Skip to main content
The Ulster Medical Journal logoLink to The Ulster Medical Journal
. 1999 Nov;68(2):68–72.

A prospective randomised study comparing polyethylene glycol and sodium phosphate bowel cleansing solutions for colonoscopy.

J Lee 1, K McCallion 1, A G Acheson 1, S T Irwin 1
PMCID: PMC2449117  PMID: 10661631

Abstract

Polyethylene glycol (Klean-Prep, Norgine) is widely used for bowel cleansing in the United Kingdom. This study compares the efficacy, acceptability and adverse effects of a polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution with sodium phosphate (Fleet Phospho-soda, De Witt) for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy. Two hundred and nine consecutive patients were prospectively randomised to either PEG or sodium phosphate (SP) preparation. The endoscopist was blinded to the randomisation process. Fifty patients were excluded from the study because of previous colectomies or incomplete data. Of the remaining 159 patients, 88 had been randomised to the PEG group and 71 to the SP group. There was no difference in sex distribution between the groups. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of patient acceptability, side effects (nausea/vomiting and abdominal cramps), adequacy of bowel preparation and colonoscopy completion rates. 74% of the PEG and 70.4% of the SP group were rated by the endoscopist as having good or excellent bowel preparation. Sodium phosphate is well tolerated without additional side effects when compared with PEG solution. Both solutions were found to be equally effective in bowel cleansing.

Full text

PDF
69

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Afridi S. A., Barthel J. S., King P. D., Pineda J. J., Marshall J. B. Prospective, randomized trial comparing a new sodium phosphate-bisacodyl regimen with conventional PEG-ES lavage for outpatient colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995 May;41(5):485–489. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(05)80008-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Church J. M. Complete colonoscopy: how often? And if not, why not? Am J Gastroenterol. 1994 Apr;89(4):556–560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Henderson J. M., Barnett J. L., Turgeon D. K., Elta G. H., Behler E. M., Crause I., Nostrant T. T. Single-day, divided-dose oral sodium phosphate laxative versus intestinal lavage as preparation for colonoscopy: efficacy and patient tolerance. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995 Sep;42(3):238–243. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(95)70098-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kolts B. E., Lyles W. E., Achem S. R., Burton L., Geller A. J., MacMath T. A comparison of the effectiveness and patient tolerance of oral sodium phosphate, castor oil, and standard electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993 Aug;88(8):1218–1223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Vanner S. J., MacDonald P. H., Paterson W. G., Prentice R. S., Da Costa L. R., Beck I. T. A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990 Apr;85(4):422–427. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Ulster Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Ulster Medical Society

RESOURCES