Abstract
Although spatial relations are essential for the anatomy domain, spatial reasoning is only weakly supported by medical knowledge representation systems. To remedy this shortcoming we express spatial relations that can intuitively be applied to anatomical objects (such as 'disconnected', 'externally connected', 'partial overlap' and 'proper part') within the formal framework of description logics. A special encoding of concept descriptions (in terms of SEP triplets) allows us to emulate spatial reasoning by classification-based reasoning.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- McCray A. T., Nelson S. J. The representation of meaning in the UMLS. Methods Inf Med. 1995 Mar;34(1-2):193–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rector A. L., Bechhofer S., Goble C. A., Horrocks I., Nowlan W. A., Solomon W. D. The GRAIL concept modelling language for medical terminology. Artif Intell Med. 1997 Feb;9(2):139–171. doi: 10.1016/s0933-3657(96)00369-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosse C., Mejino J. L., Modayur B. R., Jakobovits R., Hinshaw K. P., Brinkley J. F. Motivation and organizational principles for anatomical knowledge representation: the digital anatomist symbolic knowledge base. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998 Jan-Feb;5(1):17–40. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]