Skip to main content
PMC home page
Epidemiology and Infection logoLink to Epidemiology and Infection
. 1991 Oct;107(2):335–347. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800048974

The social and economic impact of salmonellosis. A report of a national survey in England and Wales of laboratory-confirmed Salmonella infections.

P N Sockett 1, J A Roberts 1
PMCID: PMC2272060  PMID: 1936155

Abstract

This study presents the findings of a national survey of 1482 cases of salmonellosis reported to Environmental Health Departments in England and Wales between August 1988 and March 1989. A questionnaire survey of ill individuals and the environmental health officers who investigated them sought information about costs which were imposed upon public health authorities, the health sector, individuals and their families and the costs to the wider economy in terms of lost production. Costs of 996,339 pounds were identified. Over half (507,555 pounds) resulted from lost production due to sickness absence and more than a third (392,822 pounds) were costs to the public sector which resulted from health care and local authority investigation of cases. The remaining costs (95,962 pounds), although the smallest proportion of the total, indicated that salmonellosis can have a significant impact on affected individuals and their families.

Full text

PDF
337

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cohen D. R., Porter I. A., Reid T. M., Sharp J. C., Forbes G. I., Paterson G. M. A cost benefit study of milk-borne salmonellosis. J Hyg (Lond) 1983 Aug;91(1):17–23. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400059982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Galbraith N. S., Barrett N. J., Sockett P. N. The changing pattern of foodborne disease in England and Wales. Public Health. 1987 Sep;101(5):319–328. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(87)80090-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kong K. L., Willatts S. M., Prys-Roberts C. Isoflurane compared with midazolam for sedation in the intensive care unit. BMJ. 1989 May 13;298(6683):1277–1280. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6683.1277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Levy B. S., McIntire W. The economic impact of a food-borne salmonellosis outbreak. JAMA. 1974 Dec 2;230(9):1281–1282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mann J. M., Lathrop G. D., Bannerman J. A. Economic impact of a botulism outbreak. Importance of the legal component in food-borne disease. JAMA. 1983 Mar 11;249(10):1299–1301. doi: 10.1001/jama.249.10.1299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Roberts J. A. The National Health Service in the UK: from myths to markets. Health Policy Plan. 1989 Mar;4(1):62–71. doi: 10.1093/heapol/4.1.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Todd E. Epidemiology of foodborne illness: North America. Lancet. 1990 Sep 29;336(8718):788–790. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)93250-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Epidemiology and Infection are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES