Skip to main content
PMC home page
BMC Genetics logoLink to BMC Genetics
. 2008 Apr 10;9:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-9-31

Nucleotide diversity and population differentiation of the Melanocortin 1 Receptor gene, MC1R

Sharon A Savage 1,✉, Meg R Gerstenblith 2, Alisa M Goldstein 2, Lisa Mirabello 1, Maria Concetta Fargnoli 3, Ketty Peris 3, Maria Teresa Landi 2
PMCID: PMC2324112  PMID: 18402696

Abstract

Background

The melanocortin 1 receptor gene (MC1R) is responsible for normal pigment variation in humans and is highly polymorphic with numerous population-specific alleles. Some MC1R variants have been associated with skin cancer risk.

Results

Allele frequency data were compiled on 55 single nucleotide polymorphisms from seven geographically distinct human populations (n = 2306 individuals). MC1R nucleotide diversity, π, was much higher (10.1 × 10-4) than in other genes for all subjects. A large degree of population differentiation, determined by FST, was also present, particularly between Asia and all other populations, due to the p.R163Q (c.488 G>A) polymorphism. The least amount of differentiation was between the United States, Northern Europe, and Southern Europe. Tajima's D statistic suggested the presence of positive selection in individuals from Europe.

Conclusion

This study further quantifies the degree of population-specific genetic variation and suggests that positive selection may be present in European populations in MC1R.

Background

Differences in human skin pigmentation have been attributed to genetic variation in several different genes [1-3]. Among these, the melanocortin 1 receptor gene (MC1R, MIM#155555), a member of the G protein-coupled receptors superfamily, is the major contributor to normal pigment variation in humans. It is a small, highly polymorphic gene consisting of one exon with 951 coding nucleotides on chromosome 16q24.3.

Numerous studies have demonstrated associations between specific MC1R variants and red hair, light skin, poor tanning ability and heavy freckling [4-9]. A recent genome-wide association scan confirmed the role of MC1R SNPs in hair, eye, and skin pigmentation[3]. The functional role of many of these variants has been described [10-13]. Several MC1R variants are also associated with increased risk of malignant melanoma in a variety of populations [14-22] The effect of MC1R polymorphisms in melanoma risk appears to extend beyond its effect on pigmentation in most of these investigations, and to be linked to melanomas harboring mutations in the BRAF oncogene[23].

Several hypotheses have been generated in an effort to understand the evolutionary history of skin pigmentation in humans. It has been suggested that as humans migrated out of Africa to climates with more limited exposure to sunlight, relaxation of functional constraints in pigmentation genes, including MC1R, or selection for functionally relevant variants that led to lighter skin pigmentation occurred[24]. This could result in an improved ability to synthesize vitamin D in the presence of limited sunlight exposures [25-27]. It has also been suggested that darker skin is favored in regions closer to the equator for protection against ultraviolet radiation[24]. In addition, differences in skin pigmentation could protect against pathogens and cold injury, and may have also been important in sexual selection[28].

Genetic variation of MC1R, in the form of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), is significantly different across populations from different geographic regions [29,30]. In most regions of the genome, there is a higher degree of genetic variation in individuals of African descent than in other populations, most likely due to evolutionary history [31,32]. MC1R is an exception to this observation. It has been shown to be more polymorphic in individuals of European descent than in those from Africa [29,30]. A comprehensive study of SNP allele frequencies in MC1R from populations around the world, further quantified the large differences in the distribution of variants across populations, with a prominent difference between light and dark-pigmented individuals [29]. The goal of the current study was to expand on that study of MC1R genetic variation by characterizing nucleotide diversity, population specific differentiation (FST), and to study measures of selection.

Results

Nucleotide Diversity

Allele frequency (AF) data was compiled from a total of 2306 individuals who were grouped into seven populations, based on geographic location (Table 1). The actual number of individuals in each group was Africa 117, India 53, Southern Europe 838, Northern Europe 650, Asia 343, Papua New Guinea 40, and the United States 265. The number of SNPs per population evaluated in the study ranged from three (India) to 36 (Southern Europe), with a total of 55 SNPs studied in MC1R in these analyses. AFs are shown in Table 2. Thirty-seven SNPs were nonsynonymous (NS) and 18 were synonymous (S). The greatest number of SNPs was present in individuals from Southern Europe (29 NS, 7 S) and Northern Europe (18 NS and 3 S). The fewest number of SNPs were noted in the subjects from India (2 NS, 1 S), Papua New Guinea (2 NS, 2 S) and Africa (3 NS and 8 S).

Table 1.

Description of populations and studies used for analyses of MC1R allele frequencies

Population Name Description # Individuals Reference
Africa Healthy subjects from South Africa (22 Negroid and 17 San people), 25 from South Africa, Nigeria, Zaire, Kenya and Gambia, and 53 from The Ivory Coast and Gambia 117 John 2003, Rana 1999, Harding 2000
India Healthy subjects from studies investigating MC1R variants. 53 Rana 1999, Harding 2000
Southern Europe Healthy subjects from Spain (188), Italy (495) and Greece (155) 838 Fernandez 2007, Harding2000, Fargnoli 2003, Pastorino 2004, Landi 2005, Fargnoli 2006, Stratigos 2006,
Northern Europe Healthy subjects from The Netherlands (385), Britain/Ireland (93) and France (172) 650 Bastiaens 2001, Kennedy 2001, Flanagan 2000, Harding 2000, Chaudru 2005
Asia Healthy subjects from East and Southeast Asia. Rana et al reported individuals from China (50), Japan (4), Cambodia (1), Vietnam (1), Siberian Yakut (5) and Mongolia (4). The remaining studies were of individuals from Japan. 343 Rana 1999, Harding 2000, Motokawa 2006, Nakayama 2006
Papua New Guinea Healthy subjects from studies investigating MC1R variants. 40 Harding 2000, Nakayama 2006
United States Healthy Caucasian subjects participating in a population based study conducted in Philadelphia, PA and Caucasian spouse controls from the US in a familial melanoma case/control study. 265 Kanetsky 2004, Goldstein 2005
Open in a new tab

Table 2.

Allele frequencies (%) of MC1R single nucleotide polymorphisms in seven populations.

protein nucleotide All subjects Africa Asia India NoEur SoEur US PNG
p.P18A c.52 C>G 0 0 0 0 0.08 0 0 0
p.C35Y c.104 G>A 0 0 0 0 0 0.12 0 0
p.V38M c.112 G>A 0 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 0
p.L44V c.130 C>G 0 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 0
p.F45L c.133 T>C 0 0 0 0 0 0.24 0 0
p.S47I c.140 G>T 0 0.43 0 0 0 0 0 0
p.L50L c.150 G>A 0 1.28 0 0 0 0 0 0
p.V60L c.178 G>T 0.10 0 0 0 10.69 15.75 13.21 0
p.R67Q c.200 G>A 0 0 1.17 0 0 0.06 0 0
p.A81P c.241 G>C 0 0 0 0 0.08 0 0 0
p.S83P c.247 T>C 0 0 0 0 0.15 0.12 0.19 0
p.S83L c.248 C>T 0 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 0
p.D84E c.252 C>A 0 0 0 0 1.00 0.12 1.51 0
p.V92M c.274 G>A 0.07 0 13.41 0.94 8.00 3.70 9.06 3.75
p.T95M c.284 C>T 0 0 0 0 0.08 0.12 0 0
p.L99I c.295 C>A 0 0.43 0 0 0 0 0 0
p.A103A c.309 C>T 0 0.43 0 0 0 0 0 0
p.L106Q c.317 T>A 0 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 0
L106L c.318 G>A 0 1.71 0 0 0 0.12 0 0
p.A111V c.332 C>T 0 0 0 0 0 0.18 0 0
p.I120T c.359 T>C 0 0 1.75 0 0 0.06 0 0
p.V122M c.364 G>A 0 0 0 0 0 0.24 0 0
p.V122V c.366 G>C 0 0 0 0 0 0.12 0 0
p.R142H c.425 G>A 0.01 0 0 0 0.62 1.31 0.75 0
p.R151C c. 451 C>T 0.03 0 0 0 5.62 3.16 6.42 0
p.Y152X c.456 C>A 0 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 0
p.I155T c.464 T>C 0 0 0 0 0.23 0.48 1.51 0
p.R160W c.478 C>T 0.04 0 0 0 8.31 1.85 7.17 0
p.R160Q c.479 G>A 0 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 5
p.R163Q c.488 G>A 0.14 0 75.51 4.72 4.62 1.61 4.15 0
p.A166A c.498 G>A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.25
p.I168I c.504 C>T 0 0.43 0 0 0 0 0 0
p.A171D c.512 C>A 0 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 0
p.V174I c.520 G>A 0 0 0 0 0.08 0 0 0
p.Y182Y c.546 C>T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.19 0
p.F196L c.586 T>C 0 2.14 0.15 0 0.08 0 0 0
p.R213W c.637 C>T 0 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 0
p.G220G c.660 C>T 0 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 0
p.Q228Q c.684 G>A 0 0 0 0 0 0.12 0 0
p.P230L c.689 C>T 0 0 0 0 0.31 0 0 0
p.P230P c.690 G>A 0 0 0 0 0.08 0 0 0
p.Q233Q c.699 G>A 0 0 0 0 0 0.36 0.19 0
p.A240A c.720 T>C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.19 0
p.T242T c.726 C>T 0 0 0 0 0 0.12 0 0
p.G248V c.743 G>T 0 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 0
p.H260P c.779 A>C 0 0 0 0 0.23 0 0 0
p.I264I c.792 C>T 0 0 0 0 0.15 0 0 0
p.V265V c.795 C>G 0 1.28 0 0 0 0 0 0
p.C273C c.819 C>T 0 0.43 0 0 0 0 0 0
p.K278E c.832 A>G 0 0 0 0 0.23 0.24 0 0
p.N279K c.837 C>A 0 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 0
p.D294H c.880 G>C 0.01 0 0 0 1 1.43 2.45 0
p.F300F c.900 C>T 0 2.99 0 0 0 0 0 0
p.T308M c.923 C>T 0 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 0
p.T314T c.942 A>G 0.09 44.44 13.27 13.21 7.69 2.33 10.75 18.75
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: SoEur, Southern Europe, NoEur, Northern Europe, PNG, Papua New Guinea, US, United States. Allele frequency % were rounded to two decimal places, therefore, rare alleles may be reported as zero due to rounding.

In order to correct for the variable population sizes, which could contribute to the absolute number of SNPs identified, π and θ, measures of nucleotide diversity, were calculated. The overall nucleotide diversity for all SNPs in MC1R, as measured by π, was 10.1 × 10-4 for all populations (2306 total subjects); it ranged from a low of 3.6 × 10-4 in subjects from India to a high of 11.1 × 10-4 from US subjects (Table 3). In subgroup analyses of the Northern and Southern European populations, π was the highest in subjects from Britain (18.1 × 10-4). θ, the population mutation parameter, was quite variable across populations, ranging from 6 × 10-4 in India to 47.3 × 10-4 in Southern Europe. In Southern European subjects, θ was the highest, 43.6 × 10-4, in Italy.

Table 3.

MC1R nucleotide diversity, Tajima's D, and Fu's FS statistic for seven populations Statistically significant values are bolded.

π × 10-4 θ × 10-4
# SNPs # NS SNPs All SNPs NS only All SNPs NS only Tajima's D statistic Tajima's D p-value Fu's FS Fu's FS p-value
Africa 11 3 7.6 0.6 19.2 5.2 -1.41 0.048 -0.24 0.436
India 3 2 3.6 1.2 6.0 4.0 -0.72 0.27 -1.27 0.202
SoEur 36 29 6.7 6.0 47.3 38.1 -2.13 <0.001 -27.92 <0.001
Greece 12 10 5.3 4.2 20.0 16.7 -1.71 0.008 -3.81 0.071
Italy 31 26 7.1 6.8 43.6 36.6 -2.10 <0.001 -6.46 0.055
Spain 17 15 6.7 5.4 27.5 24.2 -1.85 0.003 -8.44 0.009
NoEur 21 18 9.6 8.1 28.5 24.4 -1.53 0.026 -23.66 <0.001
Britain 10 10 18.1 10.9 10.9 18.1 -0.94 0.181 -2.07 0.207
France 12 10 9.4 7.4 19.7 16.4 -1.20 0.099 -2.92 0.131
Netherlands 16 14 9.3 7.6 23.3 20.4 -1.36 0.047 -4.74 0.095
US 14 10 11.1 9.0 21.5 15.4 -1.10 0.126 -2.41 0.212
Asia 6 5 9.4 7.0 8.9 7.4 1.05 0.855 2.15 0.839
PNG 4 2 7.2 1.8 8.5 4.2 -0.33 0.433 -0.78 0.301
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; NS, nonsynonymous; SoEur, Southern Europe; NoEur, Northern Europe; PNG, Papua New Guinea; US, United States

Nucleotide diversity was also calculated for NS SNPs only to further understand the contribution of these SNPs to MC1R genetic variation (Table 3). π in NS SNPs ranged from a low of 0.6 × 10-4 in subjects from Africa to a high of 9.0 × 10-4 in the US. Within the European populations, π for NS SNPs was the greatest in Britain (10.9 × 10-4). As was seen for all SNPs, θ for NS SNPs was the highest in Italy (36.6 × 10-4).

In addition to a high degree of inter-population variability, MC1R has a higher degree of nucleotide diversity in comparison to other groups of genes (Table 4). Studies of genetic variation in various gene groups, e.g., genes important in telomere biology [33], antigen processing and presenting genes [34], pharmaceutical response [35], and environmental response genes [36], showed π values ranging from 3.0 × 10-4 to 6.7 × 10-4, while all seven populations studied for MC1R had a combined π value of 10.1 × 10-4. θ showed similarly higher values in MC1R (64.2 × 10-4) than in other sets of genes (all <8.4 × 10-4).

Table 4.

Comparison of MC1R nucleotide diversity and Tajima's D statistic to other sets of genes. These data include subjects from different ethnic groups calculated as a whole. The number of genes evaluated is shown in parentheses.

π × 10-4 θ × 10-4 # NS/kbp #S/kbp Tajima's D statistic
MC1R 10.1 64.2 38.9 18.9 -2.08
Telomere biology genesa (n = 7) 3.0 5.5 0.59 1.01 -1.365
Nuclear hormone receptor genesb (n = 40) 4.1 7.5 1.55 1.97 ND
Antigen processing and presenting genesb (n = 72) 4.7 8.3 2.29 1.99 ND
Reference genesb (n = 4950) 4.8 7.9 1.88 1.86 ND
Pharmaceutical Response genesc (n = 1598) 5.6 ND ND ND negative
Environmental response genesd (n = 213) 6.7 ND ND ND ND
Open in a new tab

aSavage et al. [2005].

bPungliya et al. [2004].

cSchneider et al. [2003].

dLivingston et al. [2004].

Abbreviations: NS, nonsynonymous, S, synonymous, ND, not determined in the reference manuscript.

Population Differentiation

The FST statistic, a pairwise measure of population differentiation, has been used extensively to compare the degrees of heterozygosity across populations[2,37]. Therefore, MC1R FST was calculated for each of the described populations (Table 5). Overall, a very high degree of differentiation was noted between Asia and each of the other groups; FST ranged from 0.459 between Asia and Africa to 0.356 between Asia and the United States.

Table 5.

FST statistic for MC1R in seven populations.

India SoEur NoEur Asia PNG US
Africa 0.157 0.232 0.168 0.459 0.101 0.145
India 0.073 0.042 0.455 0.029 0.044
SoEur 0.016 0.437 0.089 0.017
NoEur 0.369 0.057 0.001
Asia 0.430 0.356
PNG 0.053
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: SoEur, Southern Europe, NoEur, Northern Europe, PNG, Papua New Guinea, US, United States.

The degree of differentiation between subjects from Africa and the six other groups ranged from 0.101 (Papua New Guinea) to 0.232 (Southern Europe). Papua New Guinea had relatively modest degrees of population differentiation when compared to all populations except Asia, where it was very large. The least amount of population differentiation was found in comparisons between the United States, Northern Europe, and Southern Europe.

We also performed analyses on the subpopulations that comprised the Northern Europe (Britain, the Netherlands, and France) and the Southern Europe (Greece, Italy, and Spain) groups. FST values for all of these comparisons were between 0 and 0.03, suggestive of little differentiation (data not shown).

Selection

Several studies have identified signals of positive selection in pigmentation genes in subjects from East Asia, and Europe but not from those in Africa[2,38,39]. Whether or not positive selection is present at the MC1R locus, is an area of active investigation. Previous work suggested that the high degree of variation in MC1R is not due to selection but rather to a relaxation of functional constraint outside of Africa [25]. In order to further test this hypothesis we first determined Tajima's D statistic, a measure of the relationship between the number of segregating sites (SNPs) and nucleotide diversity (Table 3). It was not statistically significant (p > 0.05) in the populations from India, Asia, Papua New Guinea, and the United States, in which Tajima's D values were -0.72, 1.05, -0.33, and -1.10, respectively. The African population studied had Tajima's D value of -1.41 and a p-value of 0.048. Statistically significant and negative Tajima's D values were present in the Southern European population (-2.13, p = <0.001). Subgroup analyses of this population showed the same trend, with negative Tajima's D values and p-values <0.05 in Greece, Italy, and Spain. The combined Northern European group had a Tajima's D value of -1.53 (p = 0.026). However, only the population from the Netherlands had a statistically significant Tajima's D value in this group (-1.36, p = 0.047).

The FS test of neutrality developed by Fu (1997) and based on θ is a powerful method to further evaluate the polymorphic patterns under population growth and genetic hitchhiking. These values are shown in Table 3. Fu's FS was statistically significant in the grouped Southern European population (-27.92, p = <0.001) but only in the subpopulation from Spain (-8.44, p = 0.009). The Northern European population group also had a statistically significant FS value (-23.66, p = <0.001). The FS values were not statistically significant in the other populations. Fu and Li's D values were comparable in scope to Tajima's D in this study but p-values were not obtainable due to software limitations (data not shown).

Discussion

MC1R is a small, highly variant gene. This study evaluated the nucleotide diversity, population-specific differentiation, and tested for positive selection of MC1R based on a compilation of previously published data. We used allele frequencies from studies that reported sequencing the entire gene and used the 951 coding bp of MC1R as the reference sequence. The genotype data used for these analyses was derived from the sample size and reported AFs, as a result, we were unable to assess the haplotype structure of MC1R. Also, we could not assess the flanking sequences of MC1R because the exact regions sequenced were not reported in the published data.

We observed that nucleotide diversity, as measured by π and θ, was greater in MC1R than in other groups of genes. It should be noted that these differences may be somewhat skewed because our study evaluated only one, small gene, MC1R, while the other studies evaluated between 7 and 4950 different genes [33-36]. Several other studies have noted the highly polymorphic nature of MC1R (compiled by Gerstenblith et al. [29]). Overall, the largest degree of nucleotide diversity was seen between Asia and all other populations, most likely due to the presence of the R163Q (c.488 G>A) SNP, which was present in 75% of Asians studied, versus less than 5% of any of the other six populations. It has been suggested that this allele may be present due to a bottleneck in Asian demographic history [25]. This allele has been shown to have reduced cell surface expression with corresponding impairment in cAMP coupling and effects in pigmentation [13].

The FST statistic was calculated to further assess the degree of population-specific differentiation in MC1R. Numerous population-specific SNPs and an overall high degree of population differentiation, as measured by FST between populations, are present in MC1R, particularly in Asians. Minimal differentiation was noted between Southern Europe, Northern Europe, and the United States. These individuals were identified in previous studies as Caucasian (i.e. of European descent), and likely share some degree of common ancestry. Although frequency of specific variants differ across populations of European descent (e.g. the allele frequency of the T allele of c.451C>T, p.R151C, was 1.9% in Greece but 10.2% in Britain/Ireland[29]), the sub-group analysis of the Northern and Southern European groups showed little evidence of population differentiation. This is consistent with other studies showing little among-population differentiation[25,27,30]. The African population in this study had moderate to large degrees of differentiation in comparison to other populations. This is consistent with prior MC1R SNP data showing fewer variants in individuals from Africa when compared to non-African populations[29].

Tajima's D statistic tests whether or not a gene or genomic region is evolving randomly (neutral evolution) or if the region is under selection (non-neutral evolution). It is based on the spectrum of AFs at different sites, as well as on population size. Tajima's D statistic was used to test MC1R for the presence of selection. These data, which are based on the very large sample size described herein, suggest that positive selection may be present in the Southern European population as a whole, as well as in its three subgroups, Greece, Italy, and Spain, based on the presence of negative Tajima D values and statistically significant p-values. The data also suggest the presence of some degree of positive selection in the Northern European population; but only the subgroup from the Netherlands had statistically significant p-values. It should be noted that Tajima's D statistic assumes that all nucleotides are equally mutable, subject to the same population dynamics, and can be misleading if a significant population bottleneck occurred. We also used Fu's FS test to address the presence of positive selection versus neutral evolution of MC1R. This was statistically significant only in the Southern and Northern European groups and the subpopulation from Spain and further suggests the presence of positive selection in the European populations. However, our data are also limited because we were only able to study the 951 bp of coding sequence in MC1R and were not able to assess the larger genomic region.

Several studies have evaluated genetic adaptation of the MC1R gene for evidence of positive selection with conflicting results. Some studies suggested that purifying selection is present in Africa and that relaxation of functional constraint in non-African populations, instead of positive selection, is present[25,27,40]. On the other hand, most recent studies have found evidence of positive selection at other pigmentation genes. For example, Myles et al [2] found evidence for positive selection in the DCT gene among individuals of Chinese ancestry. In their study, MC1R interpretations were limited because of the different SNPs genotyped between the Perlegen and HapMap data sets studied. In a study of 118 putative skin pigmentation genes, data were consistent with positive selection in subjects from Europe (OCA2, TYRP1, and KITLG) and in Asians (DCT, EGFR, and DRD2)[38]. Unfortunately, MC1R could not be evaluated in that study due to ascertainment criteria. It was also suggested that at least weak, recent positive selection may be present in MC1R, based on the AF variability between CEPH Utah and East Asian HapMap samples[3]. Our data suggest that MC1R may be under positive selection in some populations, although additional studies are needed to further evaluate this finding.

Conclusion

This study further quantifies the degree of MC1R genetic variation, illustrates the complexity of this variation across numerous populations, and suggests that positive selection plays a role in European populations. Understanding of population-specific genetic variation in MC1R and the role it plays not just in skin pigmentation, but sun sensitivity and melanoma risk, has the potential to impact clinical care and public health.

Methods

AF data of MC1R SNPs from populations around the world were compiled as described [29], from twenty-two skin cancer case-control and population studies that fully sequenced MC1R in distinct populations. From the studies included in Gerstenblith et al [29], we restricted our analyses to those that included data from healthy, control individuals [7,8,16,18,19,21,22,25,27,40-47]. We excluded studies that noted only the presence of a SNP but not actual AFs [4,48,49], that measured AFs on family members [4,9,18], that were restricted to the extremes of hair and skin color phenotypes [6], or to ethnically diverse groups in which it was not possible to determine the AFs for each ethnic group [17]. In addition, the study of MC1R variants in individuals from Spain was also included [22]. Populations from Europe and the United States were identified as Caucasian individuals in these studies. European populations were combined based on geographic locations. Northern Europe consisted on subjects from Britain, France, and the Netherlands. Southern Europe consisted of subjects from Greece, Italy, and Spain. The populations and studies from which they were derived are shown in Table 1.

Genotype data files were created from AFs for each population (Table 2) and were then analyzed in DNAsp version 4.0 [50]. The 951 base pairs (bp) of coding MC1R sequence (NM_002386) was used as the template. Since data files were created from AFs, we were unable to assess the haplotype structure of MC1R. Analyses were performed that were not dependent on haplotype structure. Nucleotide diversity (π), the average number of nucleotide substitutions per site between two sequences, was calculated with the Jukes and Cantor correction [51]. Theta (θ), the population mutation parameter (two times the mutation rate per site per generation times the number of heritable units in the population), was calculated on a base pair basis from the total number of segregating sites (SNPs) under the no recombination model [52]. Genetic differentiation among populations was measured by FST[53]. Arlequin (v3.11) was used to determine Tajima's D statistic and Fu's FS test[54] under a neutral model with 1000 simulations [55,56]. Other genes and corresponding estimates of population differentiation were selected for comparison with MC1R values [33-36].

Authors' contributions

SAS participated in the study design, performed all the population genetics analyses, data interpretation, and wrote the manuscript. MRG reviewed all manuscripts related to MC1R, analyzed the MC1R frequency in each population, summarized all data for the population genetics analyses, and participated in data analysis and interpretation. AMG participated in the study design and oversaw statistical analyses and data interpretation; LM participated in data analysis and interpretation. MCF and KP participated in the study design and data interpretation. MTL was responsible for the conception and design of the study, and oversaw data analysis and interpretation. All authors contributed to the manuscript's writing and review.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics. We thank Dr. Meredith Yeager, and Brian Staats, NCI, SAIC-Frederick for valuable advice. We also thank the reviewers for helpful comments.

Contributor Information

Sharon A Savage, Email: savagesh@mail.nih.gov.

Meg R Gerstenblith, Email: mgerstenblith@gmail.com.

Alisa M Goldstein, Email: goldstea@mail.nih.gov.

Lisa Mirabello, Email: mirabellol@mail.nih.gov.

Maria Concetta Fargnoli, Email: fargnoli@univaq.it.

Ketty Peris, Email: peris@univaq.it.

Maria Teresa Landi, Email: andim@mail.nih.gov.

References

  1. Izagirre N, Garcia I, Junquera C, de la RC, Alonso S. A scan for signatures of positive selection in candidate loci for skin pigmentation in humans. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23:1697–1706. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Myles S, Somel M, Tang K, Kelso J, Stoneking M. Identifying genes underlying skin pigmentation differences among human populations. Hum Genet. 2007;120:613–621. doi: 10.1007/s00439-006-0256-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Sulem P, Gudbjartsson DF, Stacey SN, Helgason A, Rafnar T, Magnusson KP, Manolescu A, Karason A, Palsson A, Thorleifsson G, Jakobsdottir M, Steinberg S, Palsson S, Jonasson F, Sigurgeirsson B, Thorisdottir K, Ragnarsson R, Benediktsdottir KR, Aben KK, Kiemeney LA, Olafsson JH, Gulcher J, Kong A, Thorsteinsdottir U, Stefansson K. Genetic determinants of hair, eye and skin pigmentation in Europeans. Nat Genet. 2007;39:1443–1452. doi: 10.1038/ng.2007.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Box NF, Wyeth JR, O'Gorman LE, Martin NG, Sturm RA. Characterization of melanocyte stimulating hormone receptor variant alleles in twins with red hair. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6:1891–1897. doi: 10.1093/hmg/6.11.1891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Smith R, Healy E, Siddiqui S, Flanagan N, Steijlen PM, Rosdahl I, Jacques JP, Rogers S, Turner R, Jackson IJ, Birch-Machin MA, Rees JL. Melanocortin 1 receptor variants in an Irish population. J Invest Dermatol. 1998;111:119–122. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00252.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Valverde P, Healy E, Jackson I, Rees JL, Thody AJ. Variants of the melanocyte-stimulating hormone receptor gene are associated with red hair and fair skin in humans. Nat Genet. 1995;11:328–330. doi: 10.1038/ng1195-328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bastiaens M, ter Huurne J, Gruis N, Bergman W, Westendorp R, Vermeer BJ, Bouwes Bavinck JN. The melanocortin-1-receptor gene is the major freckle gene. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10:1701–1708. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.16.1701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Flanagan N, Healy E, Ray A, Philips S, Todd C, Jackson IJ, Birch-Machin MA, Rees JL. Pleiotropic effects of the melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) gene on human pigmentation. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:2531–2537. doi: 10.1093/hmg/9.17.2531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Duffy DL, Box NF, Chen W, Palmer JS, Montgomery GW, James MR, Hayward NK, Martin NG, Sturm RA. Interactive effects of MC1R and OCA2 on melanoma risk phenotypes. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:447–461. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddh043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schioth HB, Phillips SR, Rudzish R, Birch-Machin MA, Wikberg JE, Rees JL. Loss of function mutations of the human melanocortin 1 receptor are common and are associated with red hair. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;260:488–491. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Garcia-Borron JC, Sanchez-Laorden BL, Jimenez-Cervantes C. Melanocortin-1 receptor structure and functional regulation. Pigment Cell Res. 2005;18:393–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0749.2005.00278.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wong TH, Rees JL. The relation between melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) variation and the generation of phenotypic diversity in the cutaneous response to ultraviolet radiation. Peptides. 2005;26:1965–1971. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2004.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Beaumont KA, Shekar SL, Newton RA, James MR, Stow JL, Duffy DL, Sturm RA. Receptor function, dominant negative activity and phenotype correlations for MC1R variant alleles. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16:2249–60. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Valverde P, Healy E, Sikkink S, Haldane F, Thody AJ, Carothers A, Jackson IJ, Rees JL. The Asp84Glu variant of the melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) is associated with melanoma. Hum Mol Genet. 1996;5:1663–1666. doi: 10.1093/hmg/5.10.1663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Palmer JS, Duffy DL, Box NF, Aitken JF, O'Gorman LE, Green AC, Hayward NK, Martin NG, Sturm RA. Melanocortin-1 receptor polymorphisms and risk of melanoma: is the association explained solely by pigmentation phenotype? Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66:176–186. doi: 10.1086/302711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kennedy C, ter Huurne J, Berkhout M, Gruis N, Bastiaens M, Bergman W, Willemze R, Bavinck JN. Melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) gene variants are associated with an increased risk for cutaneous melanoma which is largely independent of skin type and hair color. J Invest Dermatol. 2001;117:294–300. doi: 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01421.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Matichard E, Verpillat P, Meziani R, Gerard B, Descamps V, Legroux E, Burnouf M, Bertrand G, Bouscarat F, Archimbaud A, Picard C, Ollivaud L, Basset-Seguin N, Kerob D, Lanternier G, Lebbe C, Crickx B, Grandchamp B, Soufir N. Melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) gene variants may increase the risk of melanoma in France independently of clinical risk factors and UV exposure. J Med Genet. 2004;41:e13. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2003.011536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Landi MT, Kanetsky PA, Tsang S, Gold B, Munroe D, Rebbeck T, Swoyer J, Ter Minassian M, Hedayati M, Grossman L, Goldstein AM, Calista D, Pfeiffer RM. MC1R, ASIP, and DNA repair in sporadic and familial melanoma in a Mediterranean population. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:998–1007. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fargnoli MC, Altobelli E, Keller G, Chimenti S, Hofler H, Peris K. Contribution of melanocortin-1 receptor gene variants to sporadic cutaneous melanoma risk in a population in central Italy: a case-control study. Melanoma Res. 2006;16:175–182. doi: 10.1097/01.cmr.0000198454.11580.b5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kanetsky PA, Rebbeck TR, Hummer AJ, Panossian S, Armstrong BK, Kricker A, Marrett LD, Millikan RC, Gruber SB, Culver HA, Zanetti R, Gallagher RP, Dwyer T, Busam K, From L, Mujumdar U, Wilcox H, Begg CB, Berwick M. Population-based study of natural variation in the melanocortin-1 receptor gene and melanoma. Cancer Res. 2006;66:9330–9337. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stratigos AJ, Dimisianos G, Nikolaou V, Poulou M, Sypsa V, Stefanaki I, Papadopoulos O, Polydorou D, Plaka M, Christofidou E, Gogas H, Tsoutsos D, Kastana O, Antoniou C, Hatzakis A, Kanavakis E, Katsambas AD. Melanocortin receptor-1 gene polymorphisms and the risk of cutaneous melanoma in a low-risk southern European population. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126:1842–1849. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fernandez L, Milne R, Bravo J, Lopez J, Aviles J, Longo M, Benitez J, Lazaro P, Ribas G. MC1R: Three novel variants identified in a malignant melanoma association study in the Spanish population. Carcinogenesis. 2007 doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgm084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Landi MT, Bauer J, Pfeiffer RM, Elder DE, Hulley B, Minghetti P, Calista D, Kanetsky PA, Pinkel D, Bastian BC. MC1R germline variants confer risk for BRAF-mutant melanoma. Science. 2006;313:521–522. doi: 10.1126/science.1127515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jablonski NG, Chaplin G. The evolution of human skin coloration. J Hum Evol. 2000;39:57–106. doi: 10.1006/jhev.2000.0403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Harding RM, Healy E, Ray AJ, Ellis NS, Flanagan N, Todd C, Dixon C, Sajantila A, Jackson IJ, Birch-Machin MA, Rees JL. Evidence for variable selective pressures at MC1R. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66:1351–1361. doi: 10.1086/302863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rees JL. Genetics of hair and skin color. Annu Rev Genet. 2003;37:67–90. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rana BK, Hewett-Emmett D, Jin L, Chang BH, Sambuughin N, Lin M, Watkins S, Bamshad M, Jorde LB, Ramsay M, Jenkins T, Li WH. High polymorphism at the human melanocortin 1 receptor locus. Genetics. 1999;151:1547–1557. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.4.1547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Aoki K. Sexual selection as a cause of human skin colour variation: Darwin's hypothesis revisited. Ann Hum Biol. 2002;29:589–608. doi: 10.1080/0301446021000019144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gerstenblith MR, Goldstein AM, Fargnoli MC, Peris K, Landi MT. Comprehensive evaluation of allele frequency differences of MC1R variants across populations. Hum Mutat. 2007;28:495–505. doi: 10.1002/humu.20476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Makova K, Norton H. Worldwide polymorphism at the MC1R locus and normal pigmentation variation in humans. Peptides. 2005;26:1901–1908. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2004.12.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Akey JM, Eberle MA, Rieder MJ, Carlson CS, Shriver MD, Nickerson DA, Kruglyak L. Population History and Natural Selection Shape Patterns of Genetic Variation in 132 Genes. PLoS Biol. 2004;2:E286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kidd KK, Pakstis AJ, Speed WC, Kidd JR. Understanding human DNA sequence variation. J Hered. 2004;95:406–420. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esh060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Savage SA, Stewart BJ, Eckert A, Kiley M, Liao JS, Chanock SJ. Genetic variation, nucleotide diversity, and linkage disequilibrium in seven telomere stability genes suggest that these genes may be under constraint. Hum Mutat. 2005;26:343–350. doi: 10.1002/humu.20226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pungliya MS, Salisbury BA, Nandabalan K, Stephens JC. Genetic variability and evolution of two pharmacologically important classes of genes. Pharmacogenomics. 2004;5:115–127. doi: 10.1517/phgs.5.1.115.25684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schneider JA, Pungliya MS, Choi JY, Jiang R, Sun XJ, Salisbury BA, Stephens JC. DNA variability of human genes. Mech Ageing Dev. 2003;124:17–25. doi: 10.1016/S0047-6374(02)00165-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Livingston RJ, von Niederhausern A, Jegga AG, Crawford DC, Carlson CS, Rieder MJ, Gowrisankar S, Aronow BJ, Weiss RB, Nickerson DA. Pattern of sequence variation across 213 environmental response genes. Genome Res. 2004;14:1821–1831. doi: 10.1101/gr.2730004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hinds DA, Stuve LL, Nilsen GB, Halperin E, Eskin E, Ballinger DG, Frazer KA, Cox DR. Whole-genome patterns of common DNA variation in three human populations. Science. 2005;307:1072–1079. doi: 10.1126/science.1105436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lao O, de Gruijter JM, van Duijn K, Navarro A, Kayser M. Signatures of positive selection in genes associated with human skin pigmentation as revealed from analyses of single nucleotide polymorphisms. Ann Hum Genet. 2007;71:354–369. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2006.00341.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. McEvoy B, Beleza S, Shriver MD. The genetic architecture of normal variation in human pigmentation: an evolutionary perspective and model. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15 :R176–R181. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. John PR, Makova K, Li WH, Jenkins T, Ramsay M. DNA polymorphism and selection at the melanocortin-1 receptor gene in normally pigmented southern African individuals. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;994:299–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb03193.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Chaudru V, Laud K, Avril MF, Miniere A, Chompret A, Bressac-de Paillerets B, Demenais F. Melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) gene variants and dysplastic nevi modify penetrance of CDKN2A mutations in French melanoma-prone pedigrees. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:2384–2390. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Motokawa T, Kato T, Hongo M, Ito M, Takimoto H, Katagiri T, Hashimoto Y. Characteristic MC1R polymorphism in the Japanese population. J Dermatol Sci. 2006;41:143–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2005.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Nakayama K, Soemantri A, Jin F, Dashnyam B, Ohtsuka R, Duanchang P, Isa MN, Settheetham-Ishida W, Harihara S, Ishida T. Identification of novel functional variants of the melanocortin 1 receptor gene originated from Asians. Hum Genet. 2006;119:322–330. doi: 10.1007/s00439-006-0141-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kanetsky PA, Ge F, Najarian D, Swoyer J, Panossian S, Schuchter L, Holmes R, Guerry D, Rebbeck TR. Assessment of polymorphic variants in the melanocortin-1 receptor gene with cutaneous pigmentation using an evolutionary approach. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:808–819. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Goldstein AM, Landi MT, Tsang S, Fraser MC, Munroe DJ, Tucker MA. Association of MC1R variants and risk of melanoma in melanoma-prone families with CDKN2A mutations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:2208–2212. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0321A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Fargnoli MC, Chimenti S, Keller G, Hofler H, Peris K. Identification of four novel melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) gene variants in a Mediterranean population. Hum Mutat. 2003;21:655. doi: 10.1002/humu.9150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Pastorino L, Cusano R, Bruno W, Lantieri F, Origone P, Barile M, Gliori S, Shepherd GA, Sturm RA, Bianchi-Scarra G. Novel MC1R variants in Ligurian melanoma patients and controls. Hum Mutat. 2004;24:103. doi: 10.1002/humu.9253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Peng S, Lu XM, Luo HR, Xiang-Yu JG, Zhang YP. Melanocortin-1 receptor gene variants in four Chinese ethnic populations. Cell Res. 2001;11:81–84. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7290070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Na GY, Lee KH, Kim MK, Lee SJ, Kim DW, Kim JC. Polymorphisms in the melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) and agouti signaling protein (ASIP) genes in Korean vitiligo patients. Pigment Cell Res. 2003;16:383–387. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0749.2003.00062.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Rozas J, Sanchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:2496–2497. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Jukes TH, Cantor CR. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro EN, editor. Mammalian Protein Metabolism. New York, Academic Press; 1969. pp. 21–132. [Google Scholar]
  52. Nei M, Gojobori T. Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol Biol Evol. 1986;3:418–426. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Hudson RR, Slatkin M, Maddison WP. Estimation of levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data. Genetics. 1992;132:583–589. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Fu YX. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics. 1997;147:915–925. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989;123:585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online. 2005;1:47–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Genetics are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES