Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2008 Mar 3;105(10):3885–3890. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800190105

Kuru prions and sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease prions have equivalent transmission properties in transgenic and wild-type mice

Jonathan D F Wadsworth 1, Susan Joiner 1, Jacqueline M Linehan 1, Melanie Desbruslais 1, Katie Fox 1, Sharon Cooper 1, Sabrina Cronier 1, Emmanuel A Asante 1, Simon Mead 1, Sebastian Brandner 1, Andrew F Hill 1,*, John Collinge 1,
PMCID: PMC2268835  PMID: 18316717

Abstract

Kuru provides our principal experience of an epidemic human prion disease and primarily affected the Fore linguistic group of the Eastern Highlands of Papua New Guinea. Kuru was transmitted by the practice of consuming dead relatives as a mark of respect and mourning (transumption). To date, detailed information of the prion strain type propagated in kuru has been lacking. Here, we directly compare the transmission properties of kuru prions with sporadic, iatrogenic, and variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD) prions in Prnp-null transgenic mice expressing human prion protein and in wild-type mice. Molecular and neuropathological data from these transmissions show that kuru prions are distinct from variant CJD and have transmission properties equivalent to those of classical (sporadic) CJD prions. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that kuru originated from chance consumption of an individual with sporadic CJD.

Keywords: variant CJD, transmissible spongiform encephalopathy, iatrogenic CJD


Prion diseases are fatal neurodegenerative disorders that include Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD), Gerstmann–Sträussler–Scheinker disease, fatal familial insomnia, kuru, and variant CJD (vCJD) in humans and bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in cattle and scrapie in sheep (1, 2). Their central feature is the posttranslational conversion of host-encoded, cellular prion protein (PrPC) to an abnormal isoform, designated PrPSc (1, 2). This transition appears to involve only conformational change rather than covalent modification and confers PrPSc with partial resistance to proteolytic degradation and detergent insolubility (13). Human prion diseases are biologically unique in that the disease process can be triggered through inherited germ-line mutations in the human prion protein gene (PRNP), infection (by inoculation, or in some cases by dietary exposure) with prion-infected tissue, or by rare sporadic events that generate PrPSc (15). Substantial evidence indicates that an abnormal PrP isoform is the principal, if not the sole, component of the transmissible infectious agent, or prion (13).

The marked clinical heterogeneity observed in human prion diseases has yet to be explained. However, it has been clear for many years that distinct isolates, or strains, of prions can be propagated in the same host, and these are biologically recognized by distinctive clinical and pathological features on transmission to laboratory animals (2, 6). It is likely that a significant proportion of the clinicopathological heterogeneity seen in sporadic CJD and other human prion diseases relates to the propagation of distinct human prion strains. Within the framework of the protein-only hypothesis of prion propagation, distinct clinical and neuropathological phenotypes associated with prion strains are thought to be determined by the propagation of distinct PrPSc isoforms with divergent physicochemical properties (1, 2, 712). Genetic factors also have a role in determining prion strain selection through the coding sequence of the host prion protein gene (2, 1315), and other unknown non-PrP genetic factors have been revealed (14, 1618).

Kuru provides our principal experience of an epidemic human prion disease and affected the Fore linguistic group of the Eastern Highlands of Papua New Guinea and to a lesser extent neighboring groups with whom the Fore intermarried (1923). It was the practice in these communities to engage in consumption of dead relatives as a mark of respect and mourning (transumption). Kuru was the first human prion disease shown to be transmissible, by inoculation of nonhuman primates with autopsy-derived brain tissue (24). Interest in kuru has been renewed by the appearance of vCJD, in the United Kingdom from 1995 onward (25), and the experimental confirmation that this is caused by the same prion strain as that causing BSE in cattle (9, 14, 26, 27). This has led to widespread concern that exposure to the epizootic of BSE, and subsequent transmission of vCJD prions via iatrogenic routes, poses a distinct and conceivably a severe threat to public health in the United Kingdom and other countries (4, 5, 23, 2833). The extremely prolonged and variable incubation periods seen with prion diseases when crossing a species barrier means that it will be some years before the parameters of any human vCJD epidemic can be predicted with confidence (23, 28, 3436). Remarkably, kuru demonstrates that incubation periods of infection with human prions can exceed 50 years (23).

Genetic susceptibility is important in both the sporadic and acquired forms of human prion disease; human PrP has a common polymorphism, with either methionine or valine present at residue 129. Approximately 38% of Europeans are homozygous for the more frequent methionine allele, 51% are heterozygous, and 11% homozygous for valine. Most sporadic CJD occurs in individuals homozygous for this polymorphism (22, 3741). This susceptibility factor is also relevant in the acquired forms of CJD, most strikingly in vCJD; all clinical cases studied so far have been homozygous for codon 129 methionine of the PrP gene PRNP (4). The PRNP codon 129 genotype has shown a pronounced effect on kuru incubation periods and susceptibility, and most elderly survivors of the kuru epidemic are heterozygotes (22, 40). The clear survival advantage for PRNP codon 129 heterozygotes provides a powerful basis for balancing selection pressure in the Fore (22).

The origins of kuru have remained somewhat obscure. Previously unknown to the outside world, kuru deaths were recorded continuously from 1957 (42). From oral history, the first remembered kuru patient dated from the early 20th century, although the disease rapidly increased in incidence. A peak annual mortality of >2% was recorded in some Fore villages, largely of adult women and children. Some villages consequently became devoid of young women (19, 42). Over the latter half of the 20th century, kuru has progressively died out from the young Fore, consistent with the cessation of cannibalism in the late 1950s (42). However, a series of kuru patients have been examined in the last decade, all born before 1959, some with estimated incubation times of >50 years (23). In the absence of a pathogenic PRNP mutation associated with kuru (22, 40), the most plausible hypothesis for the origin of kuru is from chance consumption of an individual with sporadic CJD (43), which occurs worldwide with an annual incidence of ≈1–2 per million. Consistent with this hypothesis, experimental transmission rates of kuru isolates to nonhuman primates are more similar to those of classical (sporadic and iatrogenic) CJD isolates rather than inherited forms of prion disease (44). Here, we directly compare the transmission properties of kuru prions with sporadic, iatrogenic, and variant CJD prions in transgenic mice expressing human PrP and in wild-type mice. These data show that kuru prions are quite distinct from vCJD prions and have transmission properties closely similar to classical CJD prions. These findings are consistent with the contention that kuru originated from an individual with sporadic CJD.

Results

Kuru Prions Are Associated with the Same PrPSc Types That Are Seen in Classical CJD.

To date, we have identified four major types of human PrPSc associated with sporadic and acquired human prion diseases that can be differentiated on immunoblots after limited proteinase K digestion of brain homogenates (9, 45, 46) (Fig. 1A). The different PrP fragment sizes seen on immunoblots after treatment with proteinase K (corresponding to amino-terminally truncated cleavage products generated from di-, mono-, or nonglycosylated PrPSc) suggest that there are several different human PrPSc conformations, referred to as molecular strain types and these can be further classified by the ratio of the three PrP fragments seen after protease digestion. PrPSc types 1–3 are seen in classical (sporadic or iatrogenic) CJD brain, whereas type 4 PrPSc is uniquely seen in vCJD brain (9, 45, 46) [Fig. 1A and supporting information (SI) Table 1]. A simpler molecular classification (10, 11), based on subdivision into only two molecular subtypes by fragment size, is also in use, and an international consensus on human prion strain types has yet to be reached.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

PrP immunoblots of prion-diseased human brain. Immunoblots of proteinase K-digested brain homogenates from patients with human prion disease analyzed by enhanced chemiluminescence using anti-PrP monoclonal antibody 3F4 are shown. The provenance of each brain sample is designated above each lane, and the type of PrPSc detected in each sample and the PRNP codon 129 genotype of the patient (M, methionine; V, valine) is designated below. (A) Representative immunoblot demonstrating the London classification of human PrPSc types (9, 46). PrPSc types 1–3 are seen in the brain of classical forms of CJD [either sporadic (sCJD) or iatrogenic CJD], whereas type 4 PrPSc is uniquely seen in vCJD brain. (B) Immunoblot of the three kuru samples of the present study compared with sporadic CJD control samples of known PrPSc type.

Polymorphism at human PrP residue 129 places constraints on the propagation of distinct human PrPSc types, and these data provide a molecular basis for this polymorphism acting as a major factor influencing both prion disease susceptibility and phenotype in humans (2, 4, 5, 22). To date, human PrPSc types 1 and 4 have been found only in humans homozygous for PRNP codon 129 methionine, type 3 PrPSc is seen almost exclusively in individuals with at least one valine allele, whereas type 2 PrPSc has been commonly observed in all codon 129 genotypes (9, 45, 46).

The three kuru brain samples investigated in the present study showed protease-resistant PrP fragment patterns corresponding to either the type 2 or type 3 PrPSc pattern that we have observed in sporadic and iatrogenic CJD (SI Table 1) (Fig. 1B). The glycoform ratio of protease-resistant PrP fragments in these kuru samples all showed a predominance of monoglycosylated PrP similar to the PrP glycoform ratios seen in classical CJD (Fig. 1B) rather than the distinctive PrP glycoform ratios seen in either vCJD or inherited prion disease caused by PRNP point mutations (4648). These data are consistent with previous findings showing close similarity of PrPSc types in kuru and classical CJD (49, 50).

Kuru Prions and Classical CJD Prions Have the Same Transmission Rates in Transgenic or Wild-Type Mice.

Our series of transmitted samples from patients with neuropathologically confirmed sporadic, iatrogenic, and variant CJD are shown in SI Table 1. Transgenic mice expressing human PrP 129 valine, but not mouse PrP (129VV Tg152 mice) lack a transmission barrier to classical (sporadic and iatrogenic) CJD prions, regardless of the codon 129 genotype of the inoculum (9, 26, 51) (SI Table 1). These transmissions are characterized by 100% attack rates of prion infection producing clinical prion disease with similar short incubation periods of ≈200 days (9, 26, 51) (SI Table 1). In isolates that have been examined, no fall in mean incubation period is seen after secondary passage in further 129VV Tg152 mice indicative of the lack of a transmission barrier (ref. 51; unpublished data). In contrast, primary challenge of 129VV Tg152 mice with vCJD prions is characterized by a substantial transmission barrier with only ≈50% of inoculated mice becoming infected (15, 26) (SI Table 1). Affected vCJD-inoculated Tg152 mice propagate a novel prion strain associated with type 5 PrPSc (15, 26) that fails to adapt after secondary passage in further 129VV Tg152 mice (15). In wild-type FVB/NHsd mice [genotype Prnpa (52)], the relative transmission efficiencies of classical and variant CJD prions are quite different (9, 15, 26, 51) (SI Table 1). Classical CJD prions transmit infection to FVB/NHsd mice only occasionally, at long and variable incubation periods, whereas vCJD prions transmit infection far more efficiently, although incubation periods are prolonged (14, 15, 26) (SI Table 1). Consistent with the dramatic difference in the observed transmission rates of sporadic CJD and vCJD prion strains, highly distinct PrPSc types are propagated in affected vCJD- or sporadic CJD-inoculated FVB mice (26, 53) (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Molecular strain typing of human prion transmissions to mice. Immunoblots of proteinase K-digested brain homogenates from wild-type mice, human patients, or transgenic mice analyzed by enhanced chemiluminescence with anti-PrP monoclonal antibodies ICSM35 (A) or 3F4 (B–D) are shown. The provenance of each brain sample is designated above each lane, and the type of human PrPSc detected in each sample (B–D) is designated below. (A) Transmission of vCJD prions (I344) and sporadic CJD prions (I764) to FVB/NHsd mice. (B) Transmission of vCJD prions (I348) to 129VV Tg152 mice. (C) Transmission of sporadic CJD prions with type 3 PrPSc (I4855) and kuru prions with type 3 PrPSc (I516) to 129VV Tg152 mice. (D) Transmission of kuru prions with type 2 PrPSc (I518) to 129VV Tg152 mice revealing a change in molecular strain type.

In the present study, kuru-inoculated 129VV Tg152 mice and FVB/NHsd mice showed transmission rates closely similar to those of classical CJD prions rather than those of vCJD prions (SI Table 1). In 129VV Tg152 mice, all three kuru isolates produced 100% attack rates of prion infection causing clinical prion disease with closely similar mean incubation periods of ≈200 days (SI Table 1). In sharp contrast, no evidence for prion infection was seen in kuru-inoculated FVB/NHsd mice after prolonged observation periods (SI Table 1).

Transgenic Mice Inoculated with Kuru Prions and Classical CJD Prions Show the Same Molecular and Neuropathological Phenotype.

Transgenic modeling of classical CJD and vCJD prion infection in mice expressing human PrP with either 129 valine or methionine (9, 14, 15, 26, 51, 54) indicates that this polymorphism directly dictates the propagation of distinct PrPSc conformers, consistent with a conformational selection model of prion transmission barriers (2, 13, 15, 28). Human PrPSc types 1 and 4 that are seen only in PRNP codon 129 methionine homozygous patients do not replicate faithfully in 129VV Tg152 mice. Type 1 PrPSc converts to a PrPSc type with maintained glycoform ratio but a type 2 fragment size (9), and type 4 PrPSc converts to type 5 PrPSc with the same glycoform ratio as type 4 PrPSc but a type 2 PrPSc-like fragment size (15, 26) (Fig. 2B). In contrast, PrPSc types 2 and 3 appear to propagate faithfully in 129VV Tg152 mice with no apparent change in proteolytic fragment size (9).

Consistent with these observations, and in agreement with the similarities of both PrPSc type and the transmission properties of classical CJD and kuru prions, type 3 PrPSc from kuru brain isolates propagated faithfully in 129VV Tg152 mice (Figs. 2C and 3). Interestingly, however, all affected 129VV Tg152 mice inoculated with type 2 PrPSc from the PRNP codon 129 methionine homozygous kuru patient also showed propagation of type 3 PrPSc in brain, indicating a switch in molecular strain type (Figs. 2D and 3). To date, we have examined the transmission properties of only a single case of classical CJD from a codon 129 methionine homozygous patient with type 2 PrPSc in brain (SI Table 1). This isolate showed apparently faithful replication of type 2-like PrPSc fragment size in 129VV Tg152 mice (9). The observed variance in the behavior of the classical CJD prions and kuru prions associated with type 2 PrPSc and methionine at codon 129 may reflect strain-specific differences between subtypes of sporadic CJD-like prions; however, further transmissions of classical CJD isolates with this molecular strain type will now be required to investigate this directly.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Neuropathological analysis of transgenic mouse brain. Equivalent patterns of neuropathology are seen in 129VV Tg152 mice that propagate type 3 PrPSc after primary transmission of kuru prions or sporadic CJD prions that are distinct from 129VV Tg152 mice that propagate type 5 PrPSc after primary transmission of vCJD prions. Sketches represent the regional distribution of abnormal PrP deposition in transgenic mouse brain: diffuse synaptic PrP deposition (bars) and PrP plaques (circles). The bottom images show PrP immunohistochemistry with ICSM 35 (from the areas delineated by the blue boxes in the sketches) demonstrating nonflorid PrP plaques in the corpus callosum and diffuse synaptic PrP deposition in the thalamus. (Scale bar, bottom images: 100 μm.)

Both kuru-inoculated 129VV Tg152 mice and sporadic CJD-inoculated 129VV Tg152 mice propagating type 3 PrPSc showed essentially the same neuropathological changes (Fig. 3). In these mice, spongiform change was mainly restricted to the thalamus and hypothalamus. Abnormal PrP deposition had the same distribution as spongiform change characterized by a predominantly diffuse pattern of PrP staining throughout the thalamus and hypothalamus occasionally accompanied by small PrP plaques in the corpus callosum (Fig. 3). In sporadic CJD-inoculated 129VV Tg152 mice propagating type 3 PrPSc, diffuse abnormal PrP staining was also occasionally observed in the brainstem (Fig. 3). In sharp contrast, vCJD-inoculated 129VV Tg152 mice propagating type 5 PrPSc show a very different pattern of abnormal PrP deposition. In clinically affected mice with type 5 PrPSc, a pericellular pattern of PrP immunostaining was originally detected that was difficult to distinguish from mock-inoculated controls because of a high level of PrP overexpression (26). However, after secondary passage, although no clinical prion disease is observed, aged subclinically infected 129VV Tg152 mice with type 5 PrPSc have large, nonflorid, PrP plaques in the corpus callosum with an absence of diffuse PrP deposition in other brain areas (15). In the present study, we have now also observed this distinct pattern of PrP pathology in aged subclinically infected 129VV Tg152 mice after primary challenge with vCJD prions (Fig. 3 and SI Table 1). These collective data establish that the neuropathology of kuru- and sporadic CJD-inoculated 129VV Tg152 mice are closely similar and are quite distinct from the neuropathology seen in the same line of mice after primary challenge or secondary passage of vCJD prions.

Discussion

In the present study, we have compared the transmission properties of kuru prions with sporadic, iatrogenic, and variant CJD prions in transgenic mice expressing human PrP valine 129 and in wild-type mice. These data establish that kuru prions have transmission properties equivalent to those of classical CJD prions and are distinct from vCJD prions. In agreement with this finding, the molecular strain types of PrPSc seen in kuru brain correspond to those seen in classical CJD rather than the distinct PrPSc types seen in vCJD or inherited prion disease. These collective data establish that kuru and classical CJD prions have closely similar prion strain properties and are consistent with the hypothesis that kuru originated from chance consumption of an individual with sporadic CJD (43).

Human prion diseases with distinct etiologies are associated with a range of clinical presentations that are now seen as clinicopathological syndromes rather than individual disease entities (4, 55, 56). The central clinical feature of kuru is progressive cerebellar ataxia, and, in sharp contrast to sporadic CJD, dementia is a late and less prominent feature. A prodrome and three clinical stages consisting of an ambulatory stage, a sedentary stage, and a tertiary stage have been described in ref. 20. In this regard, the natural history of kuru is more reminiscent of vCJD in which early symptoms of distal sensory disturbance, joint pains, and psychiatric and behavioral changes are common before forthright dementia (4, 23, 25, 28). Despite these similarities in early clinical presentation, the molecular and neuropathological features of kuru are distinct from vCJD. In contrast to the occurrence of abundant florid PrP plaques that are the neuropathological hallmark of vCJD (25, 57, 58), the neuropathological changes seen in kuru lie within the spectrum of those seen in sporadic CJD. Unicentric PrP plaques, however, are unusually prominent and widespread (58, 59). This pattern of neuropathology most closely resembles a relatively rare subtype of sporadic CJD associated with long clinical duration and PRNP codon 129 heterozygosity in which kuru-type PrP plaques are also observed (10, 11, 46).

Although PrP plaques are not a prominent feature of the most common subtypes of sporadic CJD, where diffuse synaptic PrP deposition predominates (10, 11, 46, 60), kuru-type plaques are a notable feature of iatrogenic CJD resulting from peripheral inoculation, most conspicuously after cadaveric pituitary-derived hormone exposure (61). This form of iatrogenic CJD also typically presents with a progressive cerebellar syndrome reminiscent of kuru, whereas cases of iatrogenic CJD arising from intracerebral or ocular inoculation usually manifest clinically as sporadic CJD, with a rapidly progressive dementia (6265). These observations suggest that cerebellar onset and subsequent neuropathological changes may be determined in part by a peripheral route of exposure. The similarity of prion strain type in kuru and sporadic CJD demonstrated here now clearly suggests that peripheral routes of infection (predominantly dietary), rather than prion strain type, may be an important determinant of the clinicopathological phenotype of kuru. In this regard, the etiology of sporadic CJD remains unclear, although its remarkably uniform worldwide incidence and apparently random distribution suggest involvement of a stochastic process such as somatic PRNP mutation (2, 48, 66, 67). It is thus possible that part of the phenotypic and neuropathological heterogeneity seen in sporadic CJD could be related to peripheral versus central initiation of prion replication.

Aside from route of exposure, additional factors may also influence the neuropathology and clinical features of kuru. A number of genetic modifiers of prion disease have been mapped in mice (16, 17). Although the genes responsible for mouse incubation time quantitative trait loci have not yet been identified, orthologous human genes are likely to be globally polymorphic with significant differences within and between Europe and the Fore. Furthermore, age is an important determinant of survival in sporadic and inherited prion diseases (68, 69) and youth may be associated with an atypical sporadic CJD neuropathology (70). The marked difference in mean age of kuru and sporadic CJD patients might thus account for some of the neuropathological differences that distinguish kuru from the majority of sporadic CJD cases.

Our finding that kuru prions and vCJD prions have very different transmission properties supports previous molecular (9, 4547, 49, 50), neuropathological (25, 57, 58), and transmission (14, 15, 26, 27) data indicating that vCJD is a highly distinct human prion strain. The pathogenesis of vCJD differs significantly from that of other forms of human prion disease. PrPSc is readily detectable in lymphoreticular tissues in vCJD and not in classical CJD or inherited prion disease (29, 32, 47, 7176). Because kuru, iatrogenic CJD, and vCJD are caused by a peripheral route of exposure to infectious prions, it is possible that extensive lymphoreticular pathogenesis may result from this common route of exposure. However, the fact that tonsillar prion infection has not been detected in iatrogenic CJD associated with use of human cadaveric derived pituitary hormone (72, 75) or kuru (unpublished data) suggests that the distinct peripheral pathogenesis of vCJD is determined by prion strain type alone rather than route of infection.

Although distinct from the vCJD prion strain, kuru is critically important as our only precedent of an orally acquired human prion disease epidemic. There remain striking parallels between the two outbreaks in terms of their clinical features, restricted temporal and geographic distribution, and the long and variable incubation times observed. Profound disease susceptibility is conferred by PRNP codon 129 in both diseases (4, 5, 15, 22). Because mouse models of prion disease demonstrate the importance of a small number of non-Prnp genetic factors in control of incubation time, it will be important to understand how the orthologous human genes modify susceptibility or incubation to both kuru and vCJD.

Materials and Methods

Tissue.

Brain tissue or brain homogenates from patients with neuropathologically confirmed sporadic CJD, iatrogenic CJD, vCJD, or kuru were stored frozen at −80°C. Brain homogenates from three neuropathologically confirmed kuru patients were provided by the late Dr. Clarence J. Gibbs of the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD). These isolates belong to a cohort of 18 kuru patient brain samples that were successfully transmitted to nonhuman primates at the National Institutes of Health between 1963 and 1993 (44). Autopsy and tissue handling of prion-infected brain was performed according to established safety guidelines (77, 78). Storage and biochemical analysis of human brain samples and transmission studies to mice were performed with consent from relatives and with approval from the local research ethics committees of Imperial College School of Medicine, the Institute of Neurology/National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, and the Medical Research Advisory Committee of the Government of Papua New Guinea.

Immunoblotting.

All procedures were carried out in a microbiological containment level III facility with strict adherence to safety protocols. The 10% wt/vol brain homogenates were prepared in PBS lacking Ca2+ or Mg2+ ions by serial passage through needles of decreasing diameter. Proteinase K digestion (50 or 100 μg/ml final protease concentration; 1 h; 37°C), electrophoresis, and immunoblotting were performed as described in refs. 9, 15, 26, and 29. Immunoblot detection of human PrP was performed by using anti-PrP monoclonal antibodies 3F4 (79) or biotinylated ICSM35 (D-Gen Limited). Immunoblot detection of mouse PrP was performed by using anti-PrP antibodies 6H4 (Prionics AG), 95-108 (80), R073 (81), or biotinylated ICSM35 (D-Gen Limited). In some cases, brain homogenates scored negative for PrPSc after analysis of 10 μl of 10% brain homogenate were reanalyzed by ELISA (48) or sodium phosphotungstic acid precipitation of PrPSc from larger volumes of brain homogenate (29).

Transmission Studies.

All procedures were carried out in a microbiological containment level III facility with strict adherence to safety protocols. Care of mice was according to institutional guidelines. Transgenic mice homozygous for a human PrP 129V transgene array and murine PrP-null alleles (Prnpo/o), designated Tg(HuPrP129V+/+ Prnpo/o)-152 mice (129VV Tg152 mice), have been described in refs. 9, 15, 26, and 51. This line of transgenic mice was originally derived by breeding transgenic HuPrP-V129 Tg152 mice that also expressed mouse PrP (82) with PrP-null mice (83). Inbred FVB/NHsd mice were supplied by Harlan. Human brain (frontal cortex) was prepared as 10% (wt/vol) homogenates in sterile PBS lacking Ca2+ and Mg2+ by serial passage through needles of decreasing diameter. After intracerebral inoculation with brain homogenate (30 μl of 1% wt/vol brain homogenate in PBS) as described in refs. 14, 15, and 54, mice were examined daily and were killed if exhibiting signs of distress or once a diagnosis of clinical prion disease was established (84). Brains from inoculated mice were analyzed by immunoblotting and by neuropathological examination.

Neuropathology and Immunohistochemistry.

All steps before prion decontamination with formic acid were performed within a microbiological containment level III facility with strict adherence to safety protocols. Brain was fixed in 10% buffered formal saline and then immersed in 98% formic acid for 1 h and paraffin wax embedded. Serial sections of 4 μm thickness were pretreated by boiling for 10 min in a low ionic strength buffer (2.1 mM Tris, 1.3 mM EDTA, 1.1 mM sodium citrate, pH 7.8) before exposure to 98% formic acid for 5 min. Abnormal PrP accumulation was examined by using anti-PrP monoclonal antibody ICSM 35 (D-Gen Limited) on a Ventana automated immunohistochemical staining machine (Ventana Medical Systems) using proprietary secondary detection reagents (Ventana Medical Systems) before development with 3′,3-diaminobenzidine tetrachloride as the chromogen. Harris hematoxylin and eosin staining was done by conventional methods. Appropriate controls were used throughout.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Table

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.

We thank all of the patients and their families for generously consenting to the use of human tissues in this research, the neuropathologists who have kindly helped in providing these tissues, in particular James Ironside (National Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease Surveillance Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK) and Herbert Budka (Institute of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria), and Ray Young for preparation of figures. This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (United Kingdom), The Wellcome Trust, and the European Commission.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest statement: J.C. is a director, and J.C., A.F.H., and J.D.F.W. are shareholders and consultants, of D-Gen Limited, an academic spin-out company working in the field of prion disease diagnosis, decontamination, and therapeutics. D-Gen markets the ICSM35 antibody used in this study.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0800190105/DC1.

References

  • 1.Prusiner SB. Prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:13363–13383. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Collinge J. Prion diseases of humans and animals: Their causes and molecular basis. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:519–550. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Weissmann C. The state of the prion. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2:861–871. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Collinge J. Molecular neurology of prion disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76:906–919. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.048660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wadsworth JDF, Collinge J. Update on human prion disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1772:598–609. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2007.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bruce ME, Fraser H, McBride PA, Scott JR, Dickinson AG. In: Prion Diseases in Human and Animals. Prusiner SB, Collinge J, Powell J, Anderton B, editors. London: Ellis Horwood; 1992. pp. 497–508. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bessen RA, Marsh RF. Distinct PrP properties suggest the molecular basis of strain variation in transmissible mink encephalopathy. J Virol. 1994;68:7859–7868. doi: 10.1128/jvi.68.12.7859-7868.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Telling GC, et al. Evidence for the conformation of the pathologic isoform of the prion protein enciphering and propagating prion diversity. Science. 1996;274:2079–2082. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5295.2079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Collinge J, Sidle KCL, Meads J, Ironside J, Hill AF. Molecular analysis of prion strain variation and the aetiology of “new variant” CJD. Nature. 1996;383:685–690. doi: 10.1038/383685a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Parchi P, et al. Molecular basis of phenotypic variability in sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease. Ann Neurol. 1996;39:767–778. doi: 10.1002/ana.410390613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Parchi P, et al. Classification of sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease based on molecular and phenotypic analysis of 300 subjects. Ann Neurol. 1999;46:224–233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Safar J, et al. Eight prion strains have PrPSc molecules with different conformations. Nat Med. 1998;4:1157–1165. doi: 10.1038/2654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hill AF, Collinge J. Subclinical prion infection. Trends Microbiol. 2003;11:578–584. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2003.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Asante EA, et al. BSE prions propagate as either variant CJD-like or sporadic CJD-like prion strains in transgenic mice expressing human prion protein. EMBO J. 2002;21:6358–6366. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wadsworth JDF, et al. Human prion protein with valine 129 prevents expression of variant CJD phenotype. Science. 2004;306:1793–1796. doi: 10.1126/science.1103932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Stephenson DA, et al. Quantitative trait loci affecting prion incubation time in mice. Genomics. 2000;69:47–53. doi: 10.1006/geno.2000.6320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lloyd SE, et al. Identification of multiple quantitative trait loci linked to prion disease incubation period in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:6279–6283. doi: 10.1073/pnas.101130398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lloyd SE, et al. Characterization of two distinct prion strains derived from bovine spongiform encephalopathy transmissions to inbred mice. J Gen Virol. 2004;85:2471–2478. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.79889-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zigas V, Gajdusek DC. Kuru: Clinical, pathological and epidemiological study of a recently discovered acute progressive degenerative disease of the central nervous system reaching epidemic proportions among natives of the Eastern Highlands of New Guinea. PNG Med J. 1959;3:1–31. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(59)90251-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Alpers MP. Prions: Novel Infectious Pathogens Causing Scrapie and Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease. In: Prusiner SB, McKinley MP, editors. San Diego: Academic; 1987. pp. 451–465. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Collinge J, Palmer MS. Prion Diseases. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mead S, et al. Balancing selection at the prion protein gene consistent with prehistoric kurulike epidemics. Science. 2003;300:640–643. doi: 10.1126/science.1083320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Collinge J, et al. Kuru in the 21st century-an acquired human prion disease with very long incubation periods. Lancet. 2006;367:2068–2074. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68930-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gajdusek DC, Gibbs CJ, Jr, Alpers MP. Experimental transmission of a kuru-like syndrome to chimpanzees. Nature. 1966;209:794–796. doi: 10.1038/209794a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Will RG, et al. A new variant of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the UK. Lancet. 1996;347:921–925. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91412-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hill AF, et al. The same prion strain causes vCJD and BSE. Nature. 1997;389:448–450. doi: 10.1038/38925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bruce ME, et al. Transmissions to mice indicate that “new variant” CJD is caused by the BSE agent. Nature. 1997;389:498–501. doi: 10.1038/39057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Collinge J. Variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Lancet. 1999;354:317–323. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)05128-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wadsworth JDF, et al. Tissue distribution of protease resistant prion protein in variant CJD using a highly sensitive immuno-blotting assay. Lancet. 2001;358:171–180. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05403-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Llewelyn CA, et al. Possible transmission of variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease by blood transfusion. Lancet. 2004;363:417–421. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15486-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Peden AH, Head MW, Ritchie DL, Bell JE, Ironside JW. Preclinical vCJD after blood transfusion in a PRNP codon 129 heterozygous patient. Lancet. 2004;364:527–529. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16811-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wroe SJ, et al. Clinical presentation and pre-mortem diagnosis of variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease associated with blood transfusion: A case report. Lancet. 2006;368:2061–2067. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69835-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wadsworth JDF, et al. Prion infectivity in vCJD rectum. Gut. 2006;56:90–94. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.091637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hilton DA, et al. Prevalence of lymphoreticular prion protein accumulation in UK tissue samples. J Pathol. 2004;203:733–739. doi: 10.1002/path.1580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Frosh A, et al. Analysis of 2000 consecutive UK tonsillectomy specimens for disease-related prion protein. Lancet. 2004;364:1260–1262. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17143-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hilton DA. Pathogenesis and prevalence of variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. J Pathol. 2005;208:134–141. doi: 10.1002/path.1880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Collinge J, Palmer MS, Dryden AJ. Genetic predisposition to iatrogenic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Lancet. 1991;337:1441–1442. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93128-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Palmer MS, Dryden AJ, Hughes JT, Collinge J. Homozygous prion protein genotype predisposes to sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Nature. 1991;352:340–342. doi: 10.1038/352340a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Windl O, et al. Genetic basis of Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease in the United Kingdom: A systematic analysis of predisposing mutations and allelic variation in the PRNP gene. Hum Genet. 1996;98:259–264. doi: 10.1007/s004390050204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lee HS, et al. Increased susceptibility to kuru of carriers of the PRNP 129 methionine/methionine genotype. J Infect Dis. 2001;183:192–196. doi: 10.1086/317935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Collins SJ, et al. Determinants of diagnostic investigation sensitivities across the clinical spectrum of sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Brain. 2006;129:2278–2287. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Alpers MP. The epidemiology of kuru in the period 1987 to 1995. Commun Dis Intell. 2005;29:391–399. doi: 10.33321/cdi.2005.29.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Alpers M, Rail L. Kuru and Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease: Clinical and aetiological aspects. Proc Aust Assoc Neurol. 1971;8:7–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Brown P, et al. Human spongiform encephalopathy: The National Institutes of Health series of 300 cases of experimentally transmitted disease. Ann Neurol. 1994;35:513–529. doi: 10.1002/ana.410350504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wadsworth JDF, et al. Strain-specific prion-protein conformation determined by metal ions. Nat Cell Biol. 1999;1:55–59. doi: 10.1038/9030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hill AF, et al. Molecular classification of sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Brain. 2003;126:1333–1346. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hill AF, et al. Distinct glycoform ratios of protease resistant prion protein associated with PRNP point mutations. Brain. 2006;129:676–685. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wadsworth JDF, et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity in inherited prion disease (P102L) is associated with differential propagation of protease-resistant wild-type and mutant prion protein. Brain. 2006;129:1557–1569. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Parchi P, et al. Typing prion isoforms. Nature. 1997;386:232–233. doi: 10.1038/386232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Parchi P, et al. Genetic influence on the structural variations of the abnormal prion protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:10168–10172. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.18.10168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Collinge J, et al. Unaltered susceptibility to BSE in transgenic mice expressing human prion protein. Nature. 1995;378:779–783. doi: 10.1038/378779a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lloyd SE, et al. Identification and characterization of a novel mouse prion gene allele. Mamm Genome. 2004;15:383–389. doi: 10.1007/s00335-004-3041-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hill AF, Collinge J. Strain variations and species barriers. Contrib Microbiol. 2001;7:48–57. doi: 10.1159/000060375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Asante EA, et al. Dissociation of pathological and molecular phenotype of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in transgenic human prion protein 129 heterozygous mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:10759–10764. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604292103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Collinge J, et al. Inherited prion disease with 144 base pair gene insertion: II: Clinical and pathological features. Brain. 1992;115:687–710. doi: 10.1093/brain/115.3.687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wadsworth JDF, Hill AF, Beck JA, Collinge J. Molecular and clinical classification of human prion disease. Br Med Bull. 2003;66:241–254. doi: 10.1093/bmb/66.1.241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ironside JW, Head MW. Neuropathology and molecular biology of variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2004;284:133–159. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-08441-0_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.McLean CA, et al. Comparative neuropathology of kuru with the new variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease: Evidence for a strain of agent predominating over genotype of host. Brain Pathol. 1998;8:429–437. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1998.tb00165.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hainfellner JA, et al. Pathology and immunocytochemistry of a kuru brain. Brain Pathol. 1997;7:547–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1997.tb01072.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Budka H. Neuropathology of prion diseases. Br Med Bull. 2003;66:121–130. doi: 10.1093/bmb/66.1.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Billette de Villemeur T, et al. Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease in three growth hormone recipients: A neuropathological study. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1994;20:111–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.1994.tb01169.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Brown P, Preece MA, Will RG. “Friendly fire” in medicine: Hormones, homografts, and Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Lancet. 1992;340:24–27. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92431-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Brown P, et al. Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease at the millennium. Neurology. 2000;55:1075–1081. doi: 10.1212/wnl.55.8.1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Brown P, Brandel JP, Preese M, Sato T. Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. The waning of an era. Neurology. 2006;67:389–393. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000231528.65069.3f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Will RG. Acquired prion disease: Iatrogenic CJD, variant CJD, kuru. Br Med Bull. 2003;66:255–265. doi: 10.1093/bmb/66.1.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Brown P, Cathala F, Raubertas RF, Gajdusek DC, Castaigne P. The epidemiology of Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease: Conclusion of a 15-year investigation in France and review of the world literature. Neurology. 1987;37:895–904. doi: 10.1212/wnl.37.6.895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Mead S, et al. Inherited prion disease with 5-OPRI: Phenotype modification by repeat length and codon 129. Neurology. 2007;69:730–738. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000267642.41594.9d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Pocchiari M, et al. Predictors of survival in sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease and other human transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. Brain. 2004;127:2348–2359. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Mead S, et al. Inherited prion disease with six octapeptide repeat insertional mutation-molecular analysis of phenotypic heterogeneity. Brain. 2006;129:2297–2317. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Murray K, et al. Sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease in two adolescents. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;79:14–18. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.104570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hill AF, Zeidler M, Ironside J, Collinge J. Diagnosis of new variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease by tonsil biopsy. Lancet. 1997;349:99–100. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)24002-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hill AF, et al. Investigation of variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease and other human prion diseases with tonsil biopsy samples. Lancet. 1999;353:183–189. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)12075-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Glatzel M, Abela E, Maissen M, Aguzzi A. Extraneural pathologic prion protein in sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1812–1820. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hilton DA, et al. Specificity of lymphoreticular accumulation of prion protein for variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. J Clin Pathol. 2004;57:300–302. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2003.012278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Head MW, et al. Peripheral tissue involvement in sporadic, iatrogenic, and variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease: An immunohistochemical, quantitative, and biochemical study. Am J Pathol. 2004;164:143–153. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63105-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Joiner S, Linehan JM, Brandner S, Wadsworth JDF, Collinge J. High levels of disease related prion protein in the ileum in variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Gut. 2005;54:1506–1508. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.072447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Budka H, et al. Tissue handling in suspected Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD) and other human spongiform encephalopathies (Prion diseases). Brain Pathol. 1995;5:319–322. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1995.tb00609.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens. London: HM Stationary Office; 1998. Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy Agents: Safe Working and the Prevention of Infection. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kascsak RJ, et al. Mouse polyclonal and monoclonal antibody to scrapie-associated fibril proteins. J Virol. 1987;61:3688–3693. doi: 10.1128/jvi.61.12.3688-3693.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Piccardo P, et al. An antibody raised against a conserved sequence of the prion protein recognizes pathological isoforms in human and animal prion diseases, including Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease and bovine spongiform encephalopathy. Am J Pathol. 1998;152:1415–1420. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Serban D, Taraboulos A, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Rapid detection of Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease and scrapie prion proteins. Neurology. 1990;40:110–117. doi: 10.1212/wnl.40.1.110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Telling GC, et al. Transmission of Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease from humans to transgenic mice expressing chimeric human-mouse prion protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:9936–9940. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.21.9936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bueler H, et al. Normal development and behaviour of mice lacking the neuronal cell-surface PrP protein. Nature. 1992;356:577–582. doi: 10.1038/356577a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Carlson GA, et al. Linkage of prion protein and scrapie incubation time genes. Cell. 1986;46:503–511. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90875-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Table

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES