Abstract
A study was conducted at the University of Pittsburgh to determine the effectiveness of the selection process by clinical medical librarians and to identify the criteria used by librarians and physicians to select relevant articles. The study analyzed the similarity between librarian and physician selections, the decision-making processes used by librarians and physicians, and the utility of librarian selections versus those of physicians. No significant difference in utility between librarian and physician selection was found, suggesting that librarians can recognize and select useful articles as effectively as physicians. Both librarians and physicians based selection decisions primarily on article title, abstract, and journal title. Librarians were more likely to focus on Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) descriptors, while physicians focused on clinical applicability or similarity to a specific case. Journal selection data indicate that the principle internal medicine journals were the most frequently selected sources. The study demonstrates that librarians can effectively serve a quality filtering function in the clinical environment, and they should consider extending quality filtering activities to other arenas.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Demas J. M., Ludwig L. T. Clinical medical librarian: the last unicorn? Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1991 Jan;79(1):17–27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Etzioni A. The need for quality filters in information systems. Science. 1971 Jan 15;171(3967):133–133. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3967.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenberg B., Battison S., Kolisch M., Leredu M. Evaluation of a clinical medical librarian program at the Yale Medical Library. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1978 Jul;66(3):319–326. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- King D. N. The contribution of hospital library information services to clinical care: a study in eight hospitals. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1987 Oct;75(4):291–301. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pao M. L. A quality filtering system for medical literature. J Med Educ. 1975 Apr;50(4):353–359. doi: 10.1097/00001888-197504000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schnall J. G., Wilson J. W. Evaluation of a clinical medical librarianship program at a university Health Sciences Library. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1976 Jul;64(3):278–283. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scura G., Davidoff F. Case-related use of the medical literature. Clinical librarian services for improving patient care. JAMA. 1981 Jan 2;245(1):50–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Staudt C., Halbrook B., Brodman E. A clinical librarians' program--an attempt at evaluation. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1976 Apr;64(2):236–238. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]