Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1970 Dec 1;56(6):751–767. doi: 10.1085/jgp.56.6.751

Stochastic Properties of Discrete Waves of the Limulus Photoreceptor

Richard Srebro 1, Stephen Yeandle 1
PMCID: PMC2225976  PMID: 5483105

Abstract

In the dark-adapted photoreceptor of the horseshoe crab, Limulus, transient discrete depolarizations of the cell membrane, discrete waves, occur in total darkness and their rate of occurrence is increased by illumination. The individual latencies of the discrete waves evoked by a light stimulus often cannot be resolved because the discrete waves overlap in time. The latency of the first discrete wave that follows a stimulus can be determined with reasonable accuracy. We propose a model which allows us to make an estimate of the distribution of the latencies of the individual light-evoked discrete waves, and to predict the latency distribution of the first discrete wave that follows a stimulus of arbitrary intensity-time course from the latency distribution of the first discrete wave that follows a brief flash of light. For low intensity stimuli, the predictions agree well with the observations. We define a response as the occurrence of one or more discrete waves following a stimulus. The distribution of the peak amplitudes of responses suggests that the peak amplitude of individual discrete waves sometimes has a bimodal distribution. The latencies of the two types of discrete waves, however, follow similar distributions. The area under the voltage-time curve of responses that follow equal energy long (1.25 sec) and short (10 msec) light stimuli follows similar distributions, and this suggests that discrete waves summate linearly.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (945.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADOLPH A. R. SPONTANEOUS SLOW POTENTIAL FLUCTUATIONS IN THE LIMULUS PHOTORECEPTOR. J Gen Physiol. 1964 Nov;48:297–322. doi: 10.1085/jgp.48.2.297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Borsellino A., Fuortes M. G. Responses to single photons in virual cells of limulus. J Physiol. 1968 Jun;196(3):507–539. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FUORTES M. G., YEANDLE S. PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE OF DISCRETE POTENTIAL WAVES IN THE EYE OF LIMULUS. J Gen Physiol. 1964 Jan;47:443–463. doi: 10.1085/jgp.47.3.443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hubbard R., Bownds D., Yoshizawa T. The chemistry of visual photoreception. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1965;30:301–315. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1965.030.01.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KIKUCHI R., NAITO K., TANAKA I. Effect of sodium and potassium ions on the electrical activity of single cells in the lateral eye of the horseshoe crab. J Physiol. 1962 May;161:319–343. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Millecchia R., Mauro A. The ventral photoreceptor cells of Limulus. 3. A voltage-clamp study. J Gen Physiol. 1969 Sep;54(3):331–351. doi: 10.1085/jgp.54.3.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Smith T. G., Stell W. K., Brown J. E. Conductance changes associated with receptor potentials in Limulus photoreceptors. Science. 1968 Oct 25;162(3852):454–456. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3852.454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES