Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1997 Aug;35(8):2007–2012. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.8.2007-2012.1997

Controlled comparison of bioMérieux VITAL and BACTEC NR-660 systems for detection of bacteremia and fungemia in pediatric patients.

A K Zaidi 1, S Mirrett 1, J C McDonald 1, E E Rubin 1, L C McDonald 1, M P Weinstein 1, M Gupta 1, L B Reller 1
PMCID: PMC229892  PMID: 9230371

Abstract

The bioMérieux VITAL automated blood culture system measures a decrease in fluorescence to detect the presence of microorganisms in blood. To assess the performance of VITAL with AER aerobic medium versus that of the nonradiometric BACTEC NR-660 PEDS PLUS medium for the detection of sepsis in children, a total of 12,146 blood specimens were collected at three university medical centers and inoculated into AER and PEDS PLUS bottles that were weighed before and after filling. The sample volumes were considered adequate in 6,276 bottle pairs. The total yield of isolates was 629, of which 489 (78%) were judged to be the cause of true infections. Staphylococci (P < 0.001) and yeasts (P < 0.05) were detected more often in PEDS PLUS bottles, as were all microorganisms combined (P < 0.001). The improved detection in the PEDS PLUS medium was most marked for patients on antimicrobial therapy (P < 0.001), but remained statistically significant even for patients not on therapy (P < 0.025). There were 431 episodes of sepsis, including 407 considered adequate for analysis. Of the 363 unimicrobial episodes, 278 were detected by both bottles, 64 were detected by PEDS PLUS bottles only, and 21 were detected by AER bottles only (P < 0.01). No false-negative cultures were detected by terminal subculture of the PEDS PLUS bottles when the companion AER bottle was positive. However, there were 14 false-negative cultures (7 yeasts, 5 staphylococci, 1 Enterococcus faecalis, and 1 Enterobacter sp.) on terminal subculture of the AER bottles when the companion PEDS PLUS bottle was positive. When both systems were positive, the VITAL system detected bacteria earlier than did the BACTEC system by a mean of 1.6 h. Also, false-positive signals were less common with the VITAL system. We conclude that the VITAL system with AER medium must be modified to improve the detection of clinically important staphylococci and yeasts if it is to perform comparably to the BACTEC NR-660 nonradiometric system with PEDS PLUS medium for a pediatric population.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (136.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Appelbaum P. C., Beckwith D. G., Dipersio J. R., Dyke J. W., Salventi J. F., Stone L. L. Enhanced detection of bacteremia with a new BACTEC resin blood culture medium. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jan;17(1):48–51. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.1.48-51.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Courcol R. J., Durocher A. V., Roussel-Delvallez M., Fruchart A., Martin G. R. Routine evaluation of BACTEC NR-16A and NR-17A media. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Sep;26(9):1619–1622. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.9.1619-1622.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Doern G. V., Gantz N. M. Detection of bacteremia in patients receiving antimicrobial therapy: an evaluation of the antimicrobial removal device and 16B medium. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jul;18(1):43–48. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.1.43-48.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eisenach K., Dyke J., Boehme M., Johnson B., Cook M. B. Pediatric blood culture evaluation of the BACTEC PEDS Plus and the DuPont Isolator 1.5 systems. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Mar-Apr;15(3):225–231. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(92)90117-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jorgensen J. H., Mirrett S., McDonald L. C., Murray P. R., Weinstein M. P., Fune J., Trippy C. W., Masterson M., Reller L. B. Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of BACTEC plus aerobic/F resin medium with BacT/Alert aerobic FAN medium for detection of bacteremia and fungemia. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Jan;35(1):53–58. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.1.53-58.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Marchandin H., Compan B., Simeon De Buochberg M., Despaux E., Perez C. Detection kinetics for positive blood culture bottles by using the VITAL automated system. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Aug;33(8):2098–2101. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.8.2098-2101.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Morello J. A., Matushek S. M., Dunne W. M., Hinds D. B. Performance of a BACTEC nonradiometric medium for pediatric blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Feb;29(2):359–362. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.2.359-362.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Strand C. L., Hickman A., Bryant J. K., Sutton K. Evaluation of the BACTEC resin blood-culture medium. Am J Clin Pathol. 1983 Nov;80(5):706–710. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/80.5.706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Weinstein M. P. Current blood culture methods and systems: clinical concepts, technology, and interpretation of results. Clin Infect Dis. 1996 Jul;23(1):40–46. doi: 10.1093/clinids/23.1.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Weinstein M. P., Mirrett S., Reimer L. G., Wilson M. L., Smith-Elekes S., Chuard C. R., Joho K. L., Reller L. B. Controlled evaluation of BacT/Alert standard aerobic and FAN aerobic blood culture bottles for detection of bacteremia and fungemia. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Apr;33(4):978–981. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.4.978-981.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Weinstein M. P., Mirrett S., Wilson M. L., Harrell L. J., Stratton C. W., Reller L. B. Controlled evaluation of BACTEC Plus 26 and Roche Septi-Chek aerobic blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 May;29(5):879–882. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.5.879-882.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wilson M. L., Weinstein M. P. General principles in the laboratory detection of bacteremia and fungemia. Clin Lab Med. 1994 Mar;14(1):69–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wilson M. L., Weinstein M. P., Mirrett S., Reimer L. G., Feldman R. J., Chuard C. R., Reller L. B. Controlled evaluation of BacT/alert standard anaerobic and FAN anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Sep;33(9):2265–2270. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2265-2270.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wilson M. L., Weinstein M. P., Reimer L. G., Mirrett S., Reller L. B. Controlled comparison of the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 660/730 nonradiometric blood culture systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Feb;30(2):323–329. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.2.323-329.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Woods E. R., Merola J. L., Bithoney W. G., Spivak H., Wise P. H. Bacteremia in an ambulatory setting. Improved outcome in children treated with antibiotics. Am J Dis Child. 1990 Nov;144(11):1195–1199. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150350027017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES