Skip to main content
Current Neuropharmacology logoLink to Current Neuropharmacology
. 2006 Apr;4(2):149–163. doi: 10.2174/157015906776359531

The Role of β-Amyloid Protein in Synaptic Function: Implications for Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy

F Peña 1,*, AI Gutiérrez-Lerma 1, R Quiroz-Baez 2, C Arias 2
PMCID: PMC2430670  PMID: 18615129

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive and irreversible loss of memory and other cognitive functions. Substantial evidence based on genetic, neuropathological and biochemical data has established the central role of β-amyloid protein (βAP) in this pathology. Although the precise etiology of AD is not well understood yet, strong evidence for some of the molecular events that lead to progressive brain dysfunction and neurodegeneration in AD has been afforded by identification of biochemical pathways implicated in the generation of βAP, development of transgenic models exhibiting progressive disease pathology and by data on the effects of βAP at the neuronal network level. However, the mechanisms by which βAP causes cognitive decline have not been determined, nor is it clear if the degree of dementia correlates in time with the degree of neuronal loss. Hence, it is of interest to understand the biochemical processes involved in the mechanisms of βAP-induced neurotoxicity and the mechanisms involved in electrophysiological effects of this protein on different parameters of synaptic transmission and on neuronal firing properties. In this review we analyze recent evidence suggesting a complex role of βAP in the molecular events that lead to progressive loss of function and eventually to neurodegeneration in AD as well as the therapeutic implications based on βAP metabolism inhibition.

Key Words: Alzheimer disease, β-amyloid protein, cognitive impairment, synaptic dysfunction, synaptic plasticity

1. INTRODUCTION

Alzheimer Disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder and the most common of the late-life dementias. The sporadic form of AD frequently begins after the age of 60 years and its prevalence rises steadily with age, affecting less than 3% of individuals between 60 and 70 years of age, up to 12% of those between 70 and 80, and more than 40% of people over 85 [78]. It is expected that the number of individuals with AD will increase dramatically as the world population gets older [78]. AD is characterized by synaptic and neuronal loss, amyloid β protein (βAP) deposition, and the presence of neuro-fibrillary tangles. A central role of β AP in AD has been established by substantial genetic, neuropathological and biochemical evidence [28, 39, 52, 76, 82, 99, 101, 102, 143, 147, 153, 171, 183, 185, 201]. Although the precise etiology of AD still remains poorly understood, the identification of biochemical pathways implicated in βAP generation, and the development of β AP transgenic models exhibiting progressive disease pathology provide a strong correlation between βAP generation and the progressive neurodegeneration characteristic of AD. However, up to now the precise mechanism by which βAP causes cognitive decline has not been determined, nor if the degree of dementia correlates in time with the degree of neuronal loss.

There is growing interest in understanding the biochemical processes involved in the mechanisms of βAP induced neurotoxicity and, more recently, in the mechanisms involved in the electrophysiological effects of this protein on different parameters of synaptic function. Here we review how βAP is produced, and the putative effects of this protein once it has been released to the extracellular space, in order to identify therapeutic targets to prevent βAP-induced neurotoxicity.

II. βAP METABOLISM

The βAP is a 39-43 amino acid peptide cleavage product derived from the amyloid precursor protein (APP) [67, 125] a type I integral membrane glycoprotein. The APP gene is located in chromosome 21, widely expressed in cells throughout the body and is also highly conserved in evolution [68, 173]. There are 10 isoforms of this protein ranging in size from 563 to 770 amino acids. Neurons mainly express the 695 amino acid-long form (APP695) that lacks a Kunitz-type protease inhibitor sequence [172].

The proteolytic pathway by which βAP is generated has been well characterized in a number of cell lines [159]. βAP is generated by the sequential processing of two proteases, β-secretase and γ-secretase, which produce the N and the C termini of βAP, respectively, through the amyloidogenic pathway. Alternatively APP can be processed by α-secretase, which precludes the formation of βAP in the nonamyloidogenic pathway. Although cleavage of APP by α-secretase is the major proteolytic pathway, the exact identity of α-secretase has not been confirmed; however, its activity has been associated with regions with low cholesterol content [103]. Pharmacologic studies suggest that α-secretase could be a zinc-dependent metalloprotease [138]. This enzymatic activity may be constitutive or inducible through activation of protein kinase C (PKC) [109]. Preliminary data suggest that TACE (TNF-α converting enzyme), a metalloprotease that belongs to the ADAM (a disintegrin and metalloprotease) family (also called ADAM17), may have α-secretase-inducible activity [139]. On the other hand, ADAM10 also appears to process APP through the α-secretase pathway. The expression of a dominant-negative form of ADAM10 inhibits endogenous α-secretase activity, whereas its overexpression increases both constitutive and inducible activities [191]. Some studies suggest that ADAM9 could be another candidate protein with α-secretase activity [11].

Under normal metabolic conditions about 10% of APP molecules fail to be cleaved by α-secretase, so APP can be internalized into endocytic compartments and subsequently cleaved by β-secretase and γ-secretase, to generate βAP as mentioned above. The β-site APP-cleaving enzyme (BACE) has been identified as the protein that contains the β-secretase activity; BACE is a protein with homology to the pepsin family of aspartyl proteases [180]. The BACE-1 protein is highly expressed in neurons and appears to be the major enzyme in the amyloidogenic pathway [60]. Moreover, antisense inhibition of BACE-1 reduces the generation of βAP in cell cultures [180, 196]. BACE-1mediated cleavage occurs at the Asp-1 of the βAP domain; interestingly, the homologous protein BACE-2 has a distinct APP-cleavage specificity. It has been demonstrated in cell cultures that BACE-2 cleavage occurs in the middle of the βAP domain between phenylalanines 19 and 20 [60].

The γ-secretase is a protein complex that cleaves within one of the transmembranal regions of the APP, and it is formed by presenilin (PS) (which contains the protease activity of the complex), nicastrin, Aph-1 and Pen-2 [202, 61]. These components are critical to the γ-secretase function because each one may modify the activity and response to physiological stimuli (for review see [26]). The participation of PS in the pathogenesis of AD has been demonstrated in most cases of familiar AD (FAD), with clear genetic causes (for review see [145]).

Some studies have found that a small fraction of βAP peptides could be generated in the Golgi apparatus and, to a lesser extent, in the endoplasmic reticulum. βAP peptides generated in intracellular organelles can be secreted into the extracellular space [73]. The major species of secreted βAP are the soluble 40 amino acid-long peptides (βAP1-40), found in the CSF at low nanomolar concentrations [181]. However, the minor species of 42 amino acids length (βAP1-42) is more fibrillogenic and is highly enriched in amyloid plaque cores from AD patients and from the brain of transgenic mice models [84, 106].

III. βAP INDUCES SYNAPTIC TOXICITY

The possibility that β AP plays a physiological role throughout life is suggested by reports that show that βAP is routinely produced by many cell types [159]. In neuronal cultures, βAP is generated at high picomolar to low nanomolar concentrations [161]. Similarly, it has been postulated that secreted βAP possibly interacts with extracellular substrate molecules in the nervous system and exerts neurotrophic actions [197].

Some studies have shown that neuronal electrical activity can modulate the APP secretory products [136] and, more recently, Kamenetz et al., [89], in an acute model of over-expressed APP, reported that neuronal electrical activity modulates APP processing, possibly by promoting the endocytosis of surface APP, which becomes more accessible to BACE in endosomal/recycling compartments. Moreover, the authors suggest that βAP may have a physiological negative feedback function: increased neuronal activity produces more βAP and, in turn, βAP depresses synaptic function. Consistent with these findings it has been recently demonstrated that βAP is capable of regulating the surface expression and endocytosis of NMDA receptors [164]. Conceivably, prolonged depression of NMDA receptor-mediated transmission may initiate the pathological changes observed in AD.

The data described above may have therapeutic implications because benzodiazepines have been found to protect against AD [58] and NMDA antagonists like memantine have been shown to be effective in mild to severe AD patients [192].

In AD, loss of synapses exceeds neuronal loss and seems to underlie the cognitive deficits that characterize this degenerative dementia [47]. Some data suggest that synapses may be sites where the neurodegenerative cascade may initiate, and, in fact, the loss of the synaptic-associated protein synaptophysin has been taken as an early marker of neurodegeneration [123]. Moreover, in plaque-forming APP transgenic mice, the developed markers of active loss of synapses have been observed [38].

The loss of synaptophysin in synaptic terminals in specific brain regions [50, 79, 123, 170, 175] correlates well with the cognitive decline in AD. In contrast, the relationship between amyloid plaques and clinical manifestations of neurodegenerative changes remains controversial [16, 42, 43, 45, 69, 118, 127, 174]. Interestingly, in some APP transgenic mouse lines, the numbers of synaptophysin-positive presynaptic terminals and microtubule-associated protein (MAP2)–positive neurons are around 30% less than in nontransgenic controls at age 2 to 3 months old, well before any βAP plaque formation [81]. Comparisons of transgenic lines with variable levels of APP expression suggest that decreases in presynaptic terminals are critically dependent on cortical βAP levels, but not on the βAP plaque burden or APP levels [133]. In accordance with this finding, presynaptic terminals are significantly depleted in 2 to 4 month-old transgenic APP mice, in correlation with an increase of soluble βAP before plaque formation. These data nicely show that memory and cognitive deficits in AD correlate far better with cortical βAP levels than with plaque numbers [135]. Even in very mildly impaired cognitive patients, soluble βAP levels in the cortex show a significant correlation with the degree of synaptic loss [118]. In the transgenic mice Tg2576, the reduction in synaptic terminals is also observed in the hippocampus; in this case the presynaptic protein SNAP-25 (synaptosomal-associated protein 25) is greatly reduced prior to the formation of plaques, and the intracerebroventricular injection of anti-βAP antibodies reverts the synaptic protein lost at the age of 11 months [31].

Recent evidence has shown that the Fyn-kinase pathway seems to be involved in βAP synaptotoxicity, since on a Fyn+/+ background, βAP decreased hippocampal synaptophysin levels, but on a Fyn-/-background this decrease was not observed [34]. Furthermore, the overexpression of Fyn exacerbated the reduction of synaptophysin-immunoreactive presynaptic terminals in transgenic mice [34]. Dysregulation of the ERK/CREB signaling in an AD mouse model displaying extracellular βAP accumulation has also been demonstrated [51], and in rats expressing AD transgenes that accumulate βAP intraneuronally, the presence of βAP is sufficient to induce up-regulation of the phosphorylated form of ERK-2 [54]. Given that these signaling pathways are involved in synaptic plasticity [1], similar biochemical changes may contribute to the mild cognitive impairment observed in the preclinical stages of AD.

In addition to the evidence discussed above, other biochemical and morphological indicators suggest that an attack on synapses may underlie the cognitive decline in AD [163]. A quantitative morphometric study from Alzheimer’s brains revealed a 25%–35% decrease in the density of synapses in cerebral cortex and a 15%–35% decrease in the number of synapses per cortical neuron [44]. The neurochemical consequences of this synaptic terminal decrease must be expressed at several levels of synaptic function (for electrophysiological evidence, see below). For example, it has been observed that in hippocampal slices, β AP25–35 induces an increase in the release of excitatory amino acids after depolarization [5]. Consistent with this result, it has been reported that in cortical synaptosomes, βA P25–35 profoundly affects synaptosomal morphology as well as the levels of synaptophysin and actin proteins. Electron microscopic analysis of synaptosomes incubated with βAP shows a depletion in the content of synaptic vesicles as well as recruitment to and docking at the active zone, in addition to the appearance of pleomorphic vesicles, suggesting that βAP is capable of activating the mechanism of vesicular exocytosis [134]. Interestingly, microarray analysis of transgenic APP695-SWE mice showed that the transcript levels for some of the synaptic vesicles, trafficking-related genes are decreased [198].

Moreover, physiologically relevant concentrations of βAP-related peptides have acute, negative effects on multiple aspects of acetylcholine (ACh) synthesis and release, without inducing toxicity. These data suggest a neuromodulatory influence of the βAP peptides on central cholinergic functions (for review see [92]). The amyloid pathology seems to progress in time and affect neurotransmitter release in a specific manner, first in the cholinergic system which appears to be the most vulnerable, followed by the glutamatergic presynaptic boutons and finally by the somewhat more resilient GABAergic terminals, as has been shown in a transgenic mouse model [19].

Some studies in hippocampal slices and synaptic nerve endings have indicated that βAP is capable of inhibiting choline uptake and the release of ACh [91]. In transgenic APP-SWE mice the degeneration of ChAT-immunoreactive fibers in the environment of amyloid plaques suggests a role for βAP and/or inflammation in the specific degeneration of cholinergic synaptic structures [119]. Recently, other groups have reported an increase in the activity of the enzyme acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and specific high-affinity binding of βAP1-42 to the neuronal α7AchR, and low-affinity binding to the receptor α4β2, concomitant with a regulatory function on NMDA-R throughout the modification of the NR2A subunit [71].

Synaptic vulnerability to βAP may also be increased by other factors associated with the aging brain in AD. Epidemiological evidence suggests a strong correlation between vascular disorders, which can predispose to cerebrovascular disease or stroke, and AD, implicating vascular disease as a risk factor for AD [88]. Some results indicate that coadministration of βAP with low concentrations of the metabolic toxins 3-NP and iodoacetate produces a drastic inhibition of the synaptosomal redox function [6]. Interestingly, synaptosomes isolated from the hippocampal region appear to be more vulnerable to βAP toxicity in the presence of metabolic inhibitors than synaptosomes obtained from the neocortex, and in all conditions, the metabolic substrate pyruvate served as an excellent substrate to restore synaptosomal mitochondrial redox function altered by metabolic inhibition and βAP toxicity [6].

Many of the mentioned abnormalities induced by the presence of βAP in the brain would be expected to play a role in interfering with memory function. In this context, some very interesting studies report that βAP deposition modifies the shape and length of pyramidal and dentate granular cells dendrites [100, 178, 193], which has been suggested is sufficient to modify the relative timing of pre-and post-synaptic action potentials. Computational studies indicate that the effects of βAP on dendritic remodeling could be of considerable importance in AD [163]. In cultured neurons from Tg2576 mice, selective alterations have been found in pre- and post-synaptic compartments compared to wild-type neurons. While pre-synaptic sites appear fewer and enlarged, post-synaptic compartments appear fewer and shortened. Among the earliest changes is the reduction in the post-synaptic protein PSD-95 accompanied by reduction of the glutamate receptor subunit GluR1 [3]. On the other hand, in living Tg2576 mice, an altered pattern of disrupted neurite trajectories and a 25% reduction in dendritic spines density compared with age-matched control mice have been recently reported [165].

Interestingly, it has been suggested that βAP and not amyloid plaques play the major role in the damaging effect on dendrites. In two transgenic mouse strains (J20 and APP/PS1) that express mutant forms of the APP, swollen bulbous dystrophic neurites have been found with loss of spines as early as 3 months after birth, and not associated with amyloid plaques [132]. All these data suggest the importance of the synapto-dendritic complex in the pathophysiology of AD.

The fundamental mechanisms underlying the neuronal toxicity of βAP are complex and not well understood yet. It has been proposed that this peptide produces an early disruption of Ca2+ homeostasis [63, 65], and also increases reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn may alter several neuronal functions [27, 94].

It is generally accepted that βAP is neurotoxic in micromolar concentrations depending on its conformational state [117, 142]. βAP toxicity may be induced by two pathways: the first implies direct injury to the cell by membrane damage [121], and in the second, β AP acts indirectly by enhancing neuronal vulnerability to neurotoxic insults, such as excitotoxicity, hypoglycemia, oxidative stress or metabolic impairment [6, 126].

Current data show that βAP oligomers are stable molecules that can exist for long periods in the brain prior to conversion to fibrillar structures [35]. Target sites for oligomers are dendritic arbors; in fact, oligomers extracted from AD brain were found to attach selectively to dendrites in culture [70]. Recently, Lacor et al., [107] reported that βAP oligomers extracted from AD brain or prepared in vitro, bind to neuronal surfaces in small punctate clusters that colocalize almost exclusively with a subpopulation of synaptic terminals in cultured hippocampal neurons. Binding is accompanied by ectopic induction of Arc, a synaptic immediate-early gene involved in long-term memory formation [74].

Other synaptic signal transduction pathways are also affected by βAP oligomers in culture models. In cortical cultures, low doses of βAP oligomers inhibit the glutamate-stimulated phosphorylation of cAMP response element-binding protein [177], a signaling pathway associated with synaptic plasticity [169].

The action of βAP oligomers as pathogenic synaptic ligands provides an interesting hypothesis to explain the failure of synapse in AD. All data taken together show that βAP seems to be an instrument of synaptic attack and that synapses may be targets of therapeutic intervention in AD. We will now review evidence showing that βAP may have detrimental effects on neuronal network function through its effects on the two major components of a neuronal circuit, its intrinsic and its synaptic properties [148].

IV. βAP-INDUCED ALTERATIONS OF THE SYNAPTIC FUNCTION

We have mentioned that synapses are a chief target for βAP-induced pathology [50, 79, 124, 122, 170, 175] and that the decrease in synapse number is a major feature of AD [20, 44, 46]. Although initial studies suggested that only aggregated forms of βAP were neurotoxic [117], overwhelming evidence [56, 153] suggests that the soluble oligomeric form may also be neurotoxic at the functional level. But how does soluble βAP impair cognitive functions?

The precise mechanism that explains the link between βAP and the progressive loss of cognitive functions is still unresolved. Perturbations of proper neuronal network functioning may constitute the missing link. As we mentioned before, it is well known that the interplay between intrinsic and synaptic properties defines the functional properties of a given neuronal circuit and that alterations in one or in both components may be responsible for neuronal network dysfunction (for review see [148]). Two major neuronal network processes have been proposed to be associated with cognition, one involves synchronous activities of neuronal ensembles, such as theta and gamma rhythms [176] (for review see [17, 18]) and the other involves a diversity of effects on synaptic plasticity [2, 24, 53, 104], particularly on Long Term Potentiation (LTP), and Long Term Depression (LTD, for review see [23, 116]).

IV.A. Electrophysiological Studies

Some questions arise from the above considerations: what are the neurophysiological consequences of the βAP-induced synaptotoxicity on neuronal networks? Are the neurophysiological consequences related with cognitive dysfunction? So far, the answers remain elusive, and the results of several studies involving these issues are controversial. For example, some reports show that βAP applied in vivo or in vitro, or overproduced by transgenic mice, is capable of reducing, or alternatively having no effect on basal synaptic transmission; and the same applies for LTP. The variety of effects observed over the past years correlates with the variety of in vivo and/or in vitro models. However, in all reports, regardless of the approach used, there is always an effect of βAP either on basal synaptic transmission, on LTP or on both. There are some exceptions where no effects of βAP on basal synaptic transmission or on LTP have been shown, but in those cases, alterations in other neuronal network properties, such as the ability to induce network oscillations, have been described (see below).

IV.A.1. Effects of βAP on Basal Synaptic Transmission

There are two lines of evidence regarding the effect of βAP on basal synaptic transmission: one shows no effect of βAP on basal synaptic transmission and the other shows a βAP-induced decrease of basal synaptic transmission. In general, no significant effect on the baseline transmission amplitude was detected in the CA1 area of the hippocampus in vivo in the PDAPP transgenic mice (which expresses the human APP with the V717F mutation) both at ages 3–4.5 and 24–27 months; no changes were detected in neurons from the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus either [66]. Studies on transgenic mice overexpressing mutated human amyloid precursor protein (APP695-SWE) exhibited normal fast synaptic transmission and normal paired pulse facilitation in both the CA1 and dentate gyrus regions of the hippocampus when assessed both in vitro and in vivo at ages 2 to 8 months (without βAP deposits) or at ages 15 to 17 months (with many βAP deposits) [30]. In the same transgenic mice, also named APP-SWE Tg2576, the overall level of spontaneous cortical activity is indistinguishable from that observed in control non-transgenic mice [167]. In the prefrontal cortex of APP23 transgenic mice in vitro, no alterations in synaptic transmission were observed whereas in the hippocampus a reduction was detected at 12 and 18 months of age [152]. When βAP was intracerebroventricularly injected, no effect was observed on single-pulseevoked glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic transmission onto the hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells assessed in hippocampal slices [168]. The same approach showed no effect on basal synaptic transmission tested in vivo [40]. In in vitro preparations, brief perfusion of slices with low concentrations (200 nM or 1 μM) of βAP1–42, βAP1–40 or the active fragment βAP25-35 did not affect the basal synaptic transmission in the Schaffer collateral-CA1 pathway [32]. On the other hand, slices pre-incubated for 60 minutes in the presence of βAP-derived diffusible ligands, showed no differences in threshold intensity to evoke a synaptic response, in the slope of field excitatory post-synaptic potentials or in the input/output function [187]. Since βAP administration has no effect on paired-pulse facilitation, [64, 187], or on glutamate evoked currents [141], it has been proposed that β AP does not alter the presynaptic and postsynaptic sites.

In contrast to the evidence showing no effect of βAP on basal synaptic transmission, there is another body of evidence that shows that βAP has a strong effect on it. For example, Hsia et al., [81] showed a 40% loss of basal synaptic transmission in hippocampal slices in PDAPP transgenic mice. Synaptic impairment appeared to be due to a significant reduction in synaptic number, not to the synaptic strength. In the same report, a second mouse line to which they added the Swedish mutation was analyzed and an even worse deficit in synaptic transmission at age 2 to 4 months was observed, attributable to the accumulation of diffusible forms of βAP before plaque formation [81]. In another study with PDAPP mice, a reduction in basal synaptic transmission was confirmed in the CA1 area of the hippocampus in vitro. This reduction was accompanied by an increase in paired-pulse facilitation [110]. We previously mentioned that the basal synaptic function in the hippocampus was reduced in the homozygous APP23 mice compared with their wild type littermates at 12 and 18 months of age [152]. Finally, slices taken from 12-month-old APP695-SWE transgenic animals, displayed reduced levels of synaptic transmission in the CA1 region of the hippocampus when compared with wild-type littermate controls, but in this case paired-pulse facilitation was normal [59]. When βAP was injected intracerebroventricularly, a deficit in basal synaptic transmission was observed [41, 166].

In an in vitro study it was reported that bath and intracellular application of 200 nM βAP1-40 to rat dentate gyrus slices resulted in rapid enhancement of NMDA receptor-mediated currents in granule cells [194]. Furthermore, a higher dose of βAP25–35 (1βM) amplified NMDA receptor-mediated depolarization of guinea pig lateral septal neurons [29]. A recent study observed a mild reversible inhibition of NMDA receptor-mediated field potentials by 200 nM βAP1–40 [151]. Low doses of βAP1–42 were also found to inhibit NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic currents in dentate granule cells [33], in contrast to the finding by Wu et al., [194].

IV.A.2. Effects of βAP on Long-Term Plasticity

It has been proposed that long-term plasticity (specifically LTP and LTD) is intimately related with learning and memory (for review see [23, 53, 116]). For this reason it has been of great interest to study the effects of βAP on long-term plasticity, trying to find a correlation of these effects with cognitive impairment in AD. Similarly as with the diversity of effects of βAP on basal synaptic transmission, there are also controversial findings with respect to the effects of βAP on long-term plasticity.

IV.A.3. βAP may Reduce LTP

In the APP-SWE Tg2576 mice that showed no major disruption of synaptic markers, of cell viability, and no change in basal synaptic transmission, there was an impairment of LTP both in vivo and in vitro [30]. In the PDAPP mouse line, at 3 months of age (long before plaque formation) a decrease in LTP was observed which correlated temporarily with cognitive impairment [131]. In the same transgenic mice at age 4–5 months (prior to the deposition of βAP), a slight reduction in basal synaptic transmission was found in the CA1 area in vitro, which was associated with a reduction in theta-induced LTP. In aged mice (27 months), which had amyloid plaque formation, baseline transmission was reduced by 70%, but LTP was normal [110]. On the other hand, complete inhibition of LTP of the population spike with no significant effect on baseline amplitude was detected in the CA1 area of the hippocampus in vivo in PDAPP mice both at ages 3–4.5 and 24–27 months. Interestingly, no changes were detected in the dentate gyrus [66]. Another mutant hAPP line (V642I, London mutation, termed TgAPP/Ld/2 mice) had a deficit in the persistence of LTP of the postsynaptic potential induced by strong high frequency stimulation in the CA1 region of the hippocampus at age 5–7 months, even though amyloid plaque formation was only detected in animals older than 12 months [131]. The inhibition of LTP was confirmed in similar mice (V717I, London mutation) but was absent in double transgenic mice that also had a conditional knockout of PS1. Since β AP production might be blocked in the double transgenic, the inhibition of LTP in V717I mice was attributed to βAP [49]. When conditioned cell medium containing naturally secreted human βAP oligomers, at low concentrations, was microinjected intracerebroventricularly in rats, failure to maintain LTP in the hippocampus was observed [184]. When synthetic βAP is applied in vivo, a reduction in LTP without changes in basal synaptic transmission both in CA1 and the dentate gyrus was reported [32, 41, 64, 83, 108, 166, 182]. In vitro, brief perfusion of slices with low concentrations (200 nM or 1 mM) of βAP1–42, β AP1–40 or βAP25-35, significantly inhibited LTP induction without affecting basal synaptic transmission and post-tetanic potentiation in the dentate medial perforant pathway. Interestingly, the cell-secreted oligomeric forms of the amyloid protein used in vivo, were able to inhibit LTP in hippocampal slices from rats [188]. Furthermore, in hippocampal slices prepared from 20–30-day-old rats, soluble βAP1–42 (500 nM) was found to inhibit LTP induction by strong high frequency stimulation of the medial perforant pathway in the dentate gyrus in both population spikes [108], and postsynaptic potentials [187]. This study also showed that early- and late-phase LTP were strongly inhibited whereas basal AMPA receptor mediated synaptic transmission was not altered, although a reduction in paired-pulse depression at a short (20 ms) inter-pulse interval was found. Similarly, LTP of field EPSPs in rat CA1 and the medial perforant pathway of the dentate gyrus was inhibited by βAP1–42, β AP1–40 or by the active sequence form of βAP25-35. In fact it was shown that this sequence is necessary for inhibition of LTP induction [32]. Moreover, truncated βAP variants that were not lethal to cultured neurons also blocked LTP induction [32]. A more recent work confirmed that βAP oligomers, but not monomers, are responsible for LTP blockade [186].

The mechanisms by which βAP inhibits LTP are not well understood. Inhibition of NMDA receptor-mediated depolarization does not appear to be a key mechanism, since NMDA receptor antagonists at doses that inhibit NMDA receptor-mediated potentials to the same extent as βAP, failed to modify LTP [151, 200]. βAP effects appear to be independent of GABAA receptor-mediated synaptic inhibition, since LTP remains inhibited by the amyloid peptide even in the presence of a high dose of the GABAA receptor antagonist picrotoxin [151]. These findings suggest that βAP interferes with hippocampal LTP mechanisms downstream from NMDA receptor activation, probably by modulating a non-glutamatergic pathway.

A proposed mechanism through which βAP inhibits LTP is by up-regulation of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. Thus, administration of the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 blocked the effect of βAP-induced inhibition of LTP in the dentate gyrus [155]. βAP is also capable of inhibiting protein kinase A (PKA) activity, and consequently the phosphorylation of CREB [182]. These proteins play key roles in both the induction and maintenance of LTP; indeed, elevation of cAMP levels and the resultant PKA activation protects against βAP-induced inhibition of LTP [182].

IV.A.4. βAP may Increase or have no Effect on LTP

In addition to the abundant data reviewed above showing that βAP produces a strong LTP inhibition, there is another body of evidence, albeit smaller, that shows that βAP has no effect on LTP, using transgenic mice and the in vivo approach as well. In the APP23 mice, LTP in the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex was similar, compared with their wild-type littermates [152]. As mentioned before, despite the change in basal synaptic transmission observed in 12 and 18-month old APP695SWE transgenic mice, no change in LTP was observed [59]. In another study performed on the PDAPP transgenic line, LTP induction in response to strong high frequency stimulation remained unchanged [81]. Regarding in vivo approaches, acute single intracerebroventricular injection of synthetic βAP1–40 (0.4 or 3.5 but not 0.1 nmol) caused a reduction in baseline transmission and no change in LTP in the dentate gyrus 48 hours later [41]. Another report showed no change, neither in basal synaptic transmission nor in LTP [168].

Besides findings showing no effect on LTP in the presence of βAP, there is the report of Wu et al., [194], showing that synthetic βAP1–40 (200 nM) could enhance LTP induction in the associational–commissural pathway of the dentate gyrus of 30–50-day-old rats [195], and another report showing that βAP may rescue CA1 LTP in slices maintained 21 hours ex-vivo [105]. Moreover, in the transgenic mice that express a familial AD-linked mutation in PS-1 (A246E), in which an increase in amyloid accumulation is expected at the age of 5–6 months, facilitation of LTP was observed [137].

IV.A.5. Other Possibilities Besides LTP

Another possibility, besides the changes in LTP produced by βAP, may be the other form of long-term plasticity, which is long-term depression (LTD). Unfortunately, there are also controversial reports with respect to this issue. The fronto-striatal LTD induced by tetanic stimulation of the cortico-striatal input was similar in the transgenic mice Tg2576 and in wild-type control mice [130]. Two studies reported no effect of soluble βAP on LTD in hippocampal slices from either CA1 area [151] or the dentate gyrus [187]. In contrast, intracerebroventricular injection of βAP1–42 has been reported to facilitate the induction of LTD in the CA1 region of anesthetized animals [96]. These controversial data, along with the ones obtained from LTP, open the possibility of exploring other processes that may be underlying the βAP effects in neuronal network dysfunction, which are probably associated with cognitive impairment. One of the mechanisms that may be worthwhile to explore are neuronal network oscillations, the induction and maintenance of which have also been related to cognition [176]; (for review see [17, 18]). In fact, there are a couple of reports suggesting the βAP may disturb such oscillations. Sun and Alkon [168] reported that single intracerebroventricular injection of βAP produced cognitive impairment that was not related with changes in basal synaptic activity or in LTP, but, interestingly, the authors found that the ability of the hippocampus to generate carbachol-induced theta rhythm was abolished [115]. Theta activity is believed to gate or facilitate memory information processing in the hippocampus [176], and disruption of this kind of rhythms may also be involved in βAP-induced cognitive deficits. On the other hand, in Tg2576 transgenic mice it was found that despite no alterations observed in normal “bistable” activity produced by cortical neurons, these mice had dramatic alterations in the synaptically-induced transitions from the up-state to the down-state and viceversa; the authors suggest that this failure may be due to a βAP-induced disruption in synaptic synchronization [167]. This possibility has been suggested in other transgenic as well [25].

So, reports regarding the effect of βAP applied in vivo, in vitro or produced in transgenic mice on basic neuronal mechanisms necessary for proper network functioning and plasticity are controversial. βAP either reduces or has no effect on basal synaptic transmission, LTP or LTD. In general, we can conclude that βAP may produce very complex effects on neuronal network activity that lead to disruption of the normal neurophysiological state involving synaptic transmission, synaptic plasticity or both. The challenge is to determine the conditions in which these electrical alterations may occur in order to find ways to prevent this from happening. It is clear that β AP always produce an inhibitory effect either on basal synaptic transmission or on long-term plasticity, with some exceptions reviewed as well. It is conceivable that βAPinduced alterations of just one of the neuronal processes may be enough to induce neuronal network dysfunction and, consequently, cognitive impairment if the dysfunction occurs preferentially in those circuits related to cognition.

IV.A.6. Molecular Bases of the Differential Effects of βAP on Synaptic Function

There are several molecular aspects to be considered with respect to the reported differences elicited by βAP on synaptic or neuronal function. The diversity of models used for testing different aspects of βAP effects should be considered. They include in vivo transgenic mice and in vivo intracerebral injections of βAP in non-transgenic rodents [30, 41, 66]. There are also reports with an ex-vivo approach using brain slices obtained from transgenic mice or from non-transgenic rodents after treatment with βAP in vivo [30, 152, 168]. On the other hand, in in vitro experiments, the procedures to obtain brain slices and the conditions of recording may also contribute to the variable effects of βAP on synaptic and intrinsic neuronal properties [13, 32, 187]. Another source of discrepancy may be the variability in length of βAP peptides with different biological activity and their state of aggregation. In fact, it was originally proposed that the neurotoxic effects of βAP required micromolar concentrations and highly aggregated states [117, 118, 144]. However, recent evidence suggests a role of soluble monomer or oligomer forms of βAP that alter neuronal activity and remodeling at the functional level (long before neurodegeneration). For example structural changes as well as behavioral abnormalities are observed long before plaques are formed [34, 81, 133]. In addition, protofibrils, an intermediary form between soluble and aggregated βAP, are toxic to primary neuronal cultures and alter their electrophysiological properties [77, 199, 200, 189]. It has also been shown that oligomers but not fibrils or monomers are responsible for the inhibition of LTP in vivo [184, 186]. Furthermore, a recent report showed that, among the naturally secreted oligomers, there is a set that includes dimers and trimers, necessary and sufficient to produce cognitive deficit in rats [37]. Interestingly, it has also been found that βAP may undergo an aggregation process in vitro [112, 189]. In fact the fibrils obtained in vitro are quite similar to those observed in patients [97, 98, 129, 160]. This opens the possibility that the βAP solutions prepared to study the effects of exogenous added βAP may have mixed forms of βAP in different states of aggregation. The coexistence of several states of aggregation in the same preparation can be applied to in vivo experiments with non-transgenic and transgenic rodents since it has been shown that different forms of βAP in different states of aggregation can coexist in these animals as well as in humans with the disease [75, 144, 42, 127, 135]. A different proportion of βAP in different states of aggregation may then be an explanation of the discrepancy observed in the literature. Finally, another source of discrepancy is that distinct βAP sequences may have different effects, for instance it has been reported that oligomeric βAP25-35 increases L-type Ca2+ currents whereas βAP1-40 does not [154]. In contrast βAP1-40 may increase N- and P-types Ca2+ currents [120, 149].

V. βAP EFFECTS ON NEURONAL EXCITABILITY

Since de 1990’s extensive research has revealed that βAP affects neuronal excitability through its effects on a wide array of ionic currents [4, 14, 36, 55, 72, 85, 113, 120, 149, 150, 154, 157, 162, 179, 199, 203, 204, 205] and on ionic channels formed by the βAP itself [7, 8, 9, 10, 62, 86, 87, 95, 115, 128]. From these works emerges the proposal that βAP can alter cellular homeostasis and neuronal network communication through the modulation of ion channel function. The modulating effects of βAP on potassium and calcium channels are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Effects of βAP over the Activity of Several Ionic Channels

Channel Affected and General Effect Form and state of βAP used Particular Effect Model Used Ref.
Potassium channels; increase of K+-currents. βAP1-40 (1 μM). Increase of IA. Rat cultured cerebellar granule cells. [150]
βAP1-40 and βAP25-35. Increase of IK. Cultured neurons. [203]
Presumably, both oligomers and fibrils of βAP1-40 and βAP1-42. Up-regulation of the Kv3.4 in late and early stages of AD. AD brain tissue. [4]
Transient transfection of human presenilins 1, 2 and the APP695. Increase of the delayed IK. Rat hippocampal neurons. [205]
Potassium channels; suppression or reduction of K+ - currents. βAP1-40 and βAP25-35. Inhibition of IKca, IK and IA. Dissociated cholinergic neurons. [85]
βAP1-42. Inhibition of ID and IA. Cortical neurons in vitro. [199]
Calcium channels; increase in voltage dependent Ca2+ - channel current activity. βAP25-35 (40 μM). Increase in ICaL associated with a rise in [Ca2+]i. Human resting microglial cells. [162]
Oligomeric forms of βAP25-35 (200 nM). Increase in total ICa. CA1 pyramidal neurons. [154]
βAP25-35 (20 μM). Increase in ICaL and induction of cell death. SK-N-SH cells. [14]
(10 μM) Rat cultured cortical and hippocampal neurons. [179]
βAP1-40 (1 μM). Increase in calcium influx through ICaN and ICaP. Rat cortical synaptosomes and cultured cortical neurons. [120]
Unaggregated βAP1-40 (1 μM). Increase in ICaN and ICaP. Cultured rat cortical neurons. [149]
Aggregated βAP1-40 (1 μM). Increase in total ICa. Rat primary hippocampal cell cultures. [114]
Aggregated both βAP1-40 and βAP25-35. Increase in ICaL through MAPK phosphorylation. Cultured SH-SY-5Y human neuroblastoma cells (22-40 μM) and mice cultured cortical neurons (10–25 μM). [55]
βAP-formed cation-selective channels. βAP1-40 (about 5 μg in liposomes). Formation of cation selective channels. Synthetic planar bilayers. [10]
Soluble βAP1-40 (about 1 μM). Formation of cation selective channels; blocked by zinc. Synthetic planar bilayers. [8, 9]
βAP1-40 (about 5 μg in liposomes). Reveals that ion channels are probably transmembrane annular polymeric structures. Synthetic planar bilayers. [7]
Soluble βAP1-42 (2 mg / ml in liposomes). Formation of multimeric channel-like structures. Synthetic planar bilayers. [115]
Soluble βAP1-40 Formation of cation selective channels. Cell membranes from hypothalamic neurons. [93]

IKca, calcium-activated K+ current; IK, delayed rectifier K+ current; ID, K+ current type D (slow activating, inactivating current); IA, K+ current type A (fast activating and inactivating current); ICaL, L-type voltage-dependent Ca2+ current; ICaN and ICaP, N and P-type voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents.

V.A. βAP-formed Cationic Channels

Arispe et al., [10] showed that βAP is capable of forming pores in lipid bilayers, and suggested that these channels may directly alter cellular homeostasis and produce cell death. This proposal has since been supported by several studies, including those conducted in natural cell membranes [7, 8, 9, 10, 62, 86, 87, 95, 115, 128]. βAP is certainly capable of producing cation-selective ion channels in cellular membranes. The original study reports that βAP1-40 forms current-conducing channels across bilayer membranes, which allows the passage of different cations with selective permeability: PCs > PLi > PCa ≥ PK > PNa. The βAP1-40-induced channel current was reversibly blocked by tromethamine and by Al3+ [8]. The precise conformation of these channels in membranes is still unknown; however, there are models that suggest that a transmembrane annular polymeric structure is responsible for the ion channel properties of the membrane-bound βAP [7]. By the use of atomic force microscopy, it can be seen that globular, non-fibrillar βAP1-42 reconstituted in a planar lipid bilayer, forms multimeric channel-like structures [115].

But how do the βAP-induced alterations on ion channel activity translate to the firing properties of neurons, and of neuronal networks? Generally, suppression or reduction of K+ currents augment neural excitability and hence can alter the precise timing of neuronal firing, which is fundamental for the adequate processing of information through the nervous system. All studies that have found βAP-induced reduction of K+ channel activity [85, 199] support this motion. Indeed, it has been shown that βAP protofibrils, but presumably not fibrils, produce a rapid increase in EPSPs, action potentials, and membrane depolarizations in cultured neurons [77]. In differentiated human hNT neuronal cells, βAP induces a significant and lasting calcium-independent membrane depolarization in a concentration-dependent manner through a glutamate mediated system [22]. Of possible therapeutic interest, compounds that can inhibit the β AP-mediated membrane depolarization in this model, include specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors and inhibitors of certain chloride channels [21]. The increase in calcium conductance through specific L-VSCC can also add to abnormal neuronal hyperexcitability [14, 113, 154, 179], as βAP can induce bursts of excitatory potentials and action potential firing in individual neurons, which would affect the neuronal network communication.

VI. THERAPEUTIC APPROACHES

To date, there are no therapeutic interventions available yet capable of halting or reversing AD. The factors implicated in the chronic imbalance between production and clearance of βAP are unknown, but numerous researchers have proposed the inhibition of the proteases implicated in the generation of βAP as a therapeutic strategy.

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) are the only drugs currently available for AD treatment. Some authors have suggested that AChEIs do not only function by inhibiting ACh degradation, but also through a possible role in βAP metabolism beyond their well-known symptomatic effects. For example, donepezil increases ADAM10 levels in membrane compartments and significantly decreases the soluble APPα-form levels suggesting a role in the processing of key proteins related with AD pathogenesis [206].

In the case of β-secretase, the chemical compounds under evaluation should be small molecules, capable of binding to aspartyl protease and of penetrating the blood-brain barrier. One such compound is P10-P4statV, a peptidic inhibitor that mimics the transition-state moiety of β-secretase. The inhibitory action is the result of its binding with the two aspartate active-sites [80]. Recently, a new molecular approach has been developed using small interfering RNA (siRNA) as a therapeutic tool; this technique is directed specifically against BACE-1, in order to lower the BACE-1 protein expression levels in primary cortical neurons derived from both wild type and transgenic mice harboring the Swedish APP mutant and in neuroblastoma cells and HEK293 cells [90]. As a result of BACE-1 protein inhibition, the production of APP β-C-terminal fragment (βCTF) and βAP (1-40 and 1-42) was significantly reduced [90].

The other strategic target to inhibit βAP production, the γ-secretase, could be attacked by drugs that should be potently membrane-permeable. These compounds are already available, but they are not currently used in humans because they could interfere with Notch signaling. In vitro studies in HeLa cells [113], have shown the potent inhibitory action of L-685,458 (IC50 0.3nM), and of the hydroxyl epimer L-682,679 (IC50 82nM) over βAP production. The analog L-405,484 has very poor effects on γ-secretase inhibition (IC50 >100βM). On the other hand, the biotinylated photoreactive compounds (containing benzophenone moiety), L-852,505 and L-852,646 displayed excellent inhibitory potency (IC50≈1nM). Recently, a group in France has designed a new set of non-peptidic inhibitors of γ-secretase, with the ability to prevent production of βAP40 and βAP42 without deleterious effects on the endoproteolysis of the Notch intracellular domain. These compounds, named JLK1-8, achieved 70-80% inhibition at a concentration of 100 μM [140].

Because some of the late effects of βAP in neuronal function depend on its aggregation state, the prevention of βAP oligomerization or its clearance may constitute an important avenue of pharmacological intervention. In this respect, many research groups have been developing immunization approaches with the use of βAP-directed antibodies. However, at present immunization has not shown positives results in clinical trials [15, 48, 156].

Another approach that could prevent the early effects of βAP consists in the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). It has been noticed that chronically taken NSAIDs appear to delay the onset of AD symptoms. Besides the well-known effects of NSAIDs on COX inhibition, it has been found that some NSAIDs can also reduce nitric oxide (NO) production [53], and exert protective effects on neuronal apoptosis acting as NO scavengers [12]. Moreover, new results indicate that some NSAIDs, like indomethacin and ibuprofen, may control the activity of γ-secretase, and thus reduce the generation of βAP [190].

Recent results obtained in prospective clinical studies of AD subjects with cholesterol-lowering drugs, such as the statins, are much less conclusive. It has been reported that statins do not affect, or slightly reduce plasma or CSF amyloid concentrations [57]. Overall, preliminary results indicate that modulation of brain cholesterol homeostasis may interfere with disease onset and/or progression in subjects exposed to cholesterol-lowering agents prior to, or following a diagnosis of AD [146]. Taken together, these findings suggest that agents such as statins, which possess both cholesterol-lowering capacity and anti-inflammatory properties, could be useful anti-AD agents.

Recently, a non-pharmacological approach for AD treatment has been proposed [111]. The authors demonstrated that exposure to an enriched environment of male APP/PS1 transgenic mice which carry two distinct, highly penetrant, dominantly acting human disease-causing alleles, results in a remarkable decrease of cerebral βAP and amyloid deposits in vivo.

In conclusion, the βAP hypothesis of AD has led and will continue to lead to the development of therapeutic strategies that are likely to either prevent or treat this devastating disease.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This work was supported by CONACYT (Project No. 42870), Mexico City. We also thank I. Pérez-Montfort for revising the English manuscript.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Abel T, Kandel E. Positive and negative regulatory mechanisms that mediate long-term memory storage. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1998;26:360–378. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0173(97)00050-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ahrens KF, Freeman WJ. Response Dynamics of Entorhinal Cortex in Awake, Anesthetized, and Bulbotomized Rats. Brain Res. 2001;911:193–202. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(01)02687-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Almeida CG, Tampellini D, Takahashi RH, Greengard P, Lin MT, Snyder EM, Gouras GK. β-amyloid accumulation in APP mutant neurons reduces PSD-95 and GluR1 in synapses. NeuroBiol Dis. 2005;20:187–198. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2005.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Angulo E, Noe V, Casado V, Mallol J, Gomez-Isla T, Lluis C, Ferrer I, Ciudad CJ, Franco R. Up-regulation of the Kv3.4 potassium channel subunit in early stages of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem. 2004;91:547–557. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02771.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Arias C, Arrieta I, Tapia R. β-amyloid peptide fragment 25-35 potentiates the calcium-dependent release of excitatory amino acids from depolarized hippocampal slices. J Neurosci Res. 1995;41:561–566. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490410416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Arias C, Montiel T, Quiroz-Báez R, Massieu L. β-amyloid neurotoxicity is exacerbated during glycolysis inhibition and mitochondrial impairment in the rat hippocampus in vivo and in isolated nerve terminals: implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Exp Neurol. 2002;176:163–174. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2002.7912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Arispe N. Architecture of the Alzheimer’s AβP ion channel pore. J Membr Biol. 2004;197:33–48. doi: 10.1007/s00232-003-0638-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Arispe N, Pollard HB, Rojas E. Giant multilevel cation channels formed by Alzheimer disease amyloid β-protein [AβP (140)] in bilayer membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 90:10573–10577. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.22.10573. 1993b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Arispe N, Pollard HB, Rojas E. Zn2+ interaction with Alzheimer amyloid β protein calcium channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:1710–1715. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.4.1710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Arispe N, Rojas E, Pollard HB. Alzheimer disease amyloid β protein forms calcium channels in bilayer membranes: blockade by tromethamine and aluminum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 90:567–571. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.2.567. 1993a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Asai M, Hattori C, Szabo B, Sasagawa N, Maruyama K, Tanuma S, Ishiura S. Putative function of ADAM9, ADAM10, and ADAM17 as APP α-secretase. Biochem Biophys Res. 2003;301:231–235. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(02)02999-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Asanuma M, Nishibayashi-Asanuma S, Miyazaki I, Kohno M, Ogawa N. Neuroprotective effects of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs by direct scavenging of nitric oxide radicals. J Neurochem. 2001;76:1895–1904. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00205.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ashenafi S, Fuente A, Criado JM, Riolobos AS, Heredia M, Yajeya J. β-Amyloid peptide25-35 depresses excitatory synaptic transmission in the rat basolateral amygdala “in vitro”. Neurobiol Aging. 2005;26:419–428. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ba F, Pang PK, Benishin CG. The role of Ca2+ channel modulation in the neuroprotective actions of estrogen in β-amyloid protein and 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) cytotoxic models. Neurochem Int. 2004;45:31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2003.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bard F, Cannon C, Barbou R, Burke RL, Games D, Grajeda H, Guido T, Hu K, Huang J, Johnson-Wood K, Khan K, Kholodenko D, Lee M, Lieberburg I, Motter R, Nguyen M, Soriano F, Vasquez N, Weiss K, Welch B, Seubert P, Schenk D, Yednock T. Peripherally administered antibodies against amyloid β-peptide enter the central nervous system and reduce pathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease. Nat Med. 2000;6:916–919. doi: 10.1038/78682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bartoo GT, Nochlin D, Chang D, Kim Y, Sumi SM. The mean Aβ load in the hippocampus correlates with duration and severity of dementia in subgroups of Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1997;56:531–540. doi: 10.1097/00005072-199705000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Basar E, Basar-Eroglu C, Karakas S, Schurmann M. Are cognitive processes manifested in event-related gamma, alpha, theta and delta oscillations in the EEG? Neurosci Lett. 1999;259:165–168. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(98)00934-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Basar E, Basar-Eroglu C, Karakas S, Schurmann M. Brain oscillations in perception and memory. Int J Psychophysiol. 2000;35:95–124. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(99)00047-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bell KF, de Kort GJ, Steggerda S, Shigemoto R, Ribeiro-da-Silva A, Cuello AC. Structural involvement of the glutamatergic presynaptic boutons in a transgenic mouse model expressing early onset amyloid pathology. Neurosci Lett. 2003;353:143–147. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.09.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bertoni-Freddari C, Fattoretti P, Meier-Ruge W, Ulrich J. Computer-assisted morphometry of synaptic plasticity during aging and dementia. Pathol Res Pract. 1989;185:799–802. doi: 10.1016/S0344-0338(89)80243-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Blanchard BJ, Stockwell BR, Ingram VM. Eliminating membrane depolarization caused by the Alzheimer peptide Aβ(1-42) Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 293:1204–1208. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00290-5. 2002b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Blanchard BJ, Thomas VL, Ingram VM. Mechanism of membrane depolarization caused by the Alzheimer Aβ1-42 peptide. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 293:1197–1203. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00346-7. 2002a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bliss TV, Collingridge GL. A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature. 1993;361:31–39. doi: 10.1038/361031a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Brenowitz EA, Baptista LF, Lent K, Wingfield JC. Seasonal plasticity of the song control system in wild Nuttall’s white-crowned sparrows. J Neurobiol. 1998;34:69–82. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4695(199801)34:1<69::aid-neu6>3.0.co;2-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Brown JT, Richardson JC, Collingridge GL, Randall AD, Davies CH. Synaptic transmission and synchronous activity is disrupted in hippocampal slices taken from aged TAS10 mice. Hippocampus. 2005;15:110–117. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brunkan AL, Goate AM. Presenilin endoproteolysis is an intramolecular cleavage. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2005;29:65–73. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2004.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Butterfield DA. Amyloid β-peptide1–42-associated free radical induced oxidative stress and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease brain: mechanisms and consequences. Curr Med Chem. 2003;10:2651–2659. doi: 10.2174/0929867033456422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cacabelos R, Alvarez XA, Fernandez-Novoa L, Franco A, Mangues R, Pellicer A, Nishimura T. Brain interleukin-1 β in Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1994;16:141–151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Carette B, Poulain P, Delacourte A. Electrophysiological effects of 25-35 amyloid-β-protein on guinea-pig lateral septal neurons. Neurosci Lett. 1993;151:111–114. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(93)90059-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chapman PF, White GL, Jones MW, Cooper-Blacketer D, Marshall VJ, Irizarry M, Younkin L, Good MA, Bliss TV, Hyman BT, Younkin SG, Hsiao KK. Impaired synaptic plasticity and learning in aged amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2:271–276. doi: 10.1038/6374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chauhan NB, Siegel GJ. Reversal of amyloid beta toxicity in Alzheimer’s disease model Tg2576 by intraventricular antiamyloid β antibody. J Neurosci Res. 2002;69:10–23. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chen QS, Kagan BL, Hirakura Y, Xie CW. Impairment of hippocampal long-term potentiation by Alzheimer amyloid β-peptides. J Neurosci Res. 2000;60:65–72. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(20000401)60:1<65::AID-JNR7>3.0.CO;2-Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chen QS, Wei WZ, Shimahara T, Xie CW. Alzheimer amyloid β-peptide inhibits the late phase of long-term potentiation through calcineurin-dependent mechanisms in the hippocampal dentate gyrus. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2002;77:354–371. doi: 10.1006/nlme.2001.4034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chin J, Palop JJ, Yu GQ, Kojima N, Masliah E, Mucke L. Fyn kinase modulates synaptotoxicity, but not aberrant sprouting, in human amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice. J Neurosci. 2004;24:4692–4697. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0277-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chromy BA, Nowak RJ, Lambert MP, Viola KL, Chang L, Velasco PT, Jones BW, Fernández SJ, Lacor PN, Horowitz P, Finch CE, Krafft GA. Self-assembly of Aβ(1-42) into globular neurotoxins. Biochemistry. 2003;42:12749–12760. doi: 10.1021/bi030029q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chung S, Lee J, Joe EH, Uhm DY. β-amyloid peptide induces the expression of voltage dependent outward rectifying K+ channels in rat microglia. Neurosci Lett. 2001;300:67–70. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)01516-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cleary JP, Walsh DM, Hofmeister JJ, Shankar GM, Kuskowski MA, Selkoe DJ, Ashe KH. Natural oligomers of the amyloid-β protein specifically disrupt cognitive function. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:79–84. doi: 10.1038/nn1372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cole GM, Yang F, Chen PP, Frautschy SA, Hsiao K. Caspase activation in dystrophic neurites in Alzheimer’s disease and aged HuAPPsw transgenic mice. In: Iqbal K, Swaab DF, Winbland B, Wisniewski HM, editors. Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders: etiology, pathogenesis and therapeutics. New York: Wiley & Sons; 1999. pp. 363–369. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cotman CW, Pike CJ, Copan A. β-amyloid neurotoxicity: A discussion on in vitro findings. Neurobiol Aging. 1992;13:587–590. doi: 10.1016/0197-4580(92)90060-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cullen WK, Suh YH, Anwyl R, Rowan MJ. Block of LTP in rat hippocampus in vivo by β-amyloid precursor protein fragments. Neuroreport. 1997;8:3213–3217. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199710200-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cullen WK, Wu J, Anwyl R, Rowan MJ. β-Amyloid produces a delayed NMDA receptor-dependent reduction in synaptic transmission in rat hippocampus. Neuroreport. 1996;20:87–92. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199612200-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cummings BJ, Cotman CW. Image analysis of β-Amyloid load in Alzheimer’s disease and relation to dementia severity. Lancet. 1995;346:1524–1528. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92053-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cummings BJ, Pike CJ, Shankle R, Cotman CW. β-amyloid deposition and other measures of neuropathology predict cognitive status in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 1996;17:921–933. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(96)00170-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Davies CA, Mann DM, Sumpter PQ, Yates PO. A quantitative morphometric analysis of the neuronal and synaptic content of the frontal and temporal cortex in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Sci. 1987;78:151–164. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(87)90057-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Davis JN, Chisholm JC. The ‘amyloid cascade hypothesis’ of AD: decoy or real McCoy? Trends Neurosci. 1997;20:558–559. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(97)85989-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.DeKosky ST, Scheff SW. Synapse loss in frontal cortex biopsies in Alzheimer’s disease: correlation with cognitive severity. Ann Neurol. 1990;27:457–464. doi: 10.1002/ana.410270502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.DeKosky ST, Scheff SW, Styren SD. Structural correlates of cognition in dementia: quantification and assessment of synapse change. Neurodegeneration. 1996;5:417–421. doi: 10.1006/neur.1996.0056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.DeMattos RB, Bales KR, Cummins DJ, Dodart JC, Paul SM, Holtzman DM. Peripheral anti-Aβ antibody alters CNS and plasma Aβ clearance and decreases brain Aβ burden in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:8850–8855. doi: 10.1073/pnas.151261398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dewachter I, Reverse D, Caluwaerts N, Ris L, Kuiperi C, Van den Haute C, Spittaels K, Umans L, Serneels L, Thiry E, Moechars D, Mercken M, Godaux E, Van Leuven F. Neuronal deficiency of presenilin 1 inhibits amyloid plaque formation and corrects hippocampal long-term potentiation but not a cognitive defect of amyloid precursor protein [V717I] transgenic mice. J Neurosci. 2002;22:3445–3453. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-09-03445.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dickson DW, Crystal HA, Bevona C, Honer W, Vincent I, Davies P. Correlations of synaptic and pathological markers with cognition of the elderly. Neurobiol Aging. 1995;16:285–298. doi: 10.1016/0197-4580(95)00013-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Dineley KT, Westerman M, Bui D, Bell K, Ashe KH, Sweatt JD. β-amyloid activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade via hippocampal α-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: In vitro and in vivo mechanisms related to Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci. 2001;21:4125–4133. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-12-04125.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Du ZY, Li XY. Inhibitory effects of indomethacin on interleukin-1 and nitric oxide production in rat microglia in vitro. Int J Immunopharmacol. 1999;21:219–225. doi: 10.1016/s0192-0561(98)00084-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Dudai Y. Molecular bases of long-term memories: a question of persistence. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002;12:211–216. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(02)00305-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Echeverria V, Ducatenzeiler A, Dowd E, Jaén J, Grant SM, ZIF M, Wandosell F, Avila J, Grimm H, Dunnett SB, Hartmann T, Alhonen L, Cuello AC. Altered mitogenactivated protein kinase signaling, tau hyperphosphorylation and mild spatial learning dysfunction in transgenic rats expressing the β-amyloid peptide intracellularly in hippocampal and cortical neurons. Neuroscience. 2004;129:583–592. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.07.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ekinci FJ, Malik KU, Shea TB. Activation of the L voltage-sensitive calcium channel by mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase following exposure of neuronal cells to β-amyloid. MAP kinase mediates β-amyloid-induced neurodegeneration. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:30322–30327. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.42.30322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Etcheberrigaray E, Gibson GE, Alkon DL. Molecular mechanisms of memory and the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994;747:245–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb44413.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Fassbender K, Stroick M, Bertsch T, Ragoschke A, Kuehl S, Walter S, Walter J, Brechtel K, Muehlhauser F, Von Bergmann K, Lutjohann D. Effects of statins on human cerebral cholesterol metabolism and secretion of Alzheimer amyloid peptide. Neurology. 2002;59:1257–1258. doi: 10.1212/wnl.59.8.1257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Fastbom J, Forsell Y, Winblad B. Benzodiazepines may have protective effects against Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1998;12:14–17. doi: 10.1097/00002093-199803000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Fitzjohn SM, Morton RA, Kuenzi F, Rosahl TW, Shearman M, Lewis H, Smith D, Reynolds DS, Davies CH, Collingridge GL, Seabrook GR. Age-related impairment of synaptic transmission but normal long-term potentiation in transgenic mice that overexpress the human APP695SWE mutant form of amyloid precursor protein. J Neurosci. 2001;21:4691–4698. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-13-04691.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Fluhrer R, Capell A, Westmeyer G, Willem M, Hartung B, Condron MM, Teplow DB, Haass C, Walter J. A nonamyloidogenic function of BACE-2 in secretory pathway. J Neurochem. 2002;81:1011–1020. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.00908.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Francis R, McGrath G, Zhang J, Ruddy DA, Sym M, Apfeld J, Nicoll M, Maxwell M, Hai B, Ellis MC, Parks AL, Xu W, Li J, Gurney M, Myers RL, Himes CS, Hiebsch R, Ruble C, Nye JS, Curtis D. aph-1 and pen-2 are required for Notch pathway signaling, α-secretase cleavage of βAPP, and presenilin protein accumulation. Dev Cell. 2002;3:85–97. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00189-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Fraser SP, Suh YH, Chong YH, Djamgoz MB. Membrane currents induced in Xenopus oocytes by the C-terminal fragment of the β-amyloid precursor protein. J Neurochem. 1996;66:2034–2040. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1996.66052034.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Fraser SP, Suh YH, Djamgoz MB. Ionic effects of the Alzheimer’s disease β-amyloid precursor protein and its metabolic fragments. Trends Neurosci. 1997;20:67–72. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(96)10079-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Freir DB, Holscher C, Herron CE. Blockade of longterm potentiation by β-amyloid peptides in the CA1 region of the rat hippocampus in vivo. J Neurophysiol. 2001;85:708–713. doi: 10.1152/jn.2001.85.2.708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Fu W, Luo H, Parthasarathy S, Mattson MP. Catecholamines potentiate amyloid β-peptide neurotoxicity: involvement of oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and perturbed calcium homeostasis. NeuroBiol Dis. 1998;5:229–243. doi: 10.1006/nbdi.1998.0192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Giacchino J, Criado JR, Games D, Henriksen S. In vivo synaptic transmission in young and aged amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice. Brain Res. 2000;876:185–190. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02615-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Glenner GG, Wong CW. Alzheimer’s disease and Down’s syndrome: sharing of a unique cerebrovascular amyloid fibril protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1984;122:1131–1135. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(84)91209-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Goldgaber D, Lerman MI, McBridge OW, Saffiotti V, Gadusek DC. Characterization and chromosomal localization of a cDNA encoding brain amyloid of Alzheimer’s disease. Science. 1987;235:877–880. doi: 10.1126/science.3810169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gomez-Isla T, Hollister R, West H, Mui S, Growdon JH, Petersen RC, Parisi JE, Hyman BT. Neuronal loss correlates with but exceeds neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol. 1997;41:17–24. doi: 10.1002/ana.410410106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Gong Y, Chang L, Viola KL, Lacor PN, Lambert MP, Finch CE, Krafft GA, Klein WL. Alzheimer’s diseaseaffected brain: presence of oligomeric A ligands (ADDLs) suggests a molecular basis for reversible memory loss. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:10417–10422. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1834302100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Grassi F, Palma E, Tonini R, Amici M, Ballivet M, Eusebi F. Amyloid β1–42 peptide alters the gating of human and mouse β-bungarotoxin-sensitive nicotinic receptors. J Physiol. 2003;547:147–157. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.035436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Green KN, Boyle JP, Peers C. Hypoxia potentiates exocytosis and Ca2+ channels in PC12 cells via increased amyloid β peptide formation and reactive oxygen species generation. J Physiol. 2002;541:1013–1023. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.017582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Greenfield JP, Tsai J, Gouras GK, Hai B, Thinakaran G, Checler F, Sisodia SS, Greengard P, Xu H. Endoplasmic reticulum and trans-Golgi network generate distinct populations of Alzheimer β-amyloid peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:742–747. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.2.742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Guzowski JF, Lyford GL, Stevenson GD, Houston FP, McGaugh JL. Insights into immediate-early gene function in hippocampal memory consolidation using antisense oligonucleotide and fluorescent imaging approaches. Hippocampus. 2002;12:86–104. doi: 10.1002/hipo.10010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Hardy J, Allsop D. Amyloid deposition as the central event in the aetiology of Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1991;12:383–388. doi: 10.1016/0165-6147(91)90609-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Harper JD, Lansbury PT., Jr. Models of amyloid seeding in Alzheimer’s disease and scrapie: mechanistic truths and physiological consequences of the time-dependent solubility of amyloid proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 1997;66:385–407. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Hartley DM, Walsh DM, Ye CP, Diehl T, Vasquez S, Vassilev PM, Teplow DB, Selkoe DJ. Protofibrillar intermediates of amyloid β-protein induce acute electrophysiological changes and progressive neurotoxicity in cortical neurons. J Neurosci. 1999;19:8876–8884. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-20-08876.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hebert LE, Scherr PA, Bienias JL, Bennett DA, Evans DA. Alzheimer disease in the US population: prevalence estimates using the 2000 census. Arch Neurol. 2003;60:1119–1122. doi: 10.1001/archneur.60.8.1119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Honer WG, Dickson DW, Gleeson J, Davies P. Regional synaptic pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 1992;13:375–382. doi: 10.1016/0197-4580(92)90111-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Hong L, Koelsch G, Lin X, Wu S, Terzyan S, Ghosh AK, Zhang XC, Tang J. Structure of the protease domain of memapsin 2 (-secretase) complexed with inhibitor. Science. 2000;290:150–153. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5489.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Hsia AY, Masliah E, McConlogue L, Yu GQ, Tatsuno G, Hu K, Kholodenko D, Malenka RC, Nicoll RA, Mucke L. Plaque-independent disruption of neural circuits in Alzheimer’s disease mouse models. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:3228–3233. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.6.3228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hsiao K, Chapman P, Nilsen S, Eckman C, Harigaya Y, Younkin S, Yang F, Cole G. Correlative memory deficits, Aβ elevation, and amyloid plaques in transgenic mice. Science. 1996;274:99–102. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5284.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Itoh A, Akaike T, Sokabe M, Nitta A, Iida R, Olariu A, Yamada K, Nabeshima T. Impairments of long-term potentiation in hippocampal slices of β-myloid-infused rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 1999;382:167–175. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(99)00601-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Jarrett JT, Berger EP, Lansbury PT., Jr. The carboxy terminus of the β-amyloid protein is critical for the seeding of amyloid formation: implications for the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Biochemistry. 1993;32:4693–7. doi: 10.1021/bi00069a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Jhamandas JH, Cho C, Jassar B, Harris K, MacTavish D, Easaw J. Cellular mechanisms for amyloid β-protein activation of rat cholinergic basal forebrain neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2001;86:1312–1320. doi: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.3.1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kagan BL, Azimov R, Azimova R. Amyloid peptide channels. J Membr Biol. 2004;202:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s00232-004-0709-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kagan BL, Hirakura Y, Azimov R, Azimova R, Lin MC. The channel hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: current status. Peptides. 2002;23:1311–1315. doi: 10.1016/s0196-9781(02)00067-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Kalaria RN. The role of cerebral ischemia in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2000;21:321–330. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(00)00125-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kamenetz F, Tomita T, Hsieh H, Seabrook G, Borchelt D, Iwatsubo T, Sisodia S, Malinow R. APP processing and synaptic function. Neuron. 2003;37:925–937. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00124-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Kao SC, Krichevsky AM, Kosik KS, Tsai LH. BACE1 suppression by RNA interference in primary cortical neurons. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:1942–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M309219200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Kar S, Issa AM, Seto D, Auld DS, Collier B, Quirino RJ. Amyloid β-peptide inhibits high-affinity choline uptake and acetylcholine release in rat hippocampal slices. J Neurochem. 1998;70:2179–2187. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.70052179.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kar S, Slowikowski SP, Westaway D, Mount HT. Interactions between β-amyloid and central cholinergic neurons: implications for Alzheimer’s disease. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2004;29:427–441. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kawahara M, Arispe N, Kuroda Y, Rojas E. Alzheimer’s disease amyloid beta-protein forms Zn2+-sensitive, cation-selective channels across excised membrane patches from hypothalamic neurons. Biophys J. 1997;73:67–75. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78048-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Keller JN, Pang Z, Geddes JW, Begley JG, Germeyer A, Waeg G, Mattson MP. Impairment of glucose and glutamate transport and induction of mitochondrial oxidative stress and dysfunction in synaptosomes by amyloid β-peptide: role of the lipid peroxidation product 4-hydroxynonenal. J Neurochem. 1997;69:273–284. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.69010273.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Kim HJ, Suh YH, Lee MH, Ryu PD. Cation selective channels formed by a C-terminal fragment of β-amyloid precursor protein. Neuroreport. 1999;10:1427–1431. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199905140-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kim JH, Anwyl R, Suh YH, Djamgoz MB, Rowan MJ. Use-dependent effects of amyloidogenic fragments of β-amyloid precursor protein on synaptic plasticity in rat hippocampus in vivo. J Neurosci. 2001;21:1327–1333. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-04-01327.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Kirschner DA, Abraham C, Selkoe DJ. X-ray diffraction from intraneuronal paired helical filaments and extraneuronal amyloid fibers in Alzheimer disease indicates cross-β conformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83:503–507. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.2.503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Kirschner DA, Inouye H, Duffy LK, Sinclair A, Lind M, Selkoe DJ. Synthetic peptide homologous to β protein from Alzheimer disease forms amyloid-like fibrils in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84:6953–6957. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.19.6953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Klein WL. Self-assembly of Aβ1–42 into globular neurotoxins. Biochemistry. 2003;42:12749–12760. doi: 10.1021/bi030029q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Knowles RB, Wyart C, Buldyrev SV, Cruz L, Urbanc B, Hasselmo ME, Stanley HE, Hyman B. Plaque-induced neurite abnormalities: implication for disruption of neural networks in Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:5274–5279. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.9.5274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Kokubo H, Kayed R, Glabe CG, Saido TC, Iwata N, Helms JB, Yamaguchi H. Oligomeric proteins ultrastructurally localize to cell processes, especially to axon terminals with higher density, but not to lipid rafts in Tg2576 mouse brain. Brain Res. 2005;1045:224–228. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kokubo H, Kayed R, Glabe CG, Yamaguchi H. Soluble Aβ oligomers ultrastructurally localize to cell processes and might be related to synaptic dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease brain. Brain Res. 2005;1031:222–228. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.10.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Kojro E, Gimpl G, Lammich S, Marz W, Fahrenholz F. Low cholesterol stimulates the nonamyloidogenic pathway by its effect on the α-secretase ADAM 10. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:5815–5820. doi: 10.1073/pnas.081612998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Kornhauser JM, Greenberg ME. A kinase to remember: dual roles for MAP kinase in long-term memory. Neuron. 1997;18:839–842. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80322-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Koudinov AR, Berezov TT. Alzheimer’s amyloid-β (A beta) is an essential synaptic protein, not neurotoxic junk. Acta Neurobiol Exp. 2004;64:71–79. doi: 10.55782/ane-2004-1492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Kuo YM, Emmerling MR, Vigo-Pelfrey C, Kasunic TC, Kirkpatrick JB, Murdoch GH, Ball MJ, Roher AE. Water-soluble Aβ (N-40, N-42) oligomers in normal and Alzheimer disease brains. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:4077–4081. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.8.4077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Lacor PN, Buniel MC, Chang L, Fernandez SJ, Gong Y, Viola KL, Lambert MP, Velasco PT, Bigio EH, Finch CE, Krafft GA, Klein WL. Synaptic targeting by Alzheimer’s-related amyloid beta oligomers. J Neurosci. 2004;24:10191–10200. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3432-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Lambert MP, Barlow AK, Chromy BA, Edwards C, Freed R, Liosatos M, Morgan TE, Rozovsky I, Trommer B, Viola KL, Wals P, Zhang C, Finch CE, Krafft GA, Klein WL. Diffusible, nonfibrillar ligands derived from Aβ1-42 are potent central nervous system neurotoxins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:6448–6453. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.11.6448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Lammich S, Kojro E, Postina R, Gilbert S, Pfeiffer R, Jasionowski M, Haass C, Fahrenholz F. Constitutive and regulated α-secretase cleavage of Alzheimer’s amyloid precursor protein by a disintegrin metalloprotease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:3922–3927. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Larson J, Lynch G, Games D, Seubert P. Alterations in synaptic transmission and long-term potentiation in hippocampal slices from young and aged PDAPP mice. Brain Res. 1999;840:23–35. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)01698-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Lazarov O, Robinson J, Tang YP, Hairston IS, Korade-Mirnics Z, Lee VM, Hersh LB, Sapolsky RM, Mirnics K, Sisodia SS. Environmental enrichment reduces Aβ levels and amyloid deposition in transgenic mice. Cell. 2005;120:701–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.LeVine H., 3rd Alzheimer’s β-peptide oligomer formation at physiologic concentrations. Anal Biochem. 2004;335:81–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2004.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Li YM, Xu M, Lai MT, Huang Q, Castro JL, DiMuzio-Mower J, Harrison T, Lellis C, Nadin A, Neduvelil JG, Register RB, Sardana MK, Shearman MS, Smith AL, Shi XP, Yin KC, Shafer JA, Gardell SJ. Photoactivated γ-secretase inhibitors directed to the active site covalently label presenilin 1. Nature. 2000;405:689–94. doi: 10.1038/35015085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Li WY, Butler JP, Hale JE, McClure DB, Little SP, Czilli DL, Simmons LK. Suppression of an amyloid β peptide-mediated calcium channel response by a secreted betaamyloid precursor protein. Neuroscience. 2000;95:1–4. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(99)00479-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Lin H, Bhatia R, Lal R. Amyloid β protein forms ion channels: implications for Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology. FASEB J. 2001;15:2433–2444. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0377com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Lomo T. The discovery of long-term potentiation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003;358:617–620. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Lorenzo A, Yankner BA. β-amyloid neurotoxicity requires fibril formation and is inhibited by congo red. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:12243–12247. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.25.12243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Lue LF, Kuo YM, Roher AE, Brachova L, Shen Y, Sue L, Beach T, Kurth JH, Rydel RE, Rogers J. Soluble amyloid β peptide concentration as a predictor of synaptic change in Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Pathol. 1999;155:853–862. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65184-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Luth HJ, Apelt J, Ihunwo AO, Arendt T, Schliebs R. Degeneration of beta-amyloid-associated cholinergic structures in transgenic APP SW mice. Brain Res. 2003;977:16–22. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(03)02658-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.MacManus A, Ramsden M, Murray M, Henderson Z, Pearson HA, Campbell VA. Enhancement of 45Ca2+ influx and voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel activity by β-amyloid-1-40 in rat cortical synaptosomes and cultured cortical neurons. Modulation by the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-1β. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:4713–4718. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.7.4713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Mark RJ, Pang Z, Geddes JW, Uchida K, Mattson MP. Amyloid β-peptide impairs glucose transport in hippocampal and cortical neurons: involvement of membrane lipid peroxidation. J Neurosci. 1997;17:1046–1054. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-03-01046.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Masliah E, Mallory M, Alford M, DeTeresa R, Hansen LA, McKeel DW, Jr., Morris JC. Altered expression of synaptic proteins occurs early during progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 2001;56:127–129. doi: 10.1212/wnl.56.1.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Masliah E, Terry RD, Alford M, De Teresa R, Hansen LA. Cortical and subcortical patterns of synaptophysin-like immunoreactivity in Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Pathol. 1991;138:235–246. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Masliah E, Terry RD, Mallory M, Alford M, Hansen LA. Diffuse plaques do not accentuate synapse loss in Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Pathol. 1990;137:1293–1297. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Masters CL, Multhaup G, Simms G, Pottgiesser J, Martins RN, Beyreuther K. Neuronal origin of a cerebral amyloid: neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer’s disease contain the same protein as the amyloid of plaque cores and blood vessels. EMBO J. 1985;4:2757–2763. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb04000.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Mattson MP, Cheng B, Davis D, Bryant K, Lieberburg I, Rydel RE. β-Amyloid peptides destabilize calcium homeostasis and render human cortical neurons vulnerable to excitotoxicity. J Neurosci. 1992;12:376–389. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-02-00376.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.McLean CA, Cherny RA, Fraser FW, Fuller SJ, Smith MJ, Beyreuther K, Bush AI, Masters CL. Soluble pool of Aβ amyloid as a determinant of severity of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol. 1999;46:860–866. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(199912)46:6<860::aid-ana8>3.0.co;2-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Micelli S, Meleleo D, Picciarelli V, Gallucci E. Effect of sterols on β-amyloid peptide (AβP1-40) channel formation and their properties in planar lipid membranes. Biophys J. 2004;86:2231–2237. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74281-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Merz PA, Wisniewski HM, Somerville RA, Bobin SA, Masters CL, Iqbal K. Ultrastructural morphology of amyloid fibrils from neuritic and amyloid plaques. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1983;60:113–24. doi: 10.1007/BF00685355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Middei S, Geracitano R, Caprioli A, Mercuri N, Ammassari-Teule M. Preserved fronto-striatal plasticity and enhanced procedural learning in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease overexpressing mutant hAPPswe. Learn Mem. 2004;11:447–452. doi: 10.1101/lm.80604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Moechars D, Dewachter I, Lorent K, Reverse D, Baekelandt V, Naidu A, Tesseur I, Spittaels K, Haute CV, Checler F, Godaux E, Cordell B, Van Neuven F. Early phenotypic changes in transgenic mice that overexpress different mutants of amyloid precursor protein in brain. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:6483–6492. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.10.6483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Moolman DL, Vitolo OV, Vonsattel JPG, Shelanski ML. Dendrite and dendritic spine alterations in Alzheimer models. J Neurocytol. 2004;33:377–387. doi: 10.1023/B:NEUR.0000044197.83514.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Mucke L, Masliah E, Yu GQ, Mallory M, Rockenstein EM, Tatsuno G, Hu K, Kholodenko D, Johnson-Wood K, McConlogue L. High-level neuronal expression of Aβ1-42 in wild-type human amyloid protein precursor transgenic mice: synaptotoxicity without plaque formation. J Neurosci. 2000;20:4050–4058. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-11-04050.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Mungarro-Menchaca X, Ferrera P, Morán J, Arias C. β-amyloid peptide induces ultrastructural changes in synaptosomes and potentiates mitochondrial dysfunction in the presence of ryanodine. J Neurosci Res. 2002;68:89–96. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Naslund J, Haroutunian V, Mohs R, Davis KL, Davies P, Greengard P, Buxbaum JD. Correlation between elevated levels of amyloid beta-peptide in the brain and cognitive decline. JAMA. 2000;283:1571–1577. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.12.1571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Nitsch RM, Farber SA, Growdon JH, Wurtman RJ. Release of amyloid β-protein precursor derivatives by electrical depolarization of rat hippocampal slices. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:5191–5193. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.11.5191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Parent A, Linden DJ, Sisodia SS, Borchelt DR. Synaptic transmission and hippocampal long-term potentiation in transgenic mice expressing FAD-linked presenilin 1. NeuroBiol Dis. 1999;6:56–62. doi: 10.1006/nbdi.1998.0207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Parvathy S, Hussain I, Karran EH, Turner AJ, Hooper NM. Alzheimer’s amyloid precursor protein β-secretase is inhibited by hydroxamic acid-based zinc metalloprotease inhibitors: similarities to the angiotensin converting enzyme secretase. Biochemistry. 1998;37:1680–1685. doi: 10.1021/bi972034y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Peschon JJ, Slack JL, Reddy P, Stocking KL, Sunnarborg SW, Lee DC, Russell WE, Castner BJ, Johnson RS, Fitzner JN, Boyce RW, Nelson N, Kozlosky CJ, Wolfson MF, Rauch CT, Cerretti DP, Paxton RJ, March CJ, Black RA. An essential role for ectodomain shedding in mammalian development. Science. 1998;282:1281–1284. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5392.1281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Petit A, Bihel F, Alves da Costa C, Pourquie O, Checler F, Kraus JL. New protease inhibitors prevent γ-secretase mediated production of Aβ40/42 without affecting Notch cleavage. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:507–511. doi: 10.1038/35074581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Pettit DL, Shao Z, Yakel JL. β-Amyloid(1-42) peptide directly modulates nicotinic receptors in the rat hippocampal slice. J Neurosci. 2001;21:RC120. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-01-j0003.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Pike CJ, Walencewicz AJ, Glabe CG, Cotman CW. In vitro aging of β-amyloid protein causes peptide aggregation and neurotoxicity. Brain Res. 1991;563:311–314. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(91)91553-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Pike CJ, Burdick D, Walencewicz AJ, Glabe CG, Cotman CW. Neurodegeneration induced by β-amyloid peptides in vitro: the role of peptide assembly state. J Neurosci. 1993;13:1676–1687. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-04-01676.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Price DL, Koliatsos VE, Sisodia SS, Koo EH, Martin LJ, Walker LC, Appelgate MD, Cork LC. Amyloid-related proteins and nerve growth factor in Alzheimer’s disease and animal models. Clin Neuropharmacol. 1991;14(1):S9–14. doi: 10.1097/00002826-199114001-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Price DL, Sisodia SS. Mutant genes in familial Alzheimer’s disease and transgenic models. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1998;21:479–505. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Poirier J. Apolipoprotein E, cholesterol transport and synthesis in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2005;26:355–361. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Puzzo D, Vitolo O, Trinchese F, Jacob JP, Palmeri A, Arancio O. Amyloid-β peptide inhibits activation of the nitric oxide/cGMP/cAMP-responsive element-binding protein pathway during hippocampal synaptic plasticity. J Neurosci. 2005;25:6887–6897. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5291-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Ramirez JM, Tryba AK, Pena F. Pacemaker neurons and neuronal networks: an integrative view. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004;14:665–674. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2004.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Ramsden M, Henderson Z, Pearson HA. Modulation of Ca2+ channel currents in primary cultures of rat cortical neurones by amyloid β protein (1-40) is dependent on solubility status. Brain Res. 2002;956:254–261. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(02)03547-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Ramsden M, Plant LD, Webster NJ, Vaughan PF, Henderson Z, Pearson HA. Differential effects of unaggregated and aggregated amyloid β protein (1-40) on K+ channel currents in primary cultures of rat cerebellar granule and cortical neurons. J Neurochem. 2001;79:699–712. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00618.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Raymond CR, Ireland DR, Abraham WC. NMDA receptor regulation by amyloid-β does not account for its inhibition of LTP in rat hippocampus. Brain Res. 2003;968:263–272. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(03)02269-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Roder S, Danober L, Pozza MF, Lingenhoehl K, Wiederhold KH, Olpe HR. Electrophysiological studies on the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex assessing the effects of amyloidosis in amyloid precursor protein 23 transgenic mice. Neuroscience. 2003;120:705–720. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(03)00381-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Roher AE, Chaney MO, Kuo YM, Webster SD, Stine WB, Haverkamp LJ, Woods AS, Cotter RJ, Tuohy JM, Krafft GA, Bonnell BS, Emmerling MR. Morphology and toxicity of Aβ-(1-42) dimer derived from neuritic and vascular amyloid deposits of Alzheimer’s disease. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:20631–20635. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.34.20631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Rovira C, Arbez N, Mariani J. Aβ(25-35) and Aβ(1-40) act on different calcium channels in CA1 hippocampal neurons. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;296:1317–1321. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(02)02072-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Saleshando G, O’Connor JJ. SB203580, the p38 mitogenactivated protein kinase inhibitor blocks the inhibitory effect of β-amyloid on long-term potentiation in the rat hippocampus. Neurosci Lett. 2000;288:119–122. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(00)01210-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Schenk D, Barbour R, Dunn W, Gordon G, Grajeda H, Guido T, Hu K, Huang J, Johnson-Wood K, Khan K, Kholodenko D, Lee M, Liao Z, Lieberburg I, Motter R, Mutter L, Soriano F, Shopp G, Vasquez N, Vandevert C, Walker S, Wogulis M, Yednock T, Games D, Seubert P. Immunization with amyloid-β attenuates Alzheimerdisease-like pathology in the PDAPP mouse. Nature. 1999;400:173–177. doi: 10.1038/22124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Scragg JL, Fearon IM, Boyle JP, Ball SG, Varadi G, Peers C. Alzheimer’s amyloid peptides mediate hypoxic up-regulation of L-type Ca2+ channels. FASEB J. 2005;19:150–152. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-2659fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Selkoe DJ. The molecular pathology of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron. 1991;6:487–498. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90052-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Selkoe DJ. Aging, Amyloid, and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Perspective in Honor of Carl Cotman. Neurochem Res. 2003;28:1705–1713. doi: 10.1023/a:1026065122854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Serpell LC, Smith JM. Direct visualisation of the β-sheet structure of synthetic Alzheimer’s amyloid. J Mol Biol. 2000;299:225–231. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Shoji M, Golde TE, Ghiso J, Cheung TT, Estus S, Shaffer LM, Cai XD, McKay DM, Tintner R, Frangione B, Younkin SG. Production of the Alzheimer amyloid β-protein by normal proteolytic processing. Science. 1992;258:126–129. doi: 10.1126/science.1439760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Silei V, Fabrizi C, Venturini G, Salmona M, Bugiani O, Tagliavini F, Lauro GM. Activation of microglial cells by PrP and β-amyloid fragments raises intracellular calcium through L-type voltage sensitive calcium channels. Brain Res. 1999;818:168–170. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(98)01272-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Small DH, Mok SS, Bornstein JC. Alzheimer’s disease and Aβ toxicity: From top to bottom. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2:595–598. doi: 10.1038/35086072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Snyder EM, Nong Y, Almeida CG, Paul S, Moran T, Choi EY, Nairn AC, Salter MW, Lombroso PJ, Gouras GK, Greengard P. Regulation of NMDA receptor trafficking by amyloid-β. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:1051–1058. doi: 10.1038/nn1503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Spires TL, Meyer-Luehmann M, Stern EA, McLean PJ, Skoch J, Hyman BT. Dendritic spine abnormalities in amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice demonstrated by gene transfer and intravital multiphoton microscopy. J Neurosci. 2005;25:7278–7287. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1879-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Stephan A, Laroche S, Davis S. Generation of aggregated β-amyloid in the rat hippocampus impairs synaptic transmission and plasticity and causes memory deficits. J Neurosci. 2001;21:5703–5714. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-15-05703.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Stern EA, Bacskai BJ, Hickey GA, Attenello FJ, Lombardo JA, Hyman BT. Cortical synaptic integration in vivo is disrupted by amyloid-β plaques. J Neurosci. 2004;24:4535–4540. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0462-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Sun MK, Alkon DL. Impairment of hippocampal CA1 heterosynaptic transformation and spatial memory by β - amyloid(25-35) J Neurophysiol. 2002;87:2441–2449. doi: 10.1152/jn.00230.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Sweatt JD. The neuronal MAP kinase cascade: a biochemical signal integration system subserving synaptic plasticity and memory. J Neurochem. 2001;6:1–10. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00054.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Sze CI, Troncoso JC, Kawas C, Mouton P, Price DL, Martin LJ. Loss of the presynaptic vesicle protein synaptophysin in hippocampus correlates with cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1997;56:933–944. doi: 10.1097/00005072-199708000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Szegedi V, Juhasz G, Budai D, Penke B. Divergent effects of Aβ1-42 on ionotropic glutamate receptor-mediated responses in CA1 neurons in vivo. Brain Res. 2005;1062:120–126. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Tanzi RE, McClatchey AI, Lamperti ED, Villa-Komaroff L, Gusella JF, Neve RL. Protease inhibitor domain encoded by an amyloid protein precursor mRNA associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 1988;331:528–530. doi: 10.1038/331528a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Tanzi RE, Gusella JF, Watkins PC, Bruns GAB, St. George-Hyslop PH, Van Keuren ML, Patterson D, Pagan S, Kurnit DM, Neve RL. Amyloid β-protein gene: cDNA, mRNA distribution, and genetic linkage near the Alzheimer locus. Science. 1987;235:880–884. doi: 10.1126/science.2949367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Terry RD. The pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease: an alternative to the amyloid hypothesis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1996;55:1023–1025. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Terry RD, Masliah E, Salmon DP, Butters N, DeTeresa R, Hill R, Hansen LA, Katzman R. Physical basis of cognitive alterations in Alzheimer’s disease: synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol. 1991;30:572–580. doi: 10.1002/ana.410300410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Tesche CD, Karhu J. Theta oscillations index human hippocampal activation during a working memory task. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:919–924. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.2.919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Tong L, Thornton PL, Balazs R, Cotman CW. β-amyloid-1–42 impairs activity-dependent cAMP-response elementbinding protein signaling in neurons at concentrations in which cell survival is not compromised. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:17301–17306. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M010450200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Tsai J, Grutzendler J, Duff K, Gan WB. Fibrillar amyloid deposition leads to local synaptic abnormalities and breakage of neuronal branches. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:1181–1183. doi: 10.1038/nn1335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Ueda K, Shinohara S, Yagami T, Asakura K, Kawasaki K. Amyloid β protein potentiates Ca2+ influx through L-type voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels: a possible involvement of free radicals. J Neurochem. 1997;68:265–271. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.68010265.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Vassar R, Bennett BD, Babu-Khan S, Khan S, Mendiaz EA, Denis P, Teplow DB, Ross S, Amarante P, Loeloff R, Luo Y, Fisher S, Fuller J, Edenson S, Lile J, Jorosinski MA, Biere AL, Curran E, Burguess T, Louis JC, Collins F, Treanor J, Rogers G, Citron M. β-Secretase cleavage of Alzheimer’s amyloid precursor protein by the transmembrane aspartic protease BACE. Science. 1999;286:735–741. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5440.735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Vigo-Pelfrey C, Lee D, Keim P, Leiberburg I, Schenk DB. Characterization of b-amyloid peptide from human cerebrospinal fluid. J Neurochem. 1993;61:1965–1968. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1993.tb09841.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Vitolo OV, Sant’Angelo A, Costanzo V, Battaglia F, Arancio O, Shelanski M. Amyloid β-peptide inhibition of the PKA/CREB pathway and long-term potentiation: reversibility by drugs that enhance cAMP signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:13217–13221. doi: 10.1073/pnas.172504199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Walsh DM, Hartley DM, Kusumoto Y, Fezoui Y, Condron MM, Lomakin A, Benedek GB, Selkoe DJ, Teplow DB. Amyloid β-protein fibrillogenesis. Structure and biological activity of protofibrillar intermediates. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:25945–25952. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.36.25945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Walsh DM, Klyubin I, Fadeeva JV, Cullen WK, Anwyl R, Wolfe MS, Rowan MJ, Selkoe DJ. Naturally secreted oligomers of amyloid β protein potently inhibit hippocampal longterm potentiation in vivo. Nature. 2002;416:535–539. doi: 10.1038/416535a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Walsh DM, Selkoe DJ. Deciphering the molecular basis of memory failure in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron. 2004;44:181–193. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Walsh DM, Townsend M, Podlisny MB, Shankar GM, Fadeeva JV, Agnaf OE, Hartley DM, Selkoe DJ. Certain inhibitors of synthetic amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) fibrillogenesis block oligomerization of natural Aβ and thereby rescue long-term potentiation. J Neurosci. 2005;25:2455–2462. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4391-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Wang HW, Pasternak JF, Kuo H, Ristic H, Lambert MP, Chromy B, Viola KL, Klein WL, Stine WB, Krafft GA, Trommer BL. Soluble oligomers of β amyloid (1-42) inhibit long-term potentiation but not long-term depression in rat dentate gyrus. Brain Res. 2002;924:133–140. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(01)03058-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Wang Q, Walsh DM, Rowan MJ, Selkoe DJ, Anwyl R. Block of long-term potentiation by naturally secreted and synthetic amyloid β-peptide in hippocampal slices is mediated via activation of the kinases c-Jun N-terminal kinase, cyclin-dependent kinase 5, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase as well as metabotropic glutamate receptor type 5. J Neurosci. 2004;24:3370–3378. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1633-03.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Whalen BM, Selkoe DJ, Hartley DM. Small nonfibrillar assemblies of amyloid β-protein bearing the Arctic mutation induce rapid neuritic degeneration. NeuroBiol Dis. 2005;20:254–266. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2005.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Weggen S, Eriksen JL, Das P, Sagi SA, Wang R, Pietrzik CU, Findlay KA, Smith TE, Murphy MP, Bulter T, Kang DE, Marquez-Sterling N, Golde TE, Koo EH. A subset of NSAIDs lower amyloidogenic Aβ42 independently of cyclooxygenase activity. Nature. 2001;414:212–216. doi: 10.1038/35102591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Wen C, Metzstein MM, Greenwald I. SUP-17, a Caenorhabditis elegans ADAM protein related to Drosophila KUZBANIAN, and its role in LIN-12/NOTCH signalling. Development. 1997;124:4759–4767. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.23.4759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Winblad B, Poritis N. Memantine in severe dementia: results of the 9M-Best Study (Benefit and efficacy in severely demented patients during treatment with memantine) Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1999;14:135–146. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199902)14:2<135::aid-gps906>3.0.co;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Wu CC, Chawla F, Games D, Rydel RE, Freedman S, Schenk D, Young WG, Morrison JH, Bloom FE. Selective vulnerability of dentate granule cells prior to amyloid deposition in PDAPP mice: digital morphometric analyses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:7141–7146. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402147101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Wu J, Anwyl R, Rowan MJ. β-Amyloid selectively augments NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission in rat hippocampus. Neuroreport. 6:2409–2413. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199511270-00031. 1995a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Wu J, Anwyl R, Rowan MJ. β-Amyloid-(1-40) increases long-term potentiation in rat hippocampus in vitro. Eur J Pharmacol. 284:R1–3. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(95)00539-w. 1995b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Yan R, Bienkowski MJ, Shuck ME, Miao H, Tory MC, Pauley AM, Brashier JR, Stratman NC, Mathews WR, Buhl AE, Carter DB, Tomasselli AG, Parodi LA, Heinrikson RL, Gurney ME. Membrane-anchored aspartyl protease with Alzheimer’s disease beta-secretase activity. Nature. 1999;402:533–537. doi: 10.1038/990107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Yankner BA, Duffy LK, Kirschner DA. Neurotrophic and neurotoxic effects of amyloid beta protein: reversal by tachykinin neuropeptides. Science. 1990;250:279–282. doi: 10.1126/science.2218531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Yao PJ, Zhu M, Pyun EI, Brooks AI, Therianos S, Meyers VE, Coleman PD. Defects in expression of genes related to synaptic vesicle trafficking in frontal cortex of Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroBiol Dis. 2003;12:97–109. doi: 10.1016/s0969-9961(02)00009-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Ye CP, Selkoe DJ, Hartley DM. Protofibrils of amyloid β-protein inhibit specific K+ currents in neocortical cultures. NeuroBiol Dis. 2003;13:177–190. doi: 10.1016/s0969-9961(03)00068-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Ye L, Qiao JT. Suppressive action produced by β-amyloid peptide fragment 31-35 on long-term potentiation in rat hippocampus is N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-independent: it’s offset by (-)huperzine A. Neurosci Lett. 1999;275:187–190. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(99)00795-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Ye C, Walsh DM, Selkoe DJ, Hartley DM. Amyloid β-protein induced electrophysiological changes are dependent on aggregation state: N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) versus non-NMDA receptor/channel activation. Neurosci Lett. 2004;366:320–325. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.05.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Yu G, Nishimura M, Arawaka S, Levitan D, Zhang L, Tandon A, Song YQ, Rogaeva E, Chen F, Kawarai T, Supala A, Levesque L, Yu H, Yang DS, Holmes E, Milman P, Liang Y, Zhang DM, Xu DH, Sato C, Rogaev E, Smith M, Janus C, Zhang Y, Aebersold R, Farrer LS, Sorbi S, Bruni A, Fraser P, St George-Hyslop P. Nicastrin modulates presenilin-mediated notch/glp-1 signal transduction and betaAPP processing. Nature. 2000;407:48–54. doi: 10.1038/35024009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Yu SP, Farhangrazi ZS, Ying HS, Yeh CH, Choi DW. Enhancement of outward potassium current may participate in β-amyloid peptide-induced cortical neuronal death. NeuroBiol Dis. 1998;5:81–88. doi: 10.1006/nbdi.1998.0186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Yu SP, Yeh CH, Sensi SL, Gwag BJ, Canzoniero LM, Farhangrazi ZS, Ying HS, Tian M, Dugan LL, Choi DW. Mediation of neuronal apoptosis by enhancement of outward potassium current. Science. 1997;278:114–117. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5335.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Zhang W, Jin HW, Wang XL. Effects of presenilins and β-amyloid precursor protein on delayed rectifier potassium channels in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2004;25:181–185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Zimmermann M, Gardoni F, Marcello E, Colciaghi F, Borroni B, Padovani A, Cattabeni F, Di Luca M. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors increase ADAM10 activity by promoting its trafficking in neuroblastoma cell lines. J Neurochem. 2004;90:1489–1499. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02680.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Neuropharmacology are provided here courtesy of Bentham Science Publishers

RESOURCES