Skip to main content
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association logoLink to Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
. 1988 Jan;76(1):7–13.

User attitudes toward end-user literature searching.

L Ludwig 1, J K Mixter 1, M A Emanuele 1
PMCID: PMC227228  PMID: 3285930

Abstract

A survey to determine attitudes toward end-user searching was made at Loyola University's Medical Center Library using MEDIS, an online full-text and bibliographic medical retrieval system. One hundred forty-one completed questionnaires were analyzed for this report. Information was collected on user familiarity with computers, end-user training, system use, mechanics of searching, and attitudes toward future use. Computer familiarity was highest among the faculty users. Ninety percent of the respondents saw librarians as a crucial agent in training and in providing end-user assistance. Respondents identified five major reasons for using the system: helpfulness, convenience, time savings, rapid feedback, and presentation of needed information. Searching the MEDLINE database rather than the full-text database was the search method of choice. Continued use of both mediated and end-user searching was intended by most of the respondents. Survey results support a perceived need for end-user searching and confirmed recommendations of the Association of American Medical Colleges on medical information science skills.

Full text

PDF
13

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Collen M. F., Flagle C. D. Full-text medical literature retrieval by computer. A pilot test. JAMA. 1985 Nov 15;254(19):2768–2774. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Haynes R. B., McKibbon K. A., Fitzgerald D., Guyatt G. H., Walker C. J., Sackett D. L. How to keep up with the medical literature: V. Access by personal computer to the medical literature. Ann Intern Med. 1986 Nov;105(5):810–816. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-105-5-810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Haynes R. B., McKibbon K. A., Walker C. J., Mousseau J., Baker L. M., Fitzgerald D., Guyatt G., Norman G. R. Computer searching of the medical literature. An evaluation of MEDLINE searching systems. Ann Intern Med. 1985 Nov;103(5):812–816. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-103-5-812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Marshall J. G. How to choose the online medical database that's right for you. CMAJ. 1986 Mar 15;134(6):634-7, 640. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Poisson E. H. End-user searching in medicine. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1986 Oct;74(4):293–299. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rios Kravitz R. A. MEDIS: a user's perspective. Med Ref Serv Q. 1987 Spring;6(1):1–26. doi: 10.1300/J115v06n01_01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Singer J., Sacks H. S., Lucente F., Chalmers T. C. Physician attitudes toward applications of computer data base systems. JAMA. 1983 Mar 25;249(12):1610–1614. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the Medical Library Association are provided here courtesy of Medical Library Association

RESOURCES