Skip to main content
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 1998 May;80(3):184–187.

The continuing challenge of parastomal hernia: failure of a novel polypropylene mesh repair.

G Morris-Stiff 1, L E Hughes 1
PMCID: PMC2503031  PMID: 9682640

Abstract

In an attempt to reduce the high recurrence rate after repair of parastomal hernia, a technique was devised in which non-absorbable mesh was used to provide a permanent closure of the gap between the emerging bowel and abdominal wall. Seven patients were treated during the period 1990-1992. Five-year follow-up has given disappointing results, with recurrent hernia in 29% of cases and serious complications, including obstruction and dense adhesions to the intra-abdominal mesh, in 57% and a mesh-related abscess in 15% of cases. This study highlights a dual problem--failure of a carefully sutured mesh to maintain an occlusive position, and complications of the mesh itself. The poor results obtained with this technique together with the disappointing results with other methods described in the literature confirms that parastomal hernia presents a continuing challenge.

Full text

PDF
186

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abdu R. A. Repair of paracolostomy hernias with Marlex mesh. Dis Colon Rectum. 1982 Sep;25(6):529–531. doi: 10.1007/BF02564160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen-Mersh T. G., Thomson J. P. Surgical treatment of colostomy complications. Br J Surg. 1988 May;75(5):416–418. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800750507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bayer I., Kyzer S., Chaimoff C. A new approach to primary strengthening of colostomy with Marlex mesh to prevent paracolostomy hernia. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Dec;163(6):579–580. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Byers J. M., Steinberg J. B., Postier R. G. Repair of parastomal hernias using polypropylene mesh. Arch Surg. 1992 Oct;127(10):1246–1247. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420100112019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carlstedt A., Fasth S., Hultén L., Nordgren S., Palselius I. Long-term ileostomy complications in patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1987 Feb;2(1):22–25. doi: 10.1007/BF01648993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cuthbertson A. M., Collins J. P. Strangulated para-ileostomy hernia. Aust N Z J Surg. 1977 Feb;47(1):86–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1977.tb03941.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Etherington R. J., Williams J. G., Hayward M. W., Hughes L. E. Demonstration of para-ileostomy herniation using computed tomography. Clin Radiol. 1990 May;41(5):333–336. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81696-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Garnjobst W., Sullivan E. S. Repair of paraileostomy hernia with polypropylene mesh reinforcement. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984 Apr;27(4):268–269. doi: 10.1007/BF02553807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hopkins T. B., Trento A. Parastomal ileal loop hernia repair with marlex mesh. J Urol. 1982 Oct;128(4):811–812. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)53199-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Horgan K., Hughes L. E. Para-ileostomy hernia: failure of a local repair technique. Br J Surg. 1986 Jun;73(6):439–440. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800730607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Leslie D. The parastomal hernia. Surg Clin North Am. 1984 Apr;64(2):407–415. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)43294-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Marks C. G., Ritchie J. K. The complications of synchronous combined excision for adenocarcinoma of the rectum at St Mark's Hospital. Br J Surg. 1975 Nov;62(11):901–905. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800621111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Martin L., Foster G. Parastomal hernia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1996 Mar;78(2):81–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Phillips R., Pringle W., Evans C., Keighley M. R. Analysis of a hospital-based stomatherapy service. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1985 Jan;67(1):37–40. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rosin J. D., Bonardi R. A. Paracolostomy hernia repair with Marlex mesh: a new technique. Dis Colon Rectum. 1977 May-Jun;20(4):299–302. doi: 10.1007/BF02586428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rubin M. S., Schoetz D. J., Jr, Matthews J. B. Parastomal hernia. Is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair? Arch Surg. 1994 Apr;129(4):413–419. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420280091011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sjödahl R., Anderberg B., Bolin T. Parastomal hernia in relation to site of the abdominal stoma. Br J Surg. 1988 Apr;75(4):339–341. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800750414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stephenson B. M., Phillips R. K. Parastomal hernia: local resiting and mesh repair. Br J Surg. 1995 Oct;82(10):1395–1396. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800821033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sugarbaker P. H. Peritoneal approach to prosthetic mesh repair of paraostomy hernias. Ann Surg. 1985 Mar;201(3):344–346. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198503000-00015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. THORLAKSON R. H. TECHNIQUE OF REPAIR OF HERNIATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH COLONIC STOMAS. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1965 Feb;120:347–350. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Williams J. G., Etherington R., Hayward M. W., Hughes L. E. Paraileostomy hernia: a clinical and radiological study. Br J Surg. 1990 Dec;77(12):1355–1357. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800771212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. de Ruiter P., Bijnen A. B. Successful local repair of paracolostomy hernia with a newly developed prosthetic device. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992 Sep;7(3):132–134. doi: 10.1007/BF00360352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES