Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium logoLink to Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium
. 1999:570–574.

Modeling patient response to acute myocardial infarction: implications for a tailored technology-based program to reduce patient delay.

R Kukafka 1, Y A Lussier 1, V L Patel 1, J J Cimino 1
PMCID: PMC2232851  PMID: 10566423

Abstract

We are examining ways in which a clinical information system can favorably influence the appropriateness and rapidity of decision-making in patients suffering from symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. In order to do so, we have developed a theoretically based cognitive model for patient decision making. Our model includes somatic and emotional awareness, perceived threat (vulnerability and susceptibility), expectations of symptoms, self-efficacy and response efficacy to explain the response of an individual their symptoms. Variables are explained within a framework that details how they are interrelated in the context of other moderating variables. With an understanding of the decision process, we are able to collect, maintain and access patient specific data to tailor technology-based interventions unique to the requirements of each individual at various phases of the decision process. Existing clinical information systems at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center already address issues related to patient relevant on-line data. Other patient specific information will be collected through on-line questionnaires. By basing our approach on the use of a cognitive model, we can assess the capacity of our interventions to modify variables important to the decision-making process, allowing us to pinpoint which interventions are effective and the reasons why they are ineffective.

Full text

PDF
570

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blohm M. B., Hartford M., Karlson B. W., Luepker R. V., Herlitz J. An evaluation of the results of media and educational campaigns designed to shorten the time taken by patients with acute myocardial infarction to decide to go to hospital. Heart. 1996 Nov;76(5):430–434. doi: 10.1136/hrt.76.5.430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cox J. L., Lee E., Langer A., Armstrong P. W., Naylor C. D. Time to treatment with thrombolytic therapy: determinants and effect on short-term nonfatal outcomes of acute myocardial infarction. Canadian GUSTO Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and + PA for Occluded Coronary Arteries. CMAJ. 1997 Feb 15;156(4):497–505. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dracup K., Moser D. K., Eisenberg M., Meischke H., Alonzo A. A., Braslow A. Causes of delay in seeking treatment for heart attack symptoms. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Feb;40(3):379–392. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00278-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goff D. C., Jr, Sellers D. E., McGovern P. G., Meischke H., Goldberg R. J., Bittner V., Hedges J. R., Allender P. S., Nichaman M. Z. Knowledge of heart attack symptoms in a population survey in the United States: The REACT Trial. Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Nov 23;158(21):2329–2338. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.21.2329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gurwitz J. H., McLaughlin T. J., Willison D. J., Guadagnoli E., Hauptman P. J., Gao X., Soumerai S. B. Delayed hospital presentation in patients who have had acute myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Apr 15;126(8):593–599. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-8-199704150-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kenyon L. W., Ketterer M. W., Gheorghiade M., Goldstein S. Psychological factors related to prehospital delay during acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1991 Nov;84(5):1969–1976. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.84.5.1969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rimer B. K., Glassman B. Tailoring communications for primary care settings. Methods Inf Med. 1998 Jun;37(2):171–177. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rosenstock I. M., Strecher V. J., Becker M. H. Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Q. 1988 Summer;15(2):175–183. doi: 10.1177/109019818801500203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Scherck K. A. Recognizing a heart attack: the process of determining illness. Am J Crit Care. 1997 Jul;6(4):267–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Simons-Morton D. G., Goff D. C., Osganian S., Goldberg R. J., Raczynski J. M., Finnegan J. R., Zapka J., Eisenberg M. S., Proschan M. A., Feldman H. A. Rapid early action for coronary treatment: rationale, design, and baseline characteristics. REACT Research Group. Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Jul;5(7):726–738. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02492.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Taylor G. J., Ryan D., Bagby R. M. Toward the development of a new self-report alexithymia scale. Psychother Psychosom. 1985;44(4):191–199. doi: 10.1159/000287912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES