Skip to main content
PMC home page
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association logoLink to Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
. 1991 Jan;79(1):36–44.

Biotechnology awareness study, Part 1: Where scientists get their information.

S Grefsheim 1, J Franklin 1, D Cunningham 1
PMCID: PMC225482  PMID: 1998818

Abstract

A model study, funded by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) and conducted by the Southeastern/Atlantic Regional Medical Library (RML) and the University of Maryland Health Sciences Library, attempted to assess the information needs of researchers in the developing field of biotechnology and to determine the resources available to meet those needs in major academic health sciences centers. Nine medical schools in RML Region 2 were selected to participate in a biotechnology awareness study. A survey was conducted of the nine medical school libraries to assess their support of biotechnology research. To identify the information needs of scientists engaged in biotechnology-related research at the schools, a written survey was sent to the deans of the nine institutions and selected scientists they had identified. This was followed by individual, in-depth interviews with both the deans and scientists surveyed. In general, scientists obtained information from three major sources: their own experiments, personal communication with other scientists, and textual material (print or electronic). For textual information, most study participants relied on personal journal subscriptions. Tangential journals were scanned in the department's library. Only a few of these scientists came to the health sciences library on a regular basis. Further, the study found that personal computers have had a major impact on how biotechnologists get and use information. Implications of these findings for libraries and librarians are discussed.

Full text

PDF
36

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson J. G., Jay S. J. Computers and clinical judgment: the role of physician networks. Soc Sci Med. 1985;20(10):969–979. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90253-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson J. G., Jay S. J., Schweer H. M., Anderson M. M. Physician utilization of computers in medical practice: policy implications based on a structural model. Soc Sci Med. 1986;23(3):259–267. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90346-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson J. G., Jay S. J., Schweer H. M., Anderson M. M. Why doctors don't use computers: some empirical findings. J R Soc Med. 1986 Mar;79(3):142–144. doi: 10.1177/014107688607900305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cameron G., Kahn P., Philipson L. Journals and databanks. Nature. 1989 Dec 21;342(6252):848–848. doi: 10.1038/342848a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Covell D. G., Uman G. C., Manning P. R. Information needs in office practice: are they being met? Ann Intern Med. 1985 Oct;103(4):596–599. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-103-4-596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cunningham D., Grefsheim S., Simon M., Lansing P. S. Biotechnology awareness study, Part 2: Meeting the information needs of biotechnologists. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1991 Jan;79(1):45–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Farmer J., Guillaumin B. Information needs of clinicians: observations from a CML program. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1979 Jan;67(1):53–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jelovsek F. R., Rittwage J., Pearse W. H., Visscher H. C. Information management needs of the obstetrician-gynecologist--a survey. Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Mar;73(3 Pt 1):395–399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Knapp R. G., Miller M. C., 3rd, Levine J. Experience with and attitudes toward computers in medicine of students and clinical faculty members at one school. J Med Educ. 1987 Apr;62(4):344–346. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198704000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Maddox J. Making good databanks better. Nature. 1989 Sep 28;341(6240):277–277. doi: 10.1038/341277a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mandell S. F. Resistance to computerization. An examination of the relationship between resistance and the cognitive style of the clinician. J Med Syst. 1987 Aug;11(4):311–318. doi: 10.1007/BF00994015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McGourty C. Glasnost in publications: who's hiding the primary data? Nature. 1989 Sep 14;341(6238):94–94. doi: 10.1038/341094a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Palca J. Getting together bit by bit. Science. 1990 Apr 13;248(4952):160–162. doi: 10.1126/science.2326631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Saltz C. C., Saltz J., Rabkin M. Perceptions and knowledge of medical students regarding computer applications in medicine. J Med Educ. 1985 Sep;60(9):726–728. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198509000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schneeweiss R., Cherewatenko V. Physicians' attitudes toward the uses of computers in office practice. J Fam Pract. 1986 May;22(5):463–465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shortliffe E. H. Testing reality: the introduction of decision-support technologies for physicians. Methods Inf Med. 1989 Jan;28(1):1–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Singer J., Sacks H. S., Lucente F., Chalmers T. C. Physician attitudes toward applications of computer data base systems. JAMA. 1983 Mar 25;249(12):1610–1614. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stinson E. R., Mueller D. A. Survey of health professionals' information habits and needs. Conducted through personal interviews. JAMA. 1980 Jan 11;243(2):140–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Strasser T. C. The information needs of practicing physicians in northeastern New York State. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1978 Apr;66(2):200–209. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Strother E. A., Lancaster D. M., Gardiner J. Information needs of practicing dentists. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1986 Jul;74(3):227–230. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Teach R. L., Shortliffe E. H. An analysis of physician attitudes regarding computer-based clinical consultation systems. Comput Biomed Res. 1981 Dec;14(6):542–558. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(81)90012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Williamson J. W., German P. S., Weiss R., Skinner E. A., Bowes F., 3rd Health science information management and continuing education of physicians. A survey of U.S. primary care practitioners and their opinion leaders. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Jan 15;110(2):151–160. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-110-2-151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Woolf S. H., Benson D. A. The medical information needs of internists and pediatricians at an academic medical center. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1989 Oct;77(4):372–380. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Young D. W. What makes doctors use computers?: discussion paper. J R Soc Med. 1984 Aug;77(8):663–667. doi: 10.1177/014107688407700810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the Medical Library Association are provided here courtesy of Medical Library Association

RESOURCES