Skip to main content
The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association logoLink to The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association
. 1992 Sep;36(3):139–145.

Chiropractic treatment of patients in motor vehicle accidents: a statistical analysis

Stephen Dies, J Walter Strapp
PMCID: PMC2484939

Abstract

Motor vehicle accidents (MVA) are a major cause of spinal injuries treated by chiropractors. In this study the files of one chiropractor were reviewed retrospectively to generate a data base on the MVA cases (n = 149). The effect of age, sex, vehicle damage, symptoms and concurrent physiotherapy on the dependent variables of number of treatments, improvement and requirement for ongoing treatment was computed using an analysis of variance. Overall the average number of treatments given was 14.2. Patients who complained of headache or low back pain required more treatments than average. Improvement level was lowered by delay in seeking treatment, the presence of uncomplicated nausea and advancing age. Ongoing treatment to relieve persistent pain was required in 40.2 percent of the cases. None of the factors studied had a significant effect on this variable. The results of this study are comparable to those reported in the medical literature.

Keywords: motor vehicle accident, chiropractic, manipulation

Full text

PDF
145

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen M. J., Barnes M. R., Bodiwala G. G. The effect of seat belt legislation on injuries sustained by car occupants. Injury. 1985 Jul;16(7):471–476. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(85)90169-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ameis A. Cervical whiplash: considerations in the rehabilitation of cervical myofascial injury. Can Fam Physician. 1986 Sep;32:1871–1876. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Deans G. T., McGalliard J. N., Rutherford W. H. Incidence and duration of neck pain among patients injured in car accidents. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Jan 11;292(6513):94–95. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6513.94-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fitz-Ritson D. The chiropractic management and rehabilitation of cervical trauma. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990 Jan;13(1):17–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hohl M. Soft-tissue injuries of the neck in automobile accidents. Factors influencing prognosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974 Dec;56(8):1675–1682. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Macnab I. The "whiplash syndrome". Orthop Clin North Am. 1971 Jul;2(2):389–403. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Maimaris C., Barnes M. R., Allen M. J. 'Whiplash injuries' of the neck: a retrospective study. Injury. 1988 Nov;19(6):393–396. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(88)90131-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mealy K., Brennan H., Fenelon G. C. Early mobilization of acute whiplash injuries. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Mar 8;292(6521):656–657. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6521.656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Norris S. H., Watt I. The prognosis of neck injuries resulting from rear-end vehicle collisions. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983 Nov;65(5):608–611. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.65B5.6643566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Terrett A. C., Vernon H. Manipulation and pain tolerance. A controlled study of the effect of spinal manipulation on paraspinal cutaneous pain tolerance levels. Am J Phys Med. 1984 Oct;63(5):217–225. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vernon H. T., Dhami M. S., Howley T. P., Annett R. Spinal manipulation and beta-endorphin: a controlled study of the effect of a spinal manipulation on plasma beta-endorphin levels in normal males. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1986 Jun;9(2):115–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association are provided here courtesy of The Canadian Chiropractic Association

RESOURCES