its effects indirectly via activation of other regulatory systems, such as the PmrAB two-component system (1, 56). While we do not yet have information on which genes are directly regulated by RcsB, our analysis suggests that the RcsCDB signaling system interacts with the PhoPQ and SsrAB systems, shares signals and regulatory pathways with the EnvZ/OmpR system, and likely controls the largest genetic program identified to date.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Kelly Hughes for strains and advice with mapping, Steffen Porwollik for arrays and assistance with data processing, and Susana Mariconda for technical assistance.
This work was supported by NIH grant GM57400. M.M. was supported in part by grants AI034829, AI057733, and AI52237-06.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print on 28 September 2007.
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/.
REFERENCES
- 1.Beier, D., and R. Gross. 2006. Regulation of bacterial virulence by two-component systems. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 9:143-152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Belas, R., R. Schneider, and M. Melch. 1998. Characterization of Proteus mirabilis precocious swarming mutants: identification of rsbA, encoding a regulator of swarming behavior. J. Bacteriol. 180:6126-6139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bijlsma, J. J., and E. A. Groisman. 2005. The PhoP/PhoQ system controls the intramacrophage type three secretion system of Salmonella enterica. Mol. Microbiol. 57:85-96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cano, D. A., G. Dominguez-Bernal, A. Tierrez, F. Garcia-Del Portillo, and J. Casadesus. 2002. Regulation of capsule synthesis and cell motility in Salmonella enterica by the essential gene igaA. Genetics 162:1513-1523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cano, D. A., M. Martinez-Moya, M. G. Pucciarelli, E. A. Groisman, J. Casadesus, and F. Garcia-Del Portillo. 2001. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium response involved in attenuation of pathogen intracellular proliferation. Infect. Immun. 69:6463-6474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Castanié-Cornet, M. P., K. Cam, and A. Jacq. 2006. RcsF is an outer membrane lipoprotein involved in the RcsCDB phosphorelay signaling pathway in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 188:4264-4270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chevance, F. F., J. E. Karlinsey, C. E. Wozniak, and K. T. Hughes. 2006. A little gene with big effects: a serT mutant is defective in flgM gene translation. J. Bacteriol. 188:297-304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chilcott, G. S., and K. T. Hughes. 2000. Coupling of flagellar gene expression to flagellar assembly in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 64:694-708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Costa, C. S., M. J. Pettinari, B. S. Mendez, and D. N. Anton. 2003. Null mutations in the essential gene yrfF (mucM) are not lethal in rcsB, yojN or rcsC strains of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 222:25-32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Danese, P. N., L. A. Pratt, and R. Kolter. 2000. Exopolysaccharide production is required for development of Escherichia coli K-12 biofilm architecture. J. Bacteriol. 182:3593-3596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Datsenko, K. A., and B. L. Wanner. 2000. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:6640-6645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Detweiler, C. S., D. M. Monack, I. E. Brodsky, H. Mathew, and S. Falkow. 2003. virK, somA and rcsC are important for systemic Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection and cationic peptide resistance. Mol. Microbiol. 48:385-400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Déziel, E., F. Lepine, S. Milot, and R. Villemur. 2003. rhlA is required for the production of a novel biosurfactant promoting swarming motility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: 3-(3-hydroxyalkanoyloxy)alkanoic acids (HAAs), the precursors of rhamnolipids. Microbiology 149:2005-2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Domínguez-Bernal, G., M. G. Pucciarelli, F. Ramos-Morales, M. Garcia-Quintanilla, D. A. Cano, J. Casadesus, and F. Garcia-del Portillo. 2004. Repression of the RcsC-YojN-RcsB phosphorelay by the IgaA protein is a requisite for Salmonella virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 53:1437-1449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dufour, A., R. B. Furness, and C. Hughes. 1998. Novel genes that upregulate the Proteus mirabilis flhDC master operon controlling flagellar biogenesis and swarming. Mol. Microbiol. 29:741-751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Feng, X., R. Oropeza, and L. J. Kenney. 2003. Dual regulation by phospho-OmpR of ssrA/B gene expression in Salmonella pathogenicity island 2. Mol. Microbiol. 48:1131-1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ferrières, L., and D. J. Clarke. 2003. The RcsC sensor kinase is required for normal biofilm formation in Escherichia coli K-12 and controls the expression of a regulon in response to growth on a solid surface. Mol. Microbiol. 50:1665-1682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Francez-Charlot, A., B. Laugel, A. Van Gemert, N. Dubarry, F. Wiorowski, M. P. Castanie-Cornet, C. Gutierrez, and K. Cam. 2003. RcsCDB His-Asp phosphorelay system negatively regulates the flhDC operon in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 49:823-832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fraser, G. M., and C. Hughes. 1999. Swarming motility. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2:630-635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fredericks, C. E., S. Shibata, S. Aizawa, S. A. Reimann, and A. J. Wolfe. 2006. Acetyl phosphate-sensitive regulation of flagellar biogenesis and capsular biosynthesis depends on the Rcs phosphorelay. Mol. Microbiol. 61:734-747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Frye, J., J. E. Karlinsey, H. R. Felise, B. Marzolf, N. Dowidar, M. McClelland, and K. T. Hughes. 2006. Identification of new flagellar genes of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 188:2233-2243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Galán, J. E. 1999. Interaction of Salmonella with host cells through the centisome 63 type III secretion system. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2:46-50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Galán, J. E. 2001. Salmonella interactions with host cells: type III secretion at work. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 17:53-86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.García-Calderón, C. B., J. Casadesus, and F. Ramos-Morales. 2007. Rcs and PhoPQ regulatory overlap in the control of Salmonella enterica virulence. J. Bacteriol. 189:6635-6644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Garcia-Calderon, C. B., M. Garcia-Quintanilla, J. Casadesus, and F. Ramos-Morales. 2005. Virulence attenuation in Salmonella enterica rcsC mutants with constitutive activation of the Rcs system. Microbiology 151:579-588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Groisman, E. A. 2001. The pleiotropic two-component regulatory system PhoP-PhoQ. J. Bacteriol. 183:1835-1842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hagiwara, D., M. Sugiura, T. Oshima, H. Mori, H. Aiba, T. Yamashino, and T. Mizuno. 2003. Genome-wide analyses revealing a signaling network of the RcsC-YojN-RcsB phosphorelay system in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 185:5735-5746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Harshey, R. M. 2003. Bacterial motility on a surface: many ways to a common goal. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 57:249-273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hensel, M. 2000. Salmonella pathogenicity island 2. Mol. Microbiol. 36:1015-1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Huang, Y. H., L. Ferrieres, and D. J. Clarke. 2006. The role of the Rcs phosphorelay in Enterobacteriaceae. Res. Microbiol. 157:206-212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hueffer, K., and J. E. Galan. 2004. Salmonella-induced macrophage death: multiple mechanisms, different outcomes. Cell Microbiol. 6:1019-1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Humphries, A. D., S. M. Townsend, R. A. Kingsley, T. L. Nicholson, R. M. Tsolis, and A. J. Baumler. 2001. Role of fimbriae as antigens and intestinal colonization factors of Salmonella serovars. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 201:121-125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kearns, D. B., and R. Losick. 2003. Swarming motility in undomesticated Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 49:581-590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kuhle, V., and M. Hensel. 2004. Cellular microbiology of intracellular Salmonella enterica: functions of the type III secretion system encoded by Salmonella pathogenicity island 2. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 61:2812-2826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lindum, P. W., U. Anthoni, C. Christophersen, L. Eberl, S. Molin, and M. Givskov. 1998. N-Acyl-l-homoserine lactone autoinducers control production of an extracellular lipopeptide biosurfactant required for swarming motility of Serratia liquefaciens MG1. J. Bacteriol. 180:6384-6388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Macnab, R. M. 1996. Flagella and motility, p. 123-145. In F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 1. ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Macnab, R. M. 2003. How bacteria assemble flagella. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 57:77-100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Macnab, R. M. 2004. Type III flagellar protein export and flagellar assembly. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1694:207-217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Majdalani, N., and S. Gottesman. 2005. The Rcs phosphorelay: a complex signal transduction system. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 59:379-405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Majdalani, N., M. Heck, V. Stout, and S. Gottesman. 2005. Role of RcsF in signaling to the Rcs phosphorelay pathway in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 187:6770-6778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Maloy, S. R., and W. D. Nunn. 1981. Selection for loss of tetracycline resistance by Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 145:1110-1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mariconda, S., Q. Wang, and R. M. Harshey. 2006. A mechanical role for the chemotaxis system in swarming motility. Mol. Microbiol. 60:1590-1602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Matsuyama, T., A. Bhasin, and R. M. Harshey. 1995. Mutational analysis of flagellum-independent surface spreading of Serratia marcescens 274 on a low-agar medium. J. Bacteriol. 177:987-991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Matsuyama, T., K. Kaneda, Y. Nakagawa, K. Isa, H. Hara-Hotta, and I. Yano. 1992. A novel extracellular cyclic lipopeptide which promotes flagellum-dependent and -independent spreading growth of Serratia marcescens. J. Bacteriol. 174:1769-1776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.McClelland, M., K. E. Sanderson, J. Spieth, S. W. Clifton, P. Latreille, L. Courtney, S. Porwollik, J. Ali, M. Dante, F. Du, S. Hou, D. Layman, S. Leonard, C. Nguyen, K. Scott, A. Holmes, N. Grewal, E. Mulvaney, E. Ryan, H. Sun, L. Florea, W. Miller, T. Stoneking, M. Nhan, R. Waterston, and R. K. Wilson. 2001. Complete genome sequence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2. Nature 413:852-856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mireles, J. R., Jr., A. Toguchi, and R. M. Harshey. 2001. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium swarming mutants with altered biofilm-forming abilities: surfactin inhibits biofilm formation. J. Bacteriol. 183:5848-5854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Monsieurs, P., S. De Keersmaecker, W. W. Navarre, M. W. Bader, F. De Smet, M. McClelland, F. C. Fang, B. De Moor, J. Vanderleyden, and K. Marchal. 2005. Comparison of the PhoPQ regulon in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. J. Mol. Evol. 60:462-474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mouslim, C., M. Delgado, and E. A. Groisman. 2004. Activation of the RcsC/YojN/RcsB phosphorelay system attenuates Salmonella virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 54:386-395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mouslim, C., and E. A. Groisman. 2003. Control of the Salmonella ugd gene by three two-component regulatory systems. Mol. Microbiol. 47:335-344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Navarre, W. W., T. A. Halsey, D. Walthers, J. Frye, M. McClelland, J. L. Potter, L. J. Kenney, J. S. Gunn, F. C. Fang, and S. J. Libby. 2005. Co-regulation of Salmonella enterica genes required for virulence and resistance to antimicrobial peptides by SlyA and PhoP/PhoQ. Mol. Microbiol. 56:492-508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Nölling, J., G. Breton, M. V. Omelchenko, K. S. Makarova, Q. Zeng, R. Gibson, H. M. Lee, J. Dubois, D. Qiu, J. Hitti, Y. I. Wolf, R. L. Tatusov, F. Sabathe, L. Doucette-Stamm, P. Soucaille, M. J. Daly, G. N. Bennett, E. V. Koonin, and D. R. Smith. 2001. Genome sequence and comparative analysis of the solvent-producing bacterium Clostridium acetobutylicum. J. Bacteriol. 183:4823-4838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ophir, T., and D. L. Gutnick. 1994. A role for exopolysaccharides in the protection of microorganisms from desiccation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60:740-745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Prigent-Combaret, C., O. Vidal, C. Dorel, and P. Lejeune. 1999. Abiotic surface sensing and biofilm-dependent regulation of gene expression in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 181:5993-6002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rahman, M. M., J. Guard-Petter, K. Asokan, C. Hughes, and R. W. Carlson. 1999. The structure of the colony migration factor from pathogenic Proteus mirabilis. A capsular polysaccharide that facilitates swarming. J. Biol. Chem. 274:22993-22998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Rosenberger, C. M., and B. B. Finlay. 2003. Phagocyte sabotage: disruption of macrophage signalling by bacterial pathogens. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4:385-396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Rychlik, I., and P. A. Barrow. 2005. Salmonella stress management and its relevance to behaviour during intestinal colonisation and infection. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 29:1021-1040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Schwan, W. R., S. Shibata, S. I. Aizawa, and A. J. Wolfe. 2007. The two-component response regulator rcsb regulates type 1 piliation in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol 189:7159-7163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Shea, J. E., C. R. Beuzon, C. Gleeson, R. Mundy, and D. W. Holden. 1999. Influence of the Salmonella typhimurium pathogenicity island 2 type III secretion system on bacterial growth in the mouse. Infect. Immun. 67:213-219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Shin, S., and C. Park. 1995. Modulation of flagellar expression in Escherichia coli by acetyl phosphate and the osmoregulator OmpR. J. Bacteriol. 177:4696-4702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Takeda, S., Y. Fujisawa, M. Matsubara, H. Aiba, and T. Mizuno. 2001. A novel feature of the multistep phosphorelay in Escherichia coli: a revised model of the RcsC →YojN →RcsB signalling pathway implicated in capsular synthesis and swarming behaviour. Mol. Microbiol. 40:440-450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tierrez, A., and F. Garcia-del Portillo. 2004. The Salmonella membrane protein IgaA modulates the activity of the RcsC-YojN-RcsB and PhoP-PhoQ regulons. J. Bacteriol. 186:7481-7489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Toguchi, A., M. Siano, M. Burkart, and R. M. Harshey. 2000. Genetics of swarming motility in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium: critical role for lipopolysaccharide. J. Bacteriol. 182:6308-6321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Tusher, V. G., R. Tibshirani, and G. Chu. 2001. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:5116-5121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ulrich, L. E., and I. B. Zhulin. 2006. MiST: a microbial signal transduction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:D386-D390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wang, Q., J. G. Frye, M. McClelland, and R. M. Harshey. 2004. Gene expression patterns during swarming in Salmonella typhimurium: genes specific to surface growth and putative new motility and pathogenicity genes. Mol. Microbiol. 52:169-187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Wang, Q., H. Liu, and P. J. Szaniszlo. 2002. Compensatory expression of five chitin synthase genes, a response to stress stimuli, in Wangiella (Exophiala) dermatitidis, a melanized fungal pathogen of humans. Microbiology 148:2811-2817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Wang, Q., S. Mariconda, A. Suzuki, M. McClelland, and R. M. Harshey. 2006. Uncovering a large set of genes that affect surface motility in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 188:7981-7984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Wang, Q., A. Suzuki, S. Mariconda, S. Porwollik, and R. M. Harshey. 2005. Sensing wetness: a new role for the bacterial flagellum. EMBO J. 24:2034-2042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Waterman, S. R., and D. W. Holden. 2003. Functions and effectors of the Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 type III secretion system. Cell Microbiol. 5:501-511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wehland, M., and F. Bernhard. 2000. The RcsAB box. Characterization of a new operator essential for the regulation of exopolysaccharide biosynthesis in enteric bacteria. J. Biol. Chem. 275:7013-7020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Yanagihara, S., S. Iyoda, K. Ohnishi, T. Iino, and K. Kutsukake. 1999. Structure and transcriptional control of the flagellar master operon of Salmonella typhimurium. Genes Genet. Syst. 74:105-111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zwir, I., H. Huang, and E. A. Groisman. 2005. Analysis of differentially-regulated genes within a regulatory network by GPS genome navigation. Bioinformatics 21:4073-4083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Zwir, I., D. Shin, A. Kato, K. Nishino, T. Latifi, F. Solomon, J. M. Hare, H. Huang, and E. A. Groisman. 2005. Dissecting the PhoP regulatory network of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:2862-2867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



