Skip to main content
The Ulster Medical Journal logoLink to The Ulster Medical Journal
. 1996 Nov;65(2):137–141.

A comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography with Doppler sonography in the assessment of carotid arterial stenosis.

P K Ellis 1, B E Kelly 1, D Bennett 1, E M McIlrath 1
PMCID: PMC2448587  PMID: 8979781

Abstract

A comparison is made of the use of selective intra-arterial subtraction angiography and doppler sonography in the assessment of disease in 206 carotid arteries. Maximal stenoses in each of the internal, external and common carotid arteries were recorded and compared using both modalities. In 93% of cases, arteries reported as normal ultrasonically were also found to be normal on angiography. However, agreement between the modalities in the assessment of severe stenoses was rather less at 79%. Overall agreement between the two modalities was good using statistical analysis (weighted Kappa). It is our view that ultrasound is reliable in normal vessels, but where significant disease is present the rate of error between the two modalities is too high to warrant omission of angiography.

Full text

PDF
139

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Colquhoun I., Oates C. P., Martin K., Hall K., Whittingham T. A. The assessment of carotid and vertebral arteries: a comparison of CFM duplex ultrasound with intravenous digital subtraction angiography. Br J Radiol. 1992 Dec;65(780):1069–1074. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-65-780-1069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Farmilo R. W., Scott D. J., Cole S. E., Jeans W. D., Horrocks M. Role of duplex scanning in the selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy. Br J Surg. 1990 Apr;77(4):388–390. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800770411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hill J. C., Carbonneau K., Baliga P. K., Akers D. L., Bell W. H., 3rd, Kerstein M. D. Safe extracranial vascular evaluation and surgery without preoperative arteriography. Ann Vasc Surg. 1990 Jan;4(1):34–38. doi: 10.1007/BF02042686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Landis J. R., Koch G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Maiuri F., Gallicchio B., Iaconetta G., D'Andrea F. The role of real time B-mode ultrasonography in the follow-up of patients submitted to carotid endarterectomy. J Neurosurg Sci. 1992 Apr-Jun;36(2):73–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Poindexter J. M., Jr, Shah P. M., Clauss R. H., Babu S. C. The clinical utility of carotid duplex scanning. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1991 Jan-Feb;32(1):64–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Toh K. H., Tan K. P. Comparison of accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography with conventional angiography: a report of 45 cases. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1993 Sep;22(5):742–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zierler R. E., Kohler T. R., Strandness D. E., Jr Duplex scanning of normal or minimally diseased carotid arteries: correlation with arteriography and clinical outcome. J Vasc Surg. 1990 Oct;12(4):447–455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Ulster Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Ulster Medical Society

RESOURCES