Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1996 Sep;34(9):2180–2184. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.9.2180-2184.1996

Clinical importance of increased sensitivity of BacT/Alert FAN aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles.

L C McDonald 1, J Fune 1, L B Gaido 1, M P Weinstein 1, L G Reimer 1, T M Flynn 1, M L Wilson 1, S Mirrett 1, L B Reller 1
PMCID: PMC229213  PMID: 8862581

Abstract

Two recent multicenter blood culture studies found that BacT/Alert FAN (FAN) bottles (Organon Teknika, Durham, N.C.) had increased yields in detecting bacteremia and fungemia compared with standard BacT/Alert (STD) bottles. Because the clinical importance of this increase in microbial recovery is unknown, we performed a retrospective analysis to determine the frequency with which FAN bottles were the sole means of detecting an episode of bacteremia. There were 1,047 positive blood cultures in which both study bottles were adequately filled and the organism isolated was judged to be the cause of sepsis: 240 (23%) were positive only in FAN bottles and 73 (7%) were positive only in STD bottles. Of a total of 664 episodes of bacteremia, 126 (19%) were identified only by FAN bottles and 43 (7%) were identified only by STD bottles (P < 0.0001). Episodes detected only by FAN bottles more often were recurrent events (23 of 126, or 18%) than episodes detected only by STD bottles (2 of 43, or 5%) (P < 0.05) and more commonly occurred in patients receiving theoretically effective antibiotic therapy (33 of 126 [26%] versus 4 of 43 [9%]) (P < 0.05). The medical records for patients with 127 of these episodes (92 FAN bottles only; 35 STD bottles only) were available for review. More than half of both FAN bottle-only (60 of 92, or 65%) and STD bottle-only (20 of 35, or 57%) episodes were judged to be clinically important. We conclude that FAN bottles improve the detection of bacteremia and that the majority of the additional episodes detected are clinically important. The benefits of the greater yield in specific patient populations must be balanced against the higher costs of FAN bottles.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (169.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Appleman M. D., Swinney R. S., Heseltine P. N. Evaluation of the Antibiotic Removal Device. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Feb;15(2):278–281. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.2.278-281.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates D. W., Goldman L., Lee T. H. Contaminant blood cultures and resource utilization. The true consequences of false-positive results. JAMA. 1991 Jan 16;265(3):365–369. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bryant J. K., Strand C. L. Reliability of blood cultures collected from intravascular catheter versus venipuncture. Am J Clin Pathol. 1987 Jul;88(1):113–116. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/88.1.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Courcol R. J., Durocher A. V., Roussel-Delvallez M., Fruchart A., Martin G. R. Routine evaluation of BACTEC NR-16A and NR-17A media. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Sep;26(9):1619–1622. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.9.1619-1622.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Doern G. V., Gantz N. M. Detection of bacteremia in patients receiving antimicrobial therapy: an evaluation of the antimicrobial removal device and 16B medium. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jul;18(1):43–48. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.1.43-48.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Doern G. V. Manual blood culture systems and the antimicrobial removal device. Clin Lab Med. 1994 Mar;14(1):133–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Doern G. V., Vautour R., Gaudet M., Levy B. Clinical impact of rapid in vitro susceptibility testing and bacterial identification. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jul;32(7):1757–1762. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.7.1757-1762.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hopfer R. L., Moore D. G., Fainstein V., Watkins S., Wenglar M. Routine use of BACTEC 16B bottles to remove antibacterial and antitumor agents from blood cultures of cancer patients. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Oct;18(4):759–764. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.4.759-764.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jessamine P. G., Hoban D. J., Forward K. R. Positive Bactec resin cultures do not influence antimicrobial selection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1990 Jul-Aug;13(4):281–284. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(90)90017-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kelly M. T., Roberts F. J., Henry D., Geere I., Smith J. A. Clinical comparison of isolator and BACTEC 660 resin media for blood culture. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Sep;28(9):1925–1927. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.9.1925-1927.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kirkley B. A., Easley K. A., Washington J. A. Controlled clinical evaluation of Isolator and ESP aerobic blood culture systems for detection of bloodstream infections. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jun;32(6):1547–1549. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.6.1547-1549.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lindsey N. J., Riely P. E. In vitro antibiotic removal and bacterial recovery from blood with an antibiotic removal device. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Mar;13(3):503–507. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.3.503-507.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Peterson L. R., Shanholtzer C. J., Mohn M. L., Gerding D. N. Improved recovery of microorganisms from patients receiving antibiotics with the antimicrobial removal device. Am J Clin Pathol. 1983 Nov;80(5):692–696. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/80.5.692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pittet D., Tarara D., Wenzel R. P. Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. JAMA. 1994 May 25;271(20):1598–1601. doi: 10.1001/jama.271.20.1598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith S. M., Eng R. H. Effectiveness of antibiotic removal by the antibiotic-binding blood culture systems. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1985 May;3(3):201–212. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(85)90032-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Strand C. L. Evaluation of the antimicrobial removal device when used with the BACTEC blood culture system. Am J Clin Pathol. 1982 Dec;78(6):853–856. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/78.6.853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Strand C. L., Wajsbort R. R., Sturmann K. Effect of iodophor vs iodine tincture skin preparation on blood culture contamination rate. JAMA. 1993 Feb 24;269(8):1004–1006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Thorpe T. C., Wilson M. L., Turner J. E., DiGuiseppi J. L., Willert M., Mirrett S., Reller L. B. BacT/Alert: an automated colorimetric microbial detection system. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jul;28(7):1608–1612. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.7.1608-1612.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Weinstein M. P., Mirrett S., Reimer L. G., Wilson M. L., Smith-Elekes S., Chuard C. R., Joho K. L., Reller L. B. Controlled evaluation of BacT/Alert standard aerobic and FAN aerobic blood culture bottles for detection of bacteremia and fungemia. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Apr;33(4):978–981. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.4.978-981.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Weinstein M. P., Mirrett S., Wilson M. L., Harrell L. J., Stratton C. W., Reller L. B. Controlled evaluation of BACTEC Plus 26 and Roche Septi-Chek aerobic blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 May;29(5):879–882. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.5.879-882.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Weinstein M. P., Reller L. B., Murphy J. R., Lichtenstein K. A. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures: a comprehensive analysis of 500 episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. I. Laboratory and epidemiologic observations. Rev Infect Dis. 1983 Jan-Feb;5(1):35–53. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wilson M. L., Davis T. E., Mirrett S., Reynolds J., Fuller D., Allen S. D., Flint K. K., Koontz F., Reller L. B. Controlled comparison of the BACTEC high-blood-volume fungal medium, BACTEC Plus 26 aerobic blood culture bottle, and 10-milliliter isolator blood culture system for detection of fungemia and bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Apr;31(4):865–871. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.4.865-871.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wilson M. L., Harrell L. J., Mirrett S., Weinstein M. P., Stratton C. W., Reller L. B. Controlled evaluation of BACTEC PLUS 27 and Roche Septi-Chek anaerobic blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jan;30(1):63–66. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.1.63-66.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wilson M. L., Weinstein M. P., Mirrett S., Reimer L. G., Feldman R. J., Chuard C. R., Reller L. B. Controlled evaluation of BacT/alert standard anaerobic and FAN anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Sep;33(9):2265–2270. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2265-2270.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wilson M. L., Weinstein M. P., Reimer L. G., Mirrett S., Reller L. B. Controlled comparison of the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 660/730 nonradiometric blood culture systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Feb;30(2):323–329. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.2.323-329.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wright A. J., Thompson R. L., McLimans C. A., Wilson W. R., Washington J. A., 2nd The antimicrobial removal device. A microbiological and clinical evaluation. Am J Clin Pathol. 1982 Aug;78(2):173–177. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/78.2.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES