Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1986 Oct;52(4):819–823. doi: 10.1128/aem.52.4.819-823.1986

Gram-Negative Versus Gram-Positive (Actinomycete) Nonobligate Bacterial Predators of Bacteria in Soil

Lawrence R Zeph 1,, L E Casida Jr 1,*
PMCID: PMC239120  PMID: 16347175

Abstract

The existence of nonobligate bacterial predators of bacteria in soil has been previously reported. Several additional predators were isolated from soil and tested for predation in situ in soil by use of the indirect bacteriophage analysis technique. The trials were conducted with nutritionally poor and nutritionally enriched soil. Certain of the predators that were gram negative were found to attack a range of both gram-positive and gram-negative host cell species, including at least some of the other predator bacteria, both gram positive and gram negative. The attack occurred in both the nutritionally poor and rich soils, but in some instances it was somewhat depressed in the rich soil. This may be due to the nonobligate nature of the predation. The gram-positive predators attacked a relatively narrow range of prey species, and the attack occurred only in the nutritionally rich soil. In addition, the gram-positive predators were subject to attack by certain of the gram-negative predators. These gram-negative predators therefore appeared to play a dominant role in the control of bacterial numbers in soil.

Full text

PDF
820

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Casida L. E. Bacterial Predators of Micrococcus luteus in Soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 May;39(5):1035–1041. doi: 10.1128/aem.39.5.1035-1041.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Casida L. E. Death of Micrococcus luteus in Soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 May;39(5):1031–1034. doi: 10.1128/aem.39.5.1031-1034.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Casida L. E. Interaction of Agromyces ramosus with Other Bacteria in Soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Oct;46(4):881–888. doi: 10.1128/aem.46.4.881-888.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Germida J. J., Casida L. E. Ensifer adhaerens Predatory Activity Against Other Bacteria in Soil, as Monitored by Indirect Phage Analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Apr;45(4):1380–1388. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.4.1380-1388.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wolf D. P., Boldt J., Byrd W., Bechtol K. B. Acrosomal status evaluation in human ejaculated sperm with monoclonal antibodies. Biol Reprod. 1985 Jun;32(5):1157–1162. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod32.5.1157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES