Abstract
Soluble guanylyl/guanylate cyclase (sGC), the primary biological receptor for nitric oxide, is required for proper development and health in all animals. We have expressed heterodimeric full-length and N-terminal fragments of Manduca sexta sGC in Escherichia coli, the first time this has been accomplished for any sGC, and have performed the first functional analyses of an insect sGC. Manduca sGC behaves much like its mammalian counterparts, displaying a 170-fold stimulation by NO and sensitivity to compound YC-1. YC-1 reduces the NO and CO off-rates for the ∼100-kDa N-terminal heterodimeric fragment and increases the CO affinity by ∼50-fold to 1.7 μm. Binding of NO leads to a transient six-coordinate intermediate, followed by release of the proximal histidine to yield a five-coordinate nitrosyl complex (k6-5 = 12.8 s-1). The conversion rate is insensitive to nucleotides, YC-1, and changes in NO concentration up to ∼30 μm. NO release is biphasic in the absence of YC-1 (koff1 = 0.10 s-1 and koff2 = 0.0015 s-1); binding of YC-1 eliminates the fast phase but has little effect on the slower phase. Our data are consistent with a model for allosteric activation in which sGC undergoes a simple switch between two conformations, with an open or a closed heme pocket, integrating the influence of numerous effectors to give the final catalytic rate. Importantly, YC-1 binding occurs in the N-terminal two-thirds of the protein. Homology modeling and mutagenesis experiments suggest the presence of an H-NOX domain in the α subunit with importance for heme binding.
Nitric oxide (NO)2 regulates numerous vital functions in animal physiology, including blood pressure, memory formation, platelet aggregation, and tissue development (1). The primary NO receptor is soluble guanylyl/guanylate cyclase (sGC), a heterodimeric protein of ∼150 kDa that binds NO through a ferrous heme. NO binding stimulates cyclase activity, the production of cGMP from substrate GTP, and the subsequent amplification of NO-dependent signaling cascades (2–5). Although NO is the best described allosteric regulator of sGC, numerous other forms of regulation may also be of importance, including phosphorylation (6), nucleotide binding (7–10), calcium binding (11), nitrosylation (12, 13), and protein-protein interactions (14–17).
The primary form of sGC is an α1/β1 heterodimer composed of two evolutionarily related subunits that display several recognizable domains (Fig. 1A) (18). Heme is bound to the protein through proximal β1 His-105. NO binding to the heme leads to proximal histidine release and stimulation of cyclase activity, presumably through a change in protein conformation (reviewed in Ref. 19). The heme-binding domain has evolved from a widespread family of bacterial proteins called H-NOX (Heme-Nitric oxide/OXygen) domain proteins, of which the structures of three are known (20–22). The central portion of sGC contains two PAS domains (18, 23), and the C-terminal region contains a catalytic domain that is very similar to that of adenylyl cyclase (24, 25).
FIGURE 1.
sGC domain structure and YC-1. A, schematic diagram of Manduca sGC showing the domain structures of the α1 and β1 subunits. The predicted H-NOX, PAS (also called H-NOXA), coiled-coil, and cyclase domains are shown, along with the two truncated heterodimeric proteins prepared in the present study. B, structure of YC-1.
In the 1990s, the anti-platelet activity of YC-1, a benzylindazole derivative (Fig. 1B), was found to derive from its ability to bind to and stimulate sGC (26, 27), leading to a search for related compounds that might serve as sGC-targeted drugs for human health (28). The YC-1 mechanism of action remains unclear, as does the location of its binding site in the sGC protein. The nucleotide-like structure of YC-1, in conjunction with mutagenesis studies, has led to the suggestion that YC-1 binds to the cyclase domain (29), whereas cross-linking studies with YC-1-related compounds have indicated that they bind to the N-terminal domain of the α1 subunit (30).
Studies of insect sGC have lagged behind studies of the mammalian enzyme, but, as in mammals, insect sGC plays an important physiological role. In the Manduca sexta larva (tobacco hornworm), sGC is implicated in antennal lobe morphogenesis (31–33), and in the Manduca adult (hawkmoth), sGC is a key component for olfactory processing of odors (34–37). The development of insect cell expression systems for mammalian sGC proteins has facilitated mechanistic studies (38–40), but obtaining functional material in sufficient quantity remains a major difficulty in the field. Here we have developed Escherichia coli expression systems for both the full-length Manduca sGC heterodimer (msGC) and for two heterodimeric, N-terminal truncations (msGC-NT1 and msGC-NT2). Our analysis provides the first mechanistic results for an insect-derived sGC. We demonstrate that Manduca sGC behaves much like its mammalian counterparts and that binding of YC-1 occurs within the N-terminal portion of the protein.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Materials—Plasmid pCR®2.1-TOPO (Invitrogen) was used for cloning PCR products into the expression vector pETDuet1 (Novagen, Milwaukee, WI). PCR primers were obtained from Midland Certified Reagent Co. (Midland, TX). E. coli strain DH5α was the cloning host and E. coli strains BL21(DE3) pLysS and Rosetta(DE3) pLysS (Novagen) the expression hosts. 2-(N,N-Diethylamino)-diazenolate-2-oxide (DEA/NO) was the kind gift of Dr. Katrina Miranda. YC-1 was obtained from Cayman Chemical Co. (Ann Arbor, MI). All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma unless otherwise described.
Expression of Recombinant Manduca sGC in E. coli—Constructs for expression of full-length and truncated msGC α1/β1 (msGC-NT) in E. coli were prepared using the previously described clones obtained from a cDNA library of the Manduca prepupal abdominal nervous system (35). For the truncated constructs, DNA fragments corresponding to msGC α1 residues 1–471 (for msGC-NT1) or 49–471 (for msGC-NT2) and msGC β1 residues 1–400 (for both msGC-NT1 and -NT2) were cloned into vector pETDuet1, allowing for expression of both subunits from a single plasmid. The appropriate msGC α1 fragments were obtained from vector pET-28b-Mana1 by PCR amplification using primers 5′-ggatccgatgacgtgtccattcc-3′ (for msGC-NT1) or 5′-ggatccgctcactcttaagcatatgagtg-3′ (for msGC-NT2) and 5′-tcactcgcctagccaaagcctttt-3′. For msGC β1, the appropriate fragment was amplified from pET-17b-Manb1 with primers 5′-catatgtacgggtttgtg-3′ and 5′-tcactcgcctagccaaagcctttt-3′. For the full-length co-expression construct, primers 5′-ggatccgatgacgtgtccattcc-3′ and 5′-actagtcagtcatcatcctgctttg-3′ were used for α1 amplification, and the β1 gene was cut from pET-17b-Manb1 and ligated into pETDuet-1 using the NdeI and EcoRV restriction sites. The final constructs have a His6 tag fused onto the N terminus of the α1 subunit. All pETDuet-1-derived plasmids were verified by sequencing and transformed into BL21 (DE3) pLysS or Rosetta(DE3) pLysS competent cells for expression.
Mutations in the H-NOX domain were introduced by PCR using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), with the msGC-NT2 plasmid as the template. The primers used to generate the α1 L211A mutant were 5′-gaaccagtggcgtacgctttagtaggcagtctgaaag-3′ and 5′-ctttcagactgcctactaaagcgtacgccactggttc-3′. For the α1 T223A mutant, primers were 5′-gccatagcgaaacgactggctgatacacagacagac-3′ and 5′-gtctgtctgtgtatcagccagtcgtttcgctatggc-3′. Mutations were confirmed by complete sequencing of the genes.
Expression of soluble msGC-NT1 or -NT2 was carried out in the presence of 25 μm δ-aminolevulinate, a heme synthesis precursor. Cells were grown at 30 °C, induced with 0.5 mm isopropyl 1-thio-β-d-galactopyranoside, and harvested 6 h later.
Purification of Recombinant Manduca sGC from E. coli—All purification steps were performed at 4 °C. Cell pellets were suspended in lysis buffer (50 mm NaPO4, pH 7.0, 300 mm NaCl, 25 mg/ml DNase I, 2 mm MgCl2, 1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 mm benzamidine) and disrupted using a French press (1000 p.s.i.). Cell debris was pelleted by low speed centrifugation (GSA rotor, 12,000 rpm for 30 min) and ultracentrifugation (45Ti rotor, 40,000 rpm for 30 min). The clear supernatant was then loaded onto metal affinity resin (Clontech Talon cobalt or Qiagen Ni-NTA (Valencia, CA)) pre-equilibrated with phosphate-buffered saline (50 mm NaPO4, 300 mm NaCl, pH 7.0). The column was washed with 20 bed volumes of low concentration imidazole in phosphate-buffered saline or EDTA, and the protein was eluted with 150 mm imidazole in phosphate-buffered saline (cobalt) or 100 mm EDTA (Ni-NTA). Brown-colored fractions were pooled, concentrated, and loaded onto a Sephacryl S-200 size-exclusion column (GE Healthcare). Both msGC-NT1 and -NT2 proteins eluted as a major peak at ∼115 ml and were concentrated and buffer-exchanged into protein buffer (50 mm KPO4, pH 7.4, 100 mm KCl, and 5% glycerol) using a Vivaspin 6 concentrator (Sartorius Corp., Edgewood, NY). Protein concentration was estimated by absorption of the Soret band (see below). The procedure yielded 1–2 mg of highly pure protein per liter of cell culture. The proteins were stored at -80 °C.
Full-length msGC was expressed at a lower temperature (17 °C) in Rosetta(DE3) pLysS cells and purified in a similar manner as msGC-NT1 and -NT2, except that only a single metal-affinity column purification step was used because of difficulty with stability. The procedure yielded 0.5–1 mg of partially pure protein per liter of cell culture.
UV-visible Spectroscopy—Spectra were recorded on a Cary Bio50 spectrophotometer at room temperature at a scan rate of up to 600 nm/min. In a typical NO binding experiment, a 1-ml sGC sample was deoxygenated in a septum-capped cuvette with an argon stream (30 min), while stirring with a stir bar, before DEA/NO was added using a gas-tight syringe. A DEA/NO stock solution was prepared fresh in 10 mm NaOH and quantified by its absorbance at 250 nm using the extinction coefficient ε250 cm-1 = 8000 m-1, a value adjusted to account for incomplete release of NO (41). Complete degradation of DEA/NO was assumed to release two molecules of NO after 10 min. For CO binding, the sGC sample was purged with CO gas for 15–20 min before the spectrum was recorded.
Heme Soret Extinction Coefficient—Molar extinction coefficients were measured using the pyridine hemochromogen assay as described previously (42). The protein solution (700 μl) was mixed with 100% pyridine (300 μl), 5 n KOH (20 μl), and crystals of dithionite. The peak absorbance at 556 nm minus that at 700 nm was used to determine the hemin concentration, assuming an extinction coefficient of 32 mm-1 cm-1. NO and CO complex Soret band and all Q-band extinction coefficients were estimated by their ratio to the unliganded Soret band.
CO Dissociation Constants—The msGC-NT samples were placed in a septum-capped cuvette with minimal head space at room temperature (22 °C). Aliquots from CO-saturated protein buffer (50 mm KPO4, pH 7.4, 100 mm KCl, and 5% glycerol), assumed to be 1 mm in CO, were added to the cuvette and stirred for 10 min, and the spectrum was measured. When present, nucleotide (0.5–1 mm) or YC-1 compound (50 μm) was added before addition of CO. CO binding was measured by the shift in Soret band after accounting for dilution because of the addition of CO. This shift was estimated as A424–A437 times the dilution factor, except in the presence of YC-1, where A422 was used rather than A424. Data were fitted to a single-site saturation ligand binding model using SigmaPlot (SPSS, Inc., Chicago). For the wild-type protein in the presence of YC-1, titration was also undertaken in a cuvette with a 10-cm path length, using an RSM-1000 spectrophotometer (Olis, Inc., Bogart, GA), which yielded a value indistinguishable from that measured with the 1-cm cuvette.
Kinetics for Proximal Histidine Release—The rates for release of β1 His-105 upon NO binding to msGC-NT were measured at 10 °C by mixing msGC-NT and NO in an RSM-1000 stopped-flow spectrophotometer (OLIS, Inc.). Samples of msGC-NT (0.7–2 μm) were prepared by first deoxygenating protein buffer through bubbling of argon gas for 10 min, followed by addition of protein and additional deoxygenation with an argon stream placed above the solution for ∼30 min. The protein solution was then transferred to the instrument in a gas-tight syringe. NO solutions were prepared by addition of DEA/NO from a stock solution to argon-purged protein buffer in a gas-tight syringe and then connected to the stopped-flow device. Decomposition was allowed to proceed for 20 min at room temperature before transfer to the instrument, where the solution was allowed to equilibrate to the desired temperature (5 min). Absorbance changes (A420) were fitted to single or double exponential equations using SigmaPlot; values reported are the average and standard deviation of 5–7 consecutive measurements. For experiments with nucleotides or YC-1, the compounds were pre-mixed with the protein sample.
Kinetics of NO Release—Rates for denitrosylation of msGC-NT-NO were estimated using a dithionite/CO trap, as described (7, 43). A slight excess of NO (from DEA/NO) was added to an anaerobic msGC-NT sample prepared as described above, and a spectrum was measured to ensure saturation. Nucleotide or YC-1 was pre-mixed with the protein sample before NO addition. The trapping solution was prepared by bubbling CO gas (10 min) into a freshly prepared dithionite solution (Na2S2O4, 60 mm in protein buffer). Denitrosylation was initiated by mixing the trapping and protein solutions either in a stopped-flow device at 20 °C, or in a cuvette at room temperature (22 °C), and monitoring the change in absorbance (A424–A413 or A424–A412). Rate constants were obtained by fitting the relevant time interval to a single or double exponential equation, as appropriate. For the cuvette data, the first 100 s were discarded to remove the fast phase, which was better estimated in the stopped-flow experiment.
Kinetics of CO Binding and Release—CO binding rates were measured for a series of CO concentrations (0.05–0.5 mm) in a stopped-flow spectrophotometer by monitoring absorbance change (A424–A412) and fitting kobs versus [CO], which displayed the expected linear dependence for a monophasic process. Protein- and CO-containing solutions were prepared as described above. The second-order rate constants reported are for the slope and error from the linear fit.
CO release rates from msGC-NT-CO were measured by replacing released CO with excess NO upon rapid mixing in the stopped-flow device. One syringe contained msGC-NT-CO, and the second contained protein buffer saturated with NO from DEA/NO (∼2 mm). All reactions were performed at 20 °C, and YC-1, where included, was pre-mixed with the protein sample.
Guanylyl Cyclase Enzymatic Assay—The cGMP producing activity of msGC in cell lysates and metal-affinity column elution fractions was measured using an enzyme immunoassay kit (Cayman Chemical Co.), following the manufacturer's instructions. In a typical assay, 10 μl of reaction buffer (0.5 m HEPES, pH 7.5, 30 mm GTP, 60 mm MgCl2, 20 mm dithiothreitol) was added to protein sample for a total reaction volume of 100 μl. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 10 min and then quenched with 200 μl of 250 mm zinc acetate and 200 μl of 250 mm sodium carbonate. For experiments measuring NO-activated enzyme activity, protein samples were pre-mixed with DEA/NO before initiating catalysis by addition of reaction buffer.
Molecular Modeling of N-terminal msGC—Sequences of the α1 and β1 subunits of msGC were submitted to the Robetta structure prediction server for domain analysis using Ginzu (44). Three domains were predicted for each subunit as follows: an N-terminal domain predicted to be an H-NOX domain (20–22) (pdb-blast, confidence = 30 and 36 for the α1 and β1 subunits, respectively), a largely helical middle domain, and a C-terminal cyclase domain with homology to the catalytic domain of adenylate cyclase (pdb-blast confidence 52 and 47). A 25-residue sequence between the second and third domains in each subunit was identified as a possible coiled-coil region. The 50 N-terminal residues of the α1 subunit, which have no counterpart in the β1 subunit, were predicted to be disordered. Ginzu did not predict the PAS domains.
After domain analysis, the sequence of the α1 N-terminal domain (minus the 50 N-terminal residues predicted to be disordered) was submitted to the 3D-Jury Meta Server for structure prediction and initial model building (45). A template structure file was not specified. C-α models and alignments of α1 H-NOX with known H-NOX structures (Protein Data Bank entries 1XBN (21) and 2O09 (20)) were returned from several severs. All had very significant 3D-Jury scores (100–108). Full-atom models were built from these alignments using Modeler (46). The resulting models were nearly identical, varying only in the placement of a short insertion near the vacant heme cavity. The final model was minimized using NAMD (47).
RESULTS
Expression and Purification of Heterodimeric N-terminal Fragments of Manduca sGC—Studies on NO signaling have been limited by difficulties in obtaining sufficient quantities of intact sGC. To overcome this shortcoming, we pursued functional domains of sGC from M. sexta. Sequence analyses and homology modeling (described below) suggested boundaries for the C-terminal cyclase domains and N-terminal H-NOX domains of both subunits. Two constructs were prepared, msGC-NT1 (α1–471/β1–400), which lacks the cyclase domains and is expressed from a single plasmid, and msGC-NT2 (α49–471/β1–400), which is identical to msGC-NT1 except that it also lacks the putatively disordered N-terminal region of the α1 subunit (Fig. 1A). Both constructs produced soluble heterodimeric protein in an E. coli expression system, and both displayed identical functional behaviors, suggesting the α1 subunit N-terminal His tag did not affect activity; however, msGC-NT2 was the more stable of the two. Co-expression of both subunits and addition of heme precursor δ-aminolevulinate was required to produce soluble recombinant protein; expression of individual subunits or expression without δ-aminolevulinate led only to insoluble inclusion bodies.
Purification using the α1 subunit N-terminal His tag was complicated by a tendency of the protein to lose heme. This tendency was exacerbated by the imidazole in the elution buffer, because imidazole can coordinate to heme and facilitate its removal. Heme loss has long been known to occur in sGC during isolation. To circumvent this difficulty, we developed a purification procedure where sGC was released from the nickel-affinity column by the addition of EDTA, which chelates the nickel and releases the protein from the column. Rapid purification over nickel-affinity and gel filtration columns yielded ∼1 mg of >90% pure protein/liter of cell culture (Fig. 2A). The protein behaved as a heterodimer by size-exclusion chromatography and typically displayed an A433/A280 ratio of 1.2. Best stability for the protein was achieved under anaerobic conditions and bound to CO, where little change was observed over several days. Soret band degradation is seen with time in the presence of the reductant dithiothreitol but not in the presence of tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine.
FIGURE 2.
SDS-PAGE and UV-visible absorption spectra for msGC-NT2. A, purified msGC-NT2 (4 μg) visualized by SDS-PAGE (12%, stained with Coomassie Blue dye). B, electronic absorption spectra of purified msGC-NT2 (yellow), and its complexes with CO (blue) and NO (red). Inset shows the Q-band region of the spectra.
Truncated Manduca sGC Displays Typical Electronic Spectra— Truncated Manduca sGC heterodimers display Soret and Q-band absorption maxima that are typical for sGC proteins (Fig. 2B). The isolated protein has a broad Soret maximum centered at 433 nm, consistent with a high spin ferrous heme center. Binding of CO, which requires ferrous heme, shifts the Soret maximum to 425 nm and sharpens both the Soret and Q-bands, consistent with a low spin six-coordinate heme. The high purity of the protein allowed us to determine molar extinction coefficients for these bands, using the pyridine hemochromogen assay (Table 1). The resulting values were in good agreement with those reported for globins, nitrophorins, and full-length and β1 truncated mammalian sGC proteins (42, 48).
TABLE 1.
UV-visible absorption maxima and extinction coefficients for msGC-NT2
| Ligand | Soret | β | α |
|---|---|---|---|
| 433 (149 ± 2)a | 557 (20) | NDb | |
| CO | 425 (221) | 542 (21) | 572 (21) |
| NO | 400 (127) | 544 (19) | 574 (20) |
Wavelengths are given in nanometers, and extinction coefficients are shown in parentheses (mm–1 cm–1). The extinction coefficient for the unliganded Soret band was determined from direct measurement of heme content, with the error estimated from the standard deviation of four measurements. All other values were derived from the ratio of the absorption maximum to that of the unliganded Soret band
ND indicates not distinct
YC-1 Binding Increases the CO Affinity of msGC-NT—Small molecule effectors of sGC catalytic activity, including ATP, GTP, and the compound YC-1, have been described, but the binding site(s) for these molecules and their mechanisms of action remain unclear. The interface of the α1/β1 catalytic domains in sGC contains both a catalytic site and a second pseudo-symmetric site that has been suggested to be a regulatory binding site much like the forskolin-binding site in the related protein, adenylyl cyclase (10, 29, 49, 50). In contrast, cross-linking studies with the YC-1 related molecule BAY 41-2272 indicated binding was near α1 residues Cys-238 and Cys-243, well away from the cyclase domain (30).
To address this issue, we determined the effect of YC-1, ATP, and GTP on CO binding to msGC-NT1 and msGC-NT2, neither of which contains the sGC catalytic domain. CO binding to the full-length protein has been shown previously to increase dramatically in the presence of YC-1, leading to strong stimulation of sGC activity. CO binding to msGC-NT1 (not shown) and msGC-NT2 (Fig. 3) was monitored spectroscopically. Binding was similarly modest for both proteins in the absence of YC-1 and increased dramatically upon addition of YC-1 (Fig. 3 and Table 2). Addition of ATP and GTP (Table 2) or cGMP (not shown) had little effect on CO binding. We conclude that the major YC-1-binding site lies in the N-terminal two-thirds of the protein, away from the catalytic domain.
FIGURE 3.
Effect of YC-1 on CO binding to msGC-NT2. A, difference spectra for CO addition in the presence and absence of YC-1. Spectra were measured at room temperature for 1.5 μm protein in buffer containing 50 mm KPO4, pH 7.4, 100 mm KCl, 5% glycerol, and 50 μm YC-1 and were corrected for dilution by addition of CO-saturated buffer and for base-line drift (monitored at 700 nm). B, fitting of difference spectra to a single-site saturation model to obtain the CO dissociation constants ± YC-1 (Kd = 77 ± 7 and 1.7 ± 0.1 μm, respectively).
TABLE 2.
CO dissociation constants for msGC-NT2 measured by equilibrium titration
|
Liganda |
Kd for CO, μm |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| WT | α1 L211A | α1 Y223A | |
| 77 ± 7 | 45 ± 3 | 46 ± 5 | |
| ATP | 61 ± 6 | NDb | ND |
| GTP | 55 ± 4 | ND | ND |
| YC-1c | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 3.5 ± 0.2 | 3.1 ± 0.3 |
Ligand concentrations are as follows: ATP, 1 mm; GTP, 0.5 mm; YC-1, 50 μm. Protein concentration is 1.5 μm
ND indicates not determined
The wild-type (WT) value in the presence of YC-1 was measured in a 10-cm cuvette with a protein concentration of 0.15 μm at 22 °C
Kinetics of NO-induced β1 His-105 Release from Heme—The hallmark of sGC activation by NO is the release of β1 His-105 from the heme, leading to allosteric stimulation of cyclase activity. Elucidation of the details of this step has been hampered by insufficient protein and remains unresolved and controversial in the literature (7, 8, 19, 51). Of particular importance is the possibility that, beyond the NO-binding site on the heme, there is a second NO-binding site that affects both β1 His-105 release kinetics and allosteric stimulation of full-length sGC. We examined β1 His-105 release using stopped-flow spectroscopy (Fig. 4 and Table 3). Mixing of NO and msGC-NT1 led to rapid formation of a six-coordinate intermediate with an apparent Soret maximum of 420 nm. Because this step largely occurred in the mixing dead time (∼3 ms), the associated rate could not be accurately measured in our device. For the rat protein, this rate has been estimated to be >1.4 × 108 m-1 s-1 at 4 °C (52). Decay of the six-coordinate intermediate was relatively slow for msGC-NT1, however, and was readily monitored. For moderate NO concentrations, β1 His-105 release was ∼12 s-1 under all conditions. GTP, ATP, and YC-1 addition had no effect on this step (Table 3) nor did the kinetics of β1 His-105 release differ between msGC-NT1 and msGC-NT2 (not shown). Only under higher NO concentrations (>30 μm) was a change observed, leading to a small ∼2-fold increase in the release rate. Thus, the histidine release kinetics of msGC-NT exhibit neither the large NO concentration dependence described for the full-length rat protein (k = 2.4 × 105 m-1 s-1 (52, 53)) nor the sensitivity to nucleotide binding described for the full-length bovine protein (8).
FIGURE 4.
Kinetics for proximal histidine release examined by stopped-flow spectroscopy. A, transient spectra after NO-msGC-NT1 mixing. B, typical fitting of the change in absorbance (420 nm) versus time (10–1000 ms) using a single exponential decay model. Residuals of the fit are also shown. C, plot of the six-coordinate to five-coordinate conversion rate (k6-5) versus ln [NO]. A single msGC-NT1 sample (1 μm) was used for all measurements; [NO], 2.6 to 80 μm. Each value is the average of 3–5 measurements.
TABLE 3.
β1 His-105 release rates for msGC-NT1 upon binding NO Stopped-flow measurement with 0.7 μm msGC-NT1 and 4 μm NO (10 °C). Values for a single exponential fit of absorbance change (420 nm) were between 10 and 1000 ms.
| Liganda | k6-5 |
|---|---|
| s–1 | |
| 12.8 ± 0.4 | |
| ATP | 11.7 ± 0.8 |
| GTP | 12.3 ± 1.2 |
| YC-1 | 14.1 ± 1.8 |
Ligand concentrations are as follows: 1 mm ATP, 0.5 mm GTP, or 50 μm YC-1
YC-1 Decreases the Rate of NO Release from msGC-NT—We examined NO release from msGC-NT1 to further investigate the role of small molecule effectors on the protein and to uncover which step(s) in binding and release are altered by YC-1 binding. YC-1, ATP, and GTP have all been reported to alter the NO release rates from sGC (7, 54). To measure NO release, we mixed excess CO and dithionite with msGC-NT1-NO, allowing CO to replace NO while preventing NO rebinding through reaction with dithionite. In similar experiments with full-length rat (55) and bovine (54) sGC, binding of YC-1 or GTP led to an increase in NO release rates. In the experiments with rat sGC, two release phases were detected. Using msGC-NT1, we also found multiphasic release rates, but we were unable to capture the fastest of these through simple mixing in a cuvette, in contrast to the previously reported studies. Therefore, we employed both stopped-flow and cuvette-based spectrophotometric measures of release.
The resulting NO release behavior and associated rate constants are shown in Fig. 5 and Table 4. By itself, msGC-NT1 displayed two prominent phases by stopped-flow analysis, a very fast phase with rate constant of 0.1 s-1 (56% of the total amplitude) and a slower phase with rate constant of 0.0066 s-1 (44%). Analysis in a cuvette, after allowing for decay of the fast phase, was best fit with a single exponential, yielding a more robust value for the second phase of 0.0015 s-1. This value is ∼5-fold smaller than that reported for the first phase of the rat protein (55) and ∼3-fold larger than that of the single phase reported for the bovine protein (54). Addition of GTP or ATP had very little effect on msGC-NT1 rate measurements, whereas GTP or YC-1 greatly accelerated NO release for the full-length mammalian proteins (7, 54). To our surprise, addition of YC-1 to msGC-NT1 had a profound effect on NO release; the fast phase was completely eliminated leaving only the second phase in place. This result is clearly shown in plots of the absorbance change associated with CO formation; in the stopped-flow experiment, msGC-NT1-CO formation was markedly delayed when YC-1 was present (Fig. 5A), whereas in the cuvette experiment, the amplitude for the absorbance change because of msGC-NT1-CO formation was much greater in the presence of YC-1, because the loss of NO was not diminished by the fast phase, which was not observable in the cuvette experiment.
FIGURE 5.
YC-1 effect on denitrosylation of msGC-NT1-NO. A, to obtain the faster of the two release rates, msGC-NT1-NO (1 μm) was mixed with a CO/dithionite trap in a stopped-flow spectrophotometer (20 °C). Ligand concentrations (final) are as follows: ATP, 1 mm; GTP, 0.5 mm; YC-1, 50 μm. B, same reaction was carried out in a cuvette at room temperature to obtain the slower release rates.
TABLE 4.
Rates for NO release from msGC-NT1
|
Liganda |
Stopped-flowb |
Cuvettec |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| k1 | a1 | k2 | a2 | k2 | a2 | |
| s–1 × 10–3 | ×10–2 | s–1 × 10–3 | ×10–2 | s–1 × 10–3 | × 10–2 | |
| 101 ± 8 | 23 ± 3 | 6.6 ± 0.8 | 18 ± 1 | 1.5 ± 0.03 | 6.4 ± 0.04 | |
| ATP | 86 ± 9 | 22 ± 1 | 6.8 ± 0.6 | 20 ± 1 | 1.3 ± 0.03 | 7.0 ± 0.04 |
| GTP | 33 ± 5 | 19 ± 3 | 5.0 ± 1.1 | 31 ± 1 | 1.3 ± 0.03 | 6.3 ± 0.04 |
| YC-1 | 3.1 ± 0.3 | 27 ± 6 | 1.9 ± 0.01 | 17.9 ± 0.04 | ||
Ligand concentrations are as follows: ATP, 1 mm; GTP, 0.5 mm; YC-1, 50 μm
Data were measured by CO replacement/NO reduction with dithionite in a stopped-flow spectrophotometer. The data were fitted to a double exponential, k1 and k2 with amplitudes a1 and a2. Errors are from the fitting algorithm. For experiments including YC-1, only the slower phase was observed
Data were measured by CO replacement/NO reduction with dithionite in a cuvette. The data were fitted to a single exponential after 100 s to remove the faster phase
YC-1 Decreases Rates for CO Release from msGC-NT—We also examined CO binding and release to further characterize changes in the protein. CO release from msGC-NT1-CO was measured in a stopped-flow device by replacement with NO, which binds more quickly and more tightly to the protein. CO release was faster than NO release; nonetheless, the release rate was decreased dramatically (by ∼10-fold) by the addition of YC-1, much like with NO release (Table 5). In contrast to NO, however, CO had only one detectable release phase.
TABLE 5.
Rates for CO binding and release from msGC-NT1
1.5 μm sGC-NT1 in saturated CO ±50 μm YC-1 was mixed with 1.5 mm NO at 20 °C. Values are the mean ± S.D. of 3–7 measurements, each obtained from fitting a single exponential to ΔA424-412 (4-s interval). Similar values were obtained with 150 and 15 μm NO
Fast mixing of CO and sGC in a stopped-flow spectrophotometer. CO concentrations varied from 0.05 to 0.5 mm. Rates are the slopes of the linear fit for kobs versus [CO]
CO binding, unlike NO binding, was sufficiently slow for measurement in the stopped-flow device. The rate constants for CO binding were similar in the presence and absence of YC-1 (Table 5). The koff/kon ratios were similar to the measured values for Kd (71 versus 77 μm in the absence of YC-1 and 8 versus 2 μm in the presence of YC-1), indicating that our analysis strategy was valid. It should be noted that, for full-length sGC from bovine lung, Stone and Marletta (56) have reported that YC-1 binding has no effect on CO affinity or release rates, although Kharitinov et al. (57) have reported that YC-1 binding causes CO to bind 10-fold more tightly.
Functional Expression of Full-length Manduca sGC in E. coli— We were also able to express full-length α1/β1msGC in E. coli. As with the truncated protein, we expressed both subunits of the full-length protein from a single plasmid. Partial purification was achieved using an α1 N-terminal His tag, and yielded 0.5–1 mg of sGC protein per liter of cell culture, as estimated by the heme Soret absorption band. This value is likely an overestimation of total active protein, however, because the α1 subunit is extremely protease-sensitive and is partially degraded in our preparations.
Cyclase activity for msGC was measured using an enzymelinked immunoassay for the detection of cGMP (Fig. 6). The partially purified protein displayed a basal activity of 6.3 nmol of cGMP mg-1 min-1 and a maximal activity of 1058 nmol of mg-1 min-1, values that are 6–12-fold smaller overall than those reported for mammalian sGC proteins (7, 8, 29). The lower value we obtained is most likely because of having a mixture of full-length and α1-degraded material in the preparation, leading to overestimation of total intact protein from the Soret band absorption. However, the possibility that the intact Manduca protein is inherently less active then its mammalian counterparts cannot be ruled out.
FIGURE 6.
Cyclase activity of full-length Manduca sGC expressed in E. coli. The production of cGMP from GTP by partially purified msGC was measured using an enzyme immunoassay. The msGC concentration was estimated by Soret band absorbance using the extinction coefficient measured for msGC-NT2. Each point is the average of 3–4 measurements.
NO stimulation of msGC was similar to that of the mammalian proteins. Typically, NO stimulates mammalian sGC by 100–200-fold; in our study, NO stimulated the recombinant Manduca sGC by 135-fold alone and by 175-fold in the presence of YC-1 (Fig. 6). Importantly, YC-1 alone was also a potent stimulator of catalytic activity (Fig. 6). For maximal activity, msGC required both NO and YC-1, as has been generally reported for the mammalian proteins (29, 58–60), although one group has reported that only CO and YC-1, not NO and YC-1, are synergistic (56).
Mammalian sGC is inhibited by ATP, suggesting that the nucleotide is an allosteric regulator of the protein (7, 10, 61). When we examined inhibition of msGC, we found that 1 mm ATP, a physiologically relevant concentration (62), inhibited the enzyme by ∼70% in the presence of stoichiometric NO concentrations (Fig. 6). Overall, msGC behaves much like its mammalian counterparts, indicating our results with msGC-NT1 and msGC-NT2 are generally applicable for the entire sGC family.
Modeling sGC Functional Domains—The foregoing data confirm that YC-1 binding occurs in the N-terminal two-thirds of msGC. We reasoned that the regulatory effect of YC-1 might occur through binding to the α1 subunit in the region homologous to the β1 heme-binding domain, which has recently been recognized to have evolved from an ancient prokaryotic hemoprotein called H-NOX (20–22). We examined the domain structure of α1, searching for known folds using the Ginzu protocol as implemented in the Robetta server (see “Experimental Procedures” for details). This led to the prediction that α1 has an H-NOX fold between residues 51 and 247. A homology model of residues 61–234 based on Protein Data Bank entries 1XBN (21) and 2O09 (20) yielded a satisfactory fold with a dope score similar to that of the template structure 1XBN (Fig. 7).
FIGURE 7.
Model for the msGC α1 H-NOX domain. Shown is a ribbon drawing of the model for the α1 msGC H-NOX domain, indicating the predicted positions for the three residues mutated in the present study. The three residues lie near the position occupied by the heme in bacterial H-NOX proteins.
Based on this result, we hypothesized that a small molecule binding pocket might reside in the site equivalent to the heme-binding site in the H-NOX domain and that conserved residues in this region, such as α1 Leu-211 and Tyr-223 (Fig. 7), might be of importance in YC-1 binding. Therefore, we produced the msGC-NT2 mutants α1 L211A and Y223A. Both proteins were expressed in soluble form; however, heme loading was reduced in both mutant proteins, suggesting that a direct contact between α1 and heme might have been lost. YC-1 stimulation of CO binding was unaltered for the heme-intact portion of both mutated proteins (Table 2), and the precise location of YC-1 binding therefore remains unknown.
DISCUSSION
We have expressed functional heterodimeric full-length and truncated sGC from the tobacco hornworm (M. sexta) in E. coli, the first time this has been accomplished for sGC from any species. Both express as soluble, heterodimeric proteins with intact ferrous heme. The partially purified full-length protein shows behavior similar to its mammalian counterparts, including stimulation by NO and compound YC-1, and inhibition by ATP (Fig. 6). The specific activity of this material is 6–12-fold lower than that of its mammalian counterparts, most likely because of the presence of proteolytically degraded material in the preparation that retains heme but not catalytic activity. Truncated msGC, which contains the N-terminal two-thirds of both the α1 and β1 subunits but not the catalytic domains (Fig. 1), binds YC-1, which decreases release rates for both NO (Table 4) and CO (Table 5) and increases the binding affinity for CO (Table 2) and presumably NO (the NO dissociation constant is too small to be readily measured). In contrast, ATP, GTP, and cGMP have little effect on NO and CO binding to msGC-NT. Taken together, these results indicate that a specific binding site for YC-1 and related compounds lies away from the catalytic domain and is distinct from the allosteric site proposed for GTP, ATP, cGMP, and pyrophosphate (PPi). Below, we explore the implications of these results.
YC-1 Binding Alters the Heme Pocket—In the absence of YC-1, NO release from msGC-NT is biphasic, whereas in the presence of YC-1, release is monophasic because of loss of the fast phase (Table 4). Similarly, CO release from msGC-NT is 10-fold faster in the absence of YC-1 than in its presence, but only a single phase is observed (Table 5). YC-1 binding also leads to an ∼2-nm blue shift in the msGC-NT-CO heme Soret band (not shown), as reported previously for the full-length bovine protein (57), indicating a change in the heme pocket takes place. A Soret band shift is not observed in the absence of CO or in the presence of NO. Additionally, photolysis of CO from msGC-NT-CO in the presence of YC-1, but not in its absence, displays a large geminate recombination phase, where the photolyzed CO becomes trapped in the protein matrix and rapidly recombines with heme rather than escaping into bulk solvent.3 Taken together, these data suggest that YC-1 binding closes the msGC-NT heme pocket such that access to solvent is reduced.
An alternative possibility is that YC-1 binding changes electrostatic stabilization of the sGC NO and CO complexes. Elegant studies on myoglobin by Olson and co-workers (63, 64) indicate that dioxygen release is particularly sensitive to changes in distal pocket hydrogen bonding, and furthermore, discrimination between dioxygen and CO in myoglobin depends heavily on electrostatic stabilization of heme-bound dioxygen. However, their studies indicate that electrostatic effects have little influence on the release rates of NO and CO because of the apolar nature of the FeNO and FeCO moieties (63, 64). Thus, our results fit better with a model invoking steric trapping of the molecules.
One of two mechanisms is likely to give rise to a blocked heme pocket. First, direct blockage of the distal pocket by YC-1 would be consistent with the kinetic data and has been suggested previously (65), but it is inconsistent with the limited effects on the heme absorption spectra. Alternatively, and more likely in our view, is an allosteric model wherein YC-1 binding leads to a change in protein conformation that closes the distal pocket. That such a mechanism is possible despite the propensity for NO and CO to diffuse away is illustrated by the nitrophorins from the kissing bug (Rhodnius prolixus), which are used for NO transport during blood feeding (66). Binding of NO to the Rhodinius nitrophorin heme leads to desolvation of the distal pocket, due in part to the hydrophobic nature of the NO molecule, and to a large change in loop conformation (67), which hinders escape of NO from the heme (68–70). A similar mechanism can be envisioned for sGC.
Functional Interaction between α1 and β1 H-NOX Domains— The location of the YC-1-binding site in the N-terminal two-thirds of sGC is still unknown. To aid in the discovery of the binding site, we undertook molecular modeling, which led us to conclude that the α1 N-terminal region contains an H-NOX domain that is much like that for β1, but lacking bound heme (Figs. 1 and 7). Although the α1 domain is less conserved than the rest of the protein, a few conserved residues are present, including Phe-157, Leu-211, and Tyr-223. In the model, these residues lie in the region analogous to the β1 heme-binding pocket (Fig. 7) and are near α1 Cys-238 and Cys-243 in the human sGC sequence, which can be modified through photoaffinity labeling with a YC-1 analogue (30).
We reasoned that ligand binding in the α1 H-NOX pocket might have a regulatory effect much like that of heme binding in the β1 H-NOX domain, because of the symmetric domain structure of the protein, and therefore the α1 H-NOX pocket might represent the YC-1-binding site. We generated α1 mutant proteins L211A and Y223A to test this possibility. Neither mutation affected YC-1 binding (Table 2), but to our surprise, both mutant proteins lost heme affinity and could not be isolated with a fully intact heme pocket, suggesting that the α1 and β1 H-NOX domains contact one another and possibly even share heme binding. Interestingly, the recombinant rat β1 H-NOX domain exists as a homodimer in solution (71), consistent with our conclusion that the α1/β1 dimer shares an H-NOX interface. The binding site for YC-1, however, remains unknown.
Relation to Full-length Mammalian sGC—Marletta and co-workers (7, 55) and Russwurm and Koesling (8) have demonstrated that NO stimulation of mammalian sGC is increased in the presence of GTP (Marletta and co-workers) or Mg2+/cGMP/PPi (Russwurm and Koesling), presumably through conformational linkage of the cyclase and H-NOX domains. Additionally, Marletta and co-workers (7) and Sharma and co-workers (54) have reported that the off rates for NO increase in the presence of GTP. For msGC-NT, we saw no such effect with GTP (Table 4) or cGMP (not shown), indicating functional binding for these ligands most likely occurs only in the cyclase domain.
Mammalian sGC has been shown to have both high and low output forms that display spectrally identical five-coordinate Fe-NO complexes (7, 8, 55). Russwurm and Koesling (8) have argued that the high and low output forms of sGC arise from two different Fe-NO binding geometries, one with NO bound to the distal side of the heme (high output) and one to the proximal side (low output), displacing β1 His-105, in a geometry reminiscent of that for nitrosylated cytochrome c′ (72). Their data indicate that formation of the low output form only occurs in the absence of substrates or products. Marletta and co-workers (7, 55) have argued that high and low output forms of sGC represent two different conformations of the protein, differing in both catalytic rate and NO release rates and arising from a second NO-binding site that influences the rate of β1 His-105 release (52). In our hands, decay of the msGC-NT six-coordinate intermediate was quite fast (k6-5 = 12.8 s-1, see Table 3) and independent of NO concentration at moderate NO levels (Fig. 4), consistent with formation of the high output form of full-length sGC without binding of a second NO molecule or influence from nucleotide binding. We conclude that binding of a regulatory nucleotide or a second NO molecule, if they occur for msGC, must therefore take place in the C-terminal catalytic domain.
It should also be noted that, curiously, the opposite effect of YC-1 binding on NO release was recently found by Marletta and co-workers (55) for the full-length rat protein. In that study, two phases were also described for NO release, but YC-1, like GTP, increased the proportion of the faster phase and, to a lesser extent, increased the rate constants themselves. The authors proposed a model quite similar to ours, but opposite in direction; they suggest that GTP and YC-1 bind to the equivalent site in the catalytic domain, leading to an open conformation with faster release kinetics. In contrast, Koesling and co-workers (49, 58), by monitoring cGMP production in the presence of an NO scavenger, inferred decreased NO off rates for full-length bovine lung sGC when bound to YC-1, much as we see with msGC-NT, and Kharitinov et al. (57) reported that CO binds 10-fold more tightly to YC-1-ligated bovine lung sGC, again as we found for msGC-NT. Nonetheless, that a second YC-1-binding site exists in the cyclase domain is suggested by mutations to the catalytic domain that alter the response to the ligand (29, 49). Clearly, additional studies are required to resolve this complicated issue.
A Two-state Model for sGC Activation—In conclusion, we have demonstrated that msGC behaves much like its mammalian counterparts, and that YC-1 binding occurs in the N-terminal two-thirds of the protein and leads to a change in heme pocket conformation that is consistent with distal pocket closure. The simplest model for activation that emerges from these data is one in which the protein moves between two predominant conformations, “high output” and “low output,” such that multiple effector molecules, binding in multiple locations, can all shift the protein between the two states. In this respect, effector molecules for sGC act much like O2;CO2 and bisphosphoglycerate act on hemoglobin, where each molecule affects the equilibrium between R and T states but do so through binding, coordinating, or reacting at distinct sites on the protein. As with hemoglobin, the ever-expanding list of molecules suggested to influence sGC, including non-heme NO, CO, GTP, ATP, Mg2+/cGMP/PPi, YC-1, phosphorylation, nitrosylation, and protein partners, may all feed into a single conformational change pathway, with the sGC protein integrating all such signals to produce a final level of activity. In this model, release of β1 His-105 is unnecessary for sGC to achieve its high output conformation, but it is nonetheless favored when NO, with its strong trans effect, binds to the proximal heme site.
This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grants T32 CA09213 (to L. M.), R01 DC004292 (to A. N.), and R01 HL62969 and R01 GM077390 (to W. R. M.). This work was also supported by American Heart Association Grant 0515517Z (to X. H.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Footnotes
The abbreviations used are: NO, nitric oxide; sGC, soluble guanylate cyclase; msGC, sGC from M. sexta; msGC-NT1, msGC fragment missing the C-terminal cyclase domains but containing intact α1 and β1 N termini; msGC-NT2, msGC fragment missing the C-terminal cyclase domains and the N terminus of theα1 subunit; msGC-NT, either msGC-NT1 or -NT2; DEA/NO, 2-(N,N-diethylamino)-diazenolate-2-oxide; YC-1, 3-(5′-hydroxymethyl-2′furyl)-1-benzylindazole; Ni-NTA, nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid.
X. Hu, C. Feng, and W. R. Montfort, unpublished results.
References
- 1.Ignarro, L. J. (2000) Nitric Oxide Biology and Pathobiology, Academic Press, San Diego
- 2.Pyriochou, A., and Papapetropoulos, A. (2005) Cell. Signal. 17 407-413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Russwurm, M., and Koesling, D. (2004) Biochem. Soc. Symp. 71 51-63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Boon, E. M., and Marletta, M. A. (2005) J. Inorg. Biochem. 99 892-902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Martin, E., Berka, V., Tsai, A. L., and Murad, F. (2005) Methods Enzymol. 396 478-492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Meurer, S., Pioch, S., Gross, S., and Muller-Esterl, W. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280 33149-33156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cary, S. P., Winger, J. A., and Marletta, M. A. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 13064-13069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Russwurm, M., and Koesling, D. (2004) EMBO J. 23 4443-4450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yazawa, S., Tsuchiya, H., Hori, H., and Makino, R. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281 21763-21770 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chang, F. J., Lemme, S., Sun, Q., Sunahara, R. K., and Beuve, A. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280 11513-11519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kazerounian, S., Pitari, G. M., Ruiz-Stewart, I., Schulz, S., and Waldman, S. A. (2002) Biochemistry 41 3396-3404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Weichsel, A., Brailey, J. L., and Montfort, W. R. (2007) Biochemistry 46 1219-1227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sayed, N., Baskaran, P., Ma, X., van den Akker, F., and Beuve, A. (2007) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104 12312-12317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Balashova, N., Chang, F. J., Lamothe, M., Sun, Q., and Beuve, A. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280 2186-2196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Venema, R. C., Venema, V. J., Ju, H., Harris, M. B., Snead, C., Jilling, T., Dimitropoulou, C., Maragoudakis, M. E., and Catravas, J. D. (2003) Am. J. Physiol. 285 H669-H678 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Russwurm, M., Wittau, N., and Koesling, D. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276 44647-44652 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hanafy, K. A., Martin, E., and Murad, F. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279 46946-46953 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Iyer, L. M., Anantharaman, V., and Aravind, L. (2003) BMC Genomics 4 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Poulos, T. L. (2006) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 16 736-743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ma, X., Sayed, N., Beuve, A., and van den Akker, F. (2007) EMBO J. 26 578-588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nioche, P., Berka, V., Vipond, J., Minton, N., Tsai, A. L., and Raman, C. S. (2004) Science 306 1550-1553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pellicena, P., Karow, D. S., Boon, E. M., Marletta, M. A., and Kuriyan, J. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 12854-12859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ma, X., Sayed, N., Baskaran, P., Beuve, A., and van den Akker, F. (2008) J. Biol. Chem. 283 1167-1178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu, Y., Ruoho, A. E., Rao, V. D., and Hurley, J. H. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94 13414-13419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sunahara, R. K., Beuve, A., Tesmer, J. J. G., Sprang, S. R., Garbers, D. L., and Gilman, A. G. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273 16332-16338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Friebe, A., Schultz, G., and Koesling, D. (1996) EMBO J. 15 6863-6868 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ko, F. N., Wu, C. C., Kuo, S. C., Lee, F. Y., and Teng, C. M. (1994) Blood 84 4226-4233 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Evgenov, O. V., Pacher, P., Schmidt, P. M., Hasko, G., Schmidt, H. H., and Stasch, J. P. (2006) Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 5 755-768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lamothe, M., Chang, F. J., Balashova, N., Shirokov, R., and Beuve, A. (2004) Biochemistry 43 3039-3048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stasch, J.-P., Becker, E. M., Alonso-Alija, C., Apeler, H., Gerzer, R., Minuth, T., Perzborn, E., Pleiss, U., Schröder, H., Schroeder, W., Stahl, E., Steinke, W., Straub, A., and Schramm, M. (2001) Nature 410 212-215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gibson, N. J., Rossler, W., Nighorn, A. J., Oland, L. A., Hildebrand, J. G., and Tolbert, L. P. (2001) Dev. Biol. 240 326-339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gibson, N. J., and Nighorn, A. (2000) J. Comp. Neurol. 422 191-205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zayas, R. M., Qazi, S., Morton, D. B., and Trimmer, B. A. (2000) J. Comp. Neurol. 419 422-438 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Stengl, M., Zintl, R., De Vente, J., and Nighorn, A. (2001) Cell Tissue Res. 304 409-421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nighorn, A., Gibson, N. J., Rivers, D. M., Hildebrand, J. G., and Morton, D. B. (1998) J. Neurosci. 18 7244-7255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wilson, C. H., Christensen, T. A., and Nighorn, A. J. (2007) J. Comp. Physiol. A Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 193 715-728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Collmann, C., Carlsson, M. A., Hansson, B. S., and Nighorn, A. (2004) J. Neurosci. 24 6070-6077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Friebe, A., Wedel, B., Harteneck, C., Foerster, J., Schultz, G., and Koesling, D. (1997) Biochemistry 36 1194-1198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Brandish, P. E., Buechler, W., and Marletta, M. A. (1998) Biochemistry 37 16898-16907 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lee, Y.-C., Martin, E., and Murad, F. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97 10763-10768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Maragos, C. M., Morley, D., Wink, D. A., Dunams, T. M., Saavedra, J. E., Hoffman, A., Bove, A. A., Isaac, L., Hrabie, J. A., and Keefer, L. K. (1991) J. Med. Chem. 34 3242-3247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Maes, E. M., Roberts, S. A., Weichsel, A., and Montfort, W. R. (2005) Biochemistry 44 12690-12699 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kharitonov, V. G., Sharma, V. S., Magde, D., and Koesling, D. (1997) Biochemistry 36 6814-6818 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kim, D. E., Chivian, D., Malmstrom, L., and Baker, D. (2005) Proteins 61 Suppl. 7, 193-200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ginalski, K., Elofsson, A., Fischer, D., and Rychlewski, L. (2003) Bioinformatics (Oxf.) 19 1015-1018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sali, A., and Blundell, T. L. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 234 779-815 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Phillips, J. C., Braun, R., Wang, W., Gumbart, J., Tajkhorshid, E., Villa, E., Chipot, C., Skeel, R. D., Kale, L., and Schulten, K. (2005) J. Comput. Chem. 26 1781-1802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Karow, D. S., Pan, D., Davis, J. H., Behrends, S., Mathies, R. A., and Marletta, M. A. (2005) Biochemistry 44 16266-16274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Russwurm, M., Mergia, E., Mullershausen, F., and Koesling, D. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277 24883-24888 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Friebe, A., Russwurm, M., Mergia, E., and Koesling, D. (1999) Biochemistry 38 15253-15257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Roy, B., and Garthwaite, J. (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103 12185-12190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhao, Y., Brandish, P. E., Ballou, D. P., and Marletta, M. A. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96 14753-14758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ballou, D. P., Zhao, Y., Brandish, P. E., and Marletta, M. A. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99 12097-12101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kharitonov, V. G., Russwurm, M., Magde, D., Sharma, V. S., and Koesling, D. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 239 284-286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Winger, J. A., Derbyshire, E. R., and Marletta, M. A. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282 897-907 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Stone, J. R., and Marletta, M. A. (1998) Chem. Biol. 5 255-261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kharitonov, V. G., Sharma, V. S., Magde, D., and Koesling, D. (1999) Biochemistry 38 10699-10706 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Friebe, A., and Koesling, D. (1998) Mol. Pharmacol. 53 123-127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hoenicka, M., Becker, E. M., Apeler, H., Sirichoke, T., Schroder, H., Gerzer, R., and Stasch, J. P. (1999) J. Mol. Med. 77 14-23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Martin, E., Lee, Y. C., and Murad, F. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98 12938-12942 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ruiz-Stewart, I., Tiyyagura, S. R., Lin, J. E., Kazerounian, S., Pitari, G. M., Schulz, S., Martin, E., Murad, F., and Waldman, S. A. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 37-42 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Traut, T. W. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biochem. 140 1-22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Olson, J. S., and Phillips, G. N., Jr. (1997) J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2 544-552 [Google Scholar]
- 64.Phillips, G. N., Jr., Teodoro, M. L., Li, T., Smith, B., and Olson, J. S. (1999) J. Phys. Chem. B. 103 8817-8829 [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sharma, V. S., Magde, D., Kharitonov, V. G., and Koesling, D. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 254 188-191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ribeiro, J. M. C., Hazzard, J. M. H., Nussenzveig, R. H., Champagne, D. E., and Walker, F. A. (1993) Science 260 539-541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Weichsel, A., Andersen, J. F., Roberts, S. A., and Montfort, W. R. (2000) Nat. Struct. Biol. 7 551-554 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Maes, E. M., Weichsel, A., Andersen, J. F., Shepley, D., and Montfort, W. R. (2004) Biochemistry 43 6679-6690 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Andersen, J. F., Ding, X. D., Balfour, C., Shokhireva, T. K., Champagne, D. E., Walker, F. A., and Montfort, W. R. (2000) Biochemistry 39 10118-10131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kondrashov, D. A., and Montfort, W. R. (2007) J. Phys. Chem. B 111 9244-9252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Zhao, Y., and Marletta, M. A. (1997) Biochemistry 36 15959-15964 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Lawson, D. M., Stevenson, C. E. M., Andrew, C. R., and Eady, R. R. (2000) EMBO. J. 19 5661-5671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







