Abstract
Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use is growing rapidly. As CAM is relatively unregulated, it is important to evaluate the type and availability of CAM information. The goal of this study is to deter-mine the prevalence, content and readability of online CAM information based on searches for arthritis, diabetes and fibromyalgia using four common search engines. Fifty-eight of 599 web pages retrieved by a "condition search" (9.6%) were CAM-oriented. Of 216 CAM pages found by the "condition" and "condition + herbs" searches, 78% were authored by commercial organizations, whose pur-pose involved commerce 69% of the time and 52.3% had no references. Although 98% of the CAM information was intended for consumers, the mean read-ability was at grade level 11. We conclude that consumers searching the web for health information are likely to encounter consumer-oriented CAM advertising, which is difficult to read and is not supported by the conventional literature.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Beredjiklian P. K., Bozentka D. J., Steinberg D. R., Bernstein J. Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedic information on the Internet. The case of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Nov;82-A(11):1540–1543. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200011000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berland G. K., Elliott M. N., Morales L. S., Algazy J. I., Kravitz R. L., Broder M. S., Kanouse D. E., Muñoz J. A., Puyol J. A., Lara M. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA. 2001 May 23;285(20):2612–2621. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.20.2612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eisenberg D. M., Davis R. B., Ettner S. L., Appel S., Wilkey S., Van Rompay M., Kessler R. C. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA. 1998 Nov 11;280(18):1569–1575. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.18.1569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eisenberg D. M., Kessler R. C., Van Rompay M. I., Kaptchuk T. J., Wilkey S. A., Appel S., Davis R. B. Perceptions about complementary therapies relative to conventional therapies among adults who use both: results from a national survey. Ann Intern Med. 2001 Sep 4;135(5):344–351. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-5-200109040-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hellawell G. O., Turner K. J., Le Monnier K. J., Brewster S. F. Urology and the Internet: an evaluation of internet use by urology patients and of information available on urological topics. BJU Int. 2000 Aug;86(3):191–194. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00831.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li L., Irvin E., Guzmán J., Bombardier C. Surfing for back pain patients: the nature and quality of back pain information on the Internet. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001 Mar 1;26(5):545–557. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200103010-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oermann M. H., Wilson F. L. Quality of care information for consumers on the Internet. J Nurs Care Qual. 2000 Jul;14(4):45–54. doi: 10.1097/00001786-200007000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soot L. C., Moneta G. L., Edwards J. M. Vascular surgery and the Internet: a poor source of patient-oriented information. J Vasc Surg. 1999 Jul;30(1):84–91. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70179-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Streiff L. D. Can clients understand our instructions? Image J Nurs Sch. 1986 Summer;18(2):48–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1986.tb00542.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]