Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1988 Oct;58(4):507–511. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1988.252

The completeness of cancer registration in England: an assessment from the Oxford-FPA contraceptive study.

L Villard-Mackintosh 1, M P Coleman 1, M P Vessey 1
PMCID: PMC2246780  PMID: 3207607

Abstract

The completeness of cancer registration in England for the period 1968-85 has been assessed in a cohort of 17,000 women who reported malignancies directly to the investigators. Of 325 cancers reported, 281 (86.5%) had been registered by mid-1987. Under-registration varied considerably between regional cancer registries. Eight (18%) of the 44 unregistered cancers were treated in private hospitals. Under-registration also varied considerably with cancer site: only 8% of 150 breast cancers were not registered, and at sites accounting for 79% of all tumours, under-registration was less than 15%; however, 40% of melanomas (20 cases) and 50% of lung cancers (6 cases) were not registered. Of 281 registered tumours, only 219 (78%) were notified to the investigators from the NHSCR at Southport, with a median lag-time of 2.5 years since diagnosis. There has been a tendency for notification of registered cancers to the investigator to become more prompt but less complete.

Full text

PDF
511

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Balarajan R., Scott A. National cancer registration: an appraisal. Community Med. 1983 Feb;5(1):31–37. doi: 10.1007/BF02548581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benn R. T., Leck I., Nwene U. P. Estimation of completeness of cancer registration. Int J Epidemiol. 1982 Dec;11(4):362–367. doi: 10.1093/ije/11.4.362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hunt K., Coleman M. P. The completeness of cancer registration in follow-up studies--a cautionary note. Br J Cancer. 1987 Sep;56(3):357–359. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1987.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mattsson B., Rutqvist L. E., Wallgren A. Undernotification of diagnosed cancer cases to the Stockholm Cancer Registry. Int J Epidemiol. 1985 Mar;14(1):64–69. doi: 10.1093/ije/14.1.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nwene U., Smith A. Assessing completeness of cancer registration in the north-western region of England by a method of independent comparison. Br J Cancer. 1982 Oct;46(4):635–639. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1982.248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Vessey M. P., Johnson B., Donnelly J. Reliability of reporting by women taking part in a prospective contraceptive study. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1974 May;28(2):104–107. doi: 10.1136/jech.28.2.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Vessey M., Doll R., Peto R., Johnson B., Wiggins P. A long-term follow-up study of women using different methods of contraception--an interim report. J Biosoc Sci. 1976 Oct;8(4):373–427. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000010890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES