Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 1991 Jun;65(6):2979–2986. doi: 10.1128/jvi.65.6.2979-2986.1991

Analysis of the binding proteins and activity of the long terminal repeat of Moloney murine leukemia virus during differentiation of mouse embryonal carcinoma cells.

T Tsukiyama 1, O Niwa 1, K Yokoro 1
PMCID: PMC240943  PMID: 2033663

Abstract

Mouse embryonal carcinoma (EC) cell lines were established which carry the stably integrated chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene under the control of the transcriptional elements of the long terminal repeat (LTR) of Moloney murine leukemia virus. The activity of three elements of the stably integrated LTR was analyzed in undifferentiated EC cells (stable CAT assay). Results of the study are summarized as follows. (i) In the stable assay, the promoter region of the LTR was inactive in undifferentiated ECA2 and F9 cells, and the level of the activity was 10(-4) of that in NIH 3T3 cells. (ii) In contrast to the results of the transient assay, the enhancer was active in undifferentiated ECA2 cells and in F9 cells. It activated CAT activity more than 60-fold and about 8-fold in ECA2 cells and F9 cells, respectively. (iii) Suppression by ELP, the embryonal LTR-binding protein, was more pronounced in the stable assay than in the transient assay. These data suggest that, when compared with NIH 3T3 cells, a major factor for the inactivity of the LTR in EC cells is the inefficiency of the promoter in this assay. Transcriptional activity of the LTR was analyzed during the differentiation of EC cells. In the case of ECA2 cells, the magnitude of activation by the enhancer did not change during differentiation. The activity of the promoter increased about 10-fold, and the suppression by ELP became negligible 4 days after the induction of differentiation. Upon differentiation of F9 cells, the activity of the enhancer increased more than 300-fold, but the promoter remained inactive. The pattern of LTR-binding proteins also varied during the differentiation of EC cells. Our present data suggest that the activity of LTR elements as assayed by the stable assay differs from the activity as assayed by the transient assay. It also indicates that the activity of these elements exhibits cell-type-specific changes during the differentiation of EC cells.

Full text

PDF
2985

Images in this article

2980Image
on p.2980
2981Image
on p.2981
2983Image
on p.2983

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amati P. Polyoma regulatory region: a potential probe for mouse cell differentiation. Cell. 1985 Dec;43(3 Pt 2):561–562. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90225-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carey M., Lin Y. S., Green M. R., Ptashne M. A mechanism for synergistic activation of a mammalian gene by GAL4 derivatives. Nature. 1990 May 24;345(6273):361–364. doi: 10.1038/345361a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cohen D. R., Curran T. fra-1: a serum-inducible, cellular immediate-early gene that encodes a fos-related antigen. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 May;8(5):2063–2069. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.5.2063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Feuer G., Taketo M., Hanecak R. C., Fan H. Two blocks in Moloney murine leukemia virus expression in undifferentiated F9 embryonal carcinoma cells as determined by transient expression assays. J Virol. 1989 May;63(5):2317–2324. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.5.2317-2324.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gautsch J. W., Wilson M. C. Delayed de novo methylation in teratocarcinoma suggests additional tissue-specific mechanisms for controlling gene expression. Nature. 1983 Jan 6;301(5895):32–37. doi: 10.1038/301032a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gorman C. M., Moffat L. F., Howard B. H. Recombinant genomes which express chloramphenicol acetyltransferase in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1982 Sep;2(9):1044–1051. doi: 10.1128/mcb.2.9.1044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Graham F. L., van der Eb A. J. A new technique for the assay of infectivity of human adenovirus 5 DNA. Virology. 1973 Apr;52(2):456–467. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(73)90341-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hilberg F., Stocking C., Ostertag W., Grez M. Functional analysis of a retroviral host-range mutant: altered long terminal repeat sequences allow expression in embryonal carcinoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(15):5232–5236. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.15.5232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lin Y. S., Carey M., Ptashne M., Green M. R. How different eukaryotic transcriptional activators can cooperate promiscuously. Nature. 1990 May 24;345(6273):359–361. doi: 10.1038/345359a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Linney E., Davis B., Overhauser J., Chao E., Fan H. Non-function of a Moloney murine leukaemia virus regulatory sequence in F9 embryonal carcinoma cells. 1984 Mar 29-Apr 4Nature. 308(5958):470–472. doi: 10.1038/308470a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Loh T. P., Sievert L. L., Scott R. W. Evidence for a stem cell-specific repressor of Moloney murine leukemia virus expression in embryonal carcinoma cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Aug;10(8):4045–4057. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.8.4045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Loh T. P., Sievert L. L., Scott R. W. Proviral sequences that restrict retroviral expression in mouse embryonal carcinoma cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Oct;7(10):3775–3784. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.10.3775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Miskimins W. K., Roberts M. P., McClelland A., Ruddle F. H. Use of a protein-blotting procedure and a specific DNA probe to identify nuclear proteins that recognize the promoter region of the transferrin receptor gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Oct;82(20):6741–6744. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.20.6741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nakabeppu Y., Ryder K., Nathans D. DNA binding activities of three murine Jun proteins: stimulation by Fos. Cell. 1988 Dec 2;55(5):907–915. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90146-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Niwa O. Suppression of the hypomethylated Moloney leukemia virus genome in undifferentiated teratocarcinoma cells and inefficiency of transformation by a bacterial gene under control of the long terminal repeat. Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Sep;5(9):2325–2331. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.9.2325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Niwa O., Yokota Y., Ishida H., Sugahara T. Independent mechanisms involved in suppression of the Moloney leukemia virus genome during differentiation of murine teratocarcinoma cells. Cell. 1983 Apr;32(4):1105–1113. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90294-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Okamoto K., Okazawa H., Okuda A., Sakai M., Muramatsu M., Hamada H. A novel octamer binding transcription factor is differentially expressed in mouse embryonic cells. Cell. 1990 Feb 9;60(3):461–472. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90597-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Paludan K., Dai H. Y., Duch M., Jørgensen P., Kjeldgaard N. O., Pedersen F. S. Different relative expression from two murine leukemia virus long terminal repeats in unintegrated transfected DNA and in integrated retroviral vector proviruses. J Virol. 1989 Dec;63(12):5201–5207. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.12.5201-5207.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schöler H. R., Hatzopoulos A. K., Balling R., Suzuki N., Gruss P. A family of octamer-specific proteins present during mouse embryogenesis: evidence for germline-specific expression of an Oct factor. EMBO J. 1989 Sep;8(9):2543–2550. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08392.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Speck N. A., Baltimore D. Six distinct nuclear factors interact with the 75-base-pair repeat of the Moloney murine leukemia virus enhancer. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Mar;7(3):1101–1110. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.3.1101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stewart C. L., Stuhlmann H., Jähner D., Jaenisch R. De novo methylation, expression, and infectivity of retroviral genomes introduced into embryonal carcinoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Jul;79(13):4098–4102. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.13.4098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stief A., Winter D. M., Strätling W. H., Sippel A. E. A nuclear DNA attachment element mediates elevated and position-independent gene activity. Nature. 1989 Sep 28;341(6240):343–345. doi: 10.1038/341343a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Strickland S., Mahdavi V. The induction of differentiation in teratocarcinoma stem cells by retinoic acid. Cell. 1978 Oct;15(2):393–403. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90008-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tsukiyama T., Niwa O., Yokoro K. Characterization of the negative regulatory element of the 5' noncoding region of Moloney murine leukemia virus in mouse embryonal carcinoma cells. Virology. 1990 Aug;177(2):772–776. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(90)90547-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tsukiyama T., Niwa O., Yokoro K. Mechanism of suppression of the long terminal repeat of Moloney leukemia virus in mouse embryonal carcinoma cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Nov;9(11):4670–4676. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.11.4670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Weiher H., Barklis E., Ostertag W., Jaenisch R. Two distinct sequence elements mediate retroviral gene expression in embryonal carcinoma cells. J Virol. 1987 Sep;61(9):2742–2746. doi: 10.1128/jvi.61.9.2742-2746.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Weintraub H., Cheng P. F., Conrad K. Expression of transfected DNA depends on DNA topology. Cell. 1986 Jul 4;46(1):115–122. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90865-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wigler M., Sweet R., Sim G. K., Wold B., Pellicer A., Lacy E., Maniatis T., Silverstein S., Axel R. Transformation of mammalian cells with genes from procaryotes and eucaryotes. Cell. 1979 Apr;16(4):777–785. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90093-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zerial M., Toschi L., Ryseck R. P., Schuermann M., Müller R., Bravo R. The product of a novel growth factor activated gene, fos B, interacts with JUN proteins enhancing their DNA binding activity. EMBO J. 1989 Mar;8(3):805–813. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03441.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES