Skip to main content
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 2000 May;82(3):171–175.

Clinical examination of varicose veins--a validation study.

J Kim 1, S Richards 1, P J Kent 1
PMCID: PMC2503433  PMID: 10858678

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of clinical tests compared to colour duplex imaging in patients with primary varicose veins using a prospective, blinded comparison study. A total of 44 patients (70 limbs) with primary, previously untreated varicose veins presenting to the vascular laboratory of a university teaching hospital were studied. The patients underwent physical examination using the cough test, the tap test, Trendelenbergs' test, Perthes' test and hand-held Doppler (HHD) assessment prior to undergoing colour duplex scanning. Reflux was detected on duplex scanning, at the sapheno-femoral junction in 39/70 limbs (54%), the long saphenous vein in 47/70 limbs (64%) and the sapheno-popliteal junction in 9/70 limbs (13%). The cough test had low sensitivity (0.59) and specificity (0.67). The tap test had low sensitivity (0.18) and high specificity (0.92). The Trendelenberg test had high sensitivity (0.91) but low specificity (0.15). Perthes' test had a high sensitivity (0.97) but low specificity (0.20). Hand-held Doppler assessment of reflux at the sapheno-femoral junction, in the long saphenous vein and at the sapheno-popliteal junction had high sensitivity (0.97, 0.82, and 0.80, respectively) and specificity (0.73, 0.92, and 0.90, respectively) of detecting reflux. Clinical tests used in the examination of patients with primary varicose veins are inaccurate. Assessment using hand-held Doppler is more accurate. Courses and clinical textbooks should be revised to replace these tests with instruction in how to use hand-held Doppler in the clinical examination of patients with varicose veins.

Full text

PDF
174

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altman D. G., Bland J. M. Diagnostic tests 2: Predictive values. BMJ. 1994 Jul 9;309(6947):102–102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6947.102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Altman D. G., Bland J. M. Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity. BMJ. 1994 Jun 11;308(6943):1552–1552. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6943.1552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bladin C., Royle J. P. Acquisition of skills required for use of Doppler ultrasound and the assessment of varicose veins. Aust N Z J Surg. 1987 Apr;57(4):225–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1987.tb01344.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kent P. J., Weston M. J. Duplex scanning may be used selectively in patients with primary varicose veins. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1998 Nov;80(6):388–393. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McIrvine A. J., Corbett C. R., Aston N. O., Sherriff E. A., Wiseman P. A., Jamieson C. W. The demonstration of saphenofemoral incompetence; doppler ultrasound compared with standard clinical tests. Br J Surg. 1984 Jul;71(7):509–510. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800710712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McMullin G. M., Coleridge Smith P. D. An evaluation of Doppler ultrasound and photoplethysmography in the investigation of venous insufficiency. Aust N Z J Surg. 1992 Apr;62(4):270–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1992.tb07554.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mercer K. G., Scott D. J., Berridge D. C. Preoperative duplex imaging is required before all operations for primary varicose veins. Br J Surg. 1998 Nov;85(11):1495–1497. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00877.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sarin S., Shields D. A., Farrah J., Scurr J. H., Coleridge-Smith P. D. Does venous function deteriorate in patients waiting for varicose vein surgery? J R Soc Med. 1993 Jan;86(1):21–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sarin S., Sommerville K., Farrah J., Scurr J. H., Coleridge Smith P. D. Duplex ultrasonography for assessment of venous valvular function of the lower limb. Br J Surg. 1994 Nov;81(11):1591–1595. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800811108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Singh S., Lees T. A., Donlon M., Harris N., Beard J. D. Improving the preoperative assessment of varicose veins. Br J Surg. 1997 Jun;84(6):801–802. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.02672.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Strandness D. E., Jr, Schultz R. D., Sumner D. S., Rushmer R. F. Ultrasonic flow detection. A useful technic in the evaluation of peripheral vascular disease. Am J Surg. 1967 Mar;113(3):311–320. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(67)90272-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES