Skip to main content
Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium logoLink to Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium
. 1999:112–116.

Conceptualization of anatomical spatial entities in the Digital Anatomist Foundational Model.

J L Mejino Jr 1, C Rosse 1
PMCID: PMC2232836  PMID: 10566331

Abstract

Anatomical spatial concepts are indispensable in educational and clinical discourse, yet a system for representing these concepts has not been proposed. Guided by explicit principles and definitions of the Digital Anatomist Foundational Model, we developed an ontology of spaces, surfaces, lines and points that are associated with anatomical structures. Ontologies for Anatomical Structure and Anatomical Spatial Entity were instantiated for the thorax, abdomen, pelvis and perineum. Representing the concepts in--part of--hierarchies as well, provided formative evaluation of the classification. We invite empirical evaluation of the Foundational Model through its use for educational and clinical applications.

Full text

PDF
112

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Mejino J. L., Jr, Rosse C. The potential of the digital anatomist foundational model for assuring consistency in UMLS sources. Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:825–829. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Neal P. J., Shapiro L. G., Rosse C. The digital anatomist structural abstraction: a scheme for the spatial description of anatomical entities. Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:423–427. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Newell R. L. Anatomical spaces: a review. Clin Anat. 1999;12(1):66–69. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1999)12:1<66::AID-CA9>3.0.CO;2-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rosse C., Mejino J. L., Modayur B. R., Jakobovits R., Hinshaw K. P., Brinkley J. F. Motivation and organizational principles for anatomical knowledge representation: the digital anatomist symbolic knowledge base. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998 Jan-Feb;5(1):17–40. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rosse C., Shapiro L. G., Brinkley J. F. The digital anatomist foundational model: principles for defining and structuring its concept domain. Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:820–824. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Schulz E. B., Price C., Brown P. J. Symbolic anatomic knowledge representation in the Read Codes version 3: structure and application. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997 Jan-Feb;4(1):38–48. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stockwell R. A. "Macavity's not there!" Reflections on R.L.M. Newell: anatomical spaces. Clin Anat. 1999;12(1):70–71. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1999)12:1<70::AID-CA10>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES