Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan 14;198(3):268.e1–268.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.044

Duration of Lactation is Associated with Lower Prevalence of the Metabolic Syndrome in Midlife—SWAN, the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation

Kavitha T Ram *,, Paul Bobby *, Susan M Hailpern , Joan C Lo **, Miriam Schocken ***, Joan Skurnick ****, Nanette Santoro
PMCID: PMC2395466  NIHMSID: NIHMS43118  PMID: 18191796

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate whether lactation duration is associated with lower prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetSyn) in midlife, parous women.

Study Design

Cross-sectional cohort analysis of 2, 516 parous, midlife women using multivariable logistic regression to determine the independent association of lactation and lactation duration on prevalence of MetSyn.

Results

1,620 (64.4%) women reported a history of breastfeeding, with average lifetime duration of lactation of 1.16 (± 1.04) years. MetSyn was present in 536 (21.3%) women. Adjusting for age, smoking history, parity, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, study site, physical activity, caloric intake and high school body mass index (BMI), women with prior lactation had significantly lower odds of MetSyn (odds ratio [OR] = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]= 0.63–0.99). Furthermore, increasing duration of lactation was similarly associated with lower odds of MetSyn (OR= 0.88, 95% CI= 0.77–0.99).

Conclusions

Duration of lactation is associated with lower prevalence of MetSyn in a dose-response manner in midlife, parous women.

Keywords: lactation, metabolic syndrome, parity

Introduction

The metabolic syndrome (MetSyn) is a clustering of the metabolic abnormalities: insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, hypertension (HTN) and obesity. Women with MetSyn are at increased risk of diabetes mellitus (DM)1, major cardiovascular events2, and increased all-cause mortality3. Lifestyle factors including smoking, poor diet and sedentary lifestyle are associated with increased risk of MetSyn.

Lactation creates a metabolic drain that leads to altered energy homeostasis. The studies associating weight loss with lactation, however, have been mixed 4,5 Lactation increases HDL levels6, decreases triglyceride levels7 and improves insulin sensitivity5, 8, 9 in the postpartum period. Each of these changes represents an improvement in the characteristics of MetSyn. There is evidence that this enhanced metabolic efficiency persists in the immediate post-lactational period10. Duration of lactation has also been associated with a decreased incidence of type 2 DM11 and possibly HTN12 later in life, demonstrating that lactation may confer long-term benefits to the mother.

Although several studies have characterized the effects of lactation on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, no study, to our knowledge, has examined the association between lactation duration and MetSyn. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the association between lifetime duration of lactation and the prevalence of MetSyn in a cohort of midlife women who participated in the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). We hypothesized that duration of lactation is associated with a lower prevalence of MetSyn in midlife women.

Materials and Methods

The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN)

SWAN is a multisite, multiethnic longitudinal study of 3,302 mid-life women developed to characterize patterns of health in women as they traverse the menopausal transition. Women enrolled in the SWAN study were recruited from community-based samples at seven clinical sites. At each site a Caucasian sample and a pre-specified non-Caucasian sample were recruited. African-American women were recruited at Detroit, MI; Boston, MA; Chicago, IL and Pittsburgh, PA. Hispanic women were recruited at Newark, NJ. Chinese and Japanese women were recruited at Oakland, CA and Los Angeles, CA sites, respectively. Ethnicity was self-reported based on pre-defined categories. Women could not self-classify into more than one group. Briefly, in 1995–7, a cross-sectional cohort of 16,065 women aged 40–55 completed a short screening interview, most often by telephone. The longitudinal SWAN cohort was recruited from women who had completed the screening questionnaire; 50% of eligible women were enrolled in the longitudinal cohort. The study design and recruitment process has been previously described in detail13.

Eligibility for the longitudinal SWAN cohort included: 1) age 42–52 years; 2) an intact uterus and at least one ovary; 3) at least one menstrual period within the past 3 months; and 4) not having taken any reproductive hormones for at least 3 months. Common baseline and annual follow-up protocols were used at all sites; these included interviewer-administered forms, self-administered forms, anthropometry and phlebotomy. All data-collectors were trained and certified by SWAN. For the purposes of this study, the baseline dataset was used. For the current study, participants were required to have had at least one live birth; 2,726 met these criteria.

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Staff bilingual in Spanish, Cantonese and Japanese were available at the relevant sites, and all questionnaires were available in translation.

Lactation History

Participants answered retrospective questions about number of pregnancies and lactation duration following each live birth. All women who reported a live birth were included. Duration of lactation was coded in months, with less than 1 month of lactation effort coded as zero. Parous women who chose not to breastfeed were coded as zero. After the first year of lactation the infant receives the majority of its caloric needs from alternate sources. Therefore for the purposes of this study, for women who breastfed longer than one year/pregnancy each lactation interval was truncated at 1 year. Physical Measurements:

At baseline, 12-hour fasting blood samples were collected. Blood was refrigerated, centrifuged within 2 hours of phlebotomy, aliquoted, frozen and batched for approximately monthly shipment (Medical Research Laboratories International, Highland Heights, KY). Blood pressure, height, weight, waist and hip circumference were measured using standardized procedures. For these analyses, body mass index (BMI) was characterized as underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2), normal (≥18.5 and <25 kg/m2), overweight (≥25 and <30 kg/m2), or obese (≥30 kg/m2).

Demographic, Dietary and Lifestyle Factors

Demographic variables including age, income, education, self-identified race, employment and socioeconomic status were collected from interviewer- and self-administered questionnaires. Smoking status was dichotomized into current and past/never smokers. Weight at completion of high school was retrospectively self- reported. Socioeconomic status was categorized into 3 levels based on self-report of difficulty in paying for basics (food, shelter, heat). Daily caloric intake was measured using a modification of the 1995 Block Food Frequency (FFQ)14, with addition of ethnic-specific foods to the questionnaires used at sites enrolling Hispanic, Chinese and Japanese participants. Ethnicity was categorized as African-American, Caucasian, Chinese, Japanese, or Hispanic. Physical activity questions were adapted from the Kaiser Physical Activity Survey, adapted from the Baecke physical activity questionnaire 15.

Definition of Metabolic Syndrome

Dichotomous variables were created for each component of the MetSyn based on the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) III criteria16: 1) abdominal obesity (waist circumference >80cm for Chinese and Japanese, >88cm for Caucasians, African-Americans, and Hispanics); 2) hypertriglyceridemia (fasting triglycerides ≥150 mg/dl); 3) low HDL cholesterol <50 mg/dl; 4) elevated blood pressure (average systolic blood pressure ≤130 mm Hg or average diastolic blood pressure ≥85 mm Hg, or on antihypertensive medication); and 5) impaired fasting glucose (fasting glucose ≥110 mg/dl and ≤125 mg/dl). Participants were classified as having MetSyn if they satisfied three or more of the above criteria.

Laboratory Assays

All lipid and lipoprotein fractions were analyzed on EDTA-treated plasma. Total cholesterol was analyzed by enzymatic methods. HDL cholesterol was isolated using heparin-2M manganese chloride. Serum insulin was measured using radioimmunoassay (Diagnostics Products Corporation Coat-a-Count, Los Angeles, CA) and monitored as part of the monthly quality assurance program by the DM Diagnostic Laboratory at the University of Missouri (Columbia, MO). Glucose was measured using a hexokinase-coupled reaction (Roche Molecular Biochemicals Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN).

Analytic Sample

Of the total cohort of 2,726 parous women, 210 women with missing lactation or MetSyn data were excluded from this analysis. The final analytic sample included 2,516 women.

Statistical Analysis

Associations between demographic and clinical characteristics stratified by MetSyn were assessed using Student’s t-tests or Kruskall-Wallis tests for continuous variables. χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests were used to assess these associations for categorical variables. The association of lifetime duration of lactation with MetSyn was tested using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Spearman’s rank correlations were performed between lifetime duration of lactation and current BMI, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and fasting levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and glucose.

To evaluate the effect of lactation on the development of MetSyn, two logistic regression models were constructed with (1) lactation ever (yes/no) and (2) duration of lactation. Multivariable models included age, physical activity and daily caloric intake as continuous variables; high school BMI, parity, socio-economic status, study site, current smoking and ethnicity as categorical variables. Interaction product terms of lactation history with each covariate were created and tested separately in models that included all main effects terms. In a similar manner, interaction product terms of duration of lactation with each covariate were created and tested separately in models with all main effects terms. In addition, to determine whether parity affected the association between lactation history and MetSyn, logistic regression models were stratified on parity (1, 2, 3, and ≥4) and adjusted for the same covariates above.

To evaluate the independent effect of lactation on each individual component of the MetSyn, five additional adjusted logistic regression models were constructed with elevated blood pressure, abdominal obesity, impaired fasting glucose, low HDL, and elevated triglycerides as dependent outcome variables. Each model included the same covariates as the full model (above).

Since the full model could not be adjusted for current BMI due to collinearity with the outcome variable (MetSyn), we performed a sensitivity analysis in which MetSyn without the waist circumference component was our outcome variable. The logistic regression model with lactation (yes/no) as the independent variable was adjusted for all covariates noted above with the addition of current BMI.

All statistical tests used a two-tailed α of 0.05. All analyses were performed using STATA 8.2 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX).

Results

At baseline, the SWAN cohort consisted of 2,516 parous women with a mean (SD) age of 46.4 (2.7) years, mean BMI of 28.4 (7.2) kg/m2, and a median (interquartile range) parity of 2.0 (1.0) live births per woman. Of these women, 1,620 (64.4%) reported a history of lactation. The mean lifetime duration of lactation among women who breastfed was 1.16 (± 1.04) years.

There were 536 (21.3%) prevalent cases of MetSyn. Among those who breastfed, 297 (18.3%) met the criteria for MetSyn compared to 239 (26.7%) among those who did not (p< 0.01). Women who developed MetSyn were more likely to have a higher BMI at time of interview (p< 0.01) and at completion of high school (p< 0.01), be African American (p < 0.01) or Hispanic (p< 0.01), smoke (p= 0.02), and be of lower socioeconomic status (p= 0.04) (Table 1). They breastfed for shorter periods of time (Wilcoxon rank-sum, p<0.01).

Table 1.

Characteristics of cohort stratified by presence or absence of MetSyn

Absence of MetSyn (N= 1,980) Presence of MetSyn (N= 536) P- value
Lifetime
Lactation (years) 1.12 (0.96) 1.05 (0.99) < 0.01
Age 46.5 (2.2) 46.7 (2.1) 0.48
Daily caloric intake 1852.1 (786.5) 1936.3 (793.5) 0.09
Physical activity 7.8 (1.7) 7.2 (1.6) 0.28
High School
BMI 20.6 (2.9) 22.4 (2.9) < 0.01
Current BMI 26.3 (7.2) 34.5 (6.6) < 0.01
Parity n (%):
Para 1 400 (20.1) 114 (21.2) 0.61
Para 2 842 (42.4) 188 (34.9) < 0.01
Para 3 469 (23.6) 125 (23.2) 0.81
Para 4 or greater 275 (13.9) 112 (20.7) < 0.01
Ethnicity:
African Amer 589 (29.8) 195 (36.4) < 0.01
Caucasian 862 (43.6) 219 (40.9) 0.86
Hispanic 163 (8.2) 66 (12.3) < 0.01
Chinese 168 (8.5) 25 (4.7) < 0.01
Japanese 195 (9.9) 30 (5.6) 0.02
Lowest SES category 170 (8.6) 79 (14.7) 0.04
Current Smokers 788 (39.8) 249 (46.5) 0.02

Continuous variables presented as mean (standard deviation) with p-values calculated by t-tests or Kruskal- Wallis tests, as appropriate. Categorical variables presented as n (%) with p-values calculated by χ2

Spearman’s rank correlations were computed on all women, and found duration of lactation inversely correlated with current BMI (rs= −0.16, p<0.01), waist circumference (rs= −0.18, p< 0.01), systolic blood pressure (rs= −0.17, p<0.01), diastolic blood pressure (rs= −0.09, p< 0.01), fasting levels of glucose (rs= −0.09, p<0.01), insulin (rs= −0.15, p<0.01), triglycerides (rs= −0.06, p< 0.01), total cholesterol (rs= −0.06, p< 0.01), and LDL cholesterol (rs= −0.07, p< 0.01). There was a positive correlation with fasting HDL levels (rs= 0.07, p<0.01). While all of the above correlations were statistically significant, it is worth noting that the strength of these associations was relatively small.

Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association of lactation with MetSyn. Parous women who had ever breastfed had a significantly lower prevalence of MetSyn: unadjusted OR of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.51, 0.75). This association remained significant in the multivariable model adjusting for age, current smoking, parity, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, study site, physical activity, caloric intake and high-school BMI: OR of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.96) (Table 2). The model was not adjusted for current BMI due to collinearity with the waist circumference component of our outcome variable (rs=0.92, p< 0.01). We entered MetSyn without the waist circumference component into the multivariable model, and after adjusting for current BMI the relationship between lactation and this newly defined metabolic cluster remained statistically significant (p= 0.02). There were no statistically significant interactions of lactation history with any covariate, thus no interaction terms were included in the final model. Logistic regression analyses were then performed to assess the association of lactation history with each component of the MetSyn. Women who had ever breastfed were significantly less likely to have impaired fasting glucose (p <0.01), elevated blood pressure (p= 0.048), and abdominal obesity (p< 0.01).

Table 2.

Impact of a history of lactation (ever/never) on MetSyn and components of MetSyn, adjusted for multiple covariates

Model Outcomea Odds Ratiob 95% CI P- value
MetSyn 0.77* 0.62, 0.96 0.02
Elevated Blood Pressure 0.83* 0.68, 0.998 0.048
Abdominal Obesity 0.70* 0.58, 0.86 <0.01
Impaired Fasting Glucose 0.59* 0.40, 0.87 <0.01
Low HDL 0.85 0.70, 1.02 0.08
Elevated Triglycerides 0.93 0.74, 1.18 0.58
a

Logistic regression models adjusted for age, smoking history, parity, ethnicity, study site, socioeconomic status, physical activity, daily caloric intake, and high school BMI.

b

Odds ratio for history of ever breastfeeding as predictor of each model outcome in analyses adjusting for multiple covariates

*

denotes statistical significance

Logistic regression analysis found a significant association of duration of lactation with MetSyn: the unadjusted OR for each year of lactation was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.91). The multivariable model adjusting for all the covariates mentioned above also found a significant association: the OR per each additional year of lactation was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.77, 0.99) for MetSyn (Table 3). There were no statistically significant interactions of lactation duration with any covariate, thus no interaction terms were included in the final model. Logistic regression analyses exploring the duration of lactation with each MetSyn component demonstrated significant inverse relationships with elevated blood pressure (p= 0.04) and abdominal obesity (p < 0.01)

Table 3.

Impact of duration of lactation (per year) on MetSyn and components of MetSyn, adjusted for multiple covariates.

Model Outcome a Odds Ratio b 95% CI P- value
MetSyn 0.88* 0.77, 0.99 0.03
Elevated Blood Pressure 0.90* 0.81, 0.996 0.043
Abdominal Obesity 0.86* 0.78, 0.96 <0.01
Impaired Fasting Glucose 0.81 0.63, 1.03 0.09
Low HDL 0.99 0.89, 1.10 0.85
Elevated Triglycerides 0.90 0.79, 1.02 0.10
a

Logistic regression models adjusted for age, smoking history, parity, ethnicity, study site, socioeconomic status, physical activity, daily caloric intake, and high school BMI.

b

Odds ratio for duration of breastfeeding as predictor of each model outcome in analyses adjusting for multiple covariates

*

denotes statistical significance

When the multivariable model was stratified by parity (Table 4), a statistically significant inverse relationship between duration of lactation and MetSyn was seen in women who had one (OR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.95), or two (OR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.998) successful pregnancies. However, in women who had four or more successful pregnancies, this inverse relationship no longer persisted.

Table 4.

Multivariable logistic regression models assessing the relationship of a history of lactation with prevalence of MetSyn stratified by parity

Parity: Odds Ratio 95% CI P value
Para 1 0.57* 0.34, 0.95 0.03
Para 2 0.69* 0.47, 0.998 0.048
Para 3 0.69 0.43, 1.10 0.12
Para 4 and greater 1.31 0.68, 2.54 0.41
*

denotes statistical significance

Comment

A protective association between a history of lactation and MetSyn has recently been demonstrated17. Our study supports and extends these observations to show that the rate of MetSyn is significantly lower with increasing duration of lactation, suggesting a dose-response relationship. However, a threshold appears to be reached between the third and fourth pregnancies, after which any protective effect no longer remains. This finding was unexpected, as increasing parity should be associated with increasing duration of lactation. Increasing parity, however, is also associated with increased weight retention and has been independently associated with increased prevalence of MetSyn17. We hypothesized, therefore, that the effects of increasing parity outweigh the benefits of increased duration of lactation between the third and fourth pregnancies. A history of lactation has been shown to attenuate the adverse changes in LDL cholesterol, and longer duration of breastfeeding (>3 months) has been shown to attenuate the decrements in HDL cholesterol associated with pregnancy up to 16 months post delivery18. We also found a statistically significant correlation between a duration of lactation and HDL cholesterol, and an inverse correlation with LDL cholesterol. Furthermore, when examining the association of lactation on the individual components of MetSyn, we found that lactation was associated with significantly lower odds of elevated blood pressure, abdominal obesity, and impaired fasting glucose after adjusting for multiple risk factors.

Duration of lactation has been associated with decreased incidence of type 2 DM among parous women15. This finding is in agreement with our observation of a statistically significant protective effect of lactation on fasting glucose. Increasing duration of lactation has been shown to protect against the development of HTN in Korean women16. We found that duration of lactation had a significant protective effect against development of elevated blood pressure.

The strengths of our study lie in its large sample, and comprehensive collection of metabolic and lactation data. Breastfeeding data was collected as a continuous variable, not extrapolated from a categorical collection. Another strength is the multiethnic composition of our cohort that suggests generalizability of our results to other populations.

Our study has a number of limitations. A cross-sectional analysis cannot construct a causal or temporal relationship between the variable of interest and the outcome measure. It is possible that MetSyn preceded lactation. Alternatively, women who are prone to developing MetSyn may have difficulty initiating lactogenesis. Several studies have suggested that maternal obesity may be associated with decreased breastfeeding initiation and duration 19,20,21. However, our multivariable regression model is adjusted for high school BMI. Furthermore, in a post-hoc analysis when the model is stratified by high school BMI, the point estimates are similar and protective for the development of MetSyn in each category except the highest (data not shown). Lactation may protect against obesity, and this may be driving the association with MetSyn. This is difficult to evaluate in our model due to collinearity with our outcome variable. However, in adjusted analyses lactation was significantly associated with several components of the MetSyn in addition to abdominal obesity. Furthermore, when we removed the waist circumference component of MetSyn, and re-entered it into the multivariable model and adjusted for current BMI the relationship between history of lactation and this metabolic cluster remained statistically significant. Women who choose to breastfeed were more likely to choose other healthy behaviors and this “healthy lifestyle” bias may lead to confounding. We adjusted for markers of a healthy lifestyle, including diet, exercise, and smoking history. After adjusting for these markers, the protective association of lactation on development of MetSyn remained unchanged. Recall bias may be another limitation of this study; women were asked to provide lactation histories and weight at completion of high school several years after the prevalent outcomes. However, several studies have found both reporting of breastfeeding duration22, 23 and recall of high school weight24 to be a valid, reliable measure up to 20 years later.

Lactation may prime the metabolic system by making it a more energy-efficient machine, and this metabolic efficiency may persist in the post-lactational period. In the immediate post-lactational period, fasting plasma free fatty acids both basally and in response to noradrenaline infusion are significantly lower than those observed during lactation or in bottle-feeding and non- pregnant controls 8. Similarly, post- lactation the response of plasma glycerol to noradrenaline is significantly lower than these same controls 8. Each of these changes represents an improvement in metabolic efficiency.

Lactation may decrease visceral adiposity, and indeed we demonstrated a negative association between lactation and abdominal obesity. Central fat accumulation has been postulated to be a physiological basis for reduced postprandial thermogenesis25. A redistribution of fat from central stores through lactation may lead to improved postprandial thermogenesis, and a more efficient metabolism.

Lactation may also decrease the prevalence of MetSyn by improving insulin sensitivity. Unfortunately, most of the data on lactation and carbohydrate metabolism has been collected from gestational diabetics and confined to the immediate postpartum period. Nonetheless, improved glucose tolerance, fasting glucose, and total area under the glucose tolerance curve have been shown in breastfeeding gestational diabetics5. Gestational diabetics who lactate have a higher disposition index, indicating a more efficient pancreatic beta-cell function7. We found a significant inverse correlation between duration of lactation and fasting levels of both glucose and insulin. Longitudinal studies in women with intact carbohydrate metabolism are needed to evaluate whether lactation has a long-term impact on insulin sensitivity.

In conclusion, we have found that duration of lactation is associated with prevalence of MetSyn in parous midlife women in a dose-response manner. This association is most marked after the first and second pregnancies, and appears to reach a threshold by the fourth pregnancy. These changes may be mediated by changes in insulin resistance, visceral adiposity and/or free fatty acid metabolism. Further research is needed to confirm and elaborate upon these results. In addition to the pediatric benefits of breastfeeding, these findings of maternal benefit may encourage more women to initiate and maintain breastfeeding behavior.

Acknowledgments

The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN) has grant support from the National Institutes of Health, DHHS, through the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Nursing Research and the NIH Office of Research on Women’s Health (Grants NR004061; AG012505, AG012535, AG012531, AG012539, AG012546, AG012553, AG012554, AG012495).

Clinical Centers: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor - MaryFran Sowers, PI; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA - Robert Neer, PI 1995 - 1999; Joel Finkelstein, PI 1999- present; Rush University, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL - Lynda Powell, PI; University of California, Davis/Kaiser - Ellen Gold, PI; University of California, Los Angeles - Gail Greendale, PI; University of Medicine and Dentistry - New Jersey Medical School, Newark –Gerson Weiss, PI 1995 – 2004; Nanette Santoro, PI 2004 – present; and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA - Karen Matthews, PI.

NIH Program Office: National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, MD - Marcia Ory 1994 – 2001; Sherry Sherman 1994 – present; National Institute of Nursing Research, Bethesda, MD – Program Officers.

Central Laboratory: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor - Daniel McConnell; (Central Ligand Assay Satellite Services).

Coordinating Center: New England Research Institutes, Watertown, MA - Sonja McKinlay, PI 1995 – 2001; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA – Kim Sutton-Tyrrell, PI 2001 – present.

Steering Committee: Chris Gallagher, Chair, Susan Johnson, Chair

We thank the study staff at each site and all the women who participated in SWAN.

Footnotes

Condensation: Lactation is associated with lower prevelance of the metabolic syndrome in midlife, parous women.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Haffner SM, Valdez RA, Hazuda HP, Mitchell BD, Morales PA, Stern MP. Prospective analysis of the insulin-resistance syndrome (syndrome X) Diabetes. 1992;41:715–22. doi: 10.2337/diab.41.6.715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kip KE, Marroquin OC, Kelley DE, Johnson BD, Kelsey SF, Shaw LJ, Rogers WJ, Reis SE. Clinical Importance of obesity versus MetSyn in cardiovascular risk in women: a report from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study. Circulation. 2004;109:706–13. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000115514.44135.A8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Trevisan M, Liu J, Bahsas FB, Menotti A. Syndrome X and mortality: a population- based study. Risk Factor and Life Expectancy Research Group. Am J of Epidemiology. 1998;148(10):958–966. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brewer MM, Bates MR, Vannoy LP. Postpartum changes in maternal weight and body fat depots in lactating vs. nonlactating women. Am J Clinical Nutrition. 1989;49:259–265. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/49.2.259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sichieri R, Field AE, Rich-Edwards J, Willett WC. Prospective assessment of exclusive breastfeeding in relation to weight change in women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27:815–820. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kjos SL, Henry O, Lee RM, Buchanan TA, Mishell DR., Jr The effect of lactation on glucose and lipid metabolism in women with recent gestational DM. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:451–455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Qureshi IA, Xi XR, Limbu YR, Bin HY, Chen MI. Hyperlipidemia during normal pregnancy, parturition, and lactation. Annals of the Academy of Medicine. 1999;28(2):217– 221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McManus RM, Cuingham I, Watson A, Harker L, Finegood DT. Beta-cell function and visceral fat in lactating women with a history of gestational DM. Metabolism. 2001;50:715– 719. doi: 10.1053/meta.2001.23304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Butte NF, Hopkinson JM, Mehta N, Moon JK, Smith EO. Adjustments in energy expenditure and substrate utilization during late pregnancy and lactation. Am J of Clinical Nutrition. 1999;69(2):299–307. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/69.2.299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Illingworth PJ, Jung RT, Howie PW, Leslie P, Isles TE. Diminution in energy expenditure during lactation. British Medical Journal. 1986;292:437– 441. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6518.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Stuebe AM, Rich-Edwards JW, Willett WC, Manson JE, Michels KB. Duration of Lactation and Incidence of Type 2 DM. JAMA. 2005;294(20):2601–2610. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.20.2601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lee SY, Kim MT, Jee SH, Yang HP. Does long-term lactation protect premenopausal women against HTN risk? A Korean Women’s cohort study. Preventative Medicine. 2005;41(2):433–438. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sowers MF, Crawford SL, Sternfeld B, Morganstein D, Gold EB, Greendale GA, Evans D, Neer R, Matthews K, Sherman S, Lo A, Weiss G, Kelsey J. SWAN: A multicenter, multiethnic, community-based cohort study of women and the menopausal transition. In: Lobo RA, Kelsey J, Marcus R, editors. Menopause :biology and Pathobiology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2000. pp. 175–188. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Block G, Hartman AM, Dresser CM, Carroll MD, Gannon J, Gardner L. A data-based approach to diet questionnaire design and testing. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;124(3):453–69. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sternfeld B, Ainsworth BA, Quesenberry CP., Jr Physical activity patterns in a diverse population of women. Prev Med. 1999;28:313–23. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002;106(25):3143–421. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cohen A, Pieper CF, Brown AJ, Bastian LA. Number of Children and Risk of Metabolic Syndrome in Women. J of Women’s Health. 2006;15(6):763–773. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gunderson EP, Lewis CE, Wei GS, Whitmer RA, Quesenberry CP, Sidney S. Lactation and Changes in Maternal Metabolic Risk Factors. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2007;109(3):729– 738. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000252831.06695.03. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rassmussen KM, Hilson JA, Kjolhede CL. Obesity may impair lactogenesis II. J Nutr. 2001;131(11):3009S–3011S. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.11.3009S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Donath SM, Amir LH. Does maternal obesity adversely affect breastfeeding initiation and duration? J Ped Child Health. 2000;36:482–486. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2000.00562.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hilson JA, Rasmussen KM, Kjolhede CL. Maternal obesity and breast- feeding success in a rural population of white women [correction appears in Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 67:494] Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:1371–1378. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/66.6.1371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kark JD, Troya G, Friedlander Y, Slater PE, Stein Y. Validity of maternal reporting of breast feeding and the association with blood lipids in 17 year olds in Jerusalem. Jour of Epidemiology & Community Health. 1984;38(3):218–25. doi: 10.1136/jech.38.3.218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Eaton- Evans J, Dugdale AE. Recall by mothers of the birth weights and feeding of their children. Human Nutr—Applied Nutr. 1986;40(3):171–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.VanDam RM, Willet WC, Manson JE, Hu FB. The relationship between overweight in adolescence and premature death in women. Ann Int Med. 2006;145:91–97. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-2-200607180-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Camastra S, Bonora E, Del Prato S, Rett K, Weck M, Ferrannini E. Effect of obesity and insulin resistance on resting and glucose- induced thermogenesis in man. Int Journal of Obesity. 1999;23:1307–1313. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES