Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1983 Jul 1;158(1):25–39. doi: 10.1084/jem.158.1.25

Major histocompatibility complex-controlled, antigen-presenting cell- expressed specificity of T cell antigen recognition. Identification of a site of interaction and its relationship to Ir genes

PMCID: PMC2187065  PMID: 6190979

Abstract

In previous work (5,6), we have reported studies on a T lymphocyte hybridoma clone and the peritoneal exudate T cells (PETLES) from B10.A(5R) mice primed with the cytochrome c carboxyl terminal peptide (residues 81-103) of the tobacco horn worm moth (Manducca sextus). As expected, since B10.A(5R) is a low responder to pigeon fragment 81-104, it was found that the B10.A(5R) lymphocytes were unable to respond to the pigeon cytochrome c 81-104 fragment presented on syngeneic B10.A(5R) antigen-presenting cells (APC). However, these same T lymphocytes did respond to the pigeon fragment when presented on B10.A APC. Thus, some structural difference between the pigeon and moth peptides had prevented B10.A(5R) APC from effectively presenting the pigeon fragment to moth-primed B10.A(5R) lymphocytes. This structural difference was found to be the deletion of an alanine at position -103 (Ala103) from the pigeon sequence in the moth peptide. Two additional T cell specificities were created by changing residue-99. These T cell populations from the B10.A(5R) showed an identical dependence on the Ala103 deletion when B10.A and B10.A(5R) APC were compared. The relationship of APC-expressed antigen specificity and MHC-linked immune responsiveness differences was also examined. The B10.A(5R) was found to be a high responder to each of three peptides that lack Ala103 but not to the Ala103-containing analogues. B10.A mice, in contrast, respond to both types of peptides. Utilizing allogeneic antigen- presentation to B10.A PETLES by pulsed APC, it was shown that the poor response of the B10.A(5R) to the Ala103-containing peptides was, in two of three cases, not associated with any differences in T cell repertoires but due to two different APC capabilities of B10.A and B10.A(5R). The exception apparently represents a case of T cell repertoire polymorphism between B10.A and B10.A(5R) that can also affect immune responsiveness.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (896.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Clark R. B., Shevach E. M. Generation of T cell colonies from responder strain 2 guinea pigs that recognize the copolymer L-glutamic acid, L-lysine in association with nonresponder strain 13 Ia antigens. J Exp Med. 1982 Feb 1;155(2):635–640. doi: 10.1084/jem.155.2.635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Defranco A. L., Raveche E. S., Asofsky R., Paul W. E. Frequency of B lymphocytes responsive to anti-immunoglobulin. J Exp Med. 1982 May 1;155(5):1523–1536. doi: 10.1084/jem.155.5.1523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hansburg D., Hannum C., Inman J. K., Appella E., Margoliash E., Schwartz R. H. Parallel cross-reactivity patterns of 2 sets of antigenically distinct cytochrome c peptides: possible evidence for a presentational model of Ir gene function. J Immunol. 1981 Nov;127(5):1844–1851. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Harwell L., Skidmore B., Marrack P., Kappler J. Concanavalin A-inducible, interleukin-2-producing T cell hybridoma. J Exp Med. 1980 Oct 1;152(4):893–904. doi: 10.1084/jem.152.4.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Heber-Katz E., Schwartz R. H., Matis L. A., Hannum C., Fairwell T., Appella E., Hansburg D. Contribution of antigen-presenting cell major histocompatibility complex gene products to the specificity of antigen-induced T cell activation. J Exp Med. 1982 Apr 1;155(4):1086–1099. doi: 10.1084/jem.155.4.1086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hünig T. R., Bevan M. J. Antigen recognition by cloned cytotoxic T lymphocytes follows rules predicted by the altered-self hypothesis. J Exp Med. 1982 Jan 1;155(1):111–125. doi: 10.1084/jem.155.1.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ishii N., Baxevanis C. N., Nagy Z. A., Klein J. Responder T cells depleted of alloreactive cells react to antigen presented on allogeneic macrophages from nonresponder strains. J Exp Med. 1981 Sep 1;154(3):978–982. doi: 10.1084/jem.154.3.978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ishii N., Nagy Z. A., Klein J. Absence of Ir gene control of T cells recognizing foreign antigen in the context of allogenic MHC molecules. Nature. 1982 Feb 11;295(5849):531–533. doi: 10.1038/295531a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kapp J. A., Pierce C. W., Benacerraf B. Genetic control of immune responses in vitro. II. Cellular requirements for the development of primary plaque-forming cell responses to the random terpolymer 1-glutamic acid 60-1-alanine30-1-tyrosine10 (GAT) by mouse spleen cells in vitro. J Exp Med. 1973 Nov 1;138(5):1121–1132. doi: 10.1084/jem.138.5.1121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kappler J. W., Skidmore B., White J., Marrack P. Antigen-inducible, H-2-restricted, interleukin-2-producing T cell hybridomas. Lack of independent antigen and H-2 recognition. J Exp Med. 1981 May 1;153(5):1198–1214. doi: 10.1084/jem.153.5.1198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McDevitt H. O., Benacerraf B. Genetic control of specific immune responses. Adv Immunol. 1969;11:31–74. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60477-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pierce C. W., Kapp J. A., Benacerraf B. Regulation by the H-2 gene complex of macrophage-lymphoid cell interactions in secondary antibody responses in vitro. J Exp Med. 1976 Aug 1;144(2):371–381. doi: 10.1084/jem.144.2.371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rosenthal A. S. Determinant selection and macrophage function in genetic control of the immune response. Immunol Rev. 1978;40:136–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1978.tb00404.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schwartz R. H., Paul W. E. T-lymphocyte-enriched murine peritoneal exudate cells. II. Genetic control of antigen-induced T-lymphocyte proliferation. J Exp Med. 1976 Mar 1;143(3):529–540. doi: 10.1084/jem.143.3.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Solinger A. M., Ultee M. E., Margoliash E., Schwartz R. H. T-lymphocyte response to cytochrome c. I. Demonstration of a T-cell heteroclitic proliferative response and identification of a topographic antigenic determinant on pigeon cytochrome c whose immune recognition requires two complementing major histocompatibility complex-linked immune response genes. J Exp Med. 1979 Oct 1;150(4):830–848. doi: 10.1084/jem.150.4.830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zinkernagel R. M., Doherty P. C. Major transplantation antigens, viruses, and specificity of surveillance T cells. Contemp Top Immunobiol. 1977;7:179–220. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-3054-7_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES