Abstract
Large conductance calcium- and voltage-sensitive K+ (MaxiK) channels share properties of voltage- and ligand-gated ion channels. In voltage-gated channels, membrane depolarization promotes the displacement of charged residues contained in the voltage sensor (S4 region) inducing gating currents and pore opening. In MaxiK channels, both voltage and micromolar internal Ca2+ favor pore opening. We demonstrate the presence of voltage sensor rearrangements with voltage (gating currents) whose movement and associated pore opening is triggered by voltage and facilitated by micromolar internal Ca2+ concentration. In contrast to other voltage-gated channels, in MaxiK channels there is charge movement at potentials where the pore is open and the total charge per channel is 4–5 elementary charges.
Large conductance voltage- and Ca2+-sensitive potassium channels (MaxiK or KCa) are important modulators of neuronal firing and vascular tone (1–3). Their open probability raises when the cytoplasmic calcium concentration increases or when the plasma membrane is depolarized. MaxiK channels seemed to require the presence of calcium to open (i.e., calcium gated) (4–6) and to lack an intrinsic voltage sensor (7). However, indirect evidence using chemical modifications suggested that MaxiK channels can open in response to voltage without the requirement of intracellular calcium (8). Consistent with these results, we demonstrated that depolarization can open MaxiK channels (hslo) in a calcium-independent manner (9). This indicates that MaxiK channels have a purely voltage-dependent mode of gating and demands the existence of a voltage sensor. Indeed, MaxiK channels possess a transmembrane domain (S4 region) (10, 11) analogous to the one that, in other voltage-gated K channels, has been proposed to be the voltage sensor (12–15). The movement of this voltage sensor, triggered by depolarization, can be directly measured as gating currents (16–18). We show that MaxiK channels possess an intrinsic voltage sensor able to induce measurable voltage-dependent gating currents. As previously shown for ionic currents (9), these gating currents are purely voltage-dependent at low internal Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i); however, a raise in [Ca2+]i to micromolar levels diminishes the voltage necessary to move a given amount of charge. These results strongly suggest that in MaxiK channels, micromolar Ca2+ functions as a “facilitator” by diminishing the electrical work needed to activate the voltage-gating machinery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Clones and Expression Systems Used.
hslo (GenBank accession no. U11058U11058) cDNAs starting from the third (hsloM3), or fourth (hsloM4) (19) Kozak consensus sequence for translational initiation were used. High level expression was obtained by subcloning hslo into a vector carrying at the 5′ end a 183-bp untranslated region of ShakerH4 K+ channel and at the 3′ end a stretch of 30 thymidine residues. Xenopus laevis oocytes were injected with 45 nl of cRNA at 0.2 μg/μl and kept at 18°C for 4–7 days. Gating currents were also recorded in HEK cells transfected with hsloM3 subcloned in pCDNA3 vector (Invitrogen). HEK cells expressing the large T antigen protein of SV40 virus were cotransfected with hsloM3 and the α subunit of the human CD8 lymphocyte surface antigen. Before recording, cells were labeled with anti-CD8-coated beads (Dynal, Great Neck, NY) to select for transfected cells (20). Shaker H4-IR in pBluescript (Stratagene) was expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes (21).
Solutions.
Bath and pipette solutions contained 110 mM methanesulfonate⋅X (X-MES), 10 mM Hepes, and 0.1 mM ouabain (22) at pH 7 where X was potassium, N-methylglucamine, tetraethylammonium (TEA), or cesium. Pipette solutions contained 2 mM CaCl2. Solutions with different [Ca2+]i were prepared with 5 mM HEDTA, N-(2-Hydroxyethyl)ethylenediaminetriacetic acid and CaCl2 according to Chelator (23), taking into account 9 μM contaminant Ca2+ in buffer-free solutions as measured with a Ca2+ electrode. Free Ca2+ was then checked with a Ca2+ electrode (micromolar range; World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL) or with Fura-2 (nanomolar range).
Electrical Recordings.
Cs+ currents were recorded after equilibrating the intracellular space with Cs+; to accelerate this process, oocytes were mechanically perforated. To measure gating currents in the same oocytes, we used external TEA. We have compared gating currents with and without TEA at voltages near channel opening. Under these conditions gating currents were not modified by the presence of TEA. However, it is not established whether at higher potentials, external TEA could affect charge movement. Pulse duration was 20–25 ms for ionic and 1–20 ms for gating currents; short 1-ms pulses were used for better time resolution and to avoid membrane breakdown due to extreme positive and negative potentials. One-millisecond pulses were adequate to evaluate hslo charge movement (quasi steady state), since its main component has a time constant of decay of ≈60 μs, indicating that the majority of the charge moves in the first millisecond. However, a slow component in the charge movement becomes apparent as the duration of the voltage pulse increases from 1 to 10 ms. This slow component amounts to a maximum of 15% of the total charge at the midpoint of the charge to voltage relationship (Q–V) curve and induces a leftward shift of about 20 mV. The Q–V curves obtained with 10 and 20 ms pulses are essentially the same. Since the slow component is a small fraction of the total charge, Q–V curves cross the conductance to voltage relationship (G–V) curves with either 1-ms or 20-ms voltage pulses. Thus, 1-ms pulses were adequate to construct quasi steady-state Q–V curves. Q–V and G–V curves (Figs. 2 and 3) were analyzed in the same oocyte to eliminate large variations seen from oocyte to oocyte in K+ (19) or in Cs+ solutions. In Cs+ solutions, the SD of the midpoints of G-V curves in cell-attached patches was ±25 mV (V½ = 151 ± 25 mV, n = 15) and in 10 μM Ca2+, the SD was ±10 mV (V½ = 52 ± 10, n = 10). Midpoints of Q–V curves also vary among oocytes [V½ in the cell-attached mode was 190 ± 15 mV (n = 19) in nine oocytes].
Acquisition Parameters.
Gating and linear capacitive currents were usually acquired at 8 μs per point and filtered at 10 kHz. Ionic currents were usually acquired at 100 μs per point. We selected subtracting holding potentials (SHPs) by first checking the absence of gating currents at those potentials (cell-attached mode, SHP ≤ 0 mV; 85 μM Ca2+, SHP ≤ −100 mV).
Conductance Ratios.
Conductance ratios gK/gCs were calculated with gK of 290 pS (single channel conductance in symmetrical 110 mM K+) (19) and gCs from variance analysis (24) (see also Fig. 4). Variance analysis of 128–256 consecutive current traces from −100 mV to membrane potential (Vm) = 100–130 mV, in inside-out patches (10 μM and 85 μM Ca2+), was used to obtain unitary Cs+ current (iCs). gCs was then calculated from gCs = [iCs/(Vm − VCs)], where VCs = 0 mV. iCs was independent of [Ca2+]i and was 70 ± 12 fA (n = 5) at 100 mV. Mean gCs = 0.72 ± 0.1 pS (n = 7).
Number of Charges per Channel.
To evaluate the number of charges per channel, we measured in the same oocyte, in different but adjacent areas, the limiting charge movement (Qmax) using TEA-MES (pipette) and the number of channels (N) with nonstationary variance analysis (24) (see Fig. 4) using Cs-MES (pipette). To estimate the patches surface, we measured the membrane capacity (Cm) of each patch, which allowed us to calculate Qmax and N per unit surface. The main assumption for this measurement is that channels are homogeneously distributed in the oocyte membrane. Channel clustering or inhomogeneities in channel distribution were minimized because we used large patch pipettes; we consistently obtained similar density values for channels in individual oocytes. After measuring the Cm in each patch [using 2 ms pulses to 10 mV from holding potential (HP) = 0 mV], pulse protocols were given to measure gating currents to obtain Qmax or to measure ionic current noise to estimate N. Qmax and N were then normalized by their corresponding Cm to obtain Qmax* (Qmax/surface) and N* (N/surface). Number of charges per channel = Qmax*/e−N*, where e− is the elementary charge (1.6 × 10−19 coulombs).
Statistics.
Values are means ± SD. Student’s t test was used; results were considered significantly different at P ≤ 0.001.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Hslo Gating Currents Precede Ionic Currents.
Gating currents from hslo could be successfully recorded after maximizing the level of expression and by using large patch pipettes (15–25 μm). In Fig. 1, we show representative examples of hslo gating and ionic currents measured in cell-attached patches using either isotonic Cs+ (Fig. 1 B and C) or K+ (Fig. 1D). Because gating currents are much smaller than ionic currents, the measurement of both ionic and gating currents in patches of the same oocyte (Figs. 1 B and C, and 2–4), required the use of a permeant ion with small unitary conductance, Cs+. Human MaxiK channels (hslo) are permeable to Cs+ similar to Shaker K channels; their conductance ratio gK/gCs is about 400 (405 ± 58, n = 7; gCs = 0.72 ± 0.1 pS, n = 7; gk = 290 ps) (19), which is 4-fold larger than that of Shaker K channels (25). Thus, the use of Cs+ allowed the recording of otherwise unmeasurable huge ionic currents together with gating currents. This type of gating and ionic currents were absent in oocytes not injected with hslo cRNA (Fig. 1A). High-resolution records in Fig. 1C (acquired at 0.5 μs per point) show that gating currents predominantly precede the ionic current at low activation potentials and that with larger depolarizations, after the initial component of the gating current, the onset of ionic currents overlaps the decay of gating currents. The fact that gating currents precede channel opening suggests the presence of more than one closed state through which the channel transits before it opens. Consistent with this view, the onset of the hslo K+ current elicited during a depolarization can be delayed by hyperpolarizing prepulses (Fig. 1D). The hyperpolarizing prepulses bring the channel to deeper closed states (Cole–Moore shift) (26) delaying its opening. The Cole–Moore shift observed in hslo, however, is less voltage-dependent than the one present in Shaker K channels (21) (Fig. 1D). This shallower voltage dependency of the current delay in hslo may be explained by a smaller proportion of the total charge carried by the transitions that precede channel opening (e.g., Fig. 2C).
Characteristics of Gating Currents and the Number of Charges per Channel in hslo.
Gating currents from hslo were isolated from ionic currents by blocking the latter with external TEA (cell-attached or inside-out) or by substituting K+ for the nonconducting ion N-methylglucamine (inside-out). The size of the gating currents was proportional to the level of functional expression as measured from the ionic current. The general characteristics of hslo gating currents recorded with external TEA (Figs. 2 and 3) or with N-methylglucamine are similar: (i) they are fast transient currents with a decay time constant at the ON (of a voltage step) of 57 ± 10 μs (n = 11, cell-attached, 200 mV) and (ii) the amount of charge moved at the ON (QON) is equal to the charge measured at the end of the pulse (QOFF) (Fig. 2B). The number of charges per channel was 4.4 ± 0.8 (n = 3 cells). This value was obtained by normalizing both the number of channels (estimated from variance analysis) (24), and the limiting charge (Qmax) per membrane capacity individually measured in three to six giant patches of the same cell. This number is smaller than the one obtained for other voltage-gated ion channels of the S4 superfamily (27, 28). In Shaker K channel, the first four positive charges in S4 (29, 30) and a negative charge in S2 (glutamate-293) (30) contribute to a gating charge of about 13 charges per channel. Comparing S2 and S4 regions of hslo and Shaker K channels (11, 31), hslo lacks one of the four critical positive charges in S4 and the negative charge in S2. In a simplistic way, our results are consistent with the view that less charges in these critical S2 and S4 regions result in less gating charges per channel. Given the differences in the gating properties of hslo and Shaker K channels reported in this work, it will be interesting to study the functional role of these or other residues in hslo.
Gating Charge Moves Between Open States.
Coupling between charge movement and pore opening of MaxiK channels was analyzed constructing voltage-activation curves of both gating (Q–V) and ionic (G–V) currents. A comparison of the properties of the two types of curves is meaningful only if gating and ionic current measurements are performed in the same oocyte (Figs. 2 and 3). This is due to the fact that G–V curves of MaxiK channels measured in different oocytes vary in their midpoint by about ±20 mV, when recorded at constant [Ca2+]i in either K+ (19) or Cs+.
The most striking and unique feature in the coupling between charge movement and pore opening of MaxiK channels is that for small depolarizations the Q–V curve is negative to the G–V curve (Fig. 2C Inset) but crosses it near its foot leading to a Q–V curve positive to the G–V curve for larger depolarized potentials (e.g., Fig. 2C). This result suggests that upon depolarization little charge movement is needed to reach the initial open state(s) of the channel, in agreement with the small Cole–Moore shift (Fig. 1D), and that open-to-open transitions can carry charge. However, to explain the fast decay of the gating current with respect to the slow rising phase of the ionic current, it is necessary to postulate the existence of distant open to open transitions that are voltage-independent or that carry a very small amount of charge. The fact that charge can move along transitions between open states in MaxiK channels is in marked contrast with other voltage-gated ion channels, where most of the charge moves before pore opening (practically no charge moves in the last close to open transition), giving Q–V curves negative to G–V curves (32, 33).
Limiting Gating Charge and Limiting Open Probability Are Independent of [Ca2+]i.
We have recently reported that at “resting” internal Ca2+ (as in the cell-attached patches) or below (≤100 nM) depolarization can induce hslo ionic currents in a Ca2+-independent manner. Half-activation potentials are indistinguishable in the intact cell (cell-attached) at 100 nM, 10 nM, or 3 pM [Ca2+]i (9), suggesting that hslo has a Ca2+-independent way of gating. In agreement with these findings, gating currents measured in the same patch in cell-attached mode (≈100 nM Ca2+) were indistinguishable from gating currents measured in the presence of 5 nM Ca2+ after excision (Fig. 2A), as depicted by the superimposed voltage-activation curves (e.g., Fig. 2C). In three paired experiments, V½ values were, in the cell-attached mode, 167 ± 18 mV and, in 5 nM Ca2+, 172 ± 11 mV, which do not differ significantly. Thus, these results strongly suggest that hslo undergoes Ca2+-independent closed–closed transitions that lead to Ca2+-independent channel opening.
To understand the role of micromolar Ca2+ in the coupling between charge movement and pore opening, we investigated the effect of micromolar calcium on gating currents. G–V and Q–V curves shifted to more negative potentials after calcium was raised from “resting” (cell-attached; Fig. 3A) to micromolar calcium after excision (e.g., 85 μM in Fig. 3B). At 50 mV, practically no gating current was recorded in the cell-attached mode, whereas clear gating currents were recorded in 85 μM Ca2+ (Fig. 3C). In paired experiments, V½ values of Q–V curves shifted from 192 ± 18 mV in cell-attached to 135 ± 16 mV in 10 μM Ca2+ (n = 9) and to 105 ± 17 mV in 85 μM Ca2+ (n = 5). It seems therefore that even though Ca2+ is not needed to trigger the gating machinery or to reach the open state(s) (Figs. 1 and 2), micromolar amounts of Ca2+ promote these processes by switching the channel conformation to a state where it requires less voltage to open the gate. Consistent with this idea, Fig. 4 shows that the amount of charge moved (Fig. 4A) and the maximum amount of current flow (fig. 4B) are the same regardless of the [Ca2+]i. The mean ratio of charge moved in the cell-attached mode to charge moved in micromolar Ca2+ was 0.9 ± 0.1 (n = 10). Since Ca2+ does not change either the single-channel amplitude (i) or the number of channels (N) in the patch, the experiment in Fig. 4B indicates that the maximum open probability is reached in both conditions, Ca2+-independent (cell-attached) and Ca2+-modulated (micromolar Ca2+). To further corroborate this point, we measured noise fluctuations of ionic currents in cell-attached and in micromolar Ca2+ (Fig. 4 C and D). Maximum open probability was reached in both cases. Mean values were 0.78 ± 0.03 in cell-attached (n = 6), 0.76 ± 0.04 (n = 4) in 10 μM Ca2+ and 0.78 ± 0.03 in 100 μM Ca2+ (n = 3).
Our results suggest that MaxiK channels (hslo) can operate in two ways, a Ca2+-independent mode and a Ca2+-modulated mode, and that micromolar Ca2+ favors the switch to the Ca2+-modulated mode. In each mode the kinetic and steady-state properties may be described with a model with several closed (C) states (at least 10) with voltage-dependent transitions. The last three closed states would be connected in parallel to open states (O) with relatively slow C ⇌ O voltage-independent transitions. The relatively small Cole–Moore shift in hslo channel together with the crossing of the Q–V and G–V curves near their foot points that the charge carried along the initial C ⇌ C transitions is a small percentage of the total charge. The fact that the Q–V curve comes positive to the G–V curve indicates the presence of charged transitions among open states, which is in agreement with the overlap of the decay of the gating currents with the onset of the ionic currents for large depolarizations. In the Ca2+-modulated mode the equilibrium is shifted toward the open states. A modal type of gating for the Ca2+-dependent mode has been recently proposed for the Drosophila MaxiK channel, where slow fluctuations in open probability with time were observed (34).
We conclude that MaxiK channels possess an intrinsic voltage sensor whose activation is obligatory to open hslo channels and that open transitions also carry charge. Thus, MaxiK channels are not Ca2+-gated, as previously thought, but voltage-gated. Micromolar calcium transforms the channel from a Ca2+-independent mode into a Ca2+-modulated mode that requires less electrical energy to reach the open states.
Acknowledgments
The expression plasmid πH3-CD8 was kindly provided by Dr. Brian Seed (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston). We thank Dr. F. Bezanilla for discussions and his participation in the development of the fast acquisition system. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants to L.T. (HL-54970) and E.S. (GM-52203) by Fondo Nacional de Investigacion (FNI 94-0227 and 97-739), and by Catedra Presidencial (Chile) to R.L. This work was done during the tenure of L.T. of an Established Investigatorship from the American Heart Association.
ABBREVIATIONS
- MaxiK (or hslo)
large conductance calcium- and voltage-sensitive K+
- [Ca2+]i
internal calcium concentration
- MES
methanesulfonate
- TEA
tetraethylammonium
- Q-V
charge to voltage relationship
- G-V
conductance to voltage relationship
- SHP
subtracting holding potential
- TP
test pulse
- HP
holding potential
References
- 1.Crest M, Gola M. J Physiol (London) 1993;465:265–287. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Robitaille R, Garcia M L, Kaczorowski G J, Charlton M P. Neuron. 1993;11:645–655. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90076-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nelson M T, Cheng M R, Santana L F, Bonev A D, Knot H J, Lederer W J. Science. 1995;270:633–637. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5236.633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wong B S, Lecar H. Biophys J. 1982;39:313–317. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84522-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Moczydlowski E, Latorre R. J Gen Physiol. 1983;82:511–542. doi: 10.1085/jgp.82.4.511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.McManus O B, Magleby K L. J Physiol (London) 1991;443:739–777. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Salomao L, Wark G, Dubinsky W P, Schultz S G. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:C971–C974. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1992.262.4.C971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pallotta B S. J Gen Physiol. 1985;86:601–611. doi: 10.1085/jgp.86.5.601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Meera P, Wallner M, Toro L. FEBS Lett. 1996;382:84–88. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00151-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Atkinson N S, Robertson G A, Ganetzky B. Science. 1991;253:551–555. doi: 10.1126/science.1857984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Adelman J P, Shen K Z, Kavanaugh M P, Warren R A, Wu Y N, Lagrutta A, Bond C T, North R A. Neuron. 1992;9:209–216. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90160-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Papazian D M, Timpe L C, Jan Y N, Jan L Y. Nature (London) 1991;349:305–310. doi: 10.1038/349305a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Perozo E, Santacruz-Toloza L, Stefani E, Bezanilla F, Papazian D M. Biophys J. 1994;66:345–354. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(94)80783-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Adrian R H. Annu Rev Biophys. 1978;7:85–112. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.07.060178.000505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mannuzzu L M, Moronne M M, Isacoff E Y. Science. 1996;271:213–216. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5246.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Armstrong C M, Bezanilla F. Nature (London) 1973;242:459–461. doi: 10.1038/242459a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schneider M F, Chandler W K. Nature (London) 1973;242:244–246. doi: 10.1038/242244a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bezanilla F, Perozo E, Papazian D M, Stefani E. Science. 1991;254:679–683. doi: 10.1126/science.1948047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wallner M, Meera P, Ottolia M, Kaczorowski G, Latorre R, Garcia M L, Stefani E, Toro L. Recept Channels. 1995;3:185–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jurman M E, Boland L M, Liu Y, Yellen G. BioTechniques. 1994;17:876–881. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stefani E, Toro L, Perozo E, Bezanilla F. In: Handbook of Membrane Channels: Molecular and Cellular Physiology. Peracchia C, editor. San Diego: Academic; 1994. pp. 29–40. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rakowski R F. J Gen Physiol. 1993;101:117–144. doi: 10.1085/jgp.101.1.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schoenmakers T J, Visser G J, Flik G, Theuvenet A P. BioTechniques. 1992;12:870–874. , 876–879. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sigworth F J. J Physiol (London) 1980;307:131–142. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Heginbotham L, MacKinnon R. Biophys J. 1993;65:2089–2096. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81244-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cole K S, Moore J W. Biophys J. 1960;1:161–202. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(60)86882-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schoppa N E, McCormack K, Tanouye M A, Sigworth F J. Science. 1992;255:1712–1715. doi: 10.1126/science.1553560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Noceti F, Baldelli P, Wei X, Qin N, Toro L, Birnbaumer L. J Gen Physiol. 1996;108:143–155. doi: 10.1085/jgp.108.3.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Aggarwal S K, MacKinnon R. Neuron. 1996;16:1169–1177. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80143-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Seoh S A, Sigg D, Papazian D M, Bezanilla F. Neuron. 1996;16:1159–1167. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80142-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wallner M, Meera P, Toro L. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:14922–14927. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Stefani E, Toro L, Perozo E, Bezanilla F. Biophys J. 1994;66:996–1010. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80881-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Neely A, Wei X, Olcese R, Birnbaumer L, Stefani E. Science. 1993;262:575–578. doi: 10.1126/science.8211185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Silberberg S D, Lagrutta A, Adelman J P, Magleby K L. Biophys J. 1996;70:2640–2651. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79833-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]