Skip to main content
Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium logoLink to Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium
. 2002:894–898.

Using client-side event logging and path tracing to assess and improve the quality of web-based surveys.

Thomas M White 1, Michael J Hauan 1
PMCID: PMC2244342  PMID: 12463954

Abstract

Web-based data collection has considerable appeal. However, the quality of data collected using such instruments is often questionable. There can be systematic problems with the wording of the surveys, and/or the means with which they are deployed. In unsupervised data collection, there are also concerns about whether subjects understand the questions, and wehther they are answering honestly. This paper presents a schema for using client-side timestamps and traces of subjects' paths through instruments to detect problems with the definition of instruments and their deployment. We discuss two large, anonymous, web-based, medical surveys as examples of the utility of this approach.

Full text

PDF
896

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bell D. S., Mangione C. M., Kahn C. E., Jr Randomized testing of alternative survey formats using anonymous volunteers on the World Wide Web. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 Nov-Dec;8(6):616–620. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Couper M. P. Web survey design and administration. Public Opin Q. 2001 Summer;65(2):230–253. doi: 10.1086/322199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Couper M. Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches. Public Opin Q. 2000 Winter;64(4):464–494. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hickman S. E., Howieson D. B., Dame A., Sexton G., Kaye J. Longitudinal analysis of the effects of the aging process on neuropsychological test performance in the healthy young-old and oldest-old. Dev Neuropsychol. 2000;17(3):323–337. doi: 10.1207/S15326942DN1703_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Horne J. A., Ostberg O. A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. Int J Chronobiol. 1976;4(2):97–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pettit Frances Annie. A comparison of World-Wide Web and paper-and-pencil personality questionnaires. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002 Feb;34(1):50–54. doi: 10.3758/bf03195423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Schleyer T. K., Forrest J. L. Methods for the design and administration of web-based surveys. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000 Jul-Aug;7(4):416–425. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2000.0070416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. White T. M., Hauan M. J. The capture and use of detailed process information in the Dialogix system for structured web-based interactions. Proc AMIA Symp. 2001:761–765. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wyatt J. Same information, different decisions: format counts. Format as well as content matters in clinical information. BMJ. 1999 Jun 5;318(7197):1501–1502. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7197.1501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES