Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1997 Mar;17(3):1336–1345. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.3.1336

A severely defective TATA-binding protein-TFIIB interaction does not preclude transcriptional activation in vivo.

M Lee 1, K Struhl 1
PMCID: PMC231858  PMID: 9032260

Abstract

In yeast cells, mutations in the TATA-binding protein (TBP) that disrupt the interaction with the TATA element or with TFIIA can selectively impair the response to acidic activator proteins. We analyzed the transcriptional properties of TBP derivatives in which residues that directly interact with TFIIB were replaced by alanines. Surprisingly, a derivative with a 50-fold defect in TBP-TFIIB-TATA complex formation in vitro (E188A) supports viability and responds efficiently to activators in vivo. The E186A derivative, which displays a 100-fold defect in TBP-TFIIB-TATA complex formation, does not support viability, yet it does respond to activators. Conversely, the L189A mutation, which has the mildest effect on the interaction with TFIIB (10-fold), can abolish transcriptional activation and cell viability when combined with mutations on the DNA-binding surface. This "synthetic lethal" effect is not observed with E188A, suggesting that the previously described role of L189 in transcriptional activation may be related to its location on the DNA-binding surface and not to its interaction with TFIIB. Finally, when using TBP mutants defective on multiple interaction surfaces, we observed synthetic lethal effects between mutations on the TFIIA and TFIIB interfaces but found that mutations implicated in association with polymerase II and TFIIF did not have significant effects in vivo. Taken together, these results argue that, unlike the TBP-TATA and TBP-TFIIA interactions, the TBP-TFIIB interaction is not generally limiting for transcriptional activation in vivo.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arndt K. M., Ricupero-Hovasse S., Winston F. TBP mutants defective in activated transcription in vivo. EMBO J. 1995 Apr 3;14(7):1490–1497. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07135.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bryant G. O., Martel L. S., Burley S. K., Berk A. J. Radical mutations reveal TATA-box binding protein surfaces required for activated transcription in vivo. Genes Dev. 1996 Oct 1;10(19):2491–2504. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.19.2491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buratowski S. The basics of basal transcription by RNA polymerase II. Cell. 1994 Apr 8;77(1):1–3. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90226-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buratowski S., Zhou H. Transcription factor IID mutants defective for interaction with transcription factor IIA. Science. 1992 Feb 28;255(5048):1130–1132. doi: 10.1126/science.1546314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carey M. F. Transcriptional activation. A holistic view of the complex. Curr Biol. 1995 Sep 1;5(9):1003–1005. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(95)00201-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chatterjee S., Struhl K. Connecting a promoter-bound protein to TBP bypasses the need for a transcriptional activation domain. Nature. 1995 Apr 27;374(6525):820–822. doi: 10.1038/374820a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chi T., Lieberman P., Ellwood K., Carey M. A general mechanism for transcriptional synergy by eukaryotic activators. Nature. 1995 Sep 21;377(6546):254–257. doi: 10.1038/377254a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Colgan J., Ashali H., Manley J. L. A direct interaction between a glutamine-rich activator and the N terminus of TFIIB can mediate transcriptional activation in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Apr;15(4):2311–2320. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.4.2311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Colgan J., Wampler S., Manley J. L. Interaction between a transcriptional activator and transcription factor IIB in vivo. Nature. 1993 Apr 8;362(6420):549–553. doi: 10.1038/362549a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cormack B. P., Strubin M., Ponticelli A. S., Struhl K. Functional differences between yeast and human TFIID are localized to the highly conserved region. Cell. 1991 Apr 19;65(2):341–348. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90167-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cormack B. P., Strubin M., Stargell L. A., Struhl K. Conserved and nonconserved functions of the yeast and human TATA-binding proteins. Genes Dev. 1994 Jun 1;8(11):1335–1343. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.11.1335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cormack B. P., Struhl K. Regional codon randomization: defining a TATA-binding protein surface required for RNA polymerase III transcription. Science. 1993 Oct 8;262(5131):244–248. doi: 10.1126/science.8211143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cormack B. P., Struhl K. The TATA-binding protein is required for transcription by all three nuclear RNA polymerases in yeast cells. Cell. 1992 May 15;69(4):685–696. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90232-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Geiger J. H., Hahn S., Lee S., Sigler P. B. Crystal structure of the yeast TFIIA/TBP/DNA complex. Science. 1996 May 10;272(5263):830–836. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5263.830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodrich J. A., Hoey T., Thut C. J., Admon A., Tjian R. Drosophila TAFII40 interacts with both a VP16 activation domain and the basal transcription factor TFIIB. Cell. 1993 Nov 5;75(3):519–530. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90386-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hope I. A., Struhl K. Functional dissection of a eukaryotic transcriptional activator protein, GCN4 of yeast. Cell. 1986 Sep 12;46(6):885–894. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90070-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Imbalzano A. N., Zaret K. S., Kingston R. E. Transcription factor (TF) IIB and TFIIA can independently increase the affinity of the TATA-binding protein for DNA. J Biol Chem. 1994 Mar 18;269(11):8280–8286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Iyer V., Struhl K. Absolute mRNA levels and transcriptional initiation rates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 May 28;93(11):5208–5212. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.11.5208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Iyer V., Struhl K. Mechanism of differential utilization of the his3 TR and TC TATA elements. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Dec;15(12):7059–7066. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.12.7059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Keaveney M., Berkenstam A., Feigenbutz M., Vriend G., Stunnenberg H. G. Residues in the TATA-binding protein required to mediate a transcriptional response to retinoic acid in EC cells. Nature. 1993 Oct 7;365(6446):562–566. doi: 10.1038/365562a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kelleher R. J., 3rd, Flanagan P. M., Chasman D. I., Ponticelli A. S., Struhl K., Kornberg R. D. Yeast and human TFIIDs are interchangeable for the response to acidic transcriptional activators in vitro. Genes Dev. 1992 Feb;6(2):296–303. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.2.296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim J. L., Nikolov D. B., Burley S. K. Co-crystal structure of TBP recognizing the minor groove of a TATA element. Nature. 1993 Oct 7;365(6446):520–527. doi: 10.1038/365520a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim T. K., Hashimoto S., Kelleher R. J., 3rd, Flanagan P. M., Kornberg R. D., Horikoshi M., Roeder R. G. Effects of activation-defective TBP mutations on transcription initiation in yeast. Nature. 1994 May 19;369(6477):252–255. doi: 10.1038/369252a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim Y. J., Björklund S., Li Y., Sayre M. H., Kornberg R. D. A multiprotein mediator of transcriptional activation and its interaction with the C-terminal repeat domain of RNA polymerase II. Cell. 1994 May 20;77(4):599–608. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90221-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim Y., Geiger J. H., Hahn S., Sigler P. B. Crystal structure of a yeast TBP/TATA-box complex. Nature. 1993 Oct 7;365(6446):512–520. doi: 10.1038/365512a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Klages N., Strubin M. Stimulation of RNA polymerase II transcription initiation by recruitment of TBP in vivo. Nature. 1995 Apr 27;374(6525):822–823. doi: 10.1038/374822a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Klein C., Struhl K. Increased recruitment of TATA-binding protein to the promoter by transcriptional activation domains in vivo. Science. 1994 Oct 14;266(5183):280–282. doi: 10.1126/science.7939664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Koleske A. J., Young R. A. An RNA polymerase II holoenzyme responsive to activators. Nature. 1994 Mar 31;368(6470):466–469. doi: 10.1038/368466a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lagrange T., Kim T. K., Orphanides G., Ebright Y. W., Ebright R. H., Reinberg D. High-resolution mapping of nucleoprotein complexes by site-specific protein-DNA photocrosslinking: organization of the human TBP-TFIIA-TFIIB-DNA quaternary complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Oct 1;93(20):10620–10625. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.20.10620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lee D. K., DeJong J., Hashimoto S., Horikoshi M., Roeder R. G. TFIIA induces conformational changes in TFIID via interactions with the basic repeat. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Nov;12(11):5189–5196. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.11.5189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lee M., Struhl K. Mutations on the DNA-binding surface of TATA-binding protein can specifically impair the response to acidic activators in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Oct;15(10):5461–5469. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.10.5461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee S., Hahn S. Model for binding of transcription factor TFIIB to the TBP-DNA complex. Nature. 1995 Aug 17;376(6541):609–612. doi: 10.1038/376609a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li Y., Flanagan P. M., Tschochner H., Kornberg R. D. RNA polymerase II initiation factor interactions and transcription start site selection. Science. 1994 Feb 11;263(5148):805–807. doi: 10.1126/science.8303296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lieberman P. M., Berk A. J. A mechanism for TAFs in transcriptional activation: activation domain enhancement of TFIID-TFIIA--promoter DNA complex formation. Genes Dev. 1994 May 1;8(9):995–1006. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.9.995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lin Y. S., Green M. R. Mechanism of action of an acidic transcriptional activator in vitro. Cell. 1991 Mar 8;64(5):971–981. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90321-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lin Y. S., Ha I., Maldonado E., Reinberg D., Green M. R. Binding of general transcription factor TFIIB to an acidic activating region. Nature. 1991 Oct 10;353(6344):569–571. doi: 10.1038/353569a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Moqtaderi Z., Bai Y., Poon D., Weil P. A., Struhl K. TBP-associated factors are not generally required for transcriptional activation in yeast. Nature. 1996 Sep 12;383(6596):188–191. doi: 10.1038/383188a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Nikolov D. B., Chen H., Halay E. D., Usheva A. A., Hisatake K., Lee D. K., Roeder R. G., Burley S. K. Crystal structure of a TFIIB-TBP-TATA-element ternary complex. Nature. 1995 Sep 14;377(6545):119–128. doi: 10.1038/377119a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Nonet M. L., Young R. A. Intragenic and extragenic suppressors of mutations in the heptapeptide repeat domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA polymerase II. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):715–724. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Roberts S. G., Choy B., Walker S. S., Lin Y. S., Green M. R. A role for activator-mediated TFIIB recruitment in diverse aspects of transcriptional regulation. Curr Biol. 1995 May 1;5(5):508–516. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(95)00103-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Roberts S. G., Ha I., Maldonado E., Reinberg D., Green M. R. Interaction between an acidic activator and transcription factor TFIIB is required for transcriptional activation. Nature. 1993 Jun 24;363(6431):741–744. doi: 10.1038/363741a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Singer V. L., Wobbe C. R., Struhl K. A wide variety of DNA sequences can functionally replace a yeast TATA element for transcriptional activation. Genes Dev. 1990 Apr;4(4):636–645. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.4.636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Stargell L. A., Struhl K. A new class of activation-defective TATA-binding protein mutants: evidence for two steps of transcriptional activation in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Aug;16(8):4456–4464. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.8.4456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Stargell L. A., Struhl K. The TBP-TFIIA interaction in the response to acidic activators in vivo. Science. 1995 Jul 7;269(5220):75–78. doi: 10.1126/science.7604282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Strubin M., Struhl K. Yeast and human TFIID with altered DNA-binding specificity for TATA elements. Cell. 1992 Feb 21;68(4):721–730. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90147-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Struhl K. Chromatin structure and RNA polymerase II connection: implications for transcription. Cell. 1996 Jan 26;84(2):179–182. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80970-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Struhl K. Yeast transcriptional regulatory mechanisms. Annu Rev Genet. 1995;29:651–674. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.29.120195.003251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sun Z. W., Hampsey M. Identification of the gene (SSU71/TFG1) encoding the largest subunit of transcription factor TFIIF as a suppressor of a TFIIB mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Apr 11;92(8):3127–3131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.8.3127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tan S., Hunziker Y., Sargent D. F., Richmond T. J. Crystal structure of a yeast TFIIA/TBP/DNA complex. Nature. 1996 May 9;381(6578):127–151. doi: 10.1038/381127a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tang H., Sun X., Reinberg D., Ebright R. H. Protein-protein interactions in eukaryotic transcription initiation: structure of the preinitiation complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Feb 6;93(3):1119–1124. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.3.1119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tjian R., Maniatis T. Transcriptional activation: a complex puzzle with few easy pieces. Cell. 1994 Apr 8;77(1):5–8. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90227-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Tzamarias D., Struhl K. Functional dissection of the yeast Cyc8-Tup1 transcriptional co-repressor complex. Nature. 1994 Jun 30;369(6483):758–761. doi: 10.1038/369758a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Walker S. S., Reese J. C., Apone L. M., Green M. R. Transcription activation in cells lacking TAFIIS. Nature. 1996 Sep 12;383(6596):185–188. doi: 10.1038/383185a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang W., Gralla J. D., Carey M. The acidic activator GAL4-AH can stimulate polymerase II transcription by promoting assembly of a closed complex requiring TFIID and TFIIA. Genes Dev. 1992 Sep;6(9):1716–1727. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.9.1716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wobbe C. R., Struhl K. Yeast and human TATA-binding proteins have nearly identical DNA sequence requirements for transcription in vitro. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Aug;10(8):3859–3867. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.8.3859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Xiao H., Friesen J. D., Lis J. T. Recruiting TATA-binding protein to a promoter: transcriptional activation without an upstream activator. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Oct;15(10):5757–5761. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.10.5757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Zawel L., Reinberg D. Common themes in assembly and function of eukaryotic transcription complexes. Annu Rev Biochem. 1995;64:533–561. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.002533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES