Skip to main content
PMC home page
Epidemiology and Infection logoLink to Epidemiology and Infection
. 1995 Feb;114(1):179–193. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800052031

The occurrence of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle in and around an area subject to extensive badger (Meles meles) control.

R S Clifton-Hadley 1, J W Wilesmith 1, M S Richards 1, P Upton 1, S Johnston 1
PMCID: PMC2271337  PMID: 7867737

Abstract

The occurrence of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle herds during the period 1966-92 in two geographically related areas in South-West England is compared. In one area comprising 104 km2 all badgers were systematically destroyed from 1975-81, after which recolonization was allowed; in the other, comprising 116 km2, small scale, statutory badger removal operations were undertaken from 1975 onwards where specific herds were detected with M. bovis infection. In the area with total clearance, no further incidents with M. bovis isolation occurred from 1982-92. Survival analysis and proportional hazards regression indicated that the risk of herds being identified with infection was less once badgers had been cleared from their neighbourhood, whereas it was greater in herds with 50 or more animals, and once cattle in a herd had responded positively to the tuberculin skin test, even though infection with M. bovis was not confirmed subsequently. The study provides further evidence that badgers represent an important reservoir of M. bovis infection for cattle and that badger control is effective in reducing incidents of cattle infection with M. bovis if action is thorough and recolonization is prevented.

Full text

PDF
182

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Breslow N. Covariance analysis of censored survival data. Biometrics. 1974 Mar;30(1):89–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cheeseman C. L., Wilesmith J. W., Stuart F. A. Tuberculosis: the disease and its epidemiology in the badger, a review. Epidemiol Infect. 1989 Aug;103(1):113–125. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800030417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clifton-Hadley R. S., Wilesmith J. W. Tuberculosis in deer: a review. Vet Rec. 1991 Jul 6;129(1):5–12. doi: 10.1136/vr.129.1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gallagher J., Nelson J. Cause of ill health and natural death in badgers in Gloucestershire. Vet Rec. 1979 Dec 15;105(24):546–551. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lesslie I. W., Herbert C. N., Barnett D. N. Comparison of the specificity of human and bovine tuberculin PPD for testing cattle. 2. South-eastern England. Vet Rec. 1975 Apr 12;96(15):335–338. doi: 10.1136/vr.96.15.335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lesslie I. W., Herbert C. N., Burn K. J., MacClancy B. N., Donnelly W. J. Comparison of the specificty of human and bovine tuberculin PPD for testing cattle. 1--Republic of Ireland. Vet Rec. 1975 Apr 12;96(15):332–334. doi: 10.1136/vr.96.15.332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lesslie I. W., Herbert C. N. Comparison of the specificity of human and bovine tuberculin PPF for testing cattle. 3. National trial in Great Britain. Vet Rec. 1975 Apr 12;96(15):338–341. doi: 10.1136/vr.96.15.338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Little T. W., Swan C., Thompson H. V., Wilesmith J. W. Bovine tuberculosis in domestic and wild mammals in an area of Dorset. II. The badger population, its ecology and tuberculosis status. J Hyg (Lond) 1982 Oct;89(2):211–224. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400070741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Murhead R. H., Burns K. J. Tuberculosis in wild badgers in Gloucestershire: epidemiology. Vet Rec. 1974 Dec 14;95(24):552–555. doi: 10.1136/vr.95.24.552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pritchard D. G., Stuart F. A., Brewer J. I., Mahmood K. H. Experimental infection of badgers (Meles meles) with Mycobacterium bovis. Epidemiol Infect. 1987 Apr;98(2):145–154. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800061859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wilesmith J. W. Epidemiological features of bovine tuberculosis in cattle herds in Great Britain. J Hyg (Lond) 1983 Apr;90(2):159–176. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400028837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wilesmith J. W., Little T. W., Thompson H. V., Swan C. Bovine tuberculosis in domestic and wild mammals in an area of Dorset. I. Tuberculosis in cattle. J Hyg (Lond) 1982 Oct;89(2):195–210. doi: 10.1017/s002217240007073x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wilesmith J. W., Sayers P. E., Little T. W., Brewer J. I., Bode R., Hillman G. D., Pritchard D. G., Stuart F. A. Tuberculosis in East Sussex. IV. A systematic examination of wild mammals other than badgers for tuberculosis. J Hyg (Lond) 1986 Aug;97(1):37–48. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400064330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wilesmith J. W., Williams D. R. Observations on the incidence of herds with non-visible lesioned tuberculin test reactors in south-west England. Epidemiol Infect. 1987 Aug;99(1):173–178. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800067005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Worthington R. W. Mycobacterial PPD sensitins and the nonspecific reactor problem. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1967 Dec;34(2):345–437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Epidemiology and Infection are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES