Skip to main content
Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium logoLink to Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium
. 1999:911–915.

Filtering Web pages for quality indicators: an empirical approach to finding high quality consumer health information on the World Wide Web.

S L Price 1, W R Hersh 1
PMCID: PMC2232852  PMID: 10566493

Abstract

The World Wide Web is an increasingly popular source for consumer health information, but many authors have expressed concerns about the quality of health information present on the Internet. We have developed a prototype system that responds to a consumer health query by returning a list of Web pages that are ranked according to the likely quality of the page contents. A computer program identifies some of the criteria that have been suggested for assessing the quality of health information on the Internet. It also identifies characteristics that may serve as proxies for desirable (or undesirable) qualities that are difficult to assess directly using an algorithm. Intervening in the search process and automatically analyzing the contents of each page returned by a general search engine may facilitate the search for high quality consumer health information on the Web.

Full text

PDF
911

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Eysenbach G., Diepgen T. L. Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information. BMJ. 1998 Nov 28;317(7171):1496–1500. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7171.1496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hersh W. R., Gorman P. N., Sacherek L. S. Applicability and quality of information for answering clinical questions on the Web. JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1307–1308. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Impicciatore P., Pandolfini C., Casella N., Bonati M. Reliability of health information for the public on the World Wide Web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. BMJ. 1997 Jun 28;314(7098):1875–1879. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jadad A. R., Gagliardi A. Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? JAMA. 1998 Feb 25;279(8):611–614. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.8.611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kiley R. Quality of medical information on the Internet. J R Soc Med. 1998 Jul;91(7):369–370. doi: 10.1177/014107689809100707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Silberg W. M., Lundberg G. D., Musacchio R. A. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997 Apr 16;277(15):1244–1245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wyatt J. C. Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the World Wide Web. BMJ. 1997 Jun 28;314(7098):1879–1881. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES