Skip to main content
Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium logoLink to Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium
. 1998:91–95.

Identification of design features to enhance utilization and acceptance of systems for Internet-based decision support at the point of care.

C S Gadd 1, P Baskaran 1, D F Lobach 1
PMCID: PMC2232383  PMID: 9929188

Abstract

Extensive utilization of point-of-care decision support systems will be largely dependent on the development of user interaction capabilities that make them effective clinical tools in patient care settings. This research identified critical design features of point-of-care decision support systems that are preferred by physicians, through a multi-method formative evaluation of an evolving prototype of an Internet-based clinical decision support system. Clinicians used four versions of the system--each highlighting a different functionality. Surveys and qualitative evaluation methodologies assessed clinicians' perceptions regarding system usability and usefulness. Our analyses identified features that improve perceived usability, such as telegraphic representations of guideline-related information, facile navigation, and a forgiving, flexible interface. Users also preferred features that enhance usefulness and motivate use, such as an encounter documentation tool and the availability of physician instruction and patient education materials. In addition to identifying design features that are relevant to efforts to develop clinical systems for point-of-care decision support, this study demonstrates the value of combining quantitative and qualitative methods of formative evaluation with an iterative system development strategy to implement new information technology in complex clinical settings.

Full text

PDF
92

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cork R. D., Detmer W. M., Friedman C. P. Development and initial validation of an instrument to measure physicians' use of, knowledge about, and attitudes toward computers. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998 Mar-Apr;5(2):164–176. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Grimshaw J. M., Russell I. T. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993 Nov 27;342(8883):1317–1322. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kushniruk A., Patel V., Cimino J. J., Barrows R. A. Cognitive evaluation of the user interface and vocabulary of an outpatient information system. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1996:22–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lobach D. F., Gadd C. S., Hales J. W. Structuring clinical practice guidelines in a relational database model for decision support on the Internet. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1997:158–162. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tierney W. M., Overhage J. M., Takesue B. Y., Harris L. E., Murray M. D., Vargo D. L., McDonald C. J. Computerizing guidelines to improve care and patient outcomes: the example of heart failure. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1995 Sep-Oct;2(5):316–322. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1995.96073834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES