Abstract
We have developed an automated, modular utility assessment software package called U-titer. The package implements the rating scale, category scaling, standard gamble, chronic and temporary time trade-off methods of assessing patient's preferences, and allows extensive tailoring of each method. In addition to calculating utilities, U-titer records information on the process experienced by the user. It can use information gathered in one module to coordinate another module. Our early experience suggests U-titer assessments are similar to traditional assessments. This software should facilitate both the study of patient's utilities and the study of the assessment methods and their implementation.
Full text
PDF![701](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fb9/2247621/387979358c03/procascamc00004-0714.png)
![702](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fb9/2247621/916bc8199941/procascamc00004-0715.png)
![703](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fb9/2247621/d9608499ecc6/procascamc00004-0716.png)
![704](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fb9/2247621/61ab805a720f/procascamc00004-0717.png)
![705](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fb9/2247621/f9c5b2cfea60/procascamc00004-0718.png)
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Beck J. R., Pauker S. G., Gottlieb J. E., Klein K., Kassirer J. P. A convenient approximation of life expectancy (the "DEALE"). II. Use in medical decision-making. Am J Med. 1982 Dec;73(6):889–897. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(82)90787-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mehrez A., Gafni A. Quality-adjusted life years, utility theory, and healthy-years equivalents. Med Decis Making. 1989 Apr-Jun;9(2):142–149. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8900900209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Torrance G. W., Thomas W. H., Sackett D. L. A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Serv Res. 1972 Summer;7(2):118–133. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981 Jan 30;211(4481):453–458. doi: 10.1126/science.7455683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]