Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
letter
. 2008 May 19;52(8):2992–2993. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01686-07

Coprevalence of Plasmid-Mediated Quinolone Resistance Determinants QepA, Qnr, and AAC(6′)-Ib-cr among 16S rRNA Methylase RmtB-Producing Escherichia coli Isolates from Pigs

Jian-Hua Liu 1, Yu-Ting Deng 1, Zhen-Ling Zeng 1, Jun-Hua Gao 1, Lin Chen 1, Yoshichika Arakawa 1,*, Zhang-Liu Chen 1,
PMCID: PMC2493129  PMID: 18490500

Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants, including Qnr peptides and AAC(6′)-Ib-cr, are increasingly identified worldwide among various clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae (7, 9, 10). Very recently, a novel plasmid-mediated fluoroquinolone-resistant determinant, QepA (quinolone efflux pump), which showed a considerable similarity to the major facilitator superfamily-type efflux pumps, was first identified in an Escherichia coli clinical isolate from Japan (13) and later found also in an E. coli isolate in Belgium (6). Interestingly, both of the two qepA-harboring E. coli isolates also contained the rmtB gene encoding a 16S rRNA methyltransferase, an emerging new molecular mechanism responsible for high-level pan-aminoglycoside resistance among gram-negative pathogens (3, 4, 6, 13, 14).

Our previous study showed that rmtB was highly prevalent among E. coli isolates from pigs in China (1). The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants among rmtB-producing E. coli isolates from pigs in China and to identify the association of the qepA gene with rmtB.

One hundred fifty-one E. coli isolates were obtained from pig feces sampled at two pig farms. These isolates were collected from 2005 to 2006, and 48 of them were identified as producers of RmtB. (Some of these data were published previously [1].) Screening for qepA, qnrA, qnrB, qnrS, and aac(6)-Ib-cr genes was carried out by PCR amplification among the 48 rmtB-positive isolates. For qepA, the following primers were used to produce a 218-bp amplicon: qepA-F (5′-GCAGGTCCAGCAGCGGGTAG-3′) and qepA-R (5′-CTTCCTGCCCGAGTATCGTG-3′). Positive results were confirmed by direct sequencing of PCR products. qnrA, qnrB, qnrS, and aac(6)-Ib-cr genes were detected by PCR using specific primers (the used qnrB primers were able to detect almost all known qnrB alleles except qnrB8), as previously described (5, 8, 11), and were finally confirmed by sequencing of each PCR product.

Overall, qepA, qnrB, qnrS, and aac(6)-Ib-cr were detected in 28 (58.3%), 1 (2.1%), 9 (18.8%), and 6 (12.5%) of 48 RmtB-producing E. coli isolates, respectively (Table 1). The qnrB genes were identified as qnrB6 alleles by sequencing. The qnrS genes were confirmed as qnrS1 (four isolates) and qnrS2 (five isolates) alleles by sequencing. Four isolates with uniform pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns harbored qepA, qnrS2, and aac(6)-Ib-cr genes concurrently.

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of E. coli isolates and transconjugants harboring rmtB, as well as qnr, qepA, and/or aac(6)-Ib-cr

Isolate(s)a PFGE type Resistance gene detected MIC (μg/ml) of enrofloxacin Fold increase in quinolone MIC for transconjugant vs recipientb
NOR ENR CIP NAL LEV
GZ3 A1 qepA 64 16 4 8 8 2
GZ4 A2 qepA 32 4 4 8 2 2
GZ5, GZ6 B qepA 16 16,8 8, 2 8, 16 1 2, 4
GZ8 C qepA 64 8 16 4 4 1
GZ9 D qepA 32 16 2 8 4 2
GZ11 E qepA 128 4 4 4 2 2
GZ12, GZ13, GZ14 F qepA 16, 8, 16 16, 8, 16 4, 2, 8 8, 16, 4 1, 4, 1 8, 2, 4
GZ15 G qepA 8 4 8 4 1 2
GZ16 H qepA >128 8 2 8 2 4
CQ15 I1 qepA 2 8 16 16 1 1
CQ18, CQ2, CQ5 I2 qepA 2, 2, 4 8, 16, 16 1, 16, 2 1, 3, 2, 8 1 1, 4, 1
CQ4c J1 qepA 0.03 2 1 1 2 1
CQ20 J1 qepA 0.03 4 4 2 1 2
CQ26 K qepA 0.5 4 2 4 1 1
CQ10 L qepA 0.25 32 2 8 1 2
CQ14 M qepA 16 32 2 4 1 2
GZ7 N qepA, qnrS1 32 16 1 2 16 1
GZ1 O qnrS1 4 16 32 16 4 4
GZ2c O qnrS1 2 2 2 4 4 2
CQ22c P qnrS1 4 2 2 1 1 1
CQ13 K qnrS2 0.5 4 8 4 4 4
CQ6, CQ7, CQ12, CQ16 Q qepA, qnrS2, aac(6)-Ib-cr 2 16 2, 2, 4, 2 16, 4, 8, 8 16, 1, 1, 2 4, 1, 2, 2
GZ10 R qepA, aac(6)-Ib-cr 16 16 4 16 16 4
CQ19 S qepA, aac(6)-Ib-cr 2 16 4 4 1 1
CQ1c U qnrB6 0.25 2 1 1 2 1
a

Isolates with the same letters were isolated from the same farm.

b

The quinolone MICs of the recipient strains were 4 μg/ml for nalidixic acid (NAL); 0.015 μg/ml for ciprofloxacin (CIP); and 0.03 μg/ml for norfloxacin (NOR), enrofloxacin (ENR), and levofloxacin (LEV).

c

RmtB-positive transconjugants not containing any plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants.

To investigate the association of rmtB and qepA, rmtB-positive E. coli transconjugants described previously (1) were subjected to PCR amplification of qepA, and all transconjugants that originated from the 28 qepA-positive isolates selected with aminoglycoside resistance were positive for the qepA gene except one, suggesting an strong linkage of qepA with rmtB. Two rmtB-positive transconjugants also harbored qnrS1 or qnrS2.

MICs of ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, levofloxacin, nalidixic acid, and norfloxacin for the 27 qepA-positive and 2 qnrS-positive transconjugants were determined by the agar dilution method according to CLSI guidelines (2). The increase (fold) in quinolone MICs for transconjugants compared with those of recipients is shown in Table 1. The MICs for transconjugants strongly indicated that qepA as well as qnrS conferred quinolone resistance, with a 4- to 32-fold increase in norfloxacin MICs and 1- to 32-fold increase in enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin MICs. However, variations in the quinolone MICs for different transconjugants suggested that the QepA may be expressed at variable levels. Xu et al. (12) recently reported that different promoter strengths may cause the differences in qnrA expression levels and in ciprofloxacin MICs of different transconjugants. Further studies are needed to find out whether the wide range of MICs of quinolones for different qepA-harboring transconjugants depends on the diversities in qepA expression levels due to different promoter strengths. MICs of enrofloxacin for all isolates were also determined by the agar dilution method according to CLSI guidelines. As indicated in Table 1, most isolates were resistant to enrofloxacin (MIC, ≥2 μg/ml), but six isolates were susceptible to enrofloxacin.

This study shows the high prevalence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants among E. coli isolates recovered from food-producing animals. A total of 58.3% (28/48) of rmtB-positive E. coli isolates harbored qepA gene, indicating a close relationship between qepA and rmtB, which has been reported in the previous studies (6, 13). This is also the first time three different plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants (QepA, Qnr, and AAC(6′)-Ib-cr) were identified in an E. coli strain. Coproduction of QepA, Qnr, AAC(6′)-Ib-cr, and RmtB may well facilitate the survival of bacteria under selective pressure of antimicrobial agents in both veterinary and human clinical environments, and the resistance determinants in food-producing animals could be transmitted to humans via the food chain. Further spread of these resistance determinants among pathogenic microbes may occur in the near future. Thus, it is necessary to monitor and minimize the spread of such resistance determinants among hazardous bacteria in both humans and animals.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Ming-Gui Wang (Division of Infectious Diseases, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University) and Sheng Chen (Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Medical College of Wisconsin) for critically reading the manuscript.

This work was supported in part by research grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30500373 and 30130140) and National Key Technology R&D Program of China (2006BAK02A03-5).

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 19 May 2008.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Chen, L., Z. L. Chen, J. H. Liu, Z. L. Zeng, J. Y. Ma, and H. X. Jiang. 2007. Emergence of RmtB methylase-producing Escherichia coli and Enterobacter cloacae isolates from pigs in China. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 59:880-885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2002. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals. Approved standard, 2nd ed. Document M31-A2. CLSI, Wayne, PA.
  • 3.Doi, Y., and Y. Arakawa. 2007. 16S ribosomal RNA methylation: emerging resistance mechanism against aminoglycosides. Clin. Infect. Dis. 45:88-94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Doi, Y., K. Yokoyama, K. Yamane, J.-I. Wachino, N. Shibata, T. Yagi, K. Shibayama, H. Kato, and Y. Arakawa. 2004. Plasmid-mediated 16S rRNA methylase in Serratia marcescens conferring high-level resistance to aminoglycosides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:491-496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Park, C. H., A. Robicsek, G. A. Jacoby, D. Sahm, and D. C. Hooper. 2006. Prevalence in the United States of aac(6)-Ib-cr encoding a ciprofloxacin-modifying enzyme. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:3953-3955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Périchon, B., P. Courvalin, and M. Galimand. 2007. Transferable resistance to aminoglycosides by methylation of G1405 in 16S rRNA and to hydrophilic fluoroquinolones by QepA-mediated efflux in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:2464-2469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Robicsek, A., G. A. Jacoby, and D. C. Hooper. 2006. The worldwide emergence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance. Lancet Infect. Dis. 6:629-640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Robicsek, A., J. Strahilevitz, D. F. Sahm, G. A. Jacoby, and D. C. Hooper. 2006. qnr prevalence in ceftazidime-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates from the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:2872-2874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Robicsek, A., J. Strahilevitz, G. A. Jacoby, M. Macielag, D. Abbanat, C. H. Park, K. Bush, and D. C. Hooper. 2006. Fluoroquinolone-modifying enzyme: a new adaptation of a common aminoglycoside acetyltransferase. Nat. Med. 12:83-88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tran, J. H., and G. A. Jacoby. 2002. Mechanism of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:5638-5642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wu, J.-J., W.-C. Ko, S.-H. Tsai, and J.-J. Yan. 2007. Prevalence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants QnrA, QnrB, and QnrS among clinical isolates of Enterobacter cloacae in a Taiwanese hospital. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:1223-1227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Xu, X., S. Wu, X. Ye, Y. Liu, W. Shi, Y. Zhang, and M. Wang. 2007. Prevalence and expression of the plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinant qnrA1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:4105-4110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yamane, K., J. Wachino, S. Suzuki, K. Kimura, N. Shibata, H. Kato, K. Shibayama, T. Konda, and Y. Arakawa. 2007. New plasmid-mediated fluoroquinolone efflux pump, QepA, found in an Escherichia coli clinical isolate. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:3354-3360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yokoyama, K., Y. Doi, K. Yamane, H. Kurokawa, N. Shibata, K. Shibayama, T. Yagi, H. Kato, and Y. Arakawa. 2003. Acquisition of 16S rRNA methylase gene in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Lancet 362:1888-1893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES