Skip to main content
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association logoLink to Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
. 1993 Jan;81(1):20–28.

Augmenting GRATEFUL MED with the UMLS Metathesaurus: an initial evaluation.

J S Jachna 1, S M Powsner 1, P L Miller 1
PMCID: PMC225723  PMID: 8428185

Abstract

Clinicians in patient care settings must be able to locate relevant recent medical literature quickly. Computer literacy is increasing, but many clinicians remain ill at ease with search strategies for online bibliographic databases. As part of an ongoing project to simplify the translation of clinical questions into effective searches, a Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Metathesaurus tool was designed. The authors compared bibliographic searches by relatively inexperienced users employing only GRATEFUL MED to searches done using GRATEFUL MED augmented with this tool. The users were clinicians examining questions related to a test set of clinical cases. Their problems and successes were monitored; the results suggest that the addition of a thesaurus helps resolve some problems in citation retrieval that trouble the novice user. By helping the user understand indexing terms in context and by reducing typing errors, a thesaurus can help provide an intelligent solution to lexical mismatches in bibliographic retrieval.

Full text

PDF
24

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bonham M. D., Nelson L. L. An evaluation of four end-user systems for searching MEDLINE. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1988 Apr;76(2):171–180. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Haynes R. B., McKibbon K. A., Walker C. J., Ryan N., Fitzgerald D., Ramsden M. F. Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings. A study of use and usefulness. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jan 1;112(1):78–84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-112-1-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. McKibbon K. A., Haynes R. B., Dilks C. J., Ramsden M. F., Ryan N. C., Baker L., Flemming T., Fitzgerald D. How good are clinical MEDLINE searches? A comparative study of clinical end-user and librarian searches. Comput Biomed Res. 1990 Dec;23(6):583–593. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(90)90042-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Powsner S. M., Riely C. A., Barwick K. W., Morrow J. S., Miller P. L. Automated bibliographic retrieval based on current topics in hepatology: hepatopix. Comput Biomed Res. 1989 Dec;22(6):552–564. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(89)90075-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Walker C. J., McKibbon K. A., Haynes R. B., Ramsden M. F. Problems encountered by clinical end users of MEDLINE and GRATEFUL MED. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1991 Jan;79(1):67–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the Medical Library Association are provided here courtesy of Medical Library Association

RESOURCES