Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1997 Apr;17(4):2057–2065. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.4.2057

Saccharomyces cerevisiae BUR6 encodes a DRAP1/NC2alpha homolog that has both positive and negative roles in transcription in vivo.

G Prelich 1
PMCID: PMC232053  PMID: 9121454

Abstract

BUR3 and BUR6 were identified previously by selecting for mutations that increase transcription from an upstream activating sequence (UAS)-less promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The bur3-1 and bur6-1 mutations are recessive, increase transcription from a suc2 delta uas allele, and cause other mutant phenotypes, suggesting that Bur3p and Bur6p function as general repressors of the basal transcriptional machinery. The molecular cloning and characterization of BUR3 and BUR6 are presented here. BUR3 is identical to MOT1, a previously characterized essential gene that encodes an ATP-dependent inhibitor of the TATA box-binding protein. Cloning and nucleotide sequence analysis reveals that BUR6 encodes a homolog of DRAP1 (also called NC2alpha), a mammalian repressor of basal transcription. Strains that contain a bur6 null allele are viable but grow extremely poorly, demonstrating that BUR6 is critical for normal cell growth in yeast. The Bur6p histone fold domain is required for function; an extensive nonoverlapping set of deletion alleles throughout the histone fold domain impairs BUR6 function in vivo, whereas mutations in the amino- and carboxy-terminal tails have no detectable effect. BUR6 and BUR3/MOT1 have different functions depending on promoter context: although the bur3-1 and bur6-1 mutations increase transcription from delta uas promoters, they result in reduced transcription from the wild-type GAL1 and GAL10 promoters. This transcriptional defect is due to the inability of the GAL10 UAS to function in bur6-1 strains. The similar phenotypes of bur6 and bur3 (mot1) mutations suggest that Bur6p and Mot1p have related, but not identical, functions in modulating the activity of the general transcription machinery in vivo.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arents G., Burlingame R. W., Wang B. C., Love W. E., Moudrianakis E. N. The nucleosomal core histone octamer at 3.1 A resolution: a tripartite protein assembly and a left-handed superhelix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Nov 15;88(22):10148–10152. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.22.10148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Auble D. T., Hahn S. An ATP-dependent inhibitor of TBP binding to DNA. Genes Dev. 1993 May;7(5):844–856. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.5.844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Auble D. T., Hansen K. E., Mueller C. G., Lane W. S., Thorner J., Hahn S. Mot1, a global repressor of RNA polymerase II transcription, inhibits TBP binding to DNA by an ATP-dependent mechanism. Genes Dev. 1994 Aug 15;8(16):1920–1934. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.16.1920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baxevanis A. D., Arents G., Moudrianakis E. N., Landsman D. A variety of DNA-binding and multimeric proteins contain the histone fold motif. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Jul 25;23(14):2685–2691. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.14.2685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bortvin A., Winston F. Evidence that Spt6p controls chromatin structure by a direct interaction with histones. Science. 1996 Jun 7;272(5267):1473–1476. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5267.1473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carlson M., Botstein D. Two differentially regulated mRNAs with different 5' ends encode secreted with intracellular forms of yeast invertase. Cell. 1982 Jan;28(1):145–154. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90384-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen S., West R. W., Jr, Johnson S. L., Gans H., Kruger B., Ma J. TSF3, a global regulatory protein that silences transcription of yeast GAL genes, also mediates repression by alpha 2 repressor and is identical to SIN4. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Feb;13(2):831–840. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.2.831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen S., West R. W., Jr, Ma J., Johnson S. L., Gans H., Woldehawariat G. TSF1 to TSF6, required for silencing the Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL genes, are global regulatory genes. Genetics. 1993 Jul;134(3):701–716. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.3.701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark-Adams C. D., Norris D., Osley M. A., Fassler J. S., Winston F. Changes in histone gene dosage alter transcription in yeast. Genes Dev. 1988 Feb;2(2):150–159. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.2.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Collart M. A., Struhl K. CDC39, an essential nuclear protein that negatively regulates transcription and differentially affects the constitutive and inducible HIS3 promoters. EMBO J. 1993 Jan;12(1):177–186. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05643.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Collart M. A. The NOT, SPT3, and MOT1 genes functionally interact to regulate transcription at core promoters. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Dec;16(12):6668–6676. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.12.6668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Côté J., Quinn J., Workman J. L., Peterson C. L. Stimulation of GAL4 derivative binding to nucleosomal DNA by the yeast SWI/SNF complex. Science. 1994 Jul 1;265(5168):53–60. doi: 10.1126/science.8016655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Davis J. L., Kunisawa R., Thorner J. A presumptive helicase (MOT1 gene product) affects gene expression and is required for viability in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Apr;12(4):1879–1892. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.4.1879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dollard C., Ricupero-Hovasse S. L., Natsoulis G., Boeke J. D., Winston F. SPT10 and SPT21 are required for transcription of particular histone genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Aug;14(8):5223–5228. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.8.5223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Durrin L. K., Mann R. K., Grunstein M. Nucleosome loss activates CUP1 and HIS3 promoters to fully induced levels in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Apr;12(4):1621–1629. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.4.1621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Durrin L. K., Mann R. K., Kayne P. S., Grunstein M. Yeast histone H4 N-terminal sequence is required for promoter activation in vivo. Cell. 1991 Jun 14;65(6):1023–1031. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90554-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Goppelt A., Meisterernst M. Characterization of the basal inhibitor of class II transcription NC2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Nov 15;24(22):4450–4455. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.22.4450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Goppelt A., Stelzer G., Lottspeich F., Meisterernst M. A mechanism for repression of class II gene transcription through specific binding of NC2 to TBP-promoter complexes via heterodimeric histone fold domains. EMBO J. 1996 Jun 17;15(12):3105–3116. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Grunstein M. Histone function in transcription. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1990;6:643–678. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.06.110190.003235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Han M., Grunstein M. Nucleosome loss activates yeast downstream promoters in vivo. Cell. 1988 Dec 23;55(6):1137–1145. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90258-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hirschhorn J. N., Brown S. A., Clark C. D., Winston F. Evidence that SNF2/SWI2 and SNF5 activate transcription in yeast by altering chromatin structure. Genes Dev. 1992 Dec;6(12A):2288–2298. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.12a.2288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Imbalzano A. N., Kwon H., Green M. R., Kingston R. E. Facilitated binding of TATA-binding protein to nucleosomal DNA. Nature. 1994 Aug 11;370(6489):481–485. doi: 10.1038/370481a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Inostroza J. A., Mermelstein F. H., Ha I., Lane W. S., Reinberg D. Dr1, a TATA-binding protein-associated phosphoprotein and inhibitor of class II gene transcription. Cell. 1992 Aug 7;70(3):477–489. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90172-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Irie K., Nomoto S., Miyajima I., Matsumoto K. SGV1 encodes a CDC28/cdc2-related kinase required for a G alpha subunit-mediated adaptive response to pheromone in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1991 May 31;65(5):785–795. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90386-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jiang Y. W., Stillman D. J. Involvement of the SIN4 global transcriptional regulator in the chromatin structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Oct;12(10):4503–4514. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.10.4503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Johnson A. D. Molecular mechanisms of cell-type determination in budding yeast. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1995 Oct;5(5):552–558. doi: 10.1016/0959-437x(95)80022-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Johnson L. M., Fisher-Adams G., Grunstein M. Identification of a non-basic domain in the histone H4 N-terminus required for repression of the yeast silent mating loci. EMBO J. 1992 Jun;11(6):2201–2209. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05279.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kim S., Na J. G., Hampsey M., Reinberg D. The Dr1/DRAP1 heterodimer is a global repressor of transcription in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Feb 4;94(3):820–825. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.3.820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kim T. K., Zhao Y., Ge H., Bernstein R., Roeder R. G. TATA-binding protein residues implicated in a functional interplay between negative cofactor NC2 (Dr1) and general factors TFIIA and TFIIB. J Biol Chem. 1995 May 5;270(18):10976–10981. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.18.10976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Knezetic J. A., Luse D. S. The presence of nucleosomes on a DNA template prevents initiation by RNA polymerase II in vitro. Cell. 1986 Apr 11;45(1):95–104. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90541-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kwon H., Imbalzano A. N., Khavari P. A., Kingston R. E., Green M. R. Nucleosome disruption and enhancement of activator binding by a human SW1/SNF complex. Nature. 1994 Aug 11;370(6489):477–481. doi: 10.1038/370477a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Madison J. M., Winston F. Evidence that Spt3 functionally interacts with Mot1, TFIIA, and TATA-binding protein to confer promoter-specific transcriptional control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Jan;17(1):287–295. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.1.287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Malone E. A., Clark C. D., Chiang A., Winston F. Mutations in SPT16/CDC68 suppress cis- and trans-acting mutations that affect promoter function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Nov;11(11):5710–5717. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.11.5710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Meisterernst M., Roeder R. G. Family of proteins that interact with TFIID and regulate promoter activity. Cell. 1991 Nov 1;67(3):557–567. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90530-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mermelstein F., Yeung K., Cao J., Inostroza J. A., Erdjument-Bromage H., Eagelson K., Landsman D., Levitt P., Tempst P., Reinberg D. Requirement of a corepressor for Dr1-mediated repression of transcription. Genes Dev. 1996 Apr 15;10(8):1033–1048. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.8.1033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mitchell P. J., Tjian R. Transcriptional regulation in mammalian cells by sequence-specific DNA binding proteins. Science. 1989 Jul 28;245(4916):371–378. doi: 10.1126/science.2667136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Neigeborn L., Carlson M. Genes affecting the regulation of SUC2 gene expression by glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1984 Dec;108(4):845–858. doi: 10.1093/genetics/108.4.845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Neigeborn L., Celenza J. L., Carlson M. SSN20 is an essential gene with mutant alleles that suppress defects in SUC2 transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Feb;7(2):672–678. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.2.672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Peterson C. L., Dingwall A., Scott M. P. Five SWI/SNF gene products are components of a large multisubunit complex required for transcriptional enhancement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):2905–2908. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.2905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Piña B., Brüggemeier U., Beato M. Nucleosome positioning modulates accessibility of regulatory proteins to the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Cell. 1990 Mar 9;60(5):719–731. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90087-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Prelich G., Winston F. Mutations that suppress the deletion of an upstream activating sequence in yeast: involvement of a protein kinase and histone H3 in repressing transcription in vivo. Genetics. 1993 Nov;135(3):665–676. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.3.665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rine J., Herskowitz I. Four genes responsible for a position effect on expression from HML and HMR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):9–22. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rose M. D., Novick P., Thomas J. H., Botstein D., Fink G. R. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae genomic plasmid bank based on a centromere-containing shuttle vector. Gene. 1987;60(2-3):237–243. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90232-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sarokin L., Carlson M. Upstream region required for regulated expression of the glucose-repressible SUC2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Dec;4(12):2750–2757. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.12.2750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sherwood P. W., Osley M. A. Histone regulatory (hir) mutations suppress delta insertion alleles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1991 Aug;128(4):729–738. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.4.729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sinha S., Kim I. S., Sohn K. Y., de Crombrugghe B., Maity S. N. Three classes of mutations in the A subunit of the CCAAT-binding factor CBF delineate functional domains involved in the three-step assembly of the CBF-DNA complex. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Jan;16(1):328–337. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.1.328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sternberg P. W., Stern M. J., Clark I., Herskowitz I. Activation of the yeast HO gene by release from multiple negative controls. Cell. 1987 Feb 27;48(4):567–577. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90235-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Struhl K. Yeast transcriptional regulatory mechanisms. Annu Rev Genet. 1995;29:651–674. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.29.120195.003251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Swanson M. S., Malone E. A., Winston F. SPT5, an essential gene important for normal transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, encodes an acidic nuclear protein with a carboxy-terminal repeat. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jun;11(6):3009–3019. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.6.3009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Swanson M. S., Winston F. SPT4, SPT5 and SPT6 interactions: effects on transcription and viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):325–336. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Taylor I. C., Workman J. L., Schuetz T. J., Kingston R. E. Facilitated binding of GAL4 and heat shock factor to nucleosomal templates: differential function of DNA-binding domains. Genes Dev. 1991 Jul;5(7):1285–1298. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.7.1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Vidal M., Strich R., Esposito R. E., Gaber R. F. RPD1 (SIN3/UME4) is required for maximal activation and repression of diverse yeast genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Dec;11(12):6306–6316. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.12.6306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Vidal M., Strich R., Esposito R. E., Gaber R. F. RPD1 (SIN3/UME4) is required for maximal activation and repression of diverse yeast genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Dec;11(12):6306–6316. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.12.6306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wang H., Stillman D. J. Transcriptional repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a SIN3-LexA fusion protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Mar;13(3):1805–1814. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.3.1805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Winston F., Dollard C., Ricupero-Hovasse S. L. Construction of a set of convenient Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that are isogenic to S288C. Yeast. 1995 Jan;11(1):53–55. doi: 10.1002/yea.320110107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Workman J. L., Roeder R. G. Binding of transcription factor TFIID to the major late promoter during in vitro nucleosome assembly potentiates subsequent initiation by RNA polymerase II. Cell. 1987 Nov 20;51(4):613–622. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90130-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Xie X., Kokubo T., Cohen S. L., Mirza U. A., Hoffmann A., Chait B. T., Roeder R. G., Nakatani Y., Burley S. K. Structural similarity between TAFs and the heterotetrameric core of the histone octamer. Nature. 1996 Mar 28;380(6572):316–322. doi: 10.1038/380316a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zawel L., Reinberg D. Initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase II: a multi-step process. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1993;44:67–108. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60217-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES