Skip to main content
Bulletin of the World Health Organization logoLink to Bulletin of the World Health Organization
. 1997;75(1):11–18.

The development of MUAC-for-age reference data recommended by a WHO Expert Committee.

M de Onis 1, R Yip 1, Z Mei 1
PMCID: PMC2486977  PMID: 9141745

Abstract

Low mid-upper-arm circumference (MUAC), determined on the basis of a fixed cut-off value, has commonly been used as a proxy for low weight-for-height (wasting). The use of a fixed cut-off value was based on the observation that MUAC showed small age- and sex-specific differences. However, in 1993, a WHO Expert Committee concluded that age independence is not reflected in the true pattern of mid-upper arm growth, recommended the use of MUAC-for-age, and presented age- and sex-specific MUAC reference data developed with observations obtained from a representative sample of children in the USA aged 6-59 months. In this article, we explain the methodology for the development of these data, present age- and sex-specific growth curves and tables and discuss the applications and limitations of MUAC as a nutritional indicator. To develop the reference data, estimates were first obtained for the mean and standard deviation of MUAC for each month of age using 7-month segmental regression equations; a 5th-degree and a 3rd-degree polynomial in age was then used to describe the mean and standard deviation, respectively, of MUAC-for age. These curves show important age-specific differences, and significant sex-specific differences for boys and girls < 24 months of age. Correct interpretation of MUAC with regard to nutritional status requires the use of MUAC-for-age reference data such as those presented here.

Full text

PDF
12

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bern C., Nathanail L. Is mid-upper-arm circumference a useful tool for screening in emergency settings? Lancet. 1995 Mar 11;345(8950):631–633. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90527-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Briend A., Wojtyniak B., Rowland M. G. Arm circumference and other factors in children at high risk of death in rural Bangladesh. Lancet. 1987 Sep 26;2(8561):725–728. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91084-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen L. C., Chowdhury A., Huffman S. L. Anthropometric assessment of energy-protein malnutrition and subsequent risk of mortality among preschool aged children. Am J Clin Nutr. 1980 Aug;33(8):1836–1845. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/33.8.1836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hall G., Chowdhury S., Bloem M. Use of mid-upper-arm circumference Z scores in nutritional assessment. Lancet. 1993 Jun 5;341(8858):1481–1481. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90927-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Oshaug A., Pedersen J., Diarra M., Bendech M. A., Hatløy A. Problems and pitfalls in the use of estimated age in anthropometric measurements of children from 6 to 60 months of age: a case from Mali. J Nutr. 1994 May;124(5):636–644. doi: 10.1093/jn/124.5.636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sommer A., Loewenstein M. S. Nutritional status and mortality: a prospective validation of the QUAC stick. Am J Clin Nutr. 1975 Mar;28(3):287–292. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/28.3.287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Trowbridge F. L., Sommer A. Nutritional anthropometry and mortality risk. Am J Clin Nutr. 1981 Nov;34(11):2591–2592. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/34.11.2591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Trowbridge F. L., Staehling N. Sensitivity and specificity of arm circumference indicators in identifying malnourished children. Am J Clin Nutr. 1980 Mar;33(3):687–696. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/33.3.687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Van Den Broeck J., Eeckels R., Vuylsteke J. Influence of nutritional status on child mortality in rural Zaire. Lancet. 1993 Jun 12;341(8859):1491–1495. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90632-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Vella V., Tomkins A., Borghesi A., Migliori G. B., Ndiku J., Adriko B. C. Anthropometry and childhood mortality in northwest and southwest Uganda. Am J Public Health. 1993 Nov;83(11):1616–1618. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.11.1616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. de Onis M., Habicht J. P. Anthropometric reference data for international use: recommendations from a World Health Organization Expert Committee. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996 Oct;64(4):650–658. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/64.4.650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the World Health Organization are provided here courtesy of World Health Organization

RESOURCES