Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1984 Jan;47(1):56–60. doi: 10.1128/aem.47.1.56-60.1984

Bacterial interference with coliform colony sheen production on membrane filters.

G A Burlingame, J McElhaney, M Bennett, W O Pipes
PMCID: PMC239611  PMID: 6696423

Abstract

The membrane filter (MF) method for detection and enumeration of coliform bacteria in drinking water requires that the coliforms both grow and produce a green metallic sheen when the filter is incubated on modified Endo medium at 35 degrees C for 22 h. Large numbers of noncoliform bacteria, which are enumerated by the standard plate count (SPC) technique, can interfere with the detection of coliforms on MF. This paper presents quantitative evidence from laboratory experiments on the interference of specific SPC bacteria on coliform colony sheen production on MF. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Aeromonas hydrophila caused significant reductions in Escherichia coli sheen colony counts when present at 3,000 and 220 per filter, respectively. The Flavobacterium sp. and Bacillus sp. selected for this study from SPC did not interfere with coliform colony sheen production. Excessive crowding of E. coli and Enterobacter cloacae colonies on MF also caused a reduction in the number of colonies that produced sheen. Even when there was no crowding (14 colonies per filter), only a fraction of the E. cloacae colonies produced sheen colonies on modified Endo medium.

Full text

PDF
60

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bissonnette G. K., Jezeski J. J., McFeters G. A., Stuart D. G. Influence of environmental stress on enumeration of indicator bacteria from natural waters. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Feb;29(2):186–194. doi: 10.1128/am.29.2.186-194.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hsu S. C., Williams T. J. Evaluation of factors affecting the membrane filter technique for testing drinking water. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Aug;44(2):453–460. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.2.453-460.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lupo L., Strickland E., Dufour A., Cabelli V. The effect of oxidase positive bacteria on total coliform density estimates. Health Lab Sci. 1977 Apr;14(2):117–121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McFeters G. A., Cameron S. C., LeChevallier M. W. Influence of diluents, media, and membrane filters on detection fo injured waterborne coliform bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Jan;43(1):97–103. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.1.97-103.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Means E. G., Olson B. H. Coliform inhibition by bacteriocin-like substances in drinking water distribution systems. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Sep;42(3):506–512. doi: 10.1128/aem.42.3.506-512.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES