Abstract
Mismatch repair (MMR) is critical for preserving genomic integrity. Failure of this system can accelerate somatic mutation and increase the risk of developing cancer. MSH6, in complex with MSH2, is the MMR protein that mediates DNA repair through the recognition of 1- and 2-bp mismatches. To evaluate the effects of MSH6 deficiency on genomic stability we compared the frequency of in vivo loss of heterozygosity (LOH) between MSH6-proficient and deficient, 129S2 x C57BL/6 F1 hybrid mice that were heterozygous for our reporter gene Aprt. We recovered mutant cells that had functionally lost APRT protein activity and categorized the spectrum of mutations responsible for the LOH events. We also measured the mutant frequency at the X-linked gene, Hprt, as a second reporter for point mutation. In Msh6−/−Aprt+/− mice, mutation frequency at Aprt was elevated in both T cells and fibroblasts by 2.5-fold and 5.7-fold, respectively, over Msh6+/+Aprt+/− littermate controls. While a modest increase in mitotic recombination (MR) was observed in MSH6-deficient fibroblasts compared to wild type controls, point mutation was the predominant mechanism leading to APRT deficiency in both cell types. Base substitution, consisting of multiple types of transitions, accounted for all of the point mutations identified within the Aprt coding region. We also assessed the role of MSH6 in preventing mutations caused by a common environmental mutagen, ionizing radiation (IR). In Msh6−/−Aprt+/− mice, 4 Gy of X-irradiation induced a significant increase in point mutations at both Aprt and Hprt in T cells, but not in fibroblasts. These findings indicate that MutSα reduces spontaneous and IR-induced mutation in a cell-type dependant manner.
Keywords: loss of heterozygosity, mismatch repair, MSH6, MutSα, mitotic recombination, Aprt
1. Introduction
To maintain genomic integrity, DNA must be replicated with high fidelity. It is crucial to correct any errors made during DNA replication before these errors are converted into permanent mutations in progeny cells. Mutations introduced into critical genes such as those involved in DNA repair, apoptosis, or growth control could ultimately lead to tumorigenesis.
One set of genes critical to maintaining genomic stability and preventing tumorigenesis are those involved in the mismatch repair (MMR) pathway. MMR has been shown to correct errors made by DNA replication complexes by recognizing and repairing mispaired or extrahelical nucleotides. MutS complexes, either Msh2-Msh6 (MutSα) or Msh2-Msh3 (MutSβ), recognize mismatches consisting of either 1–2 bps or 2–5 bps, respectively [1]. MutS complexes are vital to initiating repair through recruitment of MutL complexes that conduct the excision of the unpaired nucleotide(s), resynthesis of the nascent strand, and ligation of the single-stranded gap. Therefore, lack of functional MutS subunit proteins, particularly MSH2 and to a lesser extent MSH6, results in a mutator phenotype. The mutator phenotype is associated with the etiology of certain hereditary diseases, such as familial pancreatic cancer, endometrial adenocarcinomas, and in particular, hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) [2–5].
MutSα has also been implicated in the suppression of recombination between divergent DNA sequences, as first demonstrated in bacterial conjugant crosses between E. Coli and Salmonella typhimurium. The interspecific recombination was elevated a 1000-fold in a mutS-deficient background [6]. In mammalian cells, MMR is potentially involved in heteroduplex rejection during recombination. The RecQ helicase, BLM, was observed to co-localize with MLH1 and MSH6 at DNA double-strand breaks [7, 8]. The hMSH2/6 complex was later demonstrated to stimulate BLM-mediated disruption of Holliday junction intermediates by seven-fold [9]. This interaction suggested that MutSα may regulate the activity of RecQ helicases to prevent mitotic recombination between “homeologous” chromosomes in vivo. We previously showed that mitotic recombination in vivo between homeologous chromosomes is increased in 129XC57F1 Mlh1 null mice [10].
MutSα has also been shown to be involved in the repair of DNA damage caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) [11]. One of the most common consequences of ROS exposure is the incorporation of oxidized nucleotides such as 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG or °G) into the genome. Mismatch repair has been shown to repair oxidative damage by lowering the level of 8-oxoGs that are incorporated into the genome, presumably by recognizing mismatches different from those recognized by BER [11]. While BER can initiate the repair of °G:A and °G:C mispairs, no such role has been demonstrated for processing other mispairs such as °G:T or °G:G. Perhaps MMR is responsible for correcting these single nucleotide mismatches through MutSα-mediated repair.
Ionizing radiation (IR) can cause base damage, such as 8-oxoG, single- or double-strand breaks [12, 13]. Double-strand breaks in S phase are primarily repaired by homologous recombination [14]. If MutSα regulates mitotic recombination (MR), then it could play an important role in preventing hyperrecombination in IR-exposed cells. MLH1 has already been demonstrated to suppress MR at the Aprt reporter gene in kidney cell lines exposed to 5.5 Gy 137 Cs-γ radiation [15].
To evaluate the effects of MutSα deficiency on genome stability under both spontaneous and stressed conditions, we utilized a murine assay to measure in vivo mutant frequency at an endogenous gene in Msh6−/− 129XC57F1 hybrid mice. T-lymphocytes and fibroblasts that had undergone in vivo LOH at Aprt in Msh6−/−Aprt+/−mice were recovered by their resistance to adenine analog 2, 6-diaminopurine (DAP). We then categorized the mutation spectra and calculated the frequency of different mutational mechanisms such as point mutation and mitotic recombination. Under normal conditions, we observed that MSH6 plays a strong role in the repair of base substitutions and, to a lesser extent, in the tissue-specific suppression of recombination between homeologous chromosomes. We also characterized the mutations arising in Msh6−/−Aprt+/− mice that were exposed to 4 Gy of X-irradiation. We observed that MSH6 prevented a wide spectrum of IR-induced base substitution again in a tissue-specific manner. Interestingly, cell survival in MSH6-deficient backgrounds was not increasing. These results suggest that MutSα is only critical for preventing IR-induced mutation in cell types that are more susceptible to this type of damage, but not critical for triggering apoptosis in response to this type of damage.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Mice
Aprt heterozygous mice, originally generated by gene targeting, were maintained in a 129S2 background [16]. The mutant (targeted) Aprt allele has a neo insertion in the third exon, making it distinguishable from the wild-type (non-targeted) Aprt allele. MSH6-deficient mice were kept in a C57BL/6 background [17]. A subset of these Msh6 mutant mice were backcrossed for four generations to 129S2 strain mice to generate N4129S2 Msh6+/−Aprt+/−mice. We analyzed three polymorphic SSR markers, D8mit155, D8mit190, D8mit75, located 1.0, 21.0, and 37.3 cM from the centromere of mouse chromosome 8 to ensure the AprtNeo -containing chromosome 8 was mostly, if not entirely, derived from the 129S2 background in N4129S2 Msh6+/−Aprt+/− mice. The N4129S2 Msh6+/−Aprt+/− mice were crossed with C57BL/6 Msh6+/− mice to produce 129S2 x C57BL/6 F1 hybrid mice.
For X-irradiation experiments, 129 x C57 F1 hybrid mice were exposed to 4 Gy ionizing radiation using a Torrex cabinet X-ray system (Faxitron, Wheeling, IL). Mice were whole-body irradiated at 7 weeks and sacrificed at 15 weeks.
2.2. Isolation and molecular characterization of mutant clones
The isolation and characterization of DAP-resistant (DAPr) cell colonies have been previously reported [18]. Briefly, ear fibroblasts and splenic T-lymphocytes from Msh6−/−Aprt+/− mice and Msh6+/+Aprt+/− littermate controls were plated into media containing 50μl 2, 6-diaminopurine (DAP). DAPr colonies were harvested and analyzed by allele-specific PCR to determine whether or not they lost (class I) or still retained (class II) the non-targeted Aprt allele. Class I clones were further assayed for genotypes at microsatellite marker loci on chromosome 8. This assay distinguished between mitotic recombination, gene conversion/deletion and loss of the C57 homolog. Class II clones were subjected to DNA sequencing of all five exons of the non-targeted Aprt allele to detect point mutations. Only mutations with clear consequences to the amino acid sequence where included in the spectrum. Mutation at the Hprt locus in Aprt wild-type mice was evaluated by clonal recovery of 6-thiogaunine (6-TG) resistant variants, as has been described [19].
3. Results
3.1. Elevation of spontaneously occurring mutations in T cells of Msh6−/− mice
To evaluate the importance of MSH6 in maintaining genomic stability, we measured the in vivo frequency of loss of Aprt heterozygosity that produced APRT-deficient cells. We found that the median frequency of DAPr clones in T-lymphocytes of Msh6−/− mice was 2.5-fold higher than that of Msh6 wild type control mice, 25.0 × 10−6 vs. 10.0 × 10−6 (P = 0.0132, Mann-Whitney U-test, Table 1).
Table 1.
Frequencies of DAPr-variants
| T cells | Fibroblasts | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IR (Gy) | Genotype | # spleens | C.E. (mean ± s.e.) | Median freq. | # ears | C. E. (mean ± s.e.) | Median freq. |
| 0 | Msh6+/+ | 14 | 4.55 ± 0.35 | 10.0 ×10−6 a | 33 | 1.14 +/− 0.05 | 23.0 × 10−6 c |
| 0 | Msh6−/− | 11 | 4.24 ± 0.83 | 25.0 ×10−6 a | 22 | 1.06 +/− 0.04 | 130.0 × 10−6 c |
|
| |||||||
| 4 | Msh6+/+ | 7 | 1.33 ± 0.12 | 19.0 × 10−6 b | 14 | 0.61 +/− 0.05 | 41.2 × 10−6 d |
| 4 | Msh6−/− | 10 | 1.04 ± 0.15 | 109.0 × 10−6 b | 20 | 0.54 +/− 0.04 | 124.0 × 10−6 d |
P-value = 0.0132;
P-value = 0.0037;
P-value=0.0002;
P-value=0.0023. Mann-Whitney U-test
C.E.: cloning efficiency, s.e. standard error.
To identify the types of mutational events that arise in the absence of MSH6, we divided DAPr clones into two groups based on the physical loss (Class I) or retention (Class II) of the untargeted Aprt allele. The physical loss of Aprt may be attributed to multi-locus events such as mitotic recombination, gene conversion or chromosome loss. The physical retention of the wild type Aprt, as determined by allele-specific PCR, indicates either point mutation or epigenetic events restricted to Aprt [18, 19]. Previous studies in our laboratory have consistently shown that the majority of the DAPr T cell clones in both inbred and F1 hybrid mice were class I [20, 21]. Analysis of polymorphic simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers along the length of chromosome 8 revealed that over 95% of class I clones arise by mitotic recombination (MR) in each study. In this study, we found that about half of the DAPr T cell clones isolated from Msh6+/+ mice were class I (Table 2). Consistent with previous findings, all class I clones analyzed from both control and Msh6−/− groups were due to mitotic recombination (data not shown). However, the vast majority of the DAPr T cell clones obtained from Msh6−/− mice were class II (70/84, 83%). This suggests that the overall increase in mutant frequency of DAPr T cells in MSH6 deficient mice was primarily due to either point mutation or epigenetic silencing at Aprt, not mitotic recombination.
Table 2.
Classification of DAPr-variants
| T cells | Fibroblasts | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IR (Gy) | Genotype | Class II/total | % Class II | Total mutant frequency a | Class I frequency | Class II frequency | Class II/total | % Class II | Total mutant frequency a | Class I frequency | Class II frequency |
| 0 | Msh6+/+ | 17/33 | 52 | 10.0 × 10−6 | 4.8 × 10−6 | 5.2 × 10−6 | 8/67 | 12 | 23.0 × 10−6 | 20.2 × 10−6 | 2.76 × 10−6 |
| 0 | Msh6−/− | 70/84 | 83 | 25.0 × 10−6 | 4.3 × 10−6 | 20.8 × 10−6 | 47/77 | 61 | 130.0 × 10−6 | 50.7 × 10−6 | 79.3 × 10−6 |
|
| |||||||||||
| 4 | Msh6+/+ | 8/20 | 40 | 19.0 × 10−6 | 11.4 × 10−6 | 7.6 × 10−6 | n/a | n/a | 41.2 × 10−6 | n/a | n/a |
| 4 | Msh6−/− | 71/84 | 85 | 109 × 10−6 | 16.9 × 10−6 | 92.1 × 10−6 | n/a | n/a | 124.0 × 10−6 | n/a | n/a |
Class I: physical loss of untargeted Aprt allele; Class II: physical retention of untargeted Aprt allele
from Table 1. n/a, not analyzed
To test if MSH6 suppresses point mutation globally, we also estimated the mutant frequency at the X-linked Hprt locus. This gene serves as a reporter for point mutation and small deletions given that it is functionally hemizygous. In our study, T cell colonies resistant to 6-thiogaunine (6-TG) were isolated from Msh6−/−Aprt+/+ mice or wild type littermates. The median frequency of 6-TGr T cells was 11.7-fold higher in the MSH6-deficient vs. proficient group, 21.0 ×10−6 vs. 1.8 ×10−6 (P = 0.0078, Mann-Whitney U-test), suggesting that point mutation is also increased at this locus (Table 3).
Table 3.
Frequencies of Hprt mutants
| T cells | Fibroblasts | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IR (Gy) | Genotype | # spleens | C.E. (mean ± s.e.) | Median freq. | # ears | C.E. (mean ± s.e.) | Median freq. |
| 0 | Msh6+/+ | 8 | 5.2 ±.04 | 1.8 × 10−6 a | 16 | 1.20 ±.05 | 3.1 ×10−6 |
| 0 | Msh6−/− | 9 | 5.8 ±.09 | 21.0 × 10−6 a | 22 | 1.20 ±.04 | 21.0 ×10−6 |
|
| |||||||
| 4 | Msh6+/+ | 10 | 1.24 ±.14 | 38.0 × 10−6 b | 12 | 0.55 ±.04 | 16.0 ×10−6 c |
| 4 | Msh6−/− | 7 | 1.34 ±.24 | 190.0 × 10−6 b | 14 | 0.63 ±.04 | 52.0 ×10−6 c |
P-value = 0.0078;
P-value = 0.0004;
P-value=0.0166. Mann-Whitney U-test
C.E.: cloning efficiency
3.2. IR induces more mutations in T cells of Msh6−/− mice
To evaluate the role of MSH6 in correcting DNA damage from ionizing radiation, we measured the frequency of 6-TGr T cells from Msh6−/− and Msh6+/+ mice. In wild type T cells, IR induced a 20.1-fold higher 6-TGr frequency compared to untreated cells, 36.2 × 10−6 vs. 1.8 × 10−6 respectively (Table 3). This indicates that Hprt is a sensitive reporter for IR-induced DNA damage. In Msh6−/− T cells, IR induced an 8-fold higher 6-TGr frequency compared to untreated Msh6−/− T cells, 169.0 ×10−6 vs. 21.0 ×10−6 (Table 3). The induced mutant frequency in IR-treated Msh6−/− T cells was elevated 4.7-fold compared to IR-treated wild type controls, 169.0 × 10−6 vs. 36.2 ×10−6 respectively when subtracting out corresponding spontaneous frequencies (Table 3). This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0004, Mann-Whitney U-test). This indicates that MSH6 is critical in reducing IR-induced mutations in this cell type at Hprt.
In order to determine if the observations in MSH6-deficient cells were unique to Hprt, we measured the mutation frequency at Aprt. In T cells, IR-treatment induced a 9.3-fold higher DAPr frequency in MSH6-deficient vs. MSH6-proficient cells, 84.0 ×10−6 vs. 9.0 ×10−6 respectively when correcting for spontaneous mutation (Table 1). IR-treated wild type T cells had a DAPr frequency that was slightly higher than in untreated wild type cells, 19.0 ×10−6 vs. 10.0 ×10−6. However, this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0184, Mann-Whitney U-test). In IR-treated Msh6−/− T cells, we observed an induction of DAPr frequency that was 3.4-fold over the untreated Msh6−/− T cells, 84.0 × 10−6 vs. 25.0 × 10−6 (P =.0262, Mann-Whitney U-test). Thus, MSH6 plays a critical role in suppressing IR-induced mutation in T cells.
3.3 Most IR-induced mutations in T cells of Msh6−/− mice are base substitutions
In IR-treated wild type T cells, class I colonies made up 60% (12/20) of the total DAPr clones we isolated (Table 2). In IR-treated Msh6−/− T cells, Class I mutations made up only 15.5% (13/84) of the total DAPr colonies isolated. Subtracting the spontaneous class II mutant frequency 20.8 × 10−6, the absolute class II mutant frequency induced by irradiation in MSH6-deficient T cells was 71.3 × 10−6. This induced frequency was 29.7-fold higher than the induced mutant frequency in MSH6-proficient T cells, 71.3 ×10−6 vs. 2.4 ×10−6 (Table 2), indicating that MSH6 primarily suppresses IR-induced class II mutations.
Class II mutations were predominantly responsible for the elevated mutant frequency in Msh6−/− T cells (Table 2). Therefore, we further classified DAP-resistant class II colonies by sequencing all five exons of Aprt. Of the 32 clones analyzed, 23 had sequence alterations within a coding region. These alterations consisted of 14 transitions, 7 transversions, 1 single base-pair insertion, and 1 single base-pair deletion (Table 4). All the mutations reported here are unique and alter the amino acid sequence of APRT. Transitions accounted for 61% and transversions for 30% of DNA alterations (Table 4). Frameshift mutations accounted for the remaining 9%. The distribution of mutations in IR-treated mice was similar to what was observed in untreated mice. We then calculated the frequency of each type of mutation in treated and untreated spleens for a side-by-side comparison. We observed a proportional increase of each type of base substitution in treated group ranging from 3.4-fold to 5.6-fold (data not shown). Therefore, MSH6 prevents a wide range of IR-induced base substitutions in T cells.
Table 4.
Spectrum of DAPr class II mutants
| T cells | Fibroblasts | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| IR-treated | Untreated | Untreated | |
| Alterations detected | 23 | 16 | 18 |
| Clones analyzed | 32 | 25 | 21 |
| % | 72 | 64 | 86 |
|
|
|||
| Transitions (%) | 14 (61) | 10 (63) | 16 (89) |
| T>C | 5 (22) | 3 (19) | 5 (28) |
| C>T | 4 (17) | 3 (19) | 5 (28) |
| A>G | 1 (4) | 1 (6) | 0 |
| G>A | 4 (17) | 3 (19) | 6 (33) |
| Transversions (%) | 7 (30) | 6 (38) | 2 (11) |
| T>A | 1 (4) | 1 (6) | 0 |
| G>C | 1 (4) | 1 (6) | 0 |
| C>A | 1 (4) | 1 (6) | 0 |
| G>T | 4 (17) | 3 (19) | 2 (11) |
| Frameshifts (%) | 2 (9) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| (+1) IDL’s | 2 | 0 | 0 |
3.4 Spontaneous base substitutions and, to a lesser extent, mitotic recombination are increased in fibroblasts of Msh6−/− mice
As mentioned earlier, the role of mismatch repair in reducing point mutation has been demonstrated in a wide variety of experimental assays and animal models. However, the lack of functional MMR has only been implicated in causing cancer in certain tissue types, particularly colonic epithelium [24]. In order to identify possible tissue-specific differences in the types of mutations suppressed by MSH6, we compared the mutant frequencies of 6-TGr and DAPr clones in ear fibroblasts of MSH6-deficient and proficient mice. MSH6-deficient fibroblasts had a 6.8-fold higher 6-TGr frequency compared to wild type controls, 21.0 × 10−6 vs. 3.1 ×10−6 respectively (Table 3). This difference was statistically significant by a chi-square test of the number of 6-TGr clones isolated divided by the total number of viable cells in each group (Msh6+/+: 2/646,184; Msh6−/−: 18/854,481; P =.0058).
We also observed a significant 5.7-fold elevation in DAPr mutant frequency in Msh6−/−Aprt+/− mice vs. Msh6+/+Aprt+/− mice (130.0 × 10−6 vs. 23.0 ×10−6 respectively, P =.0002, Mann-Whitney U-test, Table 1). Class II variants again accounted for the majority of clones isolated from Msh6−/−Aprt+/− fibroblasts (47/77, 61%, Table 2). Class I events accounted for the majority of the total in the control group (88%, Table 2). This is comparable to our previous studies in Mlh1+/+ in which class I clones accounted for 67% of DAPr fibroblasts (10). Also consistent with our previous studies in MMR-proficient fibroblasts, all class I fibroblasts arose by mitotic recombination based on the observed pattern of loss of microsatellite markers on chromosome 8 (data not shown).
We sequenced all five exons of the non-targeted Aprt allele in class II fibroblast variants. As mentioned earlier, class II variants can arise either by intragenic mutation or epigenetic inactivation. Past studies using our assay indicated that epigenetic silencing accounts for a majority of class II events fibroblasts in wild type mice, with only 9 DNA sequence alterations identified out of 42 total clones (data not published). In Msh6−/−mice, however, intragenic alterations in coding sequences were identified in 18 of 21 fibroblast clones analyzed (84%). Base substitutions accounted for all 18 of those mutations. Of the 18 identified mutations, 10 were unique and consisted of three of the four possible types of transitions (Table 4).
3.5 Fibroblasts are less sensitive to IR-induced mutagenesis
We next assessed the effects on 4 Gy ionizing radiation on the fibroblasts of Msh6+/+Aprt+/− and Msh6+/+Aprt+/− using the same approach carried out for T cells. IR-treatment induced a 1.8-fold higher mutant frequency in wild type fibroblasts compared to untreated fibroblasts, 41.0 × 10−6 vs. 23.0 ×10−6 respectively (Table 1). However, this increase was not statistically significant (P = 0.0559, Mann-Whitney U-test). Ionizing radiation also had no apparent effect on fibroblasts in Msh6−/−Aprt+/−mice. DAPr frequencies in treated and untreated MSH6-deficienct fibroblasts were 124.0 ×10−6 and 130 ×10−6, respectively (Table 1). This suggests that fibroblasts are relatively insensitive to IR-induced mutagenesis at Aprt, even when MSH6 is absent.
In order to determine if our observations with IR-treated, MSH6-deficient mice were unique to Aprt, we also measured the mutation frequency at Hprt. IR induced a 2.4-fold higher mutant frequency in Msh6−/− fibroblasts compared to wild type controls, 31.0 ×10−6 vs. 12.9 ×10−6 when correcting for spontaneous mutation (Table 3). Ionizing radiation increased the mutant frequency at Hprt 5-fold in wild type fibroblasts (Table 3). In IR-treated Msh6−/− fibroblasts, the mutant frequency was 2.5-fold higher than that of untreated Msh6−/− fibroblasts, 52.0 ×10−6 vs. 21.0 ×10−6 (Table 3). This 2.5-fold increase in fibroblasts is modest when considering that IR treatment increased Hprt mutant frequency 9-fold in Msh6−/− T cells compared to untreated Msh6−/− T cells (Table 3). This was also the case at Aprt (see above), indicating that MSH6 is more important in preventing mutations in T cells than in fibroblasts.
4. Discussion
4.1 Evidence of functional redundancy for MutS complexes
Bacteria have one protein, mutS, which recognizes mismatches of one or multiple nucleotides. This protein functionally suppresses both base substitutions and frameshifts of one or more base pairs [1]. Eukaryotic cells have evolved two complexes to presumably split these duties. MutSα has been proposed to prevent base substitutions and MutSβ to prevent frameshifts of two or more base pairs. However, both complexes have been implicated in preventing 1-bp frameshifts, but few studies have addressed whether or not this function is completely redundant. One study showed that MutSα plays a stronger role than MutSβ in correcting 1-bp IDL’s within the transgenic reporter, supFG1 [25]. Our data obtained from an endogenous reporter gene showed that loss of MutSα, via MSH6-deficiency, does not result in a relatively large increase in 1-bp IDL’s compared to wild type mice, even after exposure to 4 Gy of IR. This is consistent with studies measuring spontaneous mutant frequencies within the transgenic reporters cII and lacI in MSH6-deficient mice, as well as in results in vitro [17, 25, 26]. This suggests that MutSα and MutSβ complexes can prevent 1-bp frameshifts independently in mammalian cells. Perhaps mammalian cells evolved this redundancy to combat an increased rate of these types of lesions under certain environmental conditions.
4.2 MMR is more important in certain cell types
The role of MutSα in recognizing certain types of mismatched nucleotides is well conserved between yeast, mice, and human cell lines. Our work indicates that MutSα at least plays a role in preventing base substitutions. However, the role of MutS complexes in suppressing recombination has been previously studied without taking tissue-specificity into account. We found that MSH6 suppressed spontaneous mitotic recombination in fibroblasts (Table 2). We, however, did not observe such a role for MSH6 in T cells (Table 2). Tissue-specific suppression of spontaneous mitotic recombination by MMR has previously been reported in Mlh1−/− mice (10), we observed that that MSH6 suppresses mitotic recombination in a similar manner. These findings raise an issue not testable by studies in lower organisms or cell lines. What are the tissue-dependant factors that make MMR necessary for preventing mutation in some cell types but not others?
One recent review article highlighted several tissue-specific factors that could explain why MMR-deficient tumors only arise in certain cell types. Such factors included high cell turnover, higher exposure to environmental stress, or hormonally-triggered cell growth [24]. Our work showed that MSH6 prevented IR-induced mutations in T cells, but not in fibroblasts. T cells are known to undergo apoptosis and repopulation (presumably from hematopoietic stem cells) after IR-exposure [27]. Fibroblasts, by contrast, arrest in Go 24 hours after IR-treatment [28]. It is likely that MutSα is not important for repairing IR-induced DNA damage in cell types that arrest after damage since DNA is not actively replicating. This could explain why we observed no increase in mutant frequency at Aprt in fibroblasts of Msh6−/− mice after their exposure to IR (Table 1), and only a relatively small increase at Hprt (Table 3).
4.3 MutSα does not trigger IR-induced apoptosis
Another possible tissue-dependant factor could be that MutSα plays a stronger role in triggering apoptosis in T cells in response to environmental DNA damage. Both MLH1 and MSH2-dependant apoptosis in response to mutagenic agents has been demonstrated in both cell lines and mouse tissues [29–31]. Perhaps the absence of MutSα allowed mutated T cells to propagate due to increased survivability. This could explain the wide range of base substitutions observed in class II DAPr clones isolated from IR-treated Msh6−/− T cells (table 4). However, the mean cloning efficiencies of IR-treated MSH6-proficient and deficient T cells in both the Aprt and Hprt studies were very similar (Tables 1 and 3). This is consistent with cell survival studies in Msh6−/− mouse ES cells exposed to UVC light [32]. MSH6 has been implicated in triggering apoptosis in mouse embryonic fibroblasts exposed to UVB light [33]. However, as in T cells, there was no increase in ear fibroblast survival in IR-treated Msh6−/− mice (Tables 1 and 3). This suggests that MutSα is not important for triggering apoptosis in response to certain environmental agents such as ionizing radiation.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01ES011633 and P30ES005022) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNG05GN24G).
Abbreviations
- Aprt
adenine phosphoribosyltransferase
- DSB
double-strand break
- Hprt
hypoxanthineguanine phosphoribosyltransferase
- IR
ionizing radiation
- MF
mutant frequency
- MMR
mismatch repair
- MR
mitotic recombination
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Reference List
- 1.Kunkel TA, Erie DA. DNA mismatch repair. Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74:681–710. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schofield MJ, Hsieh P. DNA mismatch repair: molecular mechanisms and biological function. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2003;57:579–608. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Heinen CD, Schmutte C, Fishel R. DNA repair and tumorigenesis: lessons from hereditary cancer syndromes. Cancer Biol Ther. 2002;1:477–485. doi: 10.4161/cbt.1.5.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Habbe N, Langer P, Sina-Frey M, Bartsch DK. Familial pancreatic cancer syndromes. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2006;35:417–30. xi. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2006.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Banno K, Susumu N, Yanokura M, Hirao T, Iwata T, Hirasawa A, Aoki D, Sugano K, Nozawa S. Association of HNPCC and endometrial cancers. Int J Clin Oncol. 2004;9:262–269. doi: 10.1007/s10147-004-0402-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rayssiguier C, Thaler DS, Radman M. The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants. Nature. 1989;342:396–401. doi: 10.1038/342396a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Langland G, Kordich J, Creaney J, Goss KH, Lillard-Wetherell K, Bebenek K, Kunkel TA, Groden J. The Bloom’s syndrome protein (BLM) interacts with MLH1 but is not required for DNA mismatch repair. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:30031–30035. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M009664200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pedrazzi G, Bachrati CZ, Selak N, Studer I, Petkovic M, Hickson ID, Jiricny J, Stagljar I. The Bloom’s syndrome helicase interacts directly with the human DNA mismatch repair protein hMSH6. Biol Chem. 2003;384:1155–1164. doi: 10.1515/BC.2003.128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yang Q, Zhang R, Wang XW, Linke SP, Sengupta S, Hickson ID, Pedrazzi G, Perrera C, Stagljar I, Littman SJ, Modrich P, Harris CC. The mismatch DNA repair heterodimer, hMSH2/6, regulates BLM helicase. Oncogene. 2004;23:3749–3756. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shao C, Deng L, Chen Y, Kucherlapati R, Stambrook PJ, Tischfield JA. Mlh1 mediates tissue-specific regulation of mitotic recombination. Oncogene. 2004;23:9017–9024. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Colussi C, Parlanti E, Degan P, Aquilina G, Barnes D, Macpherson P, Karran P, Crescenzi M, Dogliotti E, Bignami M. The mammalian mismatch repair pathway removes DNA 8-oxodGMP incorporated from the oxidized dNTP pool. Curr Biol. 2002;12:912–918. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00863-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Goldberg Z, Lehnert BE. Radiation-induced effects in unirradiated cells: a review and implications in cancer. Int J Oncol. 2002;21:337–349. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hall J, Angele S. Radiation, DNA damage and cancer. Mol Med Today. 1999;5:157–164. doi: 10.1016/s1357-4310(99)01435-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Thompson LH, Schild D. Recombinational DNA repair and human disease. Mutat Res. 2002;509:49–78. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(02)00224-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang Q, Ponomareva ON, Lasarev M, Turker MS. High frequency induction of mitotic recombination by ionizing radiation in Mlh1 null mouse cells. Mutat Res. 2006;594:189–198. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Engle SJ, Stockelman MG, Chen J, Boivin G, Yum MN, Davies PM, Ying MY, Sahota A, Simmonds HA, Stambrook PJ, Tischfield JA. Adenine phosphoribosyltransferase-deficient mice develop 2,8-dihydroxyadenine nephrolithiasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:5307–5312. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.11.5307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Edelmann W, Yang K, Umar A, Heyer J, Lau K, Fan K, Liedtke W, Cohen PE, Kane MF, Lipford JR, Yu N, Crouse GF, Pollard JW, Kunkel T, Lipkin M, Kolodner R, Kucherlapati R. Mutation in the mismatch repair gene Msh6 causes cancer susceptibility. Cell. 1997;91:467–477. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80433-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shao C, Deng L, Henegariu O, Liang L, Raikwar N, Sahota A, Stambrook PJ, Tischfield JA. Mitotic recombination produces the majority of recessive fibroblast variants in heterozygous mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:9230–9235. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.16.9230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shao C, Yin M, Deng L, Stambrook PJ, Doetschman T, Tischfield JA. Loss of heterozygosity and point mutation at Aprt locus in T cells and fibroblasts of Pms2−/−mice. Oncogene. 2002;21:2840–2845. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shao C, Stambrook PJ, Tischfield JA. Mitotic recombination is suppressed by chromosomal divergence in hybrids of distantly related mouse strains. Nat Genet. 2001;28:169–172. doi: 10.1038/88897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liang L, Deng L, Shao C, Stambrook PJ, Tischfield JA. In vivo loss of heterozygosity in T-cells of B6C3F1 Aprt(+/−) mice. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2000;35:150–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tauchi H, Komatsu K, Ishizaki K, Yatagai F, Kato T. Mutation spectrum of MSH3-deficient HHUA/chr. 2 cells reflects in vivo activity of the MSH3 gene product in mismatch repair. Mutat Res. 2000;447:155–164. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(99)00199-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Edelmann W, Umar A, Yang K, Heyer J, Kucherlapati M, Lia M, Kneitz B, Avdievich E, Fan K, Wong E, Crouse G, Kunkel T, Lipkin M, Kolodner RD, Kucherlapati R. The DNA mismatch repair genes Msh3 and Msh6 cooperate in intestinal tumor suppression. Cancer Res. 2000;60:803–807. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chao EC, Lipkin SM. Molecular models for the tissue specificity of DNA mismatch repair-deficient carcinogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:840–852. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hegan DC, Narayanan L, Jirik FR, Edelmann W, Liskay RM, Glazer PM. Differing patterns of genetic instability in mice deficient in the mismatch repair genes Pms2, Mlh1, Msh2, Msh3 and Msh6. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27:2402–2408. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgl079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mark SC, Sandercock LE, Luchman HA, Baross A, Edelmann W, Jirik FR. Elevated mutant frequencies and predominance of G:C to A:T transition mutations in Msh6(−/−) small intestinal epithelium. Oncogene. 2002;21:7126–7130. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wyllie AH, Kerr JF, Currie AR. Cell death: the significance of apoptosis. Int Rev Cytol. 1980;68:251–306. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62312-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhou T, Chou JW, Simpson DA, Zhou Y, Mullen TE, Medeiros M, Bushel PR, Paules RS, Yang X, Hurban P, Lobenhofer EK, Kaufmann WK. Profiles of global gene expression in ionizing-radiation-damaged human diploid fibroblasts reveal synchronization behind the G1 checkpoint in a G0-like state of quiescence. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:553–559. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zeng M, Narayanan L, Xu XS, Prolla TA, Liskay RM, Glazer PM. Ionizing radiation-induced apoptosis via separate Pms2- and p53- dependent pathways. Cancer Research. 2000;60:4889–4893. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sansom OJ, Bishop SM, Court H, Dudley S, Liskay RM, Clarke AR. Apoptosis and mutation in the murine small intestine: loss of Mlh1- and Pms2-dependent apoptosis leads to increased mutation in vivo. DNA Repair (Amst) 2003;2:1029–1039. doi: 10.1016/s1568-7864(03)00111-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Smith-Roe SL, Hegan DC, Glazer PM, Buermeyer AB. Mlh1-dependent suppression of specific mutations induced in vivo by the food-borne carcinogen 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo [4,5-b] pyridine (PhIP) Mutat Res. 2006;594:101–112. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Borgdorff V, Pauw B, van Hees-Stuivenberg S, de WN. DNA mismatch repair mediates protection from mutagenesis induced by short-wave ultraviolet light. DNA Repair (Amst) 2006;5:1364–1372. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Young LC, Peters AC, Maeda T, Edelmann W, Kucherlapati R, Andrew SE, Tron VA. DNA mismatch repair protein Msh6 is required for optimal levels of ultraviolet-B-induced apoptosis in primary mouse fibroblasts. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;121:876–880. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12486.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
