Skip to main content
PMC home page
Epidemiology and Infection logoLink to Epidemiology and Infection
. 1995 Aug;115(1):101–113. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800058167

Application of pulsed field gel electrophoresis to the 1993 epidemic of whooping cough in the UK.

S N Syedabubakar 1, R C Matthews 1, N W Preston 1, D Owen 1, V Hillier 1
PMCID: PMC2271567  PMID: 7641824

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to DNA fingerprint the majority (64%) of isolates received at the Pertussis Reference Laboratory during the 1993 whooping cough epidemic by pulsed field gel electrophoresis of Xba I-generated restriction digests. Two DNA restriction patterns, types 1 and 3, predominated (40% and 23%, respectively, of 180 isolates) but type 2, identified in a previous study was notably absent. Twenty-one new DNA types occurred (24% of isolates), some being atypical as bands 155-230 kb were no longer conserved, but there was no statistically significant difference in their incidence in the upswing (June-September) compared to the downswing (October-December) phase of the epidemic. There was a relatively high proportion of new types, compared to type 1, at the peak (September). About 50% of isolates received were from the North Western Region, where 44% of isolates were DNA type 1. Whereas only 1 out of 10 isolates from Scotland were of this type, suggesting some geographic variation. Statistically significant findings included a higher proportion of isolates from female patients (P < 0.01), most marked in the 12-24 months age group (P < 0.05); a higher proportion of infants under 12 months requiring hospital admission compared to older children (P < 0.05); and a greater number of isolates from unvaccinated children (P < 0.01). Analysis of serotype according to four age groups (under 3 months, 3-12 months, 12-24 months and above 2 years) showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) with a noticeably lower proportion (38%) of serotype 1,3 in 3-12 months age group and higher prevalence (74%) of serotype 1,3 in the 12-24 months age group. There was no correlation between DNA type and serotype.

Full text

PDF
104

Images in this article

109Fig. 2
on p.109

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Booy R., Aitken S. J., Taylor S., Tudor-Williams G., Macfarlane J. A., Moxon E. R., Ashworth L. A., Mayon-White R. T., Griffiths H., Chapel H. M. Immunogenicity of combined diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine given at 2, 3, and 4 months versus 3, 5, and 9 months of age. Lancet. 1992 Feb 29;339(8792):507–510. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90336-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cantor C. R., Smith C. L., Mathew M. K. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of very large DNA molecules. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1988;17:287–304. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.17.060188.001443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fine P. E. Herd immunity: history, theory, practice. Epidemiol Rev. 1993;15(2):265–302. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Finegold S. M. In memoriam: Vera La Verne Sutter. Rev Infect Dis. 1991 May-Jun;13(3):528–528. doi: 10.1093/clinids/13.3.528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Galbraith N. S., Forbes P., Mayon-White R. T. Changing patterns of communicable disease in England and Wales. Part III--Increasing infectious diseases. Br Med J. 1980 Aug 23;281(6239):546–549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6239.546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Khattak M. N., Matthews R. C., Burnie J. P. Is Bordetella pertussis clonal? BMJ. 1992 Mar 28;304(6830):813–815. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6830.813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Khattak M. N., Matthews R. C. Genetic relatedness of Bordetella species as determined by macrorestriction digests resolved by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1993 Oct;43(4):659–664. doi: 10.1099/00207713-43-4-659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McClelland M., Jones R., Patel Y., Nelson M. Restriction endonucleases for pulsed field mapping of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Aug 11;15(15):5985–6005. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.15.5985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Miller E., Farrington C. P. The current epidemiology of pertussis in the developed world: UK and West Germany. Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 1988;13 (Suppl):97–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pollock T. M., Miller E., Lobb J. Severity of whooping cough in England before and after the decline in pertussis immunisation. Arch Dis Child. 1984 Feb;59(2):162–165. doi: 10.1136/adc.59.2.162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Preston N. W., Carter E. J. Serotype specificity of vaccine-induced immunity to pertussis. Commun Dis Rep CDR Rev. 1992 Dec 4;2(13):R155–R156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Preston N. W. Change in serotype of pertussis infection in Britain. Lancet. 1985 Mar 2;1(8427):510–510. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92101-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Preston N. W. Technical problems in the laboratory diagnosis and prevention of whooping-cough. Lab Pract. 1970 May;19(5):482–486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ramsay M. E., Corbel M. J., Redhead K., Ashworth L. A., Begg N. T. Persistence of antibody after accelerated immunisation with diphtheria/tetanus/pertussis vaccine. BMJ. 1991 Jun 22;302(6791):1489–1491. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6791.1489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith C. L., Cantor C. R. Purification, specific fragmentation, and separation of large DNA molecules. Methods Enzymol. 1987;155:449–467. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)55030-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. White J. M., Leon S., Begg N. T. 'COVER' (cover of vaccination evaluated rapidly): 27. Commun Dis Rep CDR Rev. 1993 Oct 8;3(11):R158–R158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Epidemiology and Infection are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES