Abstract
PURPOSE: To test three related hypotheses about monographs circulation at academic health sciences libraries: (1) Juran's "Vital Few" Principle, sometimes incorrectly referred to as the "Pareto Principle"; (2) most (> 30%) new monographs will not circulate within four years; and, (3) Trueswell's 20/80 rule concerning intensity of monographs circulation. METHODS: Retrospective circulation study conducted at a major academic health sciences library in November 1997 on monographs acquired during 1993, utilizing an online review file. RESULTS: Unexpectedly, most monographs (84%) had circulated at least once in the four years following acquisition. Combining circulation and in-house data revealed that 90.7% of the monographs acquired in 1993 had been used at least once. Small percentages of these monographs produced disproportionately high circulation levels. CONCLUSION: Monographs circulation rates confirm Juran's Vital Few principle. Most monographs circulated at least once in contrast to results reported by the Pittsburgh Study or other studies reported by Hardesty and Fenske. The results do not comply with Trueswell's 20/80 ratio rule. Further research needs to investigate the effects of low students to books ratios and problem-based learning (PBL) curricula upon monographs utilization.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Brazier H., Conroy R. M. Library use and academic achievement among medical students. Med Educ. 1996 Mar;30(2):142–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1996.tb00732.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cassell E. J. Why should doctors read medical books? Ann Intern Med. 1997 Oct 1;127(7):576–578. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-7-199710010-00024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FLEMING T. P., KILGOUR F. G. MODERATELY AND HEAVILY USED BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1964 Jan;52:234–241. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fenske R. E. Evaluation of monograph selection in a health sciences library. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1994 Jul;82(3):265–270. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marshall J. G., Fitzgerald D., Busby L., Heaton G. A study of library use in problem-based and traditional medical curricula. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1993 Jul;81(3):299–305. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rankin J. A. Preparing medical libraries for use by students in PBL curricula. Acad Med. 1993 Mar;68(3):205–206. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199303000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rashid H. F. Book availability as a performance measure of a library: an analysis of the effectiveness of a health sciences library. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1990 Oct;41(7):501–507. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199010)41:7<501::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]