Skip to main content
Bulletin of the World Health Organization logoLink to Bulletin of the World Health Organization
. 1986;64(1):93–99.

The dynamics of blood pressure in populations and hypertensive cohorts*

Giovanni B Ambrosio, John E Dowd, Toma Strasser, Jaakko Tuomilehto
PMCID: PMC2490920  PMID: 3488137

Abstract

Two sets of data, derived from the WHO Cooperative Hypertension Community Control Project and concerned with spontaneous changes of blood pressure over a period of five years, are described. The first deals with the community as a whole, studied through the examination of two independent random samples of the same population made five years apart. The second pertains to cohorts of hypertensive subjects included in the hypertension registers from various centres participating in the WHO programme and followed up for four years.

The population blood pressure distribution showed a clear shift towards lower levels for both systolic and diastolic values. The mean changes, however, were smaller than 5 mmHg. In the subjects initially labelled as ”hypertensive”, the effects of ”regression to the mean” were apparent both in the short-term evaluation (five months) and, more importantly, after four years of follow-up. In the latter case, the decreases were more remarkable in the first year but continued to show until the third year.

These findings suggest that a ”controlled” design is necessary not only in prospective clinical trials but also in community projects where the effects of an intervention on blood pressure are to be evaluated.

Full text

PDF
94

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alderman M. H., Yano K. How prevalence of hypertension varies as diagnostic criteria change. Am J Med Sci. 1976 May-Jun;271(3):343–349. doi: 10.1097/00000441-197605000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Armitage P., Fox W., Rose G. A., Tinker C. M. The variability of measurements of casual blood pressure. II. Survey experience. Clin Sci. 1966 Apr;30(2):337–344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bloom J. R., Monterossa S. Hypertension labeling and sense of well-being. Am J Public Health. 1981 Nov;71(11):1228–1232. doi: 10.2105/ajph.71.11.1228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis C. E. The effect of regression to the mean in epidemiologic and clinical studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1976 Nov;104(5):493–498. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Glasunov I. S., Dowd J. E., Jaksić Z., Kesić B., Ray D., Steinberger C., Stromberg J., Vuletić S. Repetitive health examinations as an intervention measure. Bull World Health Organ. 1973;49(4):423–432. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hartley R. M., Velez R., Morris R. W., D'Souza M. F., Heller R. F. Confirming the diagnosis of mild hypertension. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Jan 22;286(6361):287–289. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6361.287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the World Health Organization are provided here courtesy of World Health Organization

RESOURCES