Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1992 Nov 1;119(3):569–582. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.3.569

Poleward kinetochore fiber movement occurs during both metaphase and anaphase-A in newt lung cell mitosis

PMCID: PMC2289668  PMID: 1400593

Abstract

Microtubules in the mitotic spindles of newt lung cells were marked using local photoactivation of fluorescence. The movement of marked segments on kinetochore fibers was tracked by digital fluorescence microscopy in metaphase and anaphase and compared to the rate of chromosome movement. In metaphase, kinetochore oscillations toward and away from the poles were coupled to kinetochore fiber shortening and growth. Marked zones on the kinetochore microtubules, meanwhile, moved slowly polewards at a rate of approximately 0.5 micron/min, which identifies a slow polewards movement, or "flux," of kinetochore microtubules accompanied by depolymerization at the pole, as previously found in PtK2 cells (Mitchison, 1989b). Marks were never seen moving away from the pole, indicating that growth of the kinetochore microtubules occurs only at their kinetochore ends. In anaphase, marked zones on kinetochore microtubules also moved polewards, though at a rate slower than overall kinetochore-to-pole movement. Early in anaphase-A, microtubule depolymerization at kinetochores accounted on average for 75% of the rate of chromosome-to-pole movement, and depolymerization at the pole accounted for 25%. When chromosome-to-pole movement slowed in late anaphase, the contribution of depolymerization at the kinetochores lessened, and flux became the dominant component in some cells. Over the whole course of anaphase-A, depolymerization at kinetochores accounted on average for 63% of kinetochore fiber shortening, and flux for 37%. In some anaphase cells up to 45% of shortening resulted from the action of flux. We conclude that kinetochore microtubules change length predominantly through polymerization and depolymerization at the kinetochores during both metaphase and anaphase as the kinetochores move away from and towards the poles. Depolymerization, though not polymerization, also occurs at the pole during metaphase and anaphase, so that flux contributes to polewards chromosome movements throughout mitosis. Poleward force production for chromosome movements is thus likely to be generated by at least two distinct molecular mechanisms.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aist J. R., Bayles C. J., Tao W., Berns M. W. Direct experimental evidence for the existence, structural basis and function of astral forces during anaphase B in vivo. J Cell Sci. 1991 Oct;100(Pt 2):279–288. doi: 10.1242/jcs.100.2.279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander S. P., Rieder C. L. Chromosome motion during attachment to the vertebrate spindle: initial saltatory-like behavior of chromosomes and quantitative analysis of force production by nascent kinetochore fibers. J Cell Biol. 1991 May;113(4):805–815. doi: 10.1083/jcb.113.4.805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cande W. Z., Hogan C. J. The mechanism of anaphase spindle elongation. Bioessays. 1989 Jul;11(1):5–9. doi: 10.1002/bies.950110103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cassimeris L., Inoué S., Salmon E. D. Microtubule dynamics in the chromosomal spindle fiber: analysis by fluorescence and high-resolution polarization microscopy. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1988;10(1-2):185–196. doi: 10.1002/cm.970100123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cassimeris L., Rieder C. L., Rupp G., Salmon E. D. Stability of microtubule attachment to metaphase kinetochores in PtK1 cells. J Cell Sci. 1990 May;96(Pt 1):9–15. doi: 10.1242/jcs.96.1.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cassimeris L., Salmon E. D. Kinetochore microtubules shorten by loss of subunits at the kinetochores of prometaphase chromosomes. J Cell Sci. 1991 Feb;98(Pt 2):151–158. doi: 10.1242/jcs.98.2.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Centonze V. E., Borisy G. G. Pole-to-chromosome movements induced at metaphase: sites of microtubule disassembly. J Cell Sci. 1991 Sep;100(Pt 1):205–211. doi: 10.1242/jcs.100.1.205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Coue M., Lombillo V. A., McIntosh J. R. Microtubule depolymerization promotes particle and chromosome movement in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1991 Mar;112(6):1165–1175. doi: 10.1083/jcb.112.6.1165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. FORER A. LOCAL REDUCTION OF SPINDLE FIBER BIREFRINGENCE IN LIVING NEPHROTOMA SUTURALIS (LOEW) SPERMATOCYTES INDUCED BY ULTRAVIOLET MICROBEAM IRRADIATION. J Cell Biol. 1965 Apr;25:SUPPL–SUPPL117. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.1.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Forer A. Characterization of the mitotic traction system, and evidence that birefringent spindle fibers neither produce nor transmit force for chromosome movement. Chromosoma. 1966;19(1):44–98. doi: 10.1007/BF00332793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gard D. L., Kirschner M. W. Microtubule assembly in cytoplasmic extracts of Xenopus oocytes and eggs. J Cell Biol. 1987 Nov;105(5):2191–2201. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.5.2191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gelfand V. I., Bershadsky A. D. Microtubule dynamics: mechanism, regulation, and function. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1991;7:93–116. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.07.110191.000521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Geuens G., Hill A. M., Levilliers N., Adoutte A., DeBrabander M. Microtubule dynamics investigated by microinjection of Paramecium axonemal tubulin: lack of nucleation but proximal assembly of microtubules at the kinetochore during prometaphase. J Cell Biol. 1989 Mar;108(3):939–953. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.3.939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gorbsky G. J., Borisy G. G. Microtubules of the kinetochore fiber turn over in metaphase but not in anaphase. J Cell Biol. 1989 Aug;109(2):653–662. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.2.653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gorbsky G. J., Sammak P. J., Borisy G. G. Microtubule dynamics and chromosome motion visualized in living anaphase cells. J Cell Biol. 1988 Apr;106(4):1185–1192. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.4.1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hamaguchi Y., Toriyama M., Sakai H., Hiramoto Y. Redistribution of fluorescently labeled tubulin in the mitotic apparatus of sand dollar eggs and the effects of taxol. Cell Struct Funct. 1987 Feb;12(1):43–52. doi: 10.1247/csf.12.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hayden J. H., Bowser S. S., Rieder C. L. Kinetochores capture astral microtubules during chromosome attachment to the mitotic spindle: direct visualization in live newt lung cells. J Cell Biol. 1990 Sep;111(3):1039–1045. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.3.1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hays T. S., Salmon E. D. Poleward force at the kinetochore in metaphase depends on the number of kinetochore microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1990 Feb;110(2):391–404. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.2.391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hays T. S., Wise D., Salmon E. D. Traction force on a kinetochore at metaphase acts as a linear function of kinetochore fiber length. J Cell Biol. 1982 May;93(2):374–389. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.2.374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hiramoto Y., Nakano Y. Micromanipulation studies of the mitotic apparatus in sand dollar eggs. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1988;10(1-2):172–184. doi: 10.1002/cm.970100122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hoyt M. A., Totis L., Roberts B. T. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):507–517. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90014-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hyman A. A., Mitchison T. J. Two different microtubule-based motor activities with opposite polarities in kinetochores. Nature. 1991 May 16;351(6323):206–211. doi: 10.1038/351206a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hyman A., Drechsel D., Kellogg D., Salser S., Sawin K., Steffen P., Wordeman L., Mitchison T. Preparation of modified tubulins. Methods Enzymol. 1991;196:478–485. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)96041-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Inoué S., Sato H. Cell motility by labile association of molecules. The nature of mitotic spindle fibers and their role in chromosome movement. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Jul;50(6 Suppl):259–292. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jensen C. G. Dynamics of spindle microtubule organization: kinetochore fiber microtubules of plant endosperm. J Cell Biol. 1982 Feb;92(2):540–558. doi: 10.1083/jcb.92.2.540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kimble M., Church K. Meiosis and early cleavage in Drosophila melanogaster eggs: effects of the claret-non-disjunctional mutation. J Cell Sci. 1983 Jul;62:301–318. doi: 10.1242/jcs.62.1.301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Koshland D. E., Mitchison T. J., Kirschner M. W. Polewards chromosome movement driven by microtubule depolymerization in vitro. Nature. 1988 Feb 11;331(6156):499–504. doi: 10.1038/331499a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Li R., Murray A. W. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):519–531. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90015-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mastronarde D. N., O'Toole E. T., McDonald K. L., McIntosh J. R., Porter M. E. Arrangement of inner dynein arms in wild-type and mutant flagella of Chlamydomonas. J Cell Biol. 1992 Sep;118(5):1145–1162. doi: 10.1083/jcb.118.5.1145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. McDonald H. B., Stewart R. J., Goldstein L. S. The kinesin-like ncd protein of Drosophila is a minus end-directed microtubule motor. Cell. 1990 Dec 21;63(6):1159–1165. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90412-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. McIntosh J. R., Pfarr C. M. Mitotic motors. J Cell Biol. 1991 Nov;115(3):577–585. doi: 10.1083/jcb.115.3.577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mitchison T. J., Kirschner M. W. Properties of the kinetochore in vitro. II. Microtubule capture and ATP-dependent translocation. J Cell Biol. 1985 Sep;101(3):766–777. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.3.766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mitchison T. J. Microtubule dynamics and kinetochore function in mitosis. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1988;4:527–549. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.04.110188.002523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mitchison T. J. Mitosis: basic concepts. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1989 Feb;1(1):67–74. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(89)80039-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mitchison T. J. Polewards microtubule flux in the mitotic spindle: evidence from photoactivation of fluorescence. J Cell Biol. 1989 Aug;109(2):637–652. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.2.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mitchison T. J. Self-organization of polymer-motor systems in the cytoskeleton. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992 Apr 29;336(1276):99–106. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1992.0049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mitchison T., Evans L., Schulze E., Kirschner M. Sites of microtubule assembly and disassembly in the mitotic spindle. Cell. 1986 May 23;45(4):515–527. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90283-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Nicklas R. B. Measurements of the force produced by the mitotic spindle in anaphase. J Cell Biol. 1983 Aug;97(2):542–548. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.2.542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Nicklas R. B. Mitosis. Adv Cell Biol. 1971;2:225–297. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-9588-5_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Nicklas R. B. The motor for poleward chromosome movement in anaphase is in or near the kinetochore. J Cell Biol. 1989 Nov;109(5):2245–2255. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.5.2245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Pfarr C. M., Coue M., Grissom P. M., Hays T. S., Porter M. E., McIntosh J. R. Cytoplasmic dynein is localized to kinetochores during mitosis. Nature. 1990 May 17;345(6272):263–265. doi: 10.1038/345263a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pickett-Heaps J. D., Tippit D. H., Porter K. R. Rethinking mitosis. Cell. 1982 Jul;29(3):729–744. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90435-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rieder C. L., Alexander S. P. Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells. J Cell Biol. 1990 Jan;110(1):81–95. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.1.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rieder C. L., Hard R. Newt lung epithelial cells: cultivation, use, and advantages for biomedical research. Int Rev Cytol. 1990;122:153–220. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61208-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rieder C. L. Mitosis: towards a molecular understanding of chromosome behavior. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;3(1):59–66. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(91)90166-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rieder C. L. The formation, structure, and composition of the mammalian kinetochore and kinetochore fiber. Int Rev Cytol. 1982;79:1–58. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61672-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Salmon E. D., Leslie R. J., Saxton W. M., Karow M. L., McIntosh J. R. Spindle microtubule dynamics in sea urchin embryos: analysis using a fluorescein-labeled tubulin and measurements of fluorescence redistribution after laser photobleaching. J Cell Biol. 1984 Dec;99(6):2165–2174. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.6.2165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Salmon E. D., McKeel M., Hays T. Rapid rate of tubulin dissociation from microtubules in the mitotic spindle in vivo measured by blocking polymerization with colchicine. J Cell Biol. 1984 Sep;99(3):1066–1075. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.3.1066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sawin K. E., Mitchison T. J. Poleward microtubule flux mitotic spindles assembled in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1991 Mar;112(5):941–954. doi: 10.1083/jcb.112.5.941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sawin K. E., Scholey J. M. Motor proteins in cell division. Trends Cell Biol. 1991 Nov;1(5):122–129. doi: 10.1016/0962-8924(91)90117-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Saxton W. M., Stemple D. L., Leslie R. J., Salmon E. D., Zavortink M., McIntosh J. R. Tubulin dynamics in cultured mammalian cells. J Cell Biol. 1984 Dec;99(6):2175–2186. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.6.2175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Simon J. R., Parsons S. F., Salmon E. D. Buffer conditions and non-tubulin factors critically affect the microtubule dynamic instability of sea urchin egg tubulin. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1992;21(1):1–14. doi: 10.1002/cm.970210102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Spurck T. P., Stonington O. G., Snyder J. A., Pickett-Heaps J. D., Bajer A., Mole-Bajer J. UV microbeam irradiations of the mitotic spindle. II. Spindle fiber dynamics and force production. J Cell Biol. 1990 Oct;111(4):1505–1518. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.4.1505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Steuer E. R., Wordeman L., Schroer T. A., Sheetz M. P. Localization of cytoplasmic dynein to mitotic spindles and kinetochores. Nature. 1990 May 17;345(6272):266–268. doi: 10.1038/345266a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wadsworth P., Salmon E. D. Analysis of the treadmilling model during metaphase of mitosis using fluorescence redistribution after photobleaching. J Cell Biol. 1986 Mar;102(3):1032–1038. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.3.1032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wadsworth P., Shelden E., Rupp G., Rieder C. L. Biotin-tubulin incorporates into kinetochore fiber microtubules during early but not late anaphase. J Cell Biol. 1989 Nov;109(5):2257–2265. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.5.2257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Walker R. A., Salmon E. D., Endow S. A. The Drosophila claret segregation protein is a minus-end directed motor molecule. Nature. 1990 Oct 25;347(6295):780–782. doi: 10.1038/347780a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wise D., Cassimeris L., Rieder C. L., Wadsworth P., Salmon E. D. Chromosome fiber dynamics and congression oscillations in metaphase PtK2 cells at 23 degrees C. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1991;18(2):131–142. doi: 10.1002/cm.970180208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES